measles alert

“(Immunization) technology was never meant to be injected into the body. Your immune system doesn’t work that way. The way your immune system works is you breathe (the pathogen) in (or digest it) and then the way that your receptors react with your white blood cells and your neutrophils- they react with an antigen to develop an antibody… When you shoot anything inside you via needle; nothing like that ever happens in nature, so your immune system freaks out. It causes an immune response and it’s harder for your body to develop an antibody.”
– Dr. Edward Group- founder of Global Healing Center

“My daughter got measles after she was vaccinated. That’s why everybody needs to get vaccinated.”
– Concerned Parent from Alaska

This measles scare is NOT a public health emergency, this is NOT science, this is NOT medicine- this IS business marketing, advertising and PR. This is creating an artificial demand for a product and advertising it with the boldest and most outlandish marketing slogan that anyone has ever had the grapefruits to come up with:


Seriously, when you put this into perspective, one can’t help but laugh about how brazenly over-the-top this whole thing is. Let’s look at the numbers: there are approximately 319 million people in the United States and right now, according to the media anyhow, 121 of them have measles. That is a fraction of a percent- and out of the “sharp rise” in measles outbreaks in the past 10 years in the United States because of “anti-vaxxers” do you know how many have died? Zero- zero people have died from the measles in the United States. But you might… just like you might die from the flu, or a cold, or driving in a car, or walking down the street… you MIGHT die… but you probably won’t, and your kids probably won’t either.

Of course, many will say, “Well you and your kids should just get the vaccine anyways: better safe than sorry right?”

Then there’s my favorite, “The risks of not being vaccinated FAR outweigh any risk from the vaccination shot itself.”

That being said, let’s take a look at the insert from Merck’s MMR II vaccine:

“The following adverse reactions are listed in decreasing order of severity, without regard to causality, within each body system category and have been reported during clinical trials, with use of the marketed vaccine, or with use of monovalent or bivalent vaccine containing measles, mumps, or rubella:
Body as a Whole:
Panniculitis; atypical measles; fever; syncope; headache; dizziness; malaise; irritability.
Cardiovascular System:
Digestive System:
Pancreatitis; diarrhea; vomiting; parotitis; nausea.
Endocrine System:
Diabetes mellitus.
Hemic and Lymphatic System:
Thrombocytopenia (see WARNINGS, Thrombocytopenia); purpura; regional lymphadenopathy; leukocytosis.
Immune System:
Anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions have been reported as well as related phenomena such as angioneurotic edema (including peripheral or facial edema) and bronchial spasm in individuals with or without an allergic history.
Musculoskeletal System:
Arthritis; arthralgia; myalgia. Arthralgia and/or arthritis (usually transient and rarely chronic), and polyneuritis are features of infection with wild-type rubella and vary in frequency and severity with age and sex, being greatest in adult females and least in prepubertal children. This type of involvement as well as myalgia and paresthesia, have also been reported following administration of MERUVAX II.
Chronic arthritis has been associated with wild-type rubella infection and has been related to persistent virus and/or viral antigen isolated from body tissues. Only rarely have vaccine recipients developed chronic joint symptoms.
Following vaccination in children, reactions in joints are uncommon and generally of brief duration. In women, incidence rates for arthritis and arthralgia are generally higher than those seen in children (children: 0-3%; women: 12-26%),{17,56,57} and the reactions tend to be more marked and of longer duration. Symptoms may persist for a matter of months or on rare occasions for years. In adolescent girls, the reactions appear to be intermediate in incidence between those seen in children and in adult women. Even in women older than 35 years, these reactions are generally well tolerated and rarely interfere with normal activities.
Nervous System:
Encephalitis; encephalopathy; measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE) subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE); Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS); acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM); transverse myelitis; febrile convulsions; afebrile convulsions or seizures; ataxia; polyneuritis; polyneuropathy; ocular palsies; paresthesia.
Respiratory System :
Pneumonia; pneumonitis (see CONTRAINDICATIONS); sore throat; cough; rhinitis.
Stevens-Johnson syndrome; erythema multiforme; urticaria; rash; measles-like rash; pruritis. Local reactions including burning/stinging at injection site; wheal and flare; redness (erythema); swelling; induration; tenderness; vesiculation at injection site.
Special Senses — Ear:
Nerve deafness; otitis media.
Special Senses — Eye:
Retinitis; optic neuritis; papillitis; retrobulbar neuritis; conjunctivitis.
Urogenital System:
Epididymitis; orchitis.
Death from various, and in some cases unknown, causes has been reported rarely following vaccination with measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines”


I’m sure getting measles is a lot worse than any of those things. Wait, the insert said you could contract measles as well, as this is a LIVE VIRUS vaccine, which means that “patient zero” at Disneyland very well could have been someone who was recently vaccinated. Various studies have shown that children given a live virus vaccination can infect others and shed the disease for weeks or even months afterwards.


In a study published in the “Journal of Clinical Microbiology” by the CDC nearly two decades ago detailed how urine samples were collected from newly vaccinated 15-month-old infants as well as young adults and that NEARLY ALL OF THEM had detectable levels of the measles virus inside their bodies, meaning they were potentially contagious. You may remember the measles outbreak in New York City back in 2011. It turned out that “patient zero” in that case was a twice-vaccinated individual who was found to have spread the measles in that instance.




Starting with the smallpox vaccine in the 19th century, vaccination has a history of spreading the disease it is supposedly trying to eliminate. An article in the Washington Post around an FDA report regarding the pertussis vaccine disclosed the following:

“The research suggests that while the vaccine may keep people from getting sick, it doesn’t prevent them from spreading whooping cough — also known as pertussis — to others… It could explain the increase in pertussis that we’re seeing in the US,’ said one of the researchers, Tod Merkel of the Food and Drug Administration…”

A report published by the Council on Foreign Relations, a foreign policy think-tank involving various heads of state and business stated: “that the most highly vaccinated populations are also those with the greatest number of outbreaks for those same infectious diseases. This was especially the case for measles, mumps, rubella, polio and pertussis outbreaks.”

The Office of Medical and Scientific Justice- a science and medical fraud investigation organization out of California had the following conclusion regarding the CFR report:

“the repeated incidences of infectious outbreaks in populations with 94% or more vaccine compliance [the alleged threshold when herd immunity is activated], and the emergence of new viral strains, the concept of herd immunity should be forgotten… The Office offers several possibilities to explain the report: 1) vaccines are increasingly becoming ineffective and causing ‘immune dysfunction,’ and 2) ‘vaccine antigen responses’ may be reprogramming viruses while weakening the immune systems of the most vaccinated individuals.”

Wait what about Dr. William Shaffner’s (a paid consultant for Merck and Co.) comment in the Web MD article I have been continuous quoting stating that “All of get vaccinated” and provide “herd immunity”? I thought herd immunity was a scientific fact? Well the thing is that the original concept of herd immunity never had anything to do with vaccines or vaccination.

Neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock had the following to say regarding vaccine-based immunity:

“naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one major problem – vaccine-induced immunity lasted for only a relatively short period, from 2 to 10 years at most, and then this applies only to humoral immunity…the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.”

herd immunity


Holland < PDF Doc from OR Law Review Questioning Herd Immunity Theory

In 1933 researcher A.W. Hedrich coined the phrase when studying measles patterns in the United States between 1900 and 1931. Hedrich observed that mass outbreaks of the measles occurred only when less than 68% of the children had developed a natural immunity to it. This was based upon children building their immunity through NATURAL exposure to the disease in some manner, by either being around someone who had it or contracting it themselves. Like chicken pox when I was a kid (they vaccinate for that now too), you got it, it kinda sucked for a few days, but then you didn’t get it again, and unless you were already on death’s door, you probably weren’t gonna die.

This was done about 30 years before the first measles vaccine was developed. In fact, the rate of measles infections was already plummeting about ten years before that vaccine was released in 1963. This drop in measles outbreaks occurred as the United States became the richest nation on the face of the Earth. It is well known that increased living standards (hygiene, sanitation, general nutrition) result in a decrease of infectious that are known to plague poor populations in underdeveloped countries. This is why outbreaks of the measles dropped in the manner they did a decade before a vaccine even existed.



A wonderful example of this came out of Leicester, England between the years of 1885 and 1887. Many may be familiar with the legend Edward Jenner and his legendary discovery of vaccination technology. However, fewer may be familiar with the fact that he was seen as a money-hungry quack by his peers until he was able to impress upon “mad” King George III the wondrous possibility of vaccines. This led to a massive financial investment in Jenner in this new “technology”. After that point a series of mandatory vaccination mandates were given, despite the fact that outbreaks of smallpox were continually being linked to the vaccinations. There was a public backlash and a number of “anti-vaxxers” were refusing to get inoculated. Author Roman Bystrianyk and Dr. Susan Humphries describe the following scenario:

“The public backlash culminated in the great demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester’s government, which had pushed f or vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination rate would result in a terrible “massacre,” especially in the “unprotected” children.

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town’s residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns. In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths. Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the “Leicester Method,” deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.”

Vaccination_A_Mythical_History_Roman_Bystrianyk_Suzanne_Humphries_MD <PDF

Jenner-history < PDF Document About “Dr.” Edward Jenner


This paints a considerably different picture than the rather simplistic, “folk tale” view of history we tend to be given. This is why it is important to get rid of our “folk tale” history and our dogmatic beliefs. We can see from the Leicester event back in the late 1800s that this vaccine faithful vs “anti-vaxxers” situation has happened before. We can also see by examining history with a keen eye for the fine points that the story of vaccination as the great savior of humanity from the scourge of disease is a myth- no, a FAIRY TALE that is perpetuated for profit and control.

Edward Jenner Bill Gates Fine Art

So if the above data is true, then how does this “church of vaccination” remain its near god-like authority and sway over people? Why do we treat our children as “little pincushions” as the WebMD article describes? One of the main reasons is because the general public is largely unaware of the role money plays in science. Historically though, from Jenner’s ties to King George and the British Government in the 19th century to Merck, the CDC and today’s medical establishment, money and power ALWAYS plays a role in what is seen as “true and legitimate thought” and what is not.

We are taught that science is this pure, unbiased and incorruptible institution. That is sadly far from the truth. The simple fact of the matter is that scientists and scientific research ALWAYS need funding; i.e. money. Those who are funding research on pharmaceuticals are quite often the manufacturers who more often than not have a predetermined result in mind that is in sync with their bottom line of progressively increasing profits. Data can be and very often is skewed and manipulated to meet a desired result. This holds especially true in a nation where the petrochemical industry- progenitor of the pharmaceutical industry- has had such immense influence and power for such a long time.


That is the real reason why there are no studies comparing the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated children in this country. Not because it is “unethical” to not vaccinate children, which is the common answer given. Dr. Sears (another favorite target of the vaccine industry) aside, scientific studies in Germany and New Zealand have both shown that vaccinated children have up to five times higher rates of various degenerative diseases ranging from asthma and allergies, to eczema and diabetes. In a nutshell, unvaccinated children tend to be HEALTHIER than vaccinated children. But I suppose that to have truly healthy children and a truly healthy society would be “unethical” and downright bad for business.



Again, I realize much of this defies what is propagated in main stream scientific thought, so to that I leave with this thought:

Science and scientific language is just that- a language.  When one is familiar and skilled enough with a language, you can use it to either speak bold truth or concoct the most elaborate fictions.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s