YOU MIGHT BE AN EXTREMIST IF…

Ex·trem·ist (n):
Somebody who holds extreme or radical political or religious beliefs;
(adj): involving, typical of, or motivated by extreme opinions, especially in politics or religion.

Rad·i·cal (adj):
Favoring or making economic, political, or social changes of a sweeping or extreme nature.

Ter·ror·ist (n):
Somebody who uses violence or the threat of violence, especially bombing, kidnapping, and assassination, to intimidate, often for political purposes.

pen-sword-25611407
The above listed terms and their definitions are ones that we as Americans, as well as people in Western nations in general, have become all too familiar with. Here in the States, the “War on Terror” has officially gone on for over 14 years now, and shows no sign of stopping. As myself and many others have previously stated, it is not something that is ever meant to end, as it enriches the Military Industrial Complex both in military operations abroad, as well as domestic surveillance and the construction of a federalized police state at home.

At this point, I feel it would be laboriously repetitive for me to go further into how all that works at this point. What I want to look at here is the narrative being established and the deeper meaning behind it. A recent interview with sociopolitical and media narrative researcher and analyst, Jay Dyer presented a deeper perspective about the whole “radical extremism” narrative that is playing out on both sides of the media. This was something that I felt compelled to explore myself.

The whole world now is on red alert because of the actions of the “newest face” of Islamic extremism, ISIS. The Paris Attacks last month, and now the more recent San Bernardino mass shooting/terror attack have got the world gripped in a state of fear and panic. President Obama even gave a rare prime time speech to address the issue, which was obviously done to create hype around the incident. While tragic and definitely a bit “close to home” for me as I work with people with developmental disabilities, the narrative around the event is somewhat suspect. First we have a mass shooter drill happening to take place at the same time as the supposed event. Second, we have what was originally described as three assailants reported officially reduced to two (we saw a similar occurrence around the Colorado Theater Shooting narrative). Third, we have the police stepping aside and letting all who wish essentially ransack the suspects’ home on live television before even conducting an investigation of the crime scene, essentially destroying any ability to connect anyone else directly to the attacks.

Fox-MSNBC-620x239

However, what I find intriguing is the “battle” between the left and the right over who the “most dangerous” extremist group is. If you look at the Right Wing, NeoCon media (i.e. Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc.), they will hammer home the point that it is Islamic extremism that is the greatest threat to our safety and security, coupled with the migrant “surges” happening from the southern border. They will state that more needs to be done abroad to destroy ISIS and that their large fan base is so numerous that Islam itself is an existential threat to America. This was recently echoed by Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, who cited examples of Islamic communities celebrating the fall of the Twin Towers during 9/11 and the recent events of soccer matches, among the reasons why any and all Muslims need to be prevented from entering the U.S. until the nation can “figure out what the hell is going on”.

On the Left, we have the “Liberal” media (i.e. MSNBC and pretty much every other major news outlet) stating that while ISIS is bad, the “real threat” in America is not Radical Islam, but rather the “white male” mass shooters such as Dylann Storm Roof (I still have a hard time believing that one) and the recent shoot-up of a Colorado abortion clinic by the almost equally strange “Robert Dear”; as in “Robert, dear, can you take out the trash?” In either case, both these men were supposedly motivated by a sort of extreme “Right Wing” ideology, be it racism, or fundamentalist Christianity, it was vehemently opposed to the ultra-politically-correct ideals of the “Liberal” Left.

In either case, both support a sort of “lockdown” policy to “keep this from happening again”. The Right favors a closing of the border, militarism, and greater surveillance to prevent Islamic extremists and other undesirable “non-Americans” from being able to do us harm. The Left favors severe gun restrictions, “hate” speech restrictions for politically incorrect language and ideas, and greater surveillance to prevent dangerous White extremists and other “hate groups” from being able to do us harm. So what do both of these policies have in common? Obviously, both share the belief that it is centralized government power, rather than a self-reliant, self-sufficient and otherwise empowered citizenry, that is the key to “keeping us safe”. But there is something else going on here as well.

faces of terror

One thing that is happening across the board in the media that we should pay close attention to is the back and forth substitutions of the words “extremist“, “terrorist“, and “radical“.  This is done deliberately so that we equate anyone that have “extreme views” (i.e. views different from mainline establishment thought) with terrorists, regardless of whether or not these people are actually use aggressive violence towards others.  This is the current that underlies the whole “terrorism” narrative on both the Right and the Left side of the Power Structure.  In truth, this isn’t a war on “terrorism” at all.

What do Religious fundamentalists (Islamic, Christian, etc.), White Nationalists (or Black Nationalists, or Hispanic Nationalists, etc.), Sovereign Citizens, Anarchists, Libertarians, Constitutionalists, and “Conspiracy Theorists” all have in common? They all have strong ideologies or opinions that in some form or fashion create competition and opposition to the dominant power structure and the elite that control it. These are ideologies that supersede the allegiance to the State in the minds and hearts of those individuals who subscribe to them. These are ideologies that if left alone, threaten the power monopoly of the State, which is why the State will either seek to infiltrate and “co-opt” them, so as to use them for its own purposes, or it will seek to destroy them.

Let’s briefly take a look at each of these different ideologies that cause the State so much concern:

Religious fundamentalism or “extremism” is what is on is on everybody’s tongue right now. Religious fundamentalism is typically the strict adherence to a particular religion and its doctrine. Fundamentalists tend to hold to a literal or “exoteric” interpretation of their religion, and tend to be “traditionalists”- meaning they believe in traditional families and cultural moral values.  While most religious fundamentalists are not violent, the belief in any sort of “Higher Power” that supersedes the State is going to be targeted and demonized.  Likewise so will any ideologies around moral virtue or traditionalism that are not “State-endorsed“.  At the same time the State will drum up fear of these ideologies in the public mind to enhance its own power and control. While particular fundamentalist ideologies like violent Islamic extremism (which is typically government enabled and funded), are used to de-stabilize various regions resistant to Globalism, the goal is ultimately for these ideologies to be absorbed into a Corporate Global Monoculture based in consumerism and debt slavery.

Nationalism, while not as much of a focal point in the States, is really gaining steam in Europe. Nationalism is the belief that the state, acting as an extension of a particular culture, tribe, folk, or race needs to remain sovereign and maintain the ability for self-determination, free of influence or pressure from outside nations or groups. The various Nationalist movements are demonized heavily in the media there, as well as here to a lesser degree. Factions of the Power Elite have used Nationalism to their advantage in the past, but as the power structure moved full swing into a Trans-National Globalist system with the conclusion of World War II, any form of Nationalism is now seen as an enemy of “progress”. We would do well to understand that the one of the primary purposes of World War II was to crush folkish Nationalism and usher in a “cosmopolitan” Globalist system.

tumblr_molgu0c4ht1svb6rio1_1280

Sovereign Citizens or “Freeman” essentially reject the notion that the State has any legitimate authority over their lives. They understand the “LEGAL NAME” as it appears in all CAPS on your birth certificate, driver’s license, and any court documents to be different than the actual flesh and blood human person. The LEGAL NAME is a corporate entity, and one’s consent to it essentially makes one property of the State and the power structure behind it. Sovereign Citizens and Freeman use this legal understanding to separate themselves from the State, most notably from paying taxes, particularly income taxes (which are unconstitutionally levied by a private bank). The State cannot exist without funding from private citizens, so naturally, anyone with this sort of ideology and understanding is seen as a threat. Far from violent, Sovereign Citizens typically just want to be left alone.  You can read for yourself: Global SOv Handbook_0

Anarchists have a similar ideology to Sovereign Citizens, as they do not believe in the legitimacy of the State or government at all whatsoever. Anarchists do not believe that any group or individual has the right do declare itself as an authority over another. Anarchists believe that any imposition upon an individual’s free will (including taxation and imprisonment) that isn’t self-defense is immoral and illegitimate. Anarchists have been given a bad rap due to the use of violence in protest settings which have mainly been perpetrated by agent provocateurs rather than actual anarchists; particularly in recent decades. The public has been conditioned to fear the word “anarchy” and link it to chaos. Anarchy in fact does not mean “without rules”, it means “without rulers”. This makes those who subscribe to it a natural enemy of the State.

anarchist-anarchy-government-statism-2516907-1000x936

Libertarianism could be considered as “Anarchy Lite”. Libertarians share many of the same beliefs as Anarchists, but believe in some form of severely limited representative government. As the State seeks to continuously expand itself, Libertarianism is seen as an enemy, although their ideology of unrestricted markets can tend to play into the hands of Corporate Globalism. Libertarians also tend to be anti-imperialism, which puts them at odds with the Military Industrial Complex that steers much of U.S. foreign policy. Libertarians often identify as “fiscally conservative” but “socially liberal”.

Constitutionalists are similar to Libertarians in ideology, but specifically hold allegiance to the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution. However, many Constitutionalists also tend to be conservative Christian and “pro-life”, while Libertarians tend to lean towards “pro-choice”. Constitutionalists reject the idea that the Constitution is a “living document” open to free interpretation that changes with the times. This ideology is particularly troublesome to the U.S. Federal Government as it has increasingly sought to expand its power and influence both at home and abroad, far beyond the scope outlined in that document. If one looks at the definition of the word, it would in fact be the Federal Government that would be defined as “radical”.

Scene_at_the_Signing_of_the_Constitution_of_the_United_States

Within the category of “Constitutionalists”, we have a large portion of active and retired U.S. Military Service members. These are men and women who swore an oath to the Constitution and it is no small wonder that returning veterans are at the top of Homeland Security’s “Terror Watch List” (here’s the pdf of the report: rightwing).  In fact, police chiefs have justified their Homeland Security funded military weapons and vehicles due to the “threat” of “Constitutionalists” and “veterans” who have “the ability and knowledge to build IEDs and to defeat law enforcement techniques”. Throughout history, it has been the military and their codes of honor that has proven to be the biggest thorn in the side of political despotism.

Lastly we have “Conspiracy Theorists”. This has been a blanket term used to apply to pretty much anyone that believes that governments lie or that small groups of people meet in secret and make plans. While these “Conspiracy Theorists” run the gamut as far as areas of focus, from false-flag terrorism to U.F.O. cover-ups, nearly all of them point to secrecy, deception and outright lawless actions being perpetrated by the State in the past or in the present. Naturally, the State does not care for this and seeks to marginalize anyone who points to any wrong doing on the part of the power structure.

Another thing that tends to link “Conspiracy Theorists” is a “belief in a New World Order conspiracy”. So what is the New World Order exactly? Aside from just being a concept mentioned in speeches by both former President George H. W. Bush and former President Bill Clinton, and far from some fantasy construct of a dystopian sci-fi novel, the “New World Order” is nothing more and nothing less than the logical end-result of Trans-National Corporate Globalism. It is a gigantic corporate merger- a consolidation of power and influence by select financial and corporate interests, their shareholders as well as the politicians and bureaucrats they have under their thumb. It is a group of cartels with who work together to enhance mutual interests and dominate world markets and resources.

corporate man

The stated goal is to create a “one world government” ruled by a sort of “neo-feudalistic serfdom”, with a form of Socialism/Communism for the masses, while the “feudal lords” sit in offshore tax havens and fortified compounds. For those familiar with the “company towns” of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it could be likened to that on a global scale. In fact, the nature of sovereignty erasing trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership is evidence of this.

The subject as to who these “feudal lords” that sit atop this “pyramid” has long been debated. Count Richard von Coudenhove–Kalergi, founder and President of the Pan-European Union, which was the predecessor of the E.U., was a big-time power player in the Globalist movement. The Count gave us a somewhat of a clue of who these “lords” might be with this statement from his 1925 book, “Praktischer Idealismus”:

From the European quantity people… two quality races rise up: blood aristocracy and Jewry… both believe in their higher mission, of their better blood… The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility.

It should be noted that the British-Dutch-German royal family are the prime shareholders of Dutch Royal Shell Oil Corporation and the largest land owners in the world. Meanwhile Jewish elite financial empires like N.M. Rothschild and Goldman-Sachs influence interest rates and hold sway over major global financial lenders like the IMF, the World Bank, and the Bank for International Settlements– the central bank of central banks like the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve. It was these financial interests as well as their counterparts on Wall Street that funded both the Zionist and Bolshevik movements of the early 20th century. Historically, the financial/merchant class has worked with aristocracy to enhance one another’s interests and power for centuries.

The late Carroll Quigley, former Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former President Bill Clinton wrote the encyclopedic-length work of dry non-fiction “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time”, in which he detailed with optimistic enthusiasm the mechanisms of what he referred to as the “Anglo-American Establishment”. The Anglo-American Establishment describes the alliance between the British Empire and the elite financial and corporate interests that were behind it (i.e. Rothschild) and the emerging American Empire and its financial and industrial titans like J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie. The forming of the much-celebrated “Special Relationship” between the U.S. and Britain in the late 19th century was at its core founded on a belief in the need for Anglo-American hegemony across the globe. As the British Empire declined, the American Empire took its place.

After the Anglo-American Establishment emerged victorious in World War II, a new entity emerged, referred to by President Eisenhower as the “Military Industrial Complex”, which acted as the “bulldog” for the financial and corporate entities who sought to get nations into debt they could not pay back, so they could then pillage their resources. The Military Industrial Complex was there to make sure that happened. Controlled primarily by the American WASP elites with ties to Zionism, this combine of arms dealers and weapons manufacturers used the power and influence they had gained in the Second World War to make sure that the war never ended. The creation of entities like the CIA as well as other Military Industrial Complex entities and operations helped to ensure this through use of false-flag terror, psychological warfare, narcotics trafficking, sex trafficking, manufactured revolutions, assassinations and puppet dictators.

With the spread of Corporate Globalism, new players like China entered into the equation. While western interests had covertly financed the Communist Revolution of Mao Tse Tung for decades, Communist China remained an “enemy” in the eyes of the general public through the Vietnam War. However, in the mid- 1970s China was “opened” to western markets- a move led by then U.S. Envoy to China and later CIA Director, George H.W. Bush. This was the beginning of the new chapter of the strange love-hate relationship between China, their elites like the Li family, and the Anglo-American Establishment. The Corporate Globalists love China due to their unending supply of cheap labor and complete disregard for the environment and human rights. Meanwhile those who are on the military and finance side of things know that China is still out for China, and not really “in” with the Judeo-Anglo-American Establishment, which seeks to be the dominant force in the world as it has for the last nearly 200 years.

The New World Order is a comprehensive system of dominance in financial, corporate, and government spheres where the most ruthless rise to the top, while the rest of the world is kept in a compartmentalized state. It is a system tailor-made for psychopaths. While there is infighting and backstabbing, as there is “no honor among thieves”, there is cooperation in the manner of a group of cartels. Judeo-Zionist, Anglo-American, and European elites primarily drive it, however players like the Saudis and the Chinese have played an increasing role in the past few decades. It has been said that millionaires see the world as a “playground”, while billionaires see the world as a “proving ground”, and this is certainly the case here as this is no “millionaires club”. The primary ideology is that of “Social Darwinism” and the belief that the 0.0001% who are in this “club” have a duty to direct the course of human civilization and lead the masses of the human population down “the right path”, with or without their consent.

However, these are also people who deeply understand the Law of Karma, which is why they always say what they are going to do in white papers, dry academic works, etc. before they do it. Silence, apathy, ignorance and disbelief from the general public equates to consent, as the information and stated goals of these folks is readily available. Likewise, they use “grunts” like the police and the military to do their dirty work, thereby skirting the immediate repercussions of Karma. They understand human psychology to an incredibly sophisticated degree and are masters at playing groups off against one another in order to advance their goals and create “order out of chaos”.

SCAN0000bb

This is the “New World Order” in a nutshell. It is the Global Corporate Mega-State. This is an entity that has been constructed in the darkness of secrecy away from the light of inquiry, but now has become more vocal and blatant with its actions, as its dominance has caused it to grow in chutzpah and arrogance. Needless to say, this system as a whole is not something that most people would consent to if they were fully aware of it, which is why anyone sounding the alarm about any aspect of this is going to be ridiculed, demonized, or worse by the establishment.

So let’s be clear: governments aren’t afraid of terrorism. Governments have used terrorism for quite some time to advance their own power. What governments are afraid of are ideologies that compete with their own. The State and the individuals behind it know their real power lies in their hold over the minds and hearts of their populace. If that is gone, it is only a matter of time before they are as well.

We should note that it is increasingly accurate to use an impersonal term like “the State” in reference to the U.S. Government as it no longer matters who “the face” is, since we have a dictatorship of Executive Branch bureaucracies and the corporate interests that control them. Policies shift focus and move faster, but never really “change”. This is a State that has not been “for the people” for a long, long time. Similar statements can be made of most governments that are in existence today.

So that leads us to the question of what exactly is the ideology of the State and the emerging Global Corporate Mega State that ultimately seeks to completely absorb it? First and foremost, the State seeks to establish itself as God (although it will never say that). The State wants you to look to it for life and sustenance. The State wants you to look to it and only it, for safety and security. The State wants women to see it as provider, children to see it as parent, and men to see it as master. The State wants to destroy human sexuality and even human imagination because of the power it has to create without the approval of the State. The State will tell you what is moral and virtuous. The State will take your ideas and your movements and make them work to advance its own goals. All things belong to the State.  The State will let you have whatever does not threaten its power.

The State wants the “poor and oppressed” to look to it for hope, opportunity, and charity which it will give in exchange for loyalty and the elimination of its enemies. The State must crush any and all competition. The State must silence any and all dissent or ridicule. The State will choose what words and language is appropriate. The State will decide what sort of science and technology you can and can’t have. The State wants you to consume more and more. The State wants you to be self-absorbed and apathetic. The State wants you to care about frivolous things and obsess over mindless entertainment. The State wants you to believe you can only be what it says you can be. The State wants you to believe everything its “experts” and media pundits tell you.  The State will write history.  The State will tell you what is true or false.The State must dictate your reality.

The State wants you to cheer it on, no matter what it does. The State demands tribute and it demands sacrifice. The State will tell you that it is virtuous and honorable to pay your tribute to the State. The State cannot survive without it. The State thinks there are too many people and that threatens its ability to maintain power and control. The true nature of the State is that of a parasitic entity. It may give a tiny little bit, but then it takes oh so much more. Like a cancer it grows and grows. The State wants you in its cage until you die broke and in debt. The State will say what is good is evil and what is evil is good. The antithesis of Light, Life and Love, the State as we know it is an archaic holdover from the Kali Yuga and represents darkness, death and fear. The State is a vampiric illusion that only exists because we have put our faith and energy into maintaining it.

This is the State as it has come to be. This is the Global Corporate Mega-State. It is “Left Wing” as well as a bit “Right Wing”. It is all about you having any sort of “freedom” that keeps you dumbed-down, distracted and self-absorbed. It wants to take all of your money as you slowly die from the diseases that it creates or allows to be created in a variety of ways. It tolerates homogeneous, watered-down religion, just as long as your actions in the world are passive and subordinate to the State, and your life remains primarily focused on tribute and support of the State. It wants you to serve it until you no longer serve a purpose. It wants you to believe you are weak, powerless, and ugly. But in truth, it knows how powerful you truly are and is scared to death of that.

At the end of the day, an “extremist” is anyone who does not agree with the legitimacy of the power monopoly of the State and its attempt to dictate reality. An “extremist” sees the State’s attempt to become God for what it is. An “extremist” isn’t a threat because he or she uses bombs, or guns, or other fear-based tactics. An “extremist” is a threat because he or she isn’t afraid to use words and ideas to create a different version of reality than the one the State approves of. The Word and the Imagination are humanity’s most powerful tools, which is why the State seeks to suppress and control them with such vigor.

warrior2

So in closing, my question to you, dear reader, is this: where do you stand? Do you stand with the State? Or do you follow a “Higher Power”? Will you be an “extremist”? Or will you be absorbed into the Global Corporate Mega-State?

Humanity is at a fork in the road, and the time is coming where we will all have to make the “hard choice”.  Honest, sincere, conscious action will be required of us.  What manner of action will depend on one’s own strengths and abilities, but in any case, it will require honest action and it will take every ounce of heart and courage we have.

There is a rough road ahead indeed, and the temptation will be there to just put our head in the ground and “go along to get along” and hope we go unnoticed.  But we may be wise to remember the words of Tuskegee Airman and Air Force Lt. Col. Hiram Mann:

“No man survives when freedom fails, the best men rot in filthy jails, and those who cry ‘appease, appease’, will be hanged by those they tried to please.”

Namaste and God Bless.

Advertisements

SYRIA AND EUROPE: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU PRAY FOR…

“There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.”

Wesley Clark, U.S. general, ex-NATO Supreme Commander; talking about the NATO bombing of Serbia, 1999

Syrian refugees

I recently came across a posting in a Facebook group that I am a member of that caught my attention. The individual who posted called for all to pray for the safety of the refugees making the harrowing journey across the Mediterranean to Europe from war-torn Syria and other parts of the Middle East and North Africa. However, this person also requested that folks pray that the countries of Europe grant asylum to these thousands of refugees. This second part I found a bit unsettling and I’ll get to why in a bit, but first, for those not 100% familiar with the back-story of what is going on in Syria, let me give a brief summary:

In March of 2011, well-armed “rebels” who were trained, armed and funded out of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, etc. fomented a revolution in Syria to topple dictator Bashar Al Assad. The majority of these “rebels” were radicalized Wahhabi Muslims, who believed in the most extreme and literal interpretation of the Koran. These men saw Assad, who had a secular (not controlled or directed by religion) government and a nation with different sects of Christians and Muslims coexisting peacefully, as an “infidel” who needed to be disposed. The media in the west painted the picture of “peaceful protesters” taking to the street to protest an “oppressive regime” and being attacked unprovoked by the Assad government. This was a deliberate obfuscation of what was actually taking place.

SyriaCivilWar

These rebels had the support of the United States Government and NATO, who had long sought to take out Assad due to his unwillingness to cooperate with International Usury and Corporate Globalism, which sought to exploit Syrian people and resources. The Assad regime is also a key ally of Iran, who has long been at odds with the Zionist State of Israel and its protectors in NATO. Retired NATO General Wesley Clark stated in an interview that Iraq, Libya, Syria and Iran were regimes that elements within NATO et al had openly planned to take out long before there was any “crisis” situation presented that justified doing so. Lastly, there is the Russian connection, as geopolitical control of the region allows the Anglo-American Alliance to move in on the borders of its old nemesis, Russia, which mirrors the Great Game of the British and Russian Empires in the 19th century as well as the Cold War of the 20th century.

A Syrian expatriate who goes by the moniker “Syrian Girl”, listed eight reasons why the west is so eager to topple Assad and Syria:

1) Syria’s Central Bank is state-owned & controlled (the U.S. Federal Reserve is NOT- it is privately owned).
2) Syria has no IMF (International Monetary Fund) debt.
3) Syria has banned genetically modified (GMO) seeds.
4) Syria’s population is well informed about the global power elite’s influence in world affairs.
5) Syria has massive oil and gas reserves.
6) Syria clearly and unequivocally opposes Zionism and Israel.
7) Syria is one of the last secular Muslim states in the Middle East.
8) Syria proudly maintains and protects its political and cultural national identity.

There is no room for a truly sovereign or self-determined nation or people in a globalist system. Nationalism is diametrically opposed to Globalism.

ATTENTION EDITORS - VISUALS COVERAGE OF SCENES OF DEATH AND INJURY Syrian activists inspect the bodies of people they say were killed by nerve gas in the Ghouta region, in the Duma neighbourhood of Damascus August 21, 2013. Syrian activists said at least 213 people, including women and children, were killed on Wednesday in a nerve gas attack by President Bashar al-Assad's forces on rebel-held districts of the Ghouta region east of Damascus. REUTERS/Bassam Khabieh (SYRIA - Tags: CONFLICT POLITICS CIVIL UNREST) TEMPLATE OUT

People may remember the infamous Ghouta chemical attack back in August 2013, in which Syrian civilians were attacked with chemical weapons- a scenario that the Obama Administration had repeatedly warned for months prior would force “military action”. However, things would not go as planned, as a massive outcry from a war-weary American public as well as sane voices within the Pentagon prevented the intervention into Syria that the war-hawks and corporate cartels had wanted. It later came out primarily in the alternative media, that the it was not even the Assad government that perpetrated the attacks, causing the story to further unravel. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, came ISIS. Well, not really out of “nowhere”, per se.

On September 11th, 2012, the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya; another formerly secular and sovereign nation that was toppled and destroyed for the same reasons the west is trying to topple Syria; was attacked by well-armed insurgents whose ultimate goal was to loot a weapons storehouse that was in the back of the Embassy. They accomplished this as they were almost completely unopposed save for a small group of Navy SEALS who defied a stand-down order that would have had to emanate from the White House. These insurgents made off with a payload of heavy artillery and it was later confirmed by people within U.S. Intelligence and the Military that these weapons indeed made their way to the “rebels” in Syria.

benghazi-on-fire

In April of 2013, the Al Qaeda (which was also trained and funded by the CIA and has had known CIA assets as leaders) affiliate known as ISIS or ISIL “officially” established itself in Syria, and then began raising hell in Iraq that fall, torching towns and stealing oil fields. It should be noted that the black Wahhabist flag- the flag of Al Qaeda, which became the flag of ISIS, had been flying high as a banner of the rebel insurgency since the beginning of the Syrian Civil War, so to say that this group appeared just recently is a bit misleading. It was the media hype and spin around the situation that swiftly changed from this group of ideologues being “freedom fighters” to “dangerous extremists”.

Syria-Civil-War-ISIS-Jihadists-Group

ISIS is very vocal about its desire to eliminate all “infidels”- including those in the west. Then there were the beheading videos- some real, some obviously fake. The ISIS narrative has become something of a mix between gruesome reality and fantastic propaganda suitable of an Orwell novel. The “leader” of ISIS, Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, is another known Intelligence asset. However, this growing threat of ISIS seems to give the Obama Administration justification to intervene in Syria after all. Make no mistake, the Syrian “rebels” that D.C. is now openly giving aid and weapons to as long as they “promise not to become radicalized” (seriously), are hopping on the ISIS train if they weren’t on it in the first place. Interestingly, there have been opportunities for drone strikes, as ISIS openly paraded in celebratory marches on foot that stretched for miles from town to town in U.S.-occupied Iraq, but no such thing occurred.

isis_0

So, long story short, Syria (as well as Iraq, Libya, etc.) is almost completely decimated and being taken over by this well-armed, well-trained, and well-funded force that is terrorizing everyone in their path and slaughtering those who do not subscribe to their view of Islam. It is also being touted that the Assad regime’s time is limited, as even their ally Russia is beginning to withdraw support (they too are fighting a U.S./NATO-manufactured war on their border). Meanwhile the people of Syria and other parts of the Middle East and North Africa are fleeing for their lives in the worst refugee crisis since World War II displaced continental Europe. These Refugees are starving and desperate, packed onto dangerously overcrowded lifeboats and headed toward continental Europe.

2C0CB65E00000578-3225289-image-a-22_1441639653548

This brings us back to the prayer in question, asking folks to pray that the countries of Europe open their arms to these refugees. One problem here is the question of what happens when the population of a nation doubles almost overnight? It has been said that a nation is like a lifeboat- if you have too many people, the whole thing tips over. In the world of debt-based economies and physical space, resources are finite and limited. While our heart may go out to the plight of those displaced by the Syrian conflict, what of the nations and the people that make up those nations in which this flood of refugees is headed to? Europe really isn’t all that big.

11But nowadays, the culture of Europe has become so “politically correct” that to advocate for the interests of native Europeans in any capacity whatsoever is seen as “racist”. This institutionalized political correctness is far more entrenched there than it is here. Europeans are taught that it is a form of penance for colonialism, etc. (even though many European countries did not have colonies) to accommodate the wants and needs of non-Europeans to the point of extreme self-detriment. The political class of the E.U. fully promotes this sort of cultural martyrdom, as evidenced by Swedish Conservative MP Fredrik Schulte’s recent suggestion that “ordinary” Swedes should be encouraged to remodel their garage to house immigrants.

This idea of sacrifice has really begun to play out in Germany, were native-born Germans living in what was originally a housing development designed to help the homeless get back on their feet, are being forced by the government to vacate what has been their home for years with nowhere to go. This is being done in order to house the massive influx of refugees that are pouring in from the Middle East and North Africa. As Joschka Fischer, ex Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor of Germany stated, “Germany is to be contained from outside and heterogenized from the inside by influx, ‘diluted’ so to speak.”

640x392_56008_199158Since the end of World War II, the people in Europe have been increasingly indoctrinated with the idea that it is honorable to put the needs of another’s “family” superior to that of their own “family”, as a tribe, a folk and a race are essentially a genetic extended family. This isn’t “service to humanity”; this is turning your back on family. I’m pretty sure for what it’s worth Jesus wouldn’t have kicked his mother Mary on the street to house escaped Roman slaves from North Africa. This is why I feel a deep unsettling around these events, as should others reading who are of European descent for the reason that these people are our distant (and not-so-distant for some) relatives and that means something on more than a physical level. Blood transcends purely physical incarnation and has a spiritual element to it.

Of course, you have nations like Hungary that are putting their foot down with all of this and are demonized by the rest of Europe as being “intolerant” and “racist”. This is the moniker given to any group in Europe that seeks to maintain any form of sovereignty or “national identity”- “the great evil”, as it has been tied to National Socialism and Fascism. This is why groups such as the Golden Dawn in Greece are so demonized while thousands of migrants pour into a country that is collapsing.  One one Greek Island as many as 6,000 refugees poured in seeking aid in one day.  Small towns throughout Europe are doubling in size almost overnight, severely taxing already limited resources.

1416426453-syrian-refugees-in-greece-demand-asylum-and-shelter_6295720

Make no mistake, Europe as a whole is collapsing economically and this massive wave of migration may just be what helps to push it over the edge.  At that point, the remaining property and resources of once-sovereign nations will be bought up for pennies on the dollar by financial oligarchs who promoted the “multiculturalism” that has the population in “survival mode” and too distracted to do anything about being robbed blind.

Elsewhere, truckers in the port of Calais in northern France as well as other parts of Europe are finding themselves being swarmed by desperate immigrants looking for a ride to asylum in the U.K., which at times causes violent conflict.   This isn’t hateful xenophobic propaganda; this is just what happens when people are desperate for survival.

PICTURE - MARK LARGE ... 29.06.15 Migrants try to get on board stationary lorries during the Ferry workers strike at the lorries queue up at the channel tunnel , Calais, France.

What is also not xenophobic propaganda is the fact that there is a difference between integrating individuals into a group as individuals and the (forced) integration of an entire group of people into another group. You are dealing with two very different modes of consciousness and behavior patterns- individual vs. collective. People will act different when they have the protection of their “tribe” then when they are trying to establish an individual relationship with members of another “tribe”. What I’m saying is that forced integration of groups that are very different on a large scale will inevitably cause conflict and alienation. This is what is happening in Europe now. This is the “Clash of Civilizations” between the east and west that many have written about.

2195850161

The majority of the population who have been immigrating into Europe from the Middle East and North Africa, not just in the latest wave, but over the past couple decades, have no desire or incentive to assimilate or be “European” in any way, but are still encouraged to collect European government assistance. Many of the young men who make the initial trek to establish themselves before sending for their family are not necessarily fond of the European peoples and are culturally, VERY different. Many of these young Muslims have a deep resentment and hatred towards the west and many are joining the cause of ISIS in its recruitment of sleeper cells and fighters for “jihad” the world over. A lot of this can be seen as blowback for the interventionist actions of NATO, the U.S. and Israel that killed people’s families in the Middle East, but the fact is that most Europeans had nothing and wanted nothing to do with any of that.

hqdefault

Sadly, this has culture clash has caused a great degree of violence that is all too real. The “socialist paradise” of Sweden has become the rape capital of Europe and violent crimes against non-Muslims have become increasingly common throughout the E.U. A particularly sad case was that of the sex-trafficking ring in the U.K. that was known about, but allowed to go on for years due to the police being threatened with legal action for being “racist” if they investigated, as the perpetrators were Arabic Muslims. But according to political and media figures like Barbara Spectre, these problems are the fault of the “white majority” as “Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural, and I think we’re going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place… Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century… It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode…”

multiculti-europe-350x216-customUnfortunately, many Europeans who are finding themselves strangers in the lands their family have lived for millennia do not share this enthusiastic sentiment, but they are too scared to say anything at all to protest for fear of being labelled “racist” or even “anti-Semitic” (Barbara Spectre happens to be Jewish in ethnicity) and facing potential legal action for “hate speech”. But they know what this means- this means that the “Old World” folk culture that so many tourists wish to experience when they visit Europe, will be no more. As E.U. Commissioner and head of the World Trade Organization, Peter Sutherland stated:

“We still nurse a sense of our homogeneity (unique racial and cultural identity) and difference from others, and that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”

Politicians and media pundits in Europe and the western world look the other way when it comes to rape and violence as well as the displacement of European people and culture, and instead celebrate the ‘end of Europe as we know it’. This celebration is articulated wonderfully by Israeli writer, Yigal Ben-Nun, writing for “Haaretz”, where he made the following statement:

“Arab migration has been the best thing that’s happened to Europe in the past 50 years. Arabs in Europe are a fact of life. It’s time we started to accept that there’s no way to block the migration of Chinese, Pakistanis or Arabs to Europe. … It’s true, Europe won’t be what it once was, but that’s a good thing. … [The] more migrants from Africa and Asia who arrive, the better off Europe will be. Sooner or later, their children and grandchildren will marry into veteran European families and change the demographics of their countries. Europe will be different.”

Or to put it in the more blunt words of former President of France, Nicholas Sarkozy:

“The goal is to meet the challenge of racial interbreeding… Not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country.”

belgium_immigrationI am not trying to pass judgment or demonize interracial romance and cross-pollination of cultures; people have the freedom to choose to love and associate with whom they want; but simple calculation shows that if this trend continues on its natural course completely unchecked on such a large scale, it is only a matter of time before France will no longer be French, Sweden will no longer be Swedish, Germany will no longer be German, Italy will no longer be Italian, and England will no longer be English- ethnically, racially or culturally.

article-2250673-169521E9000005DC-879_634x547Interracial coupling has been a reality to one degree or another for millennia, but never has it had the full power of corporate marketing and political propaganda pushing it as “trendy rebellion” and even “moral duty” as it does now. I’m not willing to label any of this is as “good” or “bad” (personally, I am attracted to women of all different races); I mean is a lion and a tiger mating and making a “liger” bad? I don’t think so, but I wouldn’t want there to be only ligers one day, either. What I am saying is that this is something we may want to step back and take a second look at before continuing full-steam ahead with. The individual races of humanity exist as individuations for a spiritual reason. They should be honored and understood; not just thrown into a blender while mindlessly repeating the mantra: “WE’RE ALL THE SAME”.

I suggest folks seriously take a look at whether our ideas and ideals around all of this are actually our own, or if someone somewhere just played into our emotions and planted a thought or belief system they desired us to have- planting a seed that germinated, while we believed it was our own.   Are we truly being motivated by higher principles or are we just politically correct parrots?

alon-ziv-Think about it- the elite classes of the world that are the prime shareholders and promoters of Globalism have always been strict about maintaining “purity” (sometimes to the point of inbreeding) amongst themselves, so is it not funny that homogenization is now being pushed on the rest of us- black, white, brown, yellow, etc. to such a degree in billboard ads, commercials, TV shows, movies, books, etc. (even more so in Europe)? Isn’t it funny that these politicians and academics and media pundits sit back in ivory towers telling people to do what they themselves do not?

Europeans make up only about 10% of the world population and have genetically recessive traits. It is also only in countries that have (or had) European majorities that this sort of replacement level migration and integration is promoted and encouraged. While there have been invasions of Europe by the Moors and other kingdoms and tribes in the past, nothing has ever approached this in sheer scale and magnitude and been met with so little resistance. The logical end result here is that Europeans, as we know them, good and bad, will be no more.

moor-invsp01s

This is not love and compassion. This is exchanging one people’s suffering and struggle for existence for another’s. This is genocide according to the U.N.’s own definition decided upon in the U.N. General Assembly of 1948 which classified genocide as:

” …any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy in whole, or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such… Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group…”

This is a genocide on a slow and subtle level- on a level that begins in the mind through guilt-based indoctrination and a slow erosion and replacement of native folk culture and tradition (modern commercial pop-culture is NOT European folk culture). It is hard to see or even believe at first as we associate genocide with blatant mass-slaughter, but it is real and it is happening right in front of us. This is not to discount the reality of the hard genocides and depopulation tactics used against Palestinians, or sub-Saharan Africans or the Indigenous peoples of the Americas, or any of the “dark-skinned” impoverished populations of developing world or the developed world for that matter; it is just a different type of operation for a different type of people.

WhiteGenocide77

Multiculturalism goes hand-in-hand with Globalism. It creates an endless supply of cheap labor, using people who are already accustomed to living under despotism. It also creates a political army of dependents who are faithful and obedient to the State that “saved” them and sustains them. The goal is for them to overwhelm, absorb and replace those pesky Euro-types with their crazy ideas of individual “rights” and “freedoms” and “living standards”, who have outlived their usefulness. At that point, the new proletariat can be absorbed into the plastic “Monoculture” of pop-consumerism, fast food, pharmaceuticals, wage slavery and debt until they no longer serve a purpose and can be “disposed” of.

globalisation3

I am not going to get into any more  potential reasons and motivations as to WHY this replacement migration and “white genocide” (or any of the other genocides mentioned) may be being orchestrated, but it is indeed happening with the full blessings, sponsorship and encouragement of European and western leaders and institutions. Perhaps it is indeed a sort of “group karma”, as Rabbi Baruch Efrati alluded to when he stated:

“Jews should rejoice at the fact that Christian Europe is losing its identity as a punishment for what it did to us for the hundreds of years we were in exile there… And now, Europe is losing its identity in favor of another people and another religion, and there will be no remnants and survivors from the impurity of Christianity, which shed a lot of blood it won’t be able to atone for.”

20091004_islam_europe1Perhaps singer and songwriter Susan Sontag was right when she stated:

“Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Balanchine ballets, et al. don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.”

“Judge not lest ye be judged.” It is no person’s place to judge and decide the karmic fate of another, regardless of whatever real, perceived or imagined “wrongs” they or their ancestors may have done. There are very few true “innocents” among any members of the tribes of humanity. Nearly all human beings have done “wrong” in the present and/or in past incarnations.

wpid-1436175665181Perhaps one could even argue that this is just part of the continued evolution of humanity as we move into the next Age. However, I have a hard time believing that the materialist political ideologies of Nikolaus Kalergi,  Franz Boas, and Cultural Marxism are going to guide anyone towards a point of spiritual ascension. And personally, and I know this is a “racist” thing to say, but I’m kinda fond of white people and I don’t really wanna see them (or any other peoples) become extinct, despite of any racial and/or cultural “character defects” they may or may not possess.

So pray for the safety of those people who have had their homes and lives destroyed by this senseless terror that has swept the Arab world. Pray that they and their families are kept safe and see them in their perfection as Light Beings. Pray that this is done with right action and that nobody is hurt. That’s enough. As Father Paul Blighton said in regards to this invocation of the Law of Manifestation; i.e. the Law of Prayer:

“(But) we don’t know all these facets (situations that involve others) off-hand, so we use this form (method of prayer) so that everybody is taken care of, there’s nobody hurt, there’s nobody infringed upon, and there’s no injustice to anyone.”

ZA'ATARI, JORDAN - FEBRUARY 01: Children pose for a picture as Syrian refugees go about their daily business in the Za'atari refugee camp on February 1, 2013 in Za'atari, Jordan. Record numbers of refugees are fleeing the violence and bombings in Syria to cross the borders to safety in northern Jordan and overwhelming the Za'atari camp. The Jordanian government are appealing for help with the influx of refugees as they struggle to cope with the sheer numbers arriving in the country. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images) ORG XMIT: 160600686

We should be careful not to try and fill in the details as to how these refugees are protected or where they go or who should do what for them. Once we start monkeying around with the wires here, things tend to get messy. This is not to say that using the Law of Prayer in a more micromanaging way won’t be effective for specifically helping those in our immediate prayers in an immediate sense, but we would do well to remember

Namaste and God Bless.