“These stories are intricate and complicated — far more so than reality or official explanations”

  • University of Miami political science professor Joseph Uscinski


As many have heard by now, major news outlets have reported that this past Sunday, a man by the name of Edgar Maddison Welch brought a pistol as well as an AR-15 assault rifle (there’s that evil gun again) to Comet Ping Pong pizzeria in Washington DC.  Thankfully, no one was hurt in the incident, while “official” reports state that Welch told police officers that he had “read online that the Comet restaurant was harboring child sex slaves and that he wanted to see for himself if they were there. He stated that he was armed to help rescue them. He surrendered peacefully when he found no evidence that underage children were being harbored in the restaurant.”

As bizarre as the whole scenario sounds on the surface, it has become a capstone in the new war on “fake news”- a talking point that began during the election and the growing concern over the movement behind Trump.  This was publicly addressed by President Obama and has been literally parroted by every major news outlet.  This narrative has been carried to the point of comprising a literal list of alleged “fake news” sites– which lists satire news sites like “The Onion” alongside anti-globalism news sites like “Infowars”.


The main target of this new campaign against “fake news” are what are labeled “conspiracy theories”.  Now this is a term that is thrown around A LOT.  In fact, CNN recently published an article online in response to the Comet Ping Pong incident entitled “Why people believe conspiracy theories like ‘pizza gate’”.  After outlining the incident, the article’s author, Gregory Krieg goes into what could best be described as an emotional mini-rant- something that is sadly more and more commonplace in supposed “real news” today:

The flourishes of the conspiracy theory pursued by Edgar Maddison Welch, a bogus and convoluted tale that casts Hillary Clinton and other top Democrats as the leaders of a child sex ring, are no more or less profane than so many others bouncing around the internet’s seedier corners.”

The article then taps social psychology (which is struggling with credibility) and political science (uuum, yeah…) professors who conclude that one of the main “problems” with the discernment of “real” and “fake” news has to do with the saturation of information since the revolution of the internet and then social media.  A major complaint in the campaign against “fake news” has been the ability for alleged “fake news” outlets to create the same sort of echo-chamber effect that mainstream media has had a monopoly on for the last several decades.

After lamenting about conspiracy theories “coming out of the closet”, so to speak, the CNN article moves into a sub-headline entitled “Preying on weakness and creating the ‘other’”, where Krieg begins with another horrendously biased mini-rant on supposed conspiracy theories:

The most prominent channels may change over the decades, but the insidious nature of the misinformation spreading these days is not fundamentally different from the lies peddled a half-century ago.”

Krieg then consults University of Utah history professor Bob Goldberg who describes these “conspiracy theories” as “an antidote to powerlessness because giving the responsibility, pointing the finger, targeting someone gives people a sense that they know what’s happening.”

After which, Krieg throws his summation in there stating, “Conspiracy theories tend to spring from those two prominent desires — creating a feeling of control where it doesn’t exist and defining an enemy where it is absent or difficult to define.

The article then moves on to portray “conspiracy theorists” as “bullying and hurtful” people who are “trying to silence the victims and survivors of horrendous tragedies”, according to Abby Clements, who claims to have been working as a second-grade teacher during the infamous Sandy Hook event.

The article refers to “pizza gate” as an “invention” to make what one can only glean from this article as the otherwise faultless Hillary Clinton and her associates as what Professor Goldberg refers to as “your enemy” and “the other“.

Professor Goldberg explains how this reasoning is used to elevate this “other” as someone “who has committed treason, someone who has betrayed the country,” deserving to be “punished”.  Because nothing ever came out that would have ever suggested that Hillary Clinton or her associates did anything that resembled treason…

The article closes by expressing the need for more effective “fact checkers” and cites the example of Lt. General Flynn- a supporter of Trump- committing a logical fallacy, which is ironic because the article was full of them, such as ad hominem and appeal to authority.

If anything, this article, with its periodic emotional rants and lamenting of “conspiracy theorists” as intolerant bullies who are trying to “silence” people is both a wonderful example of psychological projection and as well as a great snapshot of the sad creature mainstream journalism has become and why people are moving to supposed “fake news” sites for their information.  If anything, this article should be re-written and re-named as “Why people don’t believe CNN”.


A conspiracy is defined as “a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful”.

A conspiracy theory is defined as “an explanation of an event or situation that invokes a conspiracy without warrant, generally one involving an illegal or harmful act carried out by government or other powerful actors. Conspiracy theories often produce hypotheses that contradict the prevailing understanding of history or simple facts. The term is a derogatory one.”

Note that the term is referred to as “derogatory”, which means a “critical or disrespectful attitude”.

A “conspiracy theorist” is defined as “a person who holds a theory that explains an event or situation as the result of a secret plan by usually powerful people or groups

According to Florida State University professor Lance deHaven-Smith’s 2013 book “Conspiracy Theory in America”, the phrase conspiracy theory was deployed in the 1960s by the CIA to discredit people who questioned the official story around the JFK assassination, which was most famously questioned in the Oliver Stone film, “JFK”.  Now, this action in and of itself was technically illegal, as the CIA was not supposed to be operating domestically, although this was revealed to most certainly be the case with the Church Committee Hearings.  Of course, now, with the repeal of the propaganda ban back in 2013, government-created news is now legal, putting the U.S., led by the CIA, on par with the most esteemed journalism that was found in authoritarian paradises like the Soviet Union and East Germany.

Over the years, many things have been labelled “conspiracy theories” that were later revealed to be actual fact, such as La Cosa Nostra, the information in the Pentagon Papers, CIA drug running (Iran Contra), the Federal Reserve being run by private banking interests or the fact that the Bilderberg Meeting was an actual thing.  And while there are certainly wild ones out there literally based in outer space, the reality of people in high places meeting in secret and doing illegal and immoral things is a fact of history and a fact of life.

Does this mean there is one monolithic group out there running everything? No. The world is made up of groups of people who vie for their own interests, whatever they may be. Some are certainly more powerful and exert more control and influence than others, but that is the basis of it. And when said interests converge with that of other groups, these groups will often work together. The “goodness” or “badness” often lies in the fact that the interests of these groups are very different from what yours or mine may be- and sometimes that difference in interest means our own ability to thrive or even survive.

For example, the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal was negotiated in secret by corporate boards and came out piece by piece that it was designed to strictly serve the interests of multinational corporations and override any laws that would stop it.  Now this can and should to be understood to be detrimental to large groups of people and the lands they inhabit.  However, if you are on the other side, this deal may be helping you provide what you see is a better life for yourself and people you care about- even if that’s a relatively small number of people.  And knowing that people may attempt to derail the deal that is beneficial for you and your group, obviously operating in secret is the best way to go.

These things aren’t “conspiracy theory”- they are the machinations of history and human nature, as well as business.  This is how the world of men works, and will continue to until something beyond what we have ever seen or known happens.


In regards to “Pizza gate”, I must admit that I have intentionally been keeping from reading or listening to much about it because I find the topic of child sex trafficking extremely upsetting.  However, the sad fact is that the rich and powerful been caught involved in pedophilia and sex-trafficking numerous times over the years.

Most have already forgot about Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney grilling Donald Rumsfeld over major arms manufacturers like DynCorp being involved in sex trafficking or the numerous accounts of child sex abuse in the entertainment industry.

While it is certainly true that people will make loose correlations to explain things, it is also true that they will want to explain away that which makes them very, very uncomfortable. And if the idea of the people we have placed on pedestals as being the leaders of culture and society does not make you very, very uncomfortable, then I don’t know what does.

Now I don’t know the full story around Edgar Maddison Welch, other than the fact he was/is an actor and that he has served to shift some public focus away from stories of high crimes within the DC beltway elite and shift it toward the “dangers” of “fake news”.  As a rule, I am always skeptical when it comes to these “shooter” stories- especially when they occur at politically convenient times.

The mainstream media has been caught lying and spreading misinformation over and over and over (remember those weapons of mass destruction?), making this whole “fake news” campaign extremely ironic.  And while they lament against those who believe in “conspiracy theories” that target the favored sons and daughters of DC, they push their own conspiracy theory around Russian influence and intrigue to the point where the House of Representatives have quietly passed a bill to counter Russian “fake news” and its “reporters”.  Many of the accused Russian fake news agents are American Alt-Right and anti-globalism outlets.

Meanwhile mainstream pundits are calling for a sort of re-education in order to combat this “fake news” and counteract its “goal” according to CNN, which is to “erode trust in mainstream media, public figures, government institutions”- which of course has not happened organically due to said figures and institutions being caught lying and obfuscating repeatedly.

All of this should have anyone who believes in free speech a bit worried.

Regardless, let’s say we take the story of Comet Ping Pong gunman incident for absolute truth.  The real problem then is not “conspiracy theories”, but how people take and handle information- any information they receive.  This then becomes a larger issue of emotional maturity and grounded-ness, stemming from living in a society that has veered far from any sort of basis in nature and nurture of true human nature as well as potential.  These are not problems that can be resolved by censorship and corporate government strong-arming

Three years ago, the shooter who opened fire at a conservative lobbying group, Floyd Lee Corkins, cited his reasoning as being that they were on the Southern Poverty Law Center’s hate group watch list, which is accepted by many people to be a “legitimate” source of information.

The reality is that there will always be unbalanced people out there, but strictly using guilt by association to discredit a stream or source of information, whatever that may be, is error.


In response to the aforementioned CNN article, my teacher and mentor wrote the following:

We need to develop true discernment and not knee-jerk react to postings that titillate or support our biases. All of us on every side of every issue!

People are instinctively drawn to whatever supports the worldview and belief system they hold, and deem “un-credible” that which does not. That is human psychology and human nature.  However, worldviews can be expanded, but that can only happen from within the individual.

I traversed the political landscape personally and professionally over the years, and in so doing, I learned how to take truth and commonalities from news and articles from the gamut of sources- Democrat, Socialist, Libertarian, Anarchist, Christian Conservative, mainline Republican, Alt-Right, Ethno-Nationalist, and a whole slew of “conspiracy” sites.  No one perspective or political ideology has a monopoly on truth- or falsehood.  This is yet another application of “separating the wheat from the chaff”.

Now I understand that this can be hard for a lot of people, as our attachment to various fears, beliefs, and identities can prevent us from hearing or reading what seems to be diametrically opposed to what we may have been taught is “good” and “true”.  But black and white thinking is not a strength, and all things have positive and negative within them.  Ignoring and writing off information as complete lies and BS simply based on the source is error- this is even true when it comes from the mainstream media.  What typically is presented is not so simple as truth or lies, it is quite often a mixture of the two.

But regardless of all that, while we need true full-spectrum discernment and use of critical thinking, it is perhaps even more crucial that we maintain control of the emotional reactions that we may have to what we read or hear.  We cannot control what anyone says or does, but we can and must learn to control our own actions.  True freedom requires that we act rather than re-act.  In order to do this we must learn how to stay centered in Self/Higher Power, or at least learn how to move to that place as quickly as possible.

We are living in exciting and tumultuous times now, so it is more important than ever that we stay grounded in the reality of Nature and Creation, and that Ultimate Reality that exists beyond all of it.  Let us have eyes to see and ears to hear.

Namaste and God Bless.



“Here’s my take on it. Equality does not exist – because the universe has no need for it. The only thing that we all have in equal measure and of equal value is our state of aliveness. That aliveness brings a unique opening for growth as spirit descends temporarily into matter. On this expedition, the depth and quality of our being, through growth and purity of presence, is the only measure of value that is worth a damn. That is our equal opportunity. What we do with it is up to us. We generate our own value and it cannot be known by another. Everyone is at a different level of inner attainment and becoming. The animal, the soul, and the divine seek union in their own time, in their own way.”

– Neil Kramer, British philosopher and esotericist from his essay, ‘Cult of the God Men


The conversation around racial inequality is inevitably contradictory. Let’s look at the NBA, for example. If I was to complain of a lack of representation of Asians in the ranks of the NBA, I would probably get laughed at. Men of African genetics dominate the NBA because men of African genetics are better adapted to excel in the game of basketball. Black men on average tend to be taller, faster, etc. There is also a certain cultural component to it as well. Are there exceptions? Of course, but we are dealing in generalities that can most certainly be made and are in large part, general knowledge.

There seems to be no real issue for people in dealing with the notion of inequality when it comes to performance in sports and athletic competition. Most people on some level accept that various races and ethnic groups will tend to gravitate towards and excel at certain forms of physical competition while not doing so well in others, and not be offended by that.

But now, when we take this concept of inequality outside the realm of purely physical competition, now all of a sudden everyone becomes incredibly sensitive and uncomfortable.

When we go from looking at basketball scores and begin looking at IQ scores, and we see White students statistically scoring higher than Blacks and Latinos on average, and then Asians scoring higher than everyone (notice no one really includes Asians in the “race debate”), there are a multitude of justifications and outright excuses made as to why this is. People blame “White privilege”, lack of economic “opportunity”, the education system, etc. Nobody wants to believe that on average, (again there are ALWAYS exceptions and every statistic has a “bell curve”) that a majority of African-Americans and Latinos have a harder time thinking and processing information in the same manner that Whites and Asians do.

Does this mean that African-Americans and Latinos are “inferior” to Whites and Asians? No. It just means that on average they tend to process information about the world around them in a different manner. This means that racial characteristics may not just be physical, but also mental and psychological. It means that perhaps the educational model we have is not “universal” after all, and that such a thing may not exist no matter how bad we want it to.

What is being argued for is a society where there is no individual reward based on merit and work, only an across the board “fairness”. No striving to be the best at something, because that will make someone else feel bad and insecure about their own shortcomings and weaknesses. It is a world that no longer gives elaborate trophies to “champions” who put the most forth the most effort, but rather hands out miniature “participant” trophies to everyone that say “everyone’s a winner”. These are our future leaders that are openly in favor of restricting free speech so that no one’s feelings get hurt and hiding in “Safe Spaces” when someone says something that makes them uncomfortable. We should all be quite concerned with this.

This constant focus on the “inequality” of men vs. women and black vs. white is a tried-and-true tactic of “divide and rule”; intentionally stirring up resentments to get a population to fight amongst itself, keeping the people from uniting under common interests and aspirations. It keeps us from building a society where we strive for greatness, but rather we spend our energy making sure no one can be better than us or have more than us. A society where special privileges are demanded for those who see themselves as victims.

How is calling for special rights and privileges for one group of people reminiscent of Martin Luther King’s “dream” of people being judged “not by the color of their skin, but on the content of their character”? This is a weak and disempowered world we are building for ourselves.


This modern notion of equality is held up as a Utopian ideal, but what does it really mean? In math terms, when something is “equal”, it essentially means it is the same. For all humans to be equal, all humans must be exactly the same. Is there any way anyone can possibly believe that all humans are exactly the same in every manner, as a state of true equality would necessitate?

On a functional level, if you believe that any one person or a group of persons can on any day be stronger, smarter, faster, funnier, or more creative than another, then you don’t really believe in equality. If you believe anyone can “earn” anything based on work or merit or the like, then you don’t really believe in equality.

Unlike biologically determinable things like gender and race, this modern notion of “equality” is a social construct in the truest sense. This quality of inherent “sameness” does not exist in nature- “no two snowflakes are alike”. There are always going to be those who have “more” of some trait, capability or resource than another. The attempt to build a society based on this notion is a kin to building a castle on sand.

I find it funny that so often the words “diversity” and “equality” are used in conjunction with one another when the two concepts are not really compatible, as to be diverse, means to have variation, and to be equal is to be without variation.

In our efforts for equality amongst genders, races, ethnicities, sexual preferences, etc., we are doing little more than attempting to build structures that hide our own insecurities about how we see ourselves next to others. We are either pointing our finger in accusatory resentment towards our alleged oppressors, stating that it is their fault that we feel weak and inadequate in some way; or we are allowing ourselves to feel guilty for being smart, or strong, or beautiful, or talented, and allowing that guilt to trick us into hiding and suppressing these things so we don’t shine too much and make someone else feel bad. Why would anyone want that?

Sadly, what is being done in promoting this “equality” is not attempt to elevate everyone to excel and rise to his or her full potential, but rather bring everyone down to the level of the lowest common denominator. This is evidenced by the slow degeneration of both academia and culture. This is what is known as “the race to the bottom”.

Equality as it is understood in modern socio-political jargon is a belief system and nothing more. An attempt to build a society based on this sort of equality is to once again attempt to stand in opposition to the Laws of Nature and Creation. How many times are we going to do this before we realize this doesn’t really help us in the long run?

I particularly encourage folks with spiritual leanings in the esoteric and mystic traditions to contemplate and meditate on this concept of equality, particularly if you believe in and understand the reality of Karma and the Principle of Cause and Effect (i.e. the Law of Attraction). How is it that one can hold an understanding of the truth of Karma and Cause and Effect; which essentially states that there is a Divine Justice at work in reality and that everyone “reaps what they sow”; while simultaneously holding onto the belief that everyone is “equal” and therefore entitled to the same life and opportunities as everyone else? These two concepts are incompatible with one-another and cannot co-exist as “truths”. Either we reap what we sow, or we are entitled to the same things as everyone else. We can’t have it both ways. One statement is true and the other is false. Which is it?

We are all equal in the eyes of God and our bond to the Laws of Nature and Creation. After that however, any of these sort of “humanist” notions of equal intellect or equal creative potential, or equal anything else on the level of individuals or collective groups is purely an illusion. This “equality” we are sold is no more than a promotion of “sameness” to essentially get us to buy into the notion that humans are interchangeable and replaceable like nameless, faceless automatons. Contrary the sort of uplifting and “feel good” façade, equality is in fact a way of saying there is nothing special or remarkable about anyone- WE ARE ALL THE SAME. This is a perfect belief system for a global corporate government.

On the ultimate, base level of the Divine Self that makes up the core of every human being, we do have a sort of basic “equality” of being made of the same “stuff”. However, we are individuated expressions of this Divine “Stuff” as it manifests through Heaven and Earth. It is this process of the ONE God incarnating and becoming many different perspectives and personalities that negates equality. Equality exists at the Source, not in the avenues of Creation.

While we all have groups and “tribes” that we are a part of and have physical as well as spiritual responsibilities and ties to, we are still ultimately here to bring our own individual selves into a place of Internal Sovereignty or “Mastery”. We cannot move towards Mastery if we reside in a place of helplessness and maintain some form of victim mentality.

Even when we are aware that there are individuals and groups that maintain systems of control to keep us at a low level of conscious awareness, it is we who can choose to complain about oppression or we can make the choice to take back our power and “throw off” the chains made for us. We choose in our own minds whether we will be masters of our destiny or victims of our circumstance. We choose if we are going to conduct ourselves from a place of empowerment or from a place of weakness. Which is it for you?

Namaste and God Bless.


“When a man has given up the desires of his heart and is satisfied with the Self alone, be sure that he has reached the highest state.”
– Lord Krishna in The Bhagavad Gita



The subject of love, compassion, and the heart center has been a recurring theme that is popping up in my own life, as well as the world around me. I was recently in a class with some fellows from the Order and the topic was love and “opening the heart”. The emphasis of the teachings given as of late have been very “heart centered”, focusing on “ripping the heart open” and allowing it to “gush”. Opening the heart center and having it fully activated is essential for spiritual growth and development, just as I understand it as a specific lesson for my own incarnation here. However I am also seeing what is becoming a BIG problem with what I would describe as reckless, emotion-driven “heart gushing”. This is essentially when the heart becomes ensnared and motivated by emotions and the subconscious/unconscious belief systems that create them. This is a problem that appears to be afflicting people across the Western world, including many in various spiritual communities.

During the class, a fellow spoke of how they could not watch a movie with the slightest amount of pathos without going to tears. While this is natural for many and not a bad thing, it is a reaction, and understanding the mechanics of how reactions are triggered within us is something everyone should understand, so as to avoid becoming reactionary, which is antithetical to Self-Mastery.

I have detailed in previous articles as to the specifics of how media, in particular film and television, are specifically designed to target the emotional center, while bypassing the logic/reasoning center in order to implant beliefs and ideals into the subconscious. This is proven neuroscience and psychology, but we don’t even need to be told that to know that if we watched the movie “My Girl”, we probably cried when little Macaulay Culkin died. Now Macaulay Culkin didn’t really die; that was a fictional scenario, but it FELT SO REAL, because we suspended our disbelief and became engrossed in the movie.

The above scenario described had to do with fictional television and movies, which most people on a conscious level know are not real (except for so-called “reality TV” which some people do think is real), but what of those things that we see on the television or the Internet or even the newspapers that claim that they ARE real? What of those images we are given that are meant to evoke a certain emotional response from the viewer?

As anyone who has seriously studied advertising, film, photography, or graphic art and design (such as myself) will tell you that the colors, symbols, imagery and scenarios are chosen to create a desired effect on the subconscious, ultimately triggering an emotional response on the viewer. Now, this imagery can be psychologically empowering or destructive, depending on the motivations of the artist as well as the state of the viewer, but in either case, the subconscious is being worked on and to some degree, manipulated. Well-crafted visual art and media is entirely about reaching into the subconscious and unconscious mind of the viewer, and establishing some sort of relationship with it.

A great case as to how this all works is the image of the drowned Middle Eastern boy washed up on the beach that caused such an outcry among Westerners in favor of admitting the “Syrian refugees”. This was an image that was printed and reprinted in newspapers and news websites and blogs and shown on television to a point of hyper-saturation. However it turned out that the family was not living in Syria and they were not fleeing ISIS. Some stories state the father was trying to see a dentist as they are free for non-taxpayers. Others suggest that he was a human smuggler. I am not going to judge the father here, as I do not know the full breadth of the situation, but the undeniable truth here is that the media across the Western world misled people into believing a scenario in a photograph was one thing when it was another. This was done through manipulation of people’s emotions and is completely political and subversive in motivation, as is increasingly evident through the words and actions of those in positions of power.



When someone manipulates emotions, they can get someone to do things that may not necessarily be in their best interest. This is commonly done through triggering emotions like sympathy and guilt. There is a reason Nietzsche referred to sympathy as something belonging to the realm of pathology. Pathology, which is a process of disease or imbalance, is indicated in the word “sympathy”, as it is in any other word that ends in the suffix “path” or “pathy”. Sympathy is a state of “feeling sorry” for someone, which is disempowering for both parties. Sympathy is defined as “feelings of pity and sorrow for someone else’s misfortune”.

Nietzsche explained the disempowering nature of this emotion when he stated that “Pity stands in opposition to all the tonic passions that augment the energy of the feeling of aliveness: it is a depressant.”

An example of how pity could be seen as pathology can be seen in a recent story out of Sweden when a woman was raped by a migrant. The woman stated that she did not report the incident because she “felt sorry for him” and did not want him to be deported. She did not know this man or his story. The person and the story she held in her mind was one that was based in belief, not fact. This story evoked the emotions of pity as well as guilt. She felt sorry for the idea of the man based on a story someone else told her that she believed. She did not feel sorry for the man himself, as she knew nothing about him. At the end of the day, feeling sorry for another person is no more helpful than feeling sorry for oneself and does nothing to raise or elevate anyone to a state of greater spiritual strength and evolution, and ultimately harms all those involved.

This sort of pathology is evident in those who reside in a continual state of emotional dominance. One can reside in a state of emotional dominance just as one can reside in a state of intellectual dominance.

In our modern political discourse, it is emotion that really runs the show. While the Right tends to be triggered by fear and self-preservation, the Left tends to be triggered by pity and guilt, which leads to self-destruction. All of these are pathological, as living in fear of death and marching oneself off a cliff are equally fruitless, but since we are looking specifically at sympathy we will use the example of a “politically correct” Left-leaning individual. This person might put their emotionally charged views on blast, being vocal and active for the cause of “righteousness”, and then settle there, satisfied, similarly to what one feels like after eating a good meal. They may think to themselves, “Man, do I feel good about how compassionate and loving I am by backing this issue. I am on the right side of this one.”

This is of course a trap of the lower ego. Unfortunately, many who work or volunteer for Left-leaning “social justice” causes often fall into this trap of emotion-based self-righteousness, believing that all should be forced to share in their beliefs by the gun of government.

This sort of imbalance in a person is often signified by a reliance on what is known as “emotional reasoning”. Emotional reasoning is a cognitive distortion that occurs when one justifies actions strictly based on emotion; i.e. “I feel strongly about this, so I am right”. This is the belief that feeling deeply about something makes it just and true. “I feel this to be so, so it must be so”. Emotional reasoning has become pandemic in much of modern Western society, particularly on the socio-political “Left”, which has come to dominate the overall discourse of society and culture.



In contrast to all of this, we have the virtue of compassion, which is simply the ability to “identify” with one’s feelings, i.e. “I relate to your suffering because I have suffered similarly”. Of course it is hard to relate to that which we have not consciously experienced, but we are on some level capable of this type of empathy nonetheless. That being said, compassion is not obligation, compassion is not sympathy, compassion is not guilt. Compassion as I understand it is being of service, but it is also using discernment as to whether or not such service is going to ultimately benefit or harm. This why clearing out emotional clutter is so important, so we can wisely use the heart center rather than let it be driven by unbalanced emotion and beliefs.

This brings us to the other side of love referred to as “tough love”. This is the sort of love a mother bird shows its babies when she tosses them from the nest. She knows that in order for them to survive and thrive, this action that may seem harsh, is necessary. The same thing goes for the man who is an alcoholic who needs to hit rock bottom in order to find recovery and ultimately the spiritual empowerment that comes from that. If this was not allowed to happen: if some well meaning individual or group continued to supply him with everything he needed, then it is more than likely this individual would simply continue the same self-destructive behaviors and never reach a point of true empowerment and wellbeing.

Human beings need discomfort and suffering in order to grow. These are things that are the dictates of the individual experiencing the suffering as well as the karma attached to that group or individual, neither of which can be discerned from a photo or a television screen.

We in modern society have been conditioned to abhor suffering and think of it as a bad thing. We see suffering in others and see it as a bad thing. We seek to alleviate suffering AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. This is what a good portion of the general public is doing with the migrant crisis. They are suffering psychologically from the guilt of living comfortably. Therefore they are seeking to alleviate this suffering by doing whatever they can to alleviate the suffering they are told is happening to others. This is of course based in the emotions of guilt and pity, both of which are disempowering and can never amount to anything but disempowerment for all parties involved. It is also rooted in an over-identification with the physical and a fear of death. For those of a “Christian” persuasion, this could be likened to the desire to stop the Crucifixion so Jesus doesn’t suffer and ultimately die.

The heart center is what allows us to feel and truly experience life. Feeling IS NOT emotion. In a physical sense, emotion stems from the digestive/gut area, while feeling stems from the heart. Emotion happens when feeling is ensnared by reactions, which are a product of subconscious beliefs. When emotion is driving our heart, we have a problem. This is why it is so important to sort through and throw out our emotional baggage and the belief systems they have created- they can pretend to be something they are not.

All of these things I have described come from being in a state of imbalance. We want to maintain a place of balance between all three centers; Mind, Heart, and Will, as each serves and strengthens the other, and when one is out of balanced it effects the other two. These centers correlate with the Divine Masculine, the Divine Feminine and the Divine Child, respectively. If we are completely heart-focused, and neglect one or both of the other two centers, we revert to a state of child-like naivety.  In this state we are easily led, easily fooled and easily manipulated, like the trusting child lured into the van of a pedophile with an ice cream cone.

At the same time we don’t want to be completely mind-centered or will-centered, as imbalance of these things can bring about issues like heartless rationalism and thoughtless action. This internal trinity seeks a form of balance or equilibrium, and we will suffer in one way or another until that is achieved. We want strength in Mind, Heart and Will, not relying on one over the other.



This is where the Self comes in. The Self is our “internal Sun” and the place of balance and equilibrium. The Self is the Christ within- “this little Light of mine.” Austrian mystic, Rudolf Steiner understood the nature of the Christ to be one who brought balance to polarities. It is this Self; this internal Christ, which when fully attuned to, brings balance and harmony to the energy centers of the body, as well as our lives. This is what allows us to be in the place where our mind is open, our heart is open, and our will to right-action is fully activated. This is what will bring us to a place of strength and unity in our mind, heart, and will, which will allow us to achieve the personal sovereignty and mastery we are here to achieve, as well as the ability to be of service in the completion of “The Great Work.

So in closing I want to emphasize the following five points:

1. Develop a relationship with Self.

2. Focus on balance of the Mind, Heart, and Will/Action centers.

3. Pitying someone is to look down on them, while having compassion is to lift them up. This could be seen as the difference between “giving a man a fish” and “teaching him to fish”.

4. Don’t immediately buy into social-political narratives the mainstream media pushes that trigger your emotions. If a narrative is pushed into the culture to the point of saturation, it has an agenda and it’s probably all or in part bullshit.  In other words don’t believe everything you see on TV- especially if you see it a lot.

5. Be mindful of emotional reasoning and emotion-centered moral righteousness.

Namaste and God Bless.


“The masses of people are carried along, obedient to environment; the wills and desires of others stronger than themselves; heredity; suggestion; and other outward causes moving them about like pawns on the Chessboard of Life. But the Masters, rising to the plane above, dominate their moods, characters, qualities, and powers, as well as the environment surrounding them, and become Movers instead of pawns. They help to PLAY THE GAME OF LIFE, instead of being played and moved about by other wills and environment. They USE the Principle (of Cause and Effect) instead of being its tools. The Masters obey the Causation of the higher planes, but they help to RULE on their own plane.”

– The Three Hermetic Initiates speaking in “The Kybalion”


Throughout human history, the knowledge of controlling one’s own perceptions was taught to students of spiritual knowledge by the mystics; however, let us recall the Principle of “as above so below; as within so without.” There was also the knowledge of how to control the perceptions of others through concentration and extending the mind outwards is a focused manner. Extending the mind can be done obviously through concentrated thought, but also in every other manner a human can express a thought; i.e. words, writing, symbols, art, song, dance, etc. Extending the influence of the mind into the world is the basis of prayer, magick, and sorcery in addition to being the way culture and the society that grows from it is formed. One of the most ancient ways ways of creating and preserving a culture is through the stories it tells.


All races and all cultures across the Earth have had their own folk stories, legends and myths, of course some are more localized and some are widely known by people across the world. One of these ethnic cultures whose “stories” are known throughout the world is the Jewish people. One of the most notable and qualities of the Jewish people has always been their talent for “storytelling”. From the tales of the Torah and the Talmud, to the Jewish folktales fables of Eastern Europe told by the “Wise Men of Chelm“, to the modern stage and cinema, the talents abilities of these “Wandering Storytellers” to spin a tale that draws the listener/viewer in emotionally through tapping into certain aspects of their psyche has been undeniable.


image courtesy of http://projectshalom2.org/TalesoftheStoryteller.html

Outcasts in part due to the cultural and social exclusiveness inherent in Judaism, Jews were excluded in certain aspects of Eastern European and Russian society due to their strong and insular group identity, as well as a somewhat negative reputation in business and finance practices towards non-Jews or “goyim” (cattle). This appears to be the reason many Eastern European Jews turned to Communism– a resentment for Eastern European society due to real, embellished and fabricated wrongs and an intense desire to see it transformed to their moral ideals.

This historical resentment has likely contributed to the reasons modern Judeo-Globalist elitists like George Soros use their money to promote and enable social chaos and destabilization programs in the Ukraine, which borders Russia. Because of these issues with Eastern European culture, which has historically been influenced by Russia due to the bond of Eastern Orthodox Christianity, many Jews in Eastern Europe choose chose to either become Communists or emigrate to America, which had been historically welcoming of Jews. Many of these Jews migrated to professions within cultural institutions like academia, literature, news media, music and theater.

At the turn of the 20th century, Jewish-American men like the Gershwin brothers thrived producing and composing on Broadway while others such as Paul Reuter and Adolph Ochs displayed a seemingly natural tendency towards media monopoly with their ownership of major news outlets like Reuter’s newswire and the New York Times. Moving into the newly developed motion picture industry seemed a natural progression for a people who seemed to thrive in the “culture business”.

The advent of the motion picture camera in the early part of the 20th century changed the world forever. From the outset, Jews were involved in both the production and promotion of the motion picture industry in both Europe and the United States. In his book, The Complete Illustrated History of the Jewish People, Jewish South African journalist Lawrence Joffe describes the movement of Jews into Hollywood:

At first promoters and producers, then directors, scriptwriters, actors and composers, by 1912 Jews had set up over a hundred production companies in California, and were pivotal to the creation of the eight super-firms…

Almost to a man… the Jewish movie moguls were born into poverty. Carl Laemmle, the 10th of 13 immigrant children, managed a clothes shop before running a string of nickelodeons and in 1912 founding Universal, the first big studio. Louis Mayer joined the junk trade at 8, owned a New York theatre-chain at 22 and produced the epic Birth of a Nation in 1915, aged 30. Adolph Zukor, who founded Paramount pictures in 1917, was born in Hungary, emigrated at 15 and peddled fur garments.

A similar rags-to-riches story applied to the Warner Brothers, sons of a Jewish cobbler from Poland. In 1927 they amazed the filmic world by harnessing new technology to produce the first ‘talkie’. Starring Al Jolson, ‘The Jazz Singer’ presented Jewish family dilemmas about tradition and assimilation to a mainstream audience.

Today, the longevity and dominance of film studios like Warner Brothers, Metro Goldwyn-Meyer, and NBC-Universal are a testament to the legacy of the Jewish pioneers of Hollywood and the film industry. In an op-ed article entitled Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon posted in the LA Times in December of 2008, renowned Jewish American journalist and author, Joel Stein talks about the entertainment industry’s “open secret”:

Jews totally run Hollywood.

How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between ‘The 700 Club’ and ‘Davey and Goliath’ on TV all day.

However, the “rags-to-riches” tale of Jewish dominance in the American film industry has somewhat of a dark side to it (as do most tales of dominance). In his review of Neal Gabler’s book, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, writer Jack Wikoff describes what might be considered less than ethical business practices by these early film moguls in order to achieve a monopoly in the film industry:

These men acquired this control because of an excellent sense of what the public would buy, intense personal drive, group solidarity as Jews, a willingness for hard work-and — a lot of shady dealing. Gabler describes how Adolf Zukor and Carl Laemmle illegally used Edison cameras without paying the royalties and how Louis B. Mayer cheated the producers of Birth of a Nation by falsifying his bookkeeping, thereby making as much as $500,000 on the exhibition of that one film in 1915.

Of course, dirty dealings and questionable ethics in business are certainly not relegated to Jewish film moguls, although they certainly have developed a reputation as being particularly “slimy” over the years, with numerous testimonies and allegations of prostitution, sexual exploitation and abuse as well as pedophilia within the Hollywood community. However, the real thing that we need to consider for this conversation is what was being done with this new medium of film and what were the motivations behind doing it. Jewish-American actor, Ben Stein in an article for E! Online stated:

The ex-furriers who created Hollywood were Eastern European Jewish immigrants, and all of the great edifice of fantasy-making in Hollywood is their handiwork. Names like Zukor and Lasky and Goldwyn and Cohn are the foundation of mass culture in America and the world… There is a much quoted note that it took all these Eastern European Yiddish-speaking Jews to create the lasting, worldwide image of America and what America is–the mass culture mirror that America likes to hold up to its face.”

These Jewish film moguls created their vision of America and the ideal culture through the silver screen. While their brothers in Eastern Europe shaped the culture through politics, these men shaped it through storytelling. Little by little, bit by bit, the general became enamored by the “movies” and began to mimic and emulate the behaviors and ideals they saw on the movie screen. It became clear that Hollywood was not just “reflecting” certain cultural ideals and values in the American people, it was creating them.

In a speech during a Jewish American Heritage Month reception hosted by the Democratic National Committee back in 2013, Vice President and self-described “Zionist”, Joe Biden payed homage to the role of Jewish leaders in the culture industry for molding the American public’s perceptions:

What affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else?… It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace [gay marriage]. Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.



As the ability of film to be used as a medium for spreading cultural ideas and behaviors became increasingly evident, large corporations began to partner with the film studios to market their products. It was on Madison Avenue in New York City that corporate advertising began, and still exists as a dominant force today. One of the pioneers of corporate advertising was Edward Bernays, the “Father of Public Relations” and nephew of famed Jewish psychotherapist, Sigmund Freud. Bernays pioneered Madison Avenue advertising and marketing campaigns for the tobacco industry among numerous other large businesses and corporate conglomerates.

One of the most famous publicity stunts Bernays orchestrated for the tobacco companies was when he had several famous actresses line up in the front of the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade and light up cigarettes, which until that time, had been seen as something “un-lady like”. The tobacco companies used the admiration that women had for these actresses, calling cigarettes Torches of Freedom, and associating them with the feminist movement. It worked quite well, creating the image of the sexy, independent, and fashionable smoking woman.

Noticing his knack for shaping public opinion, the U.S. Government recruited Bernays in its P.R. campaign to get a reluctant and isolationist American public behind the First World War. The U.S. Government itself, being pressured into joining the war effort by International Banking interests (primarily Judeo-Zionist) based out of Britain and Western Europe. It was Bernays who was charged with bombarding the American public with embellished and outright fabricated stories of “atrocities of the Hun”, which would be repeated in an even more effective and sophisticated manner during World War II. Bernays also came up with the slogan “Making the world safe for democracy”. In his 1928 book, Propaganda, Bernays referred to his experience working for the various “powers that be”:

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country… We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.

After the First World War, Hollywood and Madison Avenue continued to develop increasingly sophisticated methods of molding public desires and opinions, and during the Second World War, the propaganda machine was put into high gear, mobilizing the patriotism of the American public to fight a war in Europe that was not truly in their best interest. This propaganda marketing was so successful and so sophisticated; it continues to be effective to this day and is evidenced by the large volume of World War II and “Holocaust” movies produced by Hollywood as well as international (typically Jewish) filmmakers seemingly every year.

It was during and after World War II that the relationship/partnership between the U.S. Government, Hollywood, and Madison Avenue (and of course, International Finance) really became solidified. The post-war release of television brought the ability for this finely crafted visual “programming” of the population into individual households across America, and eventually the world. Television would become the ultimate way for those working in Hollywood, Madison Avenue, Washington D.C., and elsewhere, to extend their mental sphere to people all over the world. The mass media is a way to send all the aspects of the extension of an individual or a group mind, as well as that mind’s desires, to people all over the world.


Shortly after World War II, President Harry Truman signed the National Security Act, which created agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA). These were and still are essentially entities whose purpose for existence is to further the interests of what President Dwight D. Eisenhower referred to in his farewell address as the “Military Industrial Complex”. These entities whose public “mission” was foreign intelligence gathering so that another Pearl Harbor-type event did not happen again, were in fact created to ensure that the War never really ended. Military weapons manufacturers and defense contractors had gained an unprecedented amount of wealth, power and influence, and sought to hold onto that power at any cost. Truman himself stated that “I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in forty-seven, if I had known it would become the American Gestapo.”

The Military Industrial Complex, with their front groups like the CIA, partnered with Global Mega Corporations and International Usury Finance, both of which had been empowered with the creation of organizations like the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund directly after World War II. This combine of the old American (as well as Anglo) WASP establishment and the Judeo-Zionists in finance and media proceeded to organize the biggest mafia-style racketeering operation the world had ever seen. This sort of partnership between White European elitists and Jewish opportunists has been going on for centuries, growing in scope and complexity, suffering from time to time from factional in-fighting,

In the post-World War II Globalist system, International Usury Finance would take the lead, and offer loans to developing nations with interest attached that would be impossible to ever repay. It would then make part of the deal that select Global Mega Corporations would be allowed to come into the nation and essentially pillage resources and create a slave-wage labor force. The ultimate goal was the natural progression of the same goal that has existed in the minds of those who desire power throughout known history: consolidation of power and control of resources and populations.

In many cases, the job of the CIA (often working in tandem with other intelligence agencies like British MI6 and Israeli Mossad) would be to run psychological operations or “psy-ops” on the populations through various media and propaganda outlets to work on the consciousness of the populace so they were receptive to and cooperative with the overall agenda of the intelligence agencies and their corporate partners.

If a leader or a population were uncooperative, the Military Industrial Complex would often create and arm resistance movements and stage assassinations to install a government that would control the populace and enable the larger agenda, or they would simply send in the CIA Jackals to “take out” whoever was standing in the way. The CIA has been linked to numerous assassinations of world leaders since its inception. It is even well established thought that the CIA was involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy after he came to fully grasp their tactics and motives, and refused to comply.  Kennedy stated “I will splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.”

In the recently published book, “The CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film and Television”, author Tricia Jenkins outlines what many have known for years and what was until recently illegal under U.S. law, which was the direct use of the film industry as well as various television and news media outlets to conduct psychological conditioning (i.e. propaganda) operations on the American public via orders from the various Executive Branch “alphabet soup” agencies (CIA, NSA, DHS, CDC, FDA, etc.). Former CIA director William Colby stated, “The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media.”

The CIA specifically has conducted psy-ops through the use of media propaganda on foreign soil to manipulate populations in a manner that suited their aims for decades. However it came out in the 1975 Church Committee Hearings that the CIA used news media outlets to push propaganda and conducted illegal operations on U.S. soil, and it had done so since its inception. Talking about the CIA’s role in the media in a meeting with President Regan in 1981, former CIA director, William Casey stated “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.

The base of operations for one of these illegal psy-ops on U.S. soil took place at Laurel Canyon in southern California during the 1960s where the CIA and military intelligence got into the music business, and like film and television, Jews were (and still are) dominant as producers and record-label owners.

The music and lifestyles that was promoted by these various music and counter-culture celebrities that came out of Laurel Canyon, etc. were designed to discredit the anti-war movement among older and more conservative populations and repel those folks from taking part in it. They were also designed to create a generation of hedonistic, “burnt-out”, “peace-nicks”, that were so passive and detached from reality that they would no longer pose any sort of real threat to the establishment and their agenda.


During the 1960s and 1970s, the CIA conducted a large, multi-subject experiment and program of psychological manipulation and control known as “MK-Ultra”. One of the techniques used for mental manipulation of subjects was the use of LSD to create a schizophrenic state in the test subject. LSD is an extremely potent hallucinogen and (unlike meth) can only be manufactured in a relatively sophisticated lab setting by an experienced chemist. LSD slowly began to make its way into the streets of America, while “gurus” like Professor Timothy Leary were given television time to promote the drug to America’s youth.

From LSD in the 60s, to Cocaine in the 70s and 80s, to the recent Opium/Heroin epidemic, the CIA has a long history of pushing drugs onto the streets of America, using that money to further fund their operations. The intelligence agencies have historically taken part in drug smuggling (which was a specific tactic of the British Empire) and sex trafficking (slave trade) to not only further fund themselves and further demoralize and debase the population, causing destabilization.

It was during this time when the values presented to Americans via the television and film screen began to slowly degenerate and become increasingly violent, decadent, vapid, and hyper-sexualized. The prevalence and cultural acceptance of pornography (also pioneered and dominated by Jewish moguls) went hand-in-hand with the various “liberation” movements of the 60s and 70s, which were steered by Intelligence Agencies and promoted and inspired by various Jewish academics, psychologists, social activists and those working in the “culture industry” working in tandem with the various intelligence agencies.

A new culture was slowly being developed and promoted for America. It was done incrementally, over the course of a few generations, as it was understood that anything too far from the course would be rejected and rebelled against. In the course of 3-4 generations, we went from Beaver getting advice from his father to Miley Cyrus dressed as a doll and twerking on stage during prime time. The moral degradation of western culture with the progressive move into decadent materialism and Cultural Marxism didn’t “just happen”. At the end of the day, Joseph McCarthy was right.

So how does this sort of programming happen? The primary method of “attack” for weaponized media is to assault our definitions and perceptions of truth and reality. Once this becomes debased, the rest one can then be reprogrammed with a new reality. This is done in the sort of hard-core trauma-based mind control experiments done by Intelligence Agencies to create an individual that can be utilized as a dupe, patsy or even an assassin.  This is done by splintering an individual’s psyche through trauma. This is done in a more subtle way to the general public through television and the mass media.

Make no mistake, the terrorist attacks and mass shootings like 9-11 and Sandy Hook are a form of mass trauma-based programming that are partially or in some cases, completely staged productions for the media and public consumption in order to generate a sort of fear-based neurosis and obedience in the general public.


To quote former Jewish American Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, “It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true.”  To many, “truth” is nothing more than what allows them feel comfortable in their own skin; what they can “deal with”, and to many, that means believing what EVERYONE ELSE believes as truth- being safe in the majority.

Let’s recall Joe Biden’s earlier quote on Jewish leaders in the entertainment industry, and the implication that television and social media can be used to change the cultural values of a population. What this means is that the entertainment industry has the potential and the ability to shape what a society feels is right or wrong. This results in the ability of the media to shape what a society believes to be true or untrue, as most people nowadays use emotional reasoning, and will generally gravitate towards what they feel as “right” as being the ultimate truth.

So how is this done? The most effective propaganda is that which appeals directly to our emotions. If we look at the mind of a person, we can essentially break it down into three basic parts: conscious mind, subconscious mind, and unconscious mind. Our emotions and feelings tend to arise at the point where our conscious mind meets our subconscious mind. In our day-to-day life of work, family, and social lives, we are operating primarily in the realm of conscious mind as we conduct tasks, make decisions, and navigate reality.

However, when we sit down and “zone out” with out favorite television PROGRAM, we tend to stop performing all of those tasks of the conscious mind, which also serves as a sort of filter for information- a sort of “B.S. filter”. This is particularly true when we are watching something that is supposedly “pure entertainment” like a sitcom or a crime drama. We shut down our critical thinking centers and stop analyzing, just opening ourselves to the experience of being “entertained”. We let down our guard.

The unconscious mind responds to colors, symbols, archetypal imagery, and primal fears. Meanwhile the subconscious mind tends to respond to more complex emotional cues and triggers relating to personal experiences. Together they are the prime target of advertising and “behavior placement” in TV and films. It is the “guardian”, i.e. the conscious, critical-thinking mind being asleep, that allows the subconscious and the unconscious to be preyed upon. Archetypally this is akin to the man of the house being asleep while his wife and child are preyed upon, or the warriors of a tribe being put in a trance by a sorcerer while the women and children of the village are violated, abducted and murdered.

Those not familiar with the concept of behavior placement are more than likely familiar with product placement. This is where you will see, for example, the main character of your favorite TV show drinking a Coke, then see a commercial or two for Coke during that time slot as Coca-Cola is a sponsor of that program. The idea is that since you like and identify with your “TV friend” you will want to emulate them and drink Coke. Behavior placement works in a similar way, but in a slightly more complex fashion.

Again, we’ll use Joe Biden’s quote stating that programs like “Will and Grace” were what shaped the general public’s attitude about gay marriage as an example. This shaping of cultural perceptions is done through use of TV characters you grow to identify with and even “love”. You develop empathy for them and their situations. You think they’re “cool” and want to be like them in the same way a child adores and emulates puppets and cartoon characters.

It is through this empathy and identification with these characters that behavior placement happens. We form a make-believe friendship in our subconscious as we identify with the plights of the characters. We then may begin to take on the values and morals that they espouse to, just as we might tend to with any other real-life friend (that’s why mom didn’t want you hanging out with the “bad kids”).

We then may begin to identify with and even desire the world the program portrays as this simulated vicarious relationship develops. A well-known example of this is the “Hollywood Ending” that so many people want for every aspect of their lives. When watching a television program, you can rest assured that pretty much anything to do with politics, gender roles, and controversial social issues on a TV show would be considered behavior placement, as the “behavior” that the producers are wishing to place you into is the point-of-view and actions of the main characters or “heroes” (even though many modern TV “heroes” would not be considered so by traditional Western standards).

When I was doing door-to-door canvassing our primary goal was to appeal to the emotions of a prospective donor. In one particular organization I would come armed with a picture of our boss’ kid looking sickly juxtaposed next to a corporate CEO stating how much he made while children went unable to receive medical care. This simple imagery appealed to the emotional center of the person, and the objective was to bypass any sort of real sophisticated policy discussion about “who’s going to pay for this?” or “how is this going to be implemented?” which I’m sure many who financially supported “grassroots” efforts to get Obamacare may wish they had asked these sorts of questions.


This method of shaping cultural opinion through media is often used to create perceptions in the public mind that the media establishment wishes them to perceive as “facts” and true events, again through appealing to emotional reasoning and the imposition of a brand of “morality”. Recent examples of this can be seen through the generation of memes through the mainstream as well as through social media regarding the Middle East refugee crisis, specifically with the comparison of “refugees” to Jews fleeing the “Holocaust” in World War II. This “refugee/holocaust” narrative is something the establishment mouthpieces are using to guilt Americans into “getting with the program“.

Recent articles out of The Huffington Post, The Nation, Politico, and The Chicago Tribune among others, ALL follow this particular talking point. Talking points are typically generated from a centralized source such as a government or corporate agency or think-tank and disseminated to the various news outlets. In this case, it appears the source of this particular “talking point” is current CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, Jonathan Greenblatt. Greenblatt called upon the spirit of Nazi-Jewish Persecution and the “Holocaust” in an attempt to guilt and shame the American people in his op-ed for the ADL’s own website entitled “Closing the Borders to Refugees: Wrong in the 1930s, and Wrong Today”:

…in January 1939 another poll asked whether the U.S. government should permit ‘10,000 refugee children from Germany—most of them Jewish—to be taken care of in American homes.’ An astounding and shameful 61 percent said no.

In May of 1939 the St. Louis carrying 937 German refugees—mostly Jews fleeing the Third Reich—set sail for Cuba. Most had applied for U.S. visas. Turned away from Cuba, as the St. Louis sailed so close to Florida that the passengers could see the lights from Miami, they appealed to President Roosevelt to give them safe harbor. With public opinion opposed to lifting the stringent immigration quotas or to make an exception for the ship’s passengers, the St. Louis returned to Europe. Almost a quarter of the passengers perished in the Holocaust.

Today, the world faces the largest refugee crisis since World War II. Almost 60 million people around the world have been forcibly displaced from their homes. The war in Syria, fueled by the unparalleled brutality of ISIS, is largely responsible for the spike. And once more—shamefully—there is a push for the United States to turn a blind eye to the suffering of refugees and shut our doors to those in need.”

It should be noted that Jewish American author, Robert I. Friedman highlighted in his book “Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America” that the Anti-Defamation League pressured and eventually convinced the FBI to call of investigations of individuals with known affiliation to the Jewish-Russian Mafia who also sought “refugee status” back in the 1970s, stating that doing so would be “anti-Semitic”. This is the same Anti-Defamation League that has had ties to the Jewish Mafia since the days when infamous Jewish American mobster, “Bugsy” Siegel established Las Vegas (now dominated by Jewish American billionaire Sheldon Adelson).

In this article we have mentioned the “refugee poll” where Americans voice a politically incorrect opinion. This is a meme that has been popping up all over social media these days thanks to “AJ+”, i.e. Al Jazeera for millennials. Al Jazeera being the news media organization owned by the government of Qatar– one of the oil-rich Arab Gulf States that is refusing to take refugees, while being linked to the funding of Islamic terror groups. Now we will use this refugee poll as an example showing how a meme on social media can be used to shape public opinion.

As the refugee poll begins to be spread around on social media, often initiated by the organization or individuals that originated it, it can then be amplified though the echo chamber that social media creates, making a new “meme”. This effect causes this the core message carried by the meme to become amplified; where it can then be promoted as well as enforced through a sort of peer-pressure, that social media and any other modern social institution inevitably creates. The pushers of the meme will then often shout down those who would disagree with ad-homonym attacks where the dissenter is ostracized and attacked as a racist, a Nazi, an anti-Semite, etc., etc., causing critics to be silenced out of fear of social ostracizing and embarrassment.

As an aside, it is may be worth noting that much of social media openly partners with U.S. Intelligence agencies to collect data on the general public while tracking the trends in public opinion through complex algorithms.


It is ingrained into us to desire to “fit in”. This desire is so strong that many will change what they know to be right or wrong to simply “belong”. This starts at childhood with our family and is further refined through schooling and institutionalized peer-pressure. This is how the newly uploaded behavior/thought pattern, after being implanted into the subconscious of a large group of people takes root and becomes self-enforced as a sort of new cultural dogma or belief system. This is how human beings are trained what to think and feel.

We live in a bubble inside of a bubble. If the physical world is indeed holographic in nature, than the world the majority of us who live in modern culture experience life that is even more of an illusion. For multiple generations now, our beliefs, our culture, what we believe is and is not true about every aspect of the world has been defined to us by someone else who saw it in a movie somewhere. We have major news networks owned by major Hollywood movie studios (i.e. NBC-Universal). Does anyone see something wrong with this? Perhaps it is high time that we as a culture, as well as individuals, took a look at our ideas and our beliefs, while thinking of these words by psychotherapist and motivational speaker, Dr. Eldon Taylor:

We’ve come to a point in our lives where it’s fair to ask, ‘what was the last original thought (I) had?’ The way you walk, the way you talk, the vocabulary you use; all of these things are built into the expectation you have of yourself, based on the role you have chosen to play in the ‘theater’ of life, as it has been defined to you.


Years ago I had a brief debate with a friend who parroted a claim by his professor that art could only follow culture and not the other way around. I did not agree, although I did not have the understanding to articulate as I am here. Any serious study of the psychological effects of words, music, symbols, pictures, and movements on an individual or group would soon realize that was not the case. Visual arts, musical arts, and performing arts are all “art”, and all involve influencing the psyche of the viewer in some way to be effective. Anything that can reach into your psyche has the potential to influence it if allowed.

What is happening here is that another world is being created inside the one our physical bodies laugh, cry, work and love. An artificial bubble has been placed around us and is being continually upgraded. It is a media bubble that taps into, amplifies, steers and molds our fear and weakness. It gives us ideas and beliefs that we may not have otherwise held because we allowed ourselves to be weak and susceptible. It is a world of fear and illusion manifesting through our weakness.

Those who have the focus and concentration to project their mind in a unified manner with other “like minds” are building the world they perceive: a world that sees reality as a prison, rather than a classroom. People who live in this world don’t really want money, as many naively claim; they use money. But what they really want is pleasure and then power- that is the progression of greed and most people in modern society suffer from it. Power to rule the prison they perceive.

Recently I saw a discussion on whether there was a “conspiracy” of a few, or if it was the mental cluster known as “the mass mind” that was to blame for the hiding or “occulting” of certain knowledge or information. I will say that if we look at the “human as cell” model I presented earlier, it is both. If look at the example of a virus or other seemingly negative entity somehow coming into an existence in the BODY, we can see how this might be similar to the selfish and destructive individuals credited/blamed for the “disinformation program” accepted to the general public, and the desires and beliefs they adhere to.

There have ALWAYS been groups of individuals who kept certain knowledge from those not deemed ready to fully understand it.  That was a foundation for the ancient Mystery Schools and later Secret Societies like the Rosicrucians.  This hiding occulting of knowledge can be seen as good or bad depending on motivations.

Regardless, at the end of the day, it is the general public who is in a state where the virus; whatever you want to name it; can do its work and create a sort of viral cancer, causing the human “cells” to turn on each other and destroy themselves. But it is weakness and ill-health within the individual cells as well as their cell groups that allows the virus to take hold in the first place. The symptoms of an illness are simply the body trying to purge itself and bring itself back to balance. The same could be said of the suffering and “illness” in the individual as well as the collective humanity and all its components.

In the end, a society and its leaders will be reflections of one another, archetypally though it is the King who is ultimately responsible for living in accordance with the Law, so the people and the land don’t fall into ruin.  But the question becomes in this day and age; who is playing the role of the King?  Is it really those we have chosen, or allowed to lead us?

We are now at a point in history where any sort of natural aristocracy we had in the past has fallen into decay.  Perhaps it is now time for each of us to gather the strength to pick up the sword and scepter and become the King- the Sovereign who is master of himself and unchanged by external impulses and forces.

So next time you turn on the television, or go see a movie, or log on to social media, look at the various messages that are being pushed. Why might be a motive for pushing these messages? What might they be trying to say to you? What are they trying to get you to think or want or believe? Who would benefit from getting you to buy into or believe what is being presented?

Television and media in general is constantly advertising and “marketing”. If it is not actual products, its ideas and belief systems that others wish to impose upon us. So next time you watch your favorite TV shows or log onto social media, keep your critical thinking mind active and see what the program is trying to download into your consciousness. Or better yet, turn the TV off, log off Facebook and experience reality without having someone else define it for you.

Namaste and God Bless.


“Growing up in reunified Germany, Eva Meyer remembers being overwhelmed by the Holocaust studies that were part of each school year. Meyer and her classmates were assigned to read books about the Holocaust. They heard personal stories from Holocaust survivors. They had to write essays about the Holocaust, too.

Learning so intensively about the horrors committed by Germans left her feeling shame and guilt, Meyer said. But that same education communicated something else:

‘There is Israel, and that’s the solution,’ Meyer said, describing the role that was assigned to the Jewish state in her education. ‘That’s the salvation. It makes you feel better. All the shame and guilt is not that bad, because there is Israel and everything is fine now. And whatever Israel wants — give it to them. And whatever a Jewish person wants — don’t ask, just give it. That’s what I learned about it.’”

– From the May 10th 2015 article, “German Left Haunted by the Holocaust- Split over Israel” written by Yermi Brenner and published in the “Jewish Daily Forward”


One of the primary motivations I had for starting this blog was the idea that personal alchemy and spiritual transformation went hand-in-hand with the quest for truth and the deconstruction of illusions and belief systems. This premise has led me to delve into some topics and ask some questions that may have made some folks uncomfortable and maybe even a little angry.

This will undoubtedly be the case with the topic I am going to delve into today.

What I am presenting here is the culmination of a year and a half of deep research.  For months I have debated as to the most appropriate way for me to address this issue. I suppose I could have just left it alone, but my own personal journey led me to it and if nothing else, this blog is about my own perspectives on the reality matrix we experience, my quest to understand and make sense of it, and my burning desire to deconstruct it to its bare bones.

When I was in fifth grade I was introduced to the “Holocaust”. We watched films like “The Dairy of Anne Frank” as well as various documentaries. We learned that the Nazis were the most evil mass-murderers of all time, using gas chambers as well as other horrific means of torture and mutilation to maim and kill. We looked at books that showed pictures of emaciated concentration camp victims and described horrible stories of family members being killed in front of one another.

This sort of trauma-based “education” continued at various points throughout my schooling where books like Eli Weisel’s “Night” were required reading. The conclusion I reached was that Nazis were megalomaniacal mass-murderers who sought to take over the world and create a “master race” of blonde-haired, blue-eyed “supermen”, while they exterminated six million Jews due to irrational racist hatred.

w36_50414016This programming I received pretty much ran as normal up until about a year and a half ago. As the “external” version of my search for the truth about history and our reality (which compliments my internal spiritual search) led me to information that I had never come across before. I was not searching for this information, but rather it “found me”.

Sure, I’d heard of people who supposedly didn’t believe the Holocaust happened, and were labeled “Holocaust Deniers”, like the former president of Iran, but I never really looked into what might make them believe that. I pretty much bought the line that it was simply due to blind, irrational hatred and “anti-Semitism” and took that as a subliminal cue not to investigate the matter further. I mean nobody wants to be labeled “Nazi” or a hateful “anti-Semite”, right? But the presentation of what was for me completely new historical evidence laid out in a very scholarly, rational way sparked my curiosity.

Before this time, any and all “evidence”- testimonies and the like, that I had seen or heard or read about the Holocaust were very “emotionally driven”; as in it was very obviously looking to trigger an emotional reaction rather than encourage intellectual inquiry.

So I researched scholarly works done by numerous historical “revisionists”- people who conduct deep research into historical events and find evidence that things might have happened differently than the standard, textbook account of things. Revisionists will often find historical evidence of various inconsistencies that conflict with and contradict the mainstream narrative of an event.

The conclusions I reached have been often reluctant ones that I came to over a lengthy period of inquiry.  I didn’t really WANT to believe this, but in the face of the evidence, I felt I had no choice if I was going to hold fast to the quest for Truth.

So all that being said, I figured the best way to tackle this topic is simply to present a list of 100 interesting and puzzling points and questions that came up for me when I did my own research into the narrative of the Holocaust, as well Zionism, Communism and the founding of Israel.

When reading this article, I ask that you do your best to put aside any emotions around the subject and look at these points OBJECTIVELY. More importantly, I challenge you to research any or all of these points and questions for yourselves:

1. The May 1897 edition of “The Open Court” religious magazine speaks of the revolts in Roman occupied Judea in led by Bar Cocheba “in which nearly six million Jews lost their lives”.

2. What is the significance of the “Ye shall return minus 6 million” prophecy laid out by Jewish-American Rabbi Benjamin Blech in his book “The Secrets of Hebrew Words”?

3. Why were there NUMEROUS (approx. 271) newspaper articles and various other publications that stated that “six million Jews” were in peril and/or being killed in Europe from 1900 to 1945?


4. The political movement known as Zionism was founded in Europe in the 1800s to establish a homeland for the Jews living in Europe. While various nations were offered, including territory in East Africa by the British Empire, the leaders of the movement insisted on Palestine, which at the time was occupied by the Ottoman Empire.

5. This movement included Lord Rothschild of the U.K., who was a member of the wealthiest and most influential banking family the world has ever seen. Today, the Rothschild family continues to hold trillions of dollars in assets including Rothschild Investment Trust (now RIT Capital), which as of 2008 reported $3.4 billion in assets.

6. In the late 19th century in Britain several Anglicanized Sephardi and Western Ashkenazi families, dubbed ‘the Cousinhood’dominated Anglo-Jewish society. This old elite put up stiff resistance to the mass flux of eastern European Jews that were moving en masse to Britain. Could this have provided a motivation for the elite British arm of the Zionist movement to seek to put these “lesser Jews” somewhere else?

7. What happened to the people of rich medieval kingdom of Khazaria on the Black Sea who mass-converted to Judaism and what is the factual basis of the “Times of Israel” and “Haaretz” and others stating that the majority of Ashkenazi Jews (which make up the majority of Jews) are actually a mix of Eastern European and Central Asiatic tribes? Would this therefore mean that the notion of Palestine being ancestral lands and a “birthright” are somewhat of a falsehood?

8. At the time of the establishment of Zionism, the British Empire was at the height of its power. At the political helm was master politician, Jewish Anglo Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli. The largest financial power within the British Empire and arguably the world was the Jewish Rothschild banking dynasty, who also had operations in mainland Europe in France and Germany. Meanwhile in the United States, Jewish American financiers like Schiff and Warburg were powerhouses on Wall Street and Jewish Americans like Paul Reuter and Adolph Olcs ran Reuters and the New York Times- two of the most influential media outlets in the world to this day.

9. What were the circumstances around the debt that the Ottoman Empire supposedly owed the Rothschild banking interests and how did Palestine end up being territory of the British Empire?

10. According to the American Jewish Committee, there were approximately 15,688, 259 Jews in the world in 1939.  After World War II, the New York Times cited there being approximately 18,700, 000.  How would there have been such a population spike if  a mass-genocide of 6 million Jews had indeed taken place?

11. In 1917, during the height of World War I, a letter was sent from Britain’s Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Baron Walter Rothschild. Known as “The Balfour Declaration” it publicly stated full support by the British Government for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Why would the most powerful Empire in the world and a notorious exploiter of peoples across the globe be so willing to accommodate a “disenfranchised minority”?

12. In 1937, former British Prime Minister David Lloyd George addressed the Palestine Royal Commission in regards to the Balfour Agreement: “In this critical situation it was believed that Jewish sympathy or the reverse would make a substantial difference one way or the other to the Allied cause. In particular Jewish sympathy would confirm the support of American Jewry, and would make it more difficult for Germany to reduce her military commitments and improve her economic position on the eastern front… The Zionist leaders gave us a definite promise that, if the Allies committed themselves to giving facilities for the establishment of a national home for the Jews in Palestine, they would do their best to rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the Allied cause. They kept their word.”

13. If Jews throughout the world were truly a voiceless and persecuted minority, why was the most powerful Empire in the world courting their influence to help them win a war against their most powerful economic competition in Germany?

14. In America, the man in charge of wartime propaganda was Jewish American Edward Bernays.  Known as the “Father of Propaganda”, Bernays created PR and marketing as we know it, and worked for some of the biggest industries around to market their products.

15. In February of 1920, future British Prime Minister Winston Churchill wrote an article for the London Sunday Herald entitled “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”. I highly suggest folks read this if they are not already familiar with it.

16. The Communist Bolshevik Revolution that brutally overtook Russia were led my and Jewish-Russians Leib Bronstein, aka. Leon Trotsky and Julius Cedarbaum, aka. Julius Martov. Vladimir Lenin was also a quarter Jewish. The intellectual founder of Communism, Karl Marx, was a Jewish German. To this day, many people revere these men as heroes. Financial interests out of London and New York reportedly provided funding for these men and their revolution.

image17. After the brutal murders of Czar Nicholas II and his wife and children, the Bolsheviks carried out what was known as the “Red Terror”- a period marked by mass arrests in the middle of the night, executions, and brutally bizarre methods of torture. These atrocities were carried out by the Jewish Russian-run “Cheka”, i.e., secret police and resulted in the murder of as many as 100,000 Russians.

18. Jewish South African Lawrence Joffe notes in “Complete Illustrated History of the Jewish People”: “Jews were enthusiastic unionists in the early 20th century… A large number were anarchists or Communists…

19. When U.S. Ambassador to Russia, David Francis, visited in January 1918, he noted: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide social revolution.

20. In 1918 Jewish-German Communists Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht founded the “Spartacus League”, which later became the Communist Party of Germany. Aided by Jewish-Hungarian leader Bela Kun, the group attempted to take advantage of post-war chaos and stage a coup in Berlin. Fearing the same fate as the Czar, Kaiser Wilhelm fled to Holland. While a group of WWI veterans known as the Freikorps reclaim control, the Communists continually attempted to seize power.

21. The primary force that decorated WWI veteran Adolf Hitler feared as a threat to Germany and Europe as a whole was Communism. The major leaders of the movement throughout Europe were Jewish.  Likewise, this very real fear of Communism was the driving force behind the various “anti-Semitic” Nationalist movements that swept across Europe prior to World War II.

22. The death toll under Communist regimes in the 20th century was 94 million people. This is a good 14-15 times the amount of deaths attributed to National Socialist Germany by mainline historians. So why is it is trendy and fashionable to wear and display Communist symbols and propaganda, use Communist slogans and why is it acceptable to openly identify as Communist, when even displaying the Swastika, an ancient Indo-European spiritual symbol is seen as evil and to even agree with any of the tenets or philosophies of National Socialism is seen as unforgivably monstrous?

23. The only record of Hitler stating he wanted to “take over the world” is taken from a book entitled , “Conversations with Hitler”, printed as “The Voice of Destruction” in the U.S. in 1940, was later presented as evidence at Nuremberg. However, Swiss historian Wolfgang Haenel spent five years diligently investigating the memoir before announcing his findings in 1983. Haenel was able to conclusively establish that the author’s claim to have met with Hitler “more than a hundred times” is a lie.  The words attributed to Hitler, he showed, were simply invented or lifted from many different sources. Haenel also found evidence that a prominent British journalist named Henry Wickham-Steele, who was known to be a right-hand man of Sir Robert Vansittart, perhaps the most vehemently anti-German figure in Britain, helped to produce the memoir.  In addition, one of Germany’s most influential periodicals, “Der Speigel” concluded in an article published in 1985 that Rauschning’s Conversations with Hitler “are a falsification, an historical distortion from the first to the last page ”  Meanwhile, Communist International or “Comintern” that was run out of Russia during that time openly stated they wanted to establish a worldwide Communist regime in numerous documents and no one knows about it.

24. If the Nazis were a brutal racist regime, why were there volunteers from Africa, the Middle East and India fighting on behalf of the Germans against the Communists and the British Empire?

25. Who has heard about the Anti-Comintern Pact between Japan and Germany? Who is aware that interests within the United States funded Mao and the Communist takeover of China and Southeast Asia?

26. Joseph Stalin, or “Uncle Joe” as FDR referred to him, was one of the most brutal dictators of the 20th century, yet he was an ally of the United States. Why did this change after the war and what if any role did the purge of the likes of Trotsky and other Jewish revolutionaries from power during the war years and taking a more nationalistic stance play in the relationship turning sour?

27. In March of 1933, shortly after the election of Adolf Hitler, there was a call by the international Jewish community to organize a worldwide boycott on German goods. There was even a rally of 40,000 that assembled in Madison Square Garden.

28. In the 1939 book “A Program for the Jews and an Answer to all Anti-Semites; A Program for Humanity” Marxist Jewish Author Harry Waton stated that “Jews are far more numerous and infinitely more powerful than the fascists are. Not that the Jews fear the fascists or have reasons to fear them, but the fascists fear the Jews, and have good reason to fear them.” In the book he also stated “Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth . . . The Jews will become the masters over the whole earth and they will subordinate to themselves all nations.

29. In 1941, Jewish American author Theodore Kaufman wrote a book that was praised in the New York Times entitled “Germany Must Perish!” which essentially called for genocide of the German people. This was a good 3 years before there was public knowledge of any “Holocaust”.

30. If Hitler and the Nazis wanted to “kill all the Jews” why was their documented policy always emigration? First with the “Transfer Agreement” to Palestine, where German Jews were set up with financial transfers and land to immigrate to Palestine, then afterwards with the plan in which the German government pleaded with the international community to allow a Jewish colony under strict supervision in Madagascar, and then finally the plan to evacuate Jews out of Europe into the Ural Mountains in Russia as was found when the British broke the German “Enigma” code.

31. Why did the British put a stop to Jews immigrating to Palestine from Germany and turn them back at gunpoint?

32. Why did a German Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937 state that: “In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world“? Given the issues with Israel and its neighbors since its founding, could this be considered an accurate assessment?  Why was Germany not the only nation that thought letting Palestine be an independent Jewish-controlled state as opposed to being under the auspices of the British, etc. was a bad idea for peace in the region and the world?

33. Forensic science shows that bodies that have been killed by poison gas turn a bright reddish color, however no photos of supposed victims of Nazi gas chambers displays this feature. Why in the over 1,000 autopsies performed on camp prisoners was there no evidence of death by poison gas found?

34. Why did the Jewish Zionists approve of the Nuremberg anti-race mixing laws?

35. The NSDAP (Nazi) government is renowned for being notoriously meticulous with paperwork and documenting EVERYTHING. So why is there no documented order from Hitler or any sort of central command to exterminate Jews via gas chambers? Why is all “proof” of such a thing taken from secondary sources?

36. Why is the only “documented evidence” of the gas extermination story that can be found from the war years in the form of propaganda leaflets dropped from the air by the Allies?

37. Official records from the time show that there were 4.5 million Jews in Nazi-controlled territory. Since the war, 4.3 million Jews have lodged claims for compensation as “Holocaust victims”. 6 million Jews supposedly were killed… Something doesn’t add up here…

38. Official German documentation actually reveals a total of 201,812 deaths in the camps- does that not sound like a more realistic statistic than “6 million”.


39. Why did the placard outside Auschwitz “mourn 4 million murdered” in 1948, only to drop to 1 million decades later?

40. “The Diary of Anne Frank” is arguably the most famous “Holocaust” story out there. However, few realize that Anne Frank did not die in “the gas chamber”, she died of Typhus.


41. Why did Anne Frank’s father admit to transcribing parts of the diary?

42. Why does virtually no one know of or discuss the epidemic of Typhus that ran rampant throughout the camps during the last months of the war- the same time when the supposed “Final Solution” was implemented?  Likewise, why is no one told that the primary cause of this as well as the starvation was the Allied bombing of supply lines going to the camps?

43. Why did General Patton cite how 800 prisoners at Buchenwald were inoculated with a typhus vaccine?  Why would you vaccinate people you are planning on killing in a gas chamber?

44. One of the major sources for imagery of the piles of emaciated bodies was Bergen-Belsen camp- which was one of the camps that was hit hardest by the Typhus epidemic.

45. Typhus is a disease that causes massive dehydration and diarrhea, and turns the victim into an emaciated skeleton. This disease is typically carried by lice, and a pesticide called Zyklon B was used to de-louse clothing to prevent spread in the camps. Zyklon B was later claimed to have been used to “gas Jews”.

46. Lizzie Van Zyl (picture below right) was a victim of typhus and died in the British concentration camps that were set up during the South African Boer War. Folks might recognize her (I know I did) as her image has been used in numerous history books and “documentaries” about the WWII Holocaust, claiming she was a victim of Nazi concentration camps.

LizzieVanZyl47. Why do the original German architect plans of Auschwitz show no gas chambers?

48. Why did forensic chemical examination of Auschwitz disprove use of Zyklon B in “ruined gas chambers”?

49. Why did the Auschwitz Camp Museum admit that the “gas chamber” it shows to millions of tourists every year is a fake?

50. Why did Israeli and Polish university archaeological digs at the Belzec and Sobibor camps fail to find any evidence of “gas chambers”?

51. Why are the “carbon monoxide” gas bottles on display at Majdanek camp labelled as carbon dioxide?

52. Why do the “gas chambers” at Majdanek have glass windows, baths and real working showers?

53. Why are none of the “gas chambers” hermetically sealed in a manner that would actually keep gas from escaping and killing the people who stood outside?

54. Why has the story surrounding the method of “gassing” changed multiple times?

55. Why did the Smithsonian say a terra-cotta tile imprinted with the logo of Polish terra-cotta manufacturer Dziewulski i Lange was a “Star of David” and state it was evidence of the existence of a Jewish gas chamber at the televised Treblinka archaeological dig in 2013?  And why does that program continue to air after its “evidence” for Treblinka being a “death camp” has been publicly discredited in the mainstream?

56. Why would a German government who needed to use prison labor to support the war effort, was suffering immense casualties and going broke fighting a war on either side of them go through the cost and expense of setting up such an elaborate operation to exterminate Jews when it would have been infinitely easier and far more cost effective to just shoot them?

57. Why did U.S. General Patton state after the war that the U.S. had “fought on the wrong side”? Why was he killed shortly thereafter?

58. Why did French anti-Nazi resistance fighter Paul Rassinier, who was imprisoned at Buchenwald “death camp” from 1943 to 1945 state that the main atrocities that occurred at the camp were perpetrated by Communist prisoners rather than the S.S. Officers? Why did he state that the gas chambers were “vague rumors”? And why are his accounts not widely published like other, more sensational tales?

59. Camp directives required that the SS keep a “safe distance” between themselves and the inmates, for security and health reasons. The actual day-to-day administration of the camps was left to the tender mercies of the so-called “Kapos,” who were charged by the SS with keeping “order” among the inmates.

60. Why was the reputation of Nazi soldiers among civilians far better than those of the Allied forces?

61. Among the accusations projected towards the Nazis was intentionally starving prisoners to death in the camps. However, it was the Allied forces that carpet-bombed German cities and the railways that took food and provisions to the camps, causing the epidemic levels of disease and starvation that took place in the camps at the end of the war.

62. Why did Heinrich Himmler, chief commandant of all detention facilities, issued an order stating “The death rate in the camps must be reduced at all costs” on December 8th, 1942?  Why are there multiple documented letters and telegraphs from concentration camp heads begging for medical supplies and provisions for inmates to the point of getting aid from the Red Cross if the goal was to exterminate them? Meanwhile no such aid was permitted for the millions who died in the Soviet Gulags, and the Red Cross was not allowed in.

63. Why did the Red Cross state on pages 73 and 74 in Vol. 111 of its report on the camps that “Civilians deported (to the camps) on administrative grounds, who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.“?

red cross auschwitz
64. Why do the official record of the Nuremberg Trials state that the camps had such things going on as Jews being fed to eagles and bears in cages, Jews being made into sausages, pedal-driven brain-bashing machines, Jews being made into lampshades, mass-electrocution extermination rooms, people being dumped into burning pits, and other wild tales of cartoonish violence (which later made their way into best-selling “historical” novels)?  And why are so many of the”German atrocity” stories (gassing, soap, lampshades, babies on bayonets, etc.) identical to the ones admittedly fabricated by the British War Propaganda Bureau back in WWI?

65. The first reports of the Holocaust came from newspapers out of the Soviet Union. Anyone familiar with the Soviet regime knows that their “journalism” was little more than government propaganda and contained little by way of objective facts.  Are we to believe that this was somehow different?

66. The stories of “Angel of Death” Dr. Mengele and his murderous medical experiments relied primarily on the testimony of one man, Miklos Nyiszli. There was actual no documentation that Dr. Mengele or anyone in his charge murdered anyone.

67. Miklos Nyiszli also originated the notion that 3 bodies could be fully cremated to ash in 20 minutes in one muffle of a cremation oven. Any mortician who has cremated a body will tell you that it takes more than 20 minutes for the water to fully evaporate from a full grown human body. The real capacity of such installations, as declared by Topf engineer Kurt Prüfer, who designed the furnaces, and Karl Schultze, who designed the blowers, was one single body per muffle per hour.

68. Why is it still taken as fact among many that the Nazis “made soap out of Jews” when even the Israel Holocaust Museum says it’s a myth?

69. Why has the story of the Holocaust repeatedly failed to stand up to forensic testing of the various concentration camp sites?

70. All German men of fighting age were fighting the war, so the manufacturing for the war effort was coming primarily from the camps. Why would the Nazis want to exterminate their labor force?

71. Why has the number of German concentration camps reported to be “death camps” shrank in number multiple times since the end of the war and why were the camps labelled as “death camps” primarily relegated to the ones that existed behind the “Iron Curtain” beyond the scope western investigation in the postwar years until the early 1990s?  Doesn’t basic criminology attest to a lie or a cover-up when a story continuously changes?

72. Why do the post-war memoirs of Dwight Eisenhower, Winston Churchill, and Charles DeGaulle mention nothing of a systematic genocide of Jews?

73. Why were German P.OW.s admittedly forced to alter a shower room at Sachenhausen camp to make it look like a gas chamber and why was this same construct demolished by the Soviets in 1952?

74. Why were the majority of Jews who did get imprisoned in the concentration camps from families and sects who opposed Zionism?

israel-zionism-protested-by-jews75. Why was Judge Wilhelm Staeglich forced to resign from his job, stripped of his doctoral degree, and have his book banned in 1973 after publishing testimony of his experience of the camps?

76. Why is it a crime punishable by fines and/or imprisonment in many European countries (particularly those around Germany that would potentially understand German) to speak out against or even question any aspect the official narrative of the Holocaust?  Why was German citizen Ernst Zundel extradited from Canada and imprisoned in Germany on a 12-year sentence for writing and speaking on the Holocaust?  Why is there no other historical period or event that is subject to these kinds of laws?  Why would truth need to be protected in such a manner?

77. Who is aware that the infamous pile of dead bodies at Bergen-Belsen was actually made by Allied soldiers to dispose of them?  In fact, The infamous video of piles of dead bodies being bulldozed into a mass grave was taken by Allied cameraman, and the driver of the bulldozer was in fact a British soldier.

78. Why was the lawyer of a Holocaust revisionist sent to prison for “defending her client too vigorously”?

79. Is it not interesting that it was the Holocaust story that finally garnered the appropriate sentiments from the international community for the U.N. to approve a sovereign Jewish state in Israel, which a decade earlier had been vehemently opposed?

80. Why does Israel continue to collect what now has accumulated to hundreds of billions of dollars in “reparations” from the German government via the taxpayer, most of whom are now too young to have had anything to do with the Nazi regime?

81. Why didn’t the U.S. go to war with Israel when Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy motor torpedo boats attacked the Navy technical research ship, the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967?

82. Why is there so much hysteria around Iran having nuclear capability when it was only recently de-classified that Israel itself had nukes that it obtained through illegal backroom deals with elements in the U.S. government? Has Israel not shown itself to be a hostile nation in its own right?

83. Why does the United States, via the taxpayers, continue to give aid and weapons to Israel, and why do politicians in D.C. continue to drum on this notion of a “special relationship” and the idea that “Israel’s welfare is our welfare”?

84. Is there a factual basis for “The Zionist Plan for Greater Israel” and if so, what role does that potentially play in U.S. foreign policy?

85. Why does Israel have its own lobbying group (AIPAC) in D.C.? Why is AIPAC one of the most powerful lobbying groups in the country?

86. Why are the conditions Israel has imposed on Palestine and the aggression taken toward the Palestinians not considered genocidal?  Why isn’t the charge of anti-Semitism used when describing Israel’s actions towards Palestinians, who are also Semitic peoples?

87. Why are calls to “Boycott and Sanction” Israel referred to by the mainstream media as “anti-Semitic”?

88. Why are Israeli children indoctrinated with the idea that any day there will be another “Holocaust”?

89. Why did the President of the World Jewish Congress state that every single European country, along with the United States, were complicit in the alleged Holocaust?

90. Why did the World Jewish Congress accumulate roughly $7 billion in Holocaust Compensation money? Isn’t that supposed to go to actual Holocaust victims?

91. Why would Israeli diplomat Adi Farjon say Israel had no interest in full normalization of relations with Germany and that maintaining German guilt about the Holocaust helps Israel?


92. Why was Israeli jazz-musician Gilad Atzmon banned from Israel for publicly questioning the Holocaust and criticizing “Jewish power”?

93. The Nuremberg Trials presented testimony from German P.O.W.s that were extracted under “interrogation”, which were used as evidence of the Holocaust and other “war crimes”. However Judge Edward L. Van Roden was part of a commission by the U.S. Army to investigate misconduct and later wrote in his book, “American Atrocities in Germany” that out of 139 cases of treatment of alleged German “war criminals” who were investigated by the commission—and who were subsequently put on trial by the American Military Tribunal in Dachau after World War II—“137 of these Germans were tortured by having their testicles crushed.”

94. Other interrogation methods included brutal beatings, placing a hood over prisoners and punching them in the face with brass knuckles, breaking their jaws, knocking out their teeth, putting them on starvation rations, and subjecting them to solitary confinement. The prisoners were then presented with prepared statements to sign. Isn’t the reason why torture is not considered a truly effective interrogation method due to the fact that it will compel the person being tortured to confess to whatever the torturer wants them to- even if it’s not true?

95. The vast majority of the “evidence” presented to confirm the “reality” of the crimes of the Holocaust has been from eyewitness testimony. Anyone with any background in criminal justice will tell you that eyewitness testimony is the least reliable form of evidence, and any serious charges relying solely on eyewitness testimony rarely stick.  So why is it taken for gospel in regards to the Holocaust story?

01 Jan 1946, Nuremberg, Germany --- The defendants at the Nuremberg Nazi trials. Pictured in the front row are: Hermann Goering, Rudolf Hess, Joachim Von Ribbentrop, Wilhelm Keitel and Ernst Kaltenbrunner. In the back row are: Karl Doenitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, and Fritz Sauckel. --- Image by © Bettmann/CORBIS

96. Why did the Jewish American Anti-Defamation League pressure and eventually persuade the FBI to call off investigations of “Soviet refugees” with ties to the Russian-Jewish mafia, stating that doing so would “foster anti-Semitism” (as highlighted in the book “Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America” by Jewish American author, Robert I. Friedman)?

97. The majority of German officers claimed no knowledge of the camps at the Nuremberg Trials with the exception of Rudolf Höss, the former Commandant of Auschwitz, who signed a document stating that he had overseen the slaughter of two and a half million Jews. Höss remarked, “Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could just as well have said it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.” Decades later, an account was published of how Höss had been tortured for three days and nights without sleep by a British army team in order to extract that statement. In a letter to his wife, Höss apologized for his ‘confessions’ and explains that they had been extracted from him under torture

98. On Sept. 25, 1945, Thomas Dodd, who was the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg, stated “You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge, you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish.” How could any sort of fair and impartial verdict be reached here?

99. One of the major points used for propagating the idea that Nazis were evil is the notion that they believed they were a sort of “Master Race” who saw Jews and anyone who was “not pure Aryan” as lesser. Is it not interesting that esteemed Jewish Community leaders like Rabbi Mendel Schneerson have stated “The body of a Jewish person, is of a totally different quality from the body of members of all other nations of the world. Bodies of the Gentiles are in vain. An even greater difference is in regard to the soul…A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.” Likewise, Jewish activist and “Holocaust survivor” Eli Wiesel stated, “Everything about us is different; Jews are ontologically exceptional.” Wouldn’t these be considered statements of racial supremacy as well?

100. During World War II, Jewish American Hollywood film directors like Frank Capra worked for the U.S. government and were integral in shaping public perception of the war, including what was seen of the concentration camps. Now the Holocaust “brand” in film and books is a multi-billion dollar industry. A film about the Holocaust is a shoe-in for an Oscar. No other historical period or event gets this sort of PR.


There are many, many more points and questions that can be and have been posed surrounding this whole situation, but I’m hoping that if folks have made it this far they will take away this one point if nothing else- the case is FAR from being closed when it comes to the events surrounding this period in history.

There have been volumes written on the subject of Holocaust as well as World War II revisionism. The meticulous work of people like Dr. Nick Koellerstrom, Jurgen Graf, Eric Hunt, Peter Winter and many others paint quite a different picture of what happened at the camps. Meanwhile the work of authors like Richard Tedor and Veronica Clark provide a different perspective of what was going on in NSDAP Germany as a whole.

Adolf Hitler addressing Nazi rally

I am not a worshiper of Adolf Hitler or National Socialism. I don’t worship politicians, regardless of how intriguing some of their ideas and rhetoric may be. I do not agree with statism and many of the tactics used by the National Socialists. I am vehemently opposed to totalitarianism and police state tactics. I am opposed to locking up political dissidents in internment camps. Likewise, I find it appalling to incarcerate innocent men, women and children who have not committed a crime because they are seen as potential enemy combatants by the government.  However we should remember that this was done in the United States as well.

I am opposed to any sort of medical testing done through deception, manipulation or coercion. Again though, this is something that the U.S. government has been guilty of on numerous occasions throughout the last 70 years. Neither am I a fan of things like coerced sterilization or many of the other components associated with state-sponsored Eugenics that was a part of NSDAP Germany. But again, we would do well to have appropriate historical context and know that these ideas and practices originated in the Anglo-American world, not Nazi Germany.

It is also worth noting that the racial supremacy ideas that have long been associated with Nazi Germany are caricatured and often understood by the general public through the rhetoric of modern day Neo-Nazi Skinhead groups (many of whom have been federally infiltrated and are headed by federal operatives, i.e. Hal Turner).  These caricatures seen in movies like “American History X“, play into the deluded and at times dangerous and violent ideologies of “antifascist” skinheads.

Image result for antifa the only good nazi

I realize that much of the evidence I have presented here starkly contradicts what is now seen as “common knowledge”. Let’s be honest though, the vast majority of the “knowledge” most have around this subject came from a film or a television screen.

As I have gone into detail in past articles, the presentations on the screen are generally designed to first and foremost appeal to emotions and subconscious desires, bypassing the logical centers of the brain. When we watch a film like “Schindler’s List” or listen to the “testimonies” of Holocaust survivors from Hollywood documentaries, logic, intellect and rationality are completely neutralized by the strong emotional response elicited.

This is the desired result, and if our desire is having an informed society, this method of “being informed” is EXTREMELY dangerous and leaves people open to manipulation. Hollywood should NOT be teaching us about history. A look at some of the  archived footage of some of Spielberg’s Shoah Foundation survivor interviews may show why.

It should also be clear to anyone remotely familiar with the history of Hollywood and the long-standing relationship between the U.S. Federal Intelligence and Hollywood dating back to before World War II that a movie disputing the narrative of murderous genocidal Nazis and the Holocaust will NEVER be made.

One should also note that it was Jewish immigrants that founded the major Hollywood film studios in the early part of the 20th century. This isn’t “anti-Semitism”; this is historical fact, as is the fact that the eight major Hollywood studios are run by Jewish execs today. However, agencies like the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center state that making such observations is “dangerous”. But that still didn’t stop Jewish American author and journalist Joel Stein from stating the following in his 2008 article in the L.A. Times entitled, Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon:

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews… As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between ‘The 700 Club’ and ‘Davey and Goliath’ on TV all day.

I think the word we’re looking for here is “chutzpah”. Stein closed out the article in similar fashion, which is worth repeating just because:

“I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”

Do with that last quote what you will, but the point is here that the narrative presented out of Hollywood is going to be one-sided. There is also the matter that the Holocaust has become a “new religion” among an increasingly secularized international Jewish community. A Pew Research Center poll found that a whopping 73% of Jews polled (a solid majority) believed that “Remembering the Holocaust” was what was “Essential to Being Jewish”- not observing Jewish law, not being part of a Jewish community, not leading an ethical/moral life, not even caring about Israel.

The Holocaust has been used to unite Jews of varying levels of faith (or lack thereof) across the world. Various Rabbis and other Jewish leaders have voiced criticism and concern over this, as well as the Holocaust being used to “evoke fear and paranoia” as was the concern of Jewish American actress, Natalie Portman.

Sadly, the Jewish community the world over is indoctrinated in the fear that another Holocaust WILL happen if they let their guard down.

I think it is unfortunate that there is such a wall around this subject and that the list I just compiled will probably get me labelled a “white supremacist anti-Semite who wants to kill Jews” among some people. If I were in Germany, I would get fined or imprisoned for doing this. I don’t hate Jews. I have friends that are Jewish if not religiously, ethnically and they are wonderful, warm and loving people. I have dated and loved two Jewish women in my life.

But seventy-plus years of a lie is long enough- especially when that lie has been nothing but toxic.

We have witch hunts taking place to imprison the elderly like 94-year-old former SS accountant Oskar Groening for accessory to what is now 300,000 “murders” (a significant drop from 1.5 million) at Auschwitz. This case has been praised for being the first case of “someone not physically involved in murder to be convicted.” Does anyone else see something wrong with this? Where were the convictions for the Atomic Bomb or the innumerable atrocities that were perpetrated by the Red Army?

Defendant Oskar Groening arrives for his trial in Luneburg April 21, 2015. A 93-year-old former bookkeeper at Auschwitz goes on trial in Germany on Tuesday, accused by prosecutors of being an accessory in the murder of 300,000 people, even though he was not involved in any actual killing at the notorious Nazi death camp. The trial of Groening, who was 21 and by his own admission an enthusiastic Nazi when he was sent to Auschwitz in 1942, may turn out to be one of the last big Holocaust trials because so few Nazis suspected of committing crimes during World War Two are still alive. REUTERS/Fabian Bimmer

As evidenced by the quote from the beginning of the article, the German people have been completely demoralized and straddled with an inhuman amount of guilt, while they are literally extorted for cash. This cash is then pocketed by large organizations and a nation that commits genocidal acts on its neighbors while screaming persecution when they fight back.

Meanwhile the Israeli population is brainwashed into believing they are the perpetual victims and the world is out to get them. This is insanity. This is a just cause for moral outrage. But to speak out against this is to be an “anti-Semite” and in the world of political correctness that is as bad, if not worse than being labelled a “racist”.

DenialWhen one questions the Holocaust narrative, they are called “deniers”, which is a modern-day facsimile of a “heretic”. These deniers are attacked on a personal level, and their very moral character is called into question. They are often called “heartless”, and other like terms. To those who may respond in such a manner I say this:

There is a time to lead with your heart and there is a time to lead with your head. While empathy and compassion and letting our heart guide us is good for a lot of things, analyzing and discerning the nature of historical events is NOT one of them. I am not saying we should not feel emotion or empathy for the suffering that took place, but I am saying that we would do well to keep our emotions on a leash if we want to see things clearly.

At the end of the day, why would we want to hold onto a belief in such a horrific story if it there were so much factual evidence disputing it? Why are Holocaust movies and books so popular? Is it really about “honoring the dead”, or is it something closer related to the cultural fascination with serial killers and horror/torture movies? And if so, what does it say about our collective psyche when our strongest attachments are around death and suffering?

One question I would implore anyone to ask when looking into the Holocaust is “who has the most to gain and who has the most to lose?” What does a man like Dr. Nick Koellerstrom have to gain from publishing a book that cost him his tenure? What does anyone who speaks out against this narrative have to gain? Ridicule, ostracization, fines, imprisonment?

Meanwhile, what do they have to lose?  In many cases, everything.

Conversely, what do the various governments and international power players involved in maintaining this narrative have to gain by perpetuating it?

The world as we know it and the structures that have control over it are the result of the victory of Globalism and its proponents during World War II.   The narrative around the demonization of Hitler and “the Good War” is what was used to convince the public to go along with everything that was set up as a result.

Likewise, the Holocaust is the cornerstone of the foundation of the Zionist State of Israel- and the power that the leaders of that nation and their associates hold. If the Holocaust narrative falls, theoretically the whole thing falls apart. It also means that Iran was right– and we DEFINITELY can’t have that…

The justification for the “speech laws” around the Holocaust in Europe is that stating these kinds of things will incite violence against Jews. However, this has already been happening to the point where the Israeli government is calling for the Jews of Europe to exodus to Israel. The violence against Jews of less than “elite” class and status has been blamed on rhetoric from groups like the Golden Dawn in Greece who blame Jewish bankers from banking institutions with Jewish names like “Goldman-Sachs” for their role in tanking Greece’s economy and selling off their natural resources for pennies-on-the-dollar.

Europe antisemitismThe sad truth is that vast majority of the Western European population where these attacks have been so domesticated and broken by the culture of political correctness that has a stranglehold on Europe that they are just not a threat to the Jews or anyone else. This is a people who are singing songs while they allow themselves to be kicked out of their homes to make way for anyone who claims to be a Syrian refugee- even if they’re obviously from Africa…

No, native Europeans are not presenting a physical threat to the Jewish population. In fact a study put out by the Institute for the Study of Global Anti-Semitism and Policy shows that the actual physical violence perpetrated on European Jews in the last 15 years is being committed by Muslims living in Europe to a “disproportionate” extent. However, much like the gang rapes of Swedish women, the media WILL NOT report that as this is seen as “racist”, and would prefer to demonize right-wing nationalist groups and people doing the “Quenelle”.

However when you have high profile shootings at bat mitzvahs by men with names like Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein, you can’t help but pause for a moment.

But, according to Israeli-American actress and the founder of the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, Barbara Lerner Specter, this “resurgence” of anti-Semitism is a side effect of Europe’s multicultural “transformation”:

“I think there’s a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multi-cultural and I think we’re going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which MUST take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic… societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multi-cultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”

Now we have a surge of young, fighting-age men flooding into Europe, while Europe’s Jews are being told throughout the media that Europe is no longer safe for them and they need to come to Israel. But I thought Netanyahu built a wall said they couldn’t take refugees because Israel was “too small” of a country?  But then again, I also heard some land might be opening up in neighboring Syria…

Meanwhile, anti-Globalist nationalists like Vladimir Putin are demonized and likened to Adolf Hitler, while intelligence agencies and men like Jewish Hungarian billionaire George Soros admittedly fund a destabilizing civil war on the doorstep of Russia. I’m not “lionizing” Putin, as he has instilled incredibly draconian anti-Holocaust denial laws.  But Putin IS promoting national sovereignty and rejecting the sort of “self-loathing” view of history that has plagued the West.

The story of the Holocaust has been used as a weapon.  It is a weapon that has caused ANYONE of European descent, German or otherwise, to be terrified of asserting anything close to ethnic, racial or nationalistic self-interest.  And to do so means you are, by approximation, “one of them”; you are aligned with the most wicked, evil, satanic force that ever existed on the face of the earth.

And because you have committed such thought crimes, you are an “unperson” who deserves to socially ostracized; who deserves to have your ability to provide for yourself and your family stripped away; who deserves to be beaten and physically attacked in the street- even if all you want to do is preserve your culture and heritage and maintain a society where your children can be safe, thrive, and be free from having self-hating ideologies imposed upon them; things desired by every self-respecting group or nation of people on Earth.

NO!  YOU CAN NOT DO THAT!  And if you do, ANYTHING negative that can (and should) be done to you is COMPLETELY JUSTIFIED because your thoughts WILL lead to concentration camps and genocide because, according to the television and government school “educated” masses: “We’ve seen this before

Even if you just want to know the truth.

This is not history, this is emotional propaganda.

Personally, I am choosing to rise above all this nonsense and view it as just another belief system to be discarded- because that’s what it is.  The Holocaust is simply yet another pseudo-religion of modernity that will eventually rot and decay; another fairy tale that will no longer be believed in once western society finally decides to grow up.

I invite you to do the same.

Because if they have no “Shoah“, their hysteria becomes just that and nothing more..

WRA-ALDA’S Blessings unto you.


Breaking the Spell: The Holocaust, Myth & Reality by Dr. Nick Koellerstrom

The Six Million: Fact Or Fiction by Peter Winter

The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering by Norman Finkelstein

National Socialist Concentration Camps: Legend and Reality by Jurgen Graf

Inconvenient History

Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust

Institute For Historical Review


Spielberg’s Hoax – The Last Days of The Big Lie




“Tao gave birth to One, One gave birth to Two, Two gave birth to Three; Three gave birth to all the myriad things.

All the myriad things carry the Yin on their backs and hold the Yang in their embrace, deriving their vital harmony from the proper blending of the two vital Breaths.”

– Lao Tzu; “Tao Teh Ching”

The topic of race and “racism” is one that seems to saturate every area of dialogue in modern society. From press, to academia, to politics and even the workplace, the conversation around race has become increasingly pervasive as well as divisive. Charleston, Baltimore, Ferguson, White Privilege, the “Knockout Game”, Political Correctness, Affirmative Action, and Immigration Reform- these things permeate the (Western) Mass Mind to such a degree that we are undoubtedly far more sensitive about race now than we ever have been. But is this manufactured hypersensitivity necessarily a “good thing”?


As I stated before, the conversation around race has become increasingly DIVISIVE, and this has led to some foreseeable results. First, the general narrative presented to the “non-white” races, (specifically those living in western countries and those wishing to immigrate to them) is that the white man has continuously oppressed and taken from them and now it is their “right” to take from the white man what they are “owed”, be it through legislation or immigration or other means.

This narrative causes a reactionary feeling of resentment and entitlement towards white people, which has played out in often-violent means. One needs only to look at the not well-publicized but unquestionably racially motivated violence in modern-day South Africa to see the results of racial resentment, institutionalized entitlement and promotion of victimhood.


The narrative given to white people is similar, stating that white people are responsible for all of the evils of the world, past and present, as well as stating that now they need to pay “reparations” in various forms to “repent” for their “White Privilege”. This view has saturated academia and pop-culture to such an extent that it has created a self-loathing and insecurity amongst the millennial and younger generations. The new documentary being released by MTV entitled “White People” showcases and perpetuates this idea of white privilege and guilt. As one interviewee in the documentary, a 23-year old young woman named Samantha states:

“We’ve never had to internalize what white people have done in here in America, but here, you can’t escape that.”


Internalizing guilt has never been healthy, and being forced to do so usually causes one of two reactions- either a hysterically apologetic form of self-loathing as demonstrated by the crying millennials in “White People”, or anger and rage at having guilt thrust upon you that you feel isn’t yours to own. There has been a backlash amongst many over the “White Privilege/White Guilt” narrative that has become so dominant in the West. Dylan Roof can be seen as the extreme of how far that can go, if you believe the “official story” regarding the Charleston Shooting, which the jury’s still out for me.

However there is a less “extreme” form of organic backlash coming out of various alternative media and political movements spearheaded by “white people”. And while much of this has been productive for creating a more open dialogue, there is still at times a very vehement resentment towards people of the “black and brown” races that comes through.


The dominant dialogue coming out of mainstream is that white people stole everything, and are undeserving of the status they have held in civilization. The reactionary dialogue is that white people built everything of substance and that the other races essentially reaped the benefits of “white civilization” and didn’t really contribute anything of merit on their own. Both arguments are flawed and one-sided from my perspective. Both preach entitlement. Both preach resentment. So now let’s look at this from an esoteric perspective. What’s REALLY going on here?

bd503c6dfac04842b3476848a2d13f66The Civil Rights, Feminist, Sexual Liberation and Environmental movements that spearheaded in the 1960s and became institutionalized in the 1990s can be seen as various aspects of one overarching, mega-event: the resurgence of the Divine Feminine into the forefront of human consciousness and civilization. This is a primal and primordial archetype that exists beyond the realm of perceived “good” and “evil”. That being said, this primordial force is one that can be directed and utilized by those who understand Her workings. This means that HOW the Divine Feminine manifests can be steered by steering human consciousness on an individual and collective scale.

So what exactly does racial conflict have to do with the awakening of the Divine Feminine? In order to explain this I am going to summon another primordial archetype- that of the Taoist diagram of the T’ai Chi T’u (Supreme Ultimate), aka. The Yin and Yang symbol. The neo-Confucian philosopher, Chou Tun-I explained this symbol in his treatise T’ai chi t’u shuo (The Diagram of the Supreme Ultimate Explained):

“The Supreme Ultimate through movement produces the yang. This movement, having reached its limit, is followed by quiescence, and by this quiescence it produces the yin. When quiescence has reached its limit, there is a return to movement. Thus movement and quiescence, in alternation, become each the source of the other. The distinction between the yin and yang is determined, and their two forms stand revealed.”


Movement and stillness. Active and receptive. Positive and negative. Heaven and Earth. Sun and Moon. Conscious and Subconscious. Male and female. Light and dark. These principles are present and reflected throughout all levels of creation including the races of men. I will again remind folks of the Hermetic axiom; “As above, so below; as below, so above.”

I have stated in previous writings that men and women are manifestations of the male and female aspects of the Divine Consciousness. I am going to build on this by postulating that this is also true for the different races, which I am going to group into two categories- the light-skinned or “Yang races” and the dark-skinned or “Yin races”. And no, I didn’t arbitrarily do this just because the Yang side is white and the Yin side is black. Far more than the “social construct” some attempt to label it as, race goes beyond the physical body and is something beautiful and vital to the expression of the Divine here on Earth.

Throughout recorded history we see over and over again from the Indo-European migrations to the Roman Empire to Colonialism, the continuous movement of the “Yang races” all over the world. Ever moving and expanding, the Yang races in their positive aspect brought many of the higher gifts of civilization such as agriculture, science, architecture and invention to the world. In their negative aspect, they brought exploitation and various forms of enslavement. Their prime deities were masculine in nature, i.e. the Sun, Jupiter and Saturn.

aryans-14AE142C8697D36AED0These Yang races have historically been explorers and empire-builders. Their civilizations have very much characterized the masculine aspect of consciousness, specifically as it “acts upon” the world, active and seeking in similar fashion to the conscious mind acting upon its surroundings as well as the subconscious mind.

As the Yang races explored and settled, they have come into repeated contact with indigenous dark-skinned peoples. These Yin races were people who generally lived as hunter-gatherers with close ties to the Mother Earth and Her creatures. They often knew much of the various plant medicines and how to live in harmony with the plants and animals. They often revered the Goddess in her many forms, recognizing she was the living Earth and the patterns of nature. Keepers of archaic knowledge through the Shamans, these were people who had a natural tendency for creative expression through song and movement.

Picture 1While there were “empires” within the Yin races, such as the Aztecs and the Zulus, they were not as a whole prone to exploration, expansion and altering their environment in the same way the Yang races were. Conversely, the Yang races also had tribes and peoples who reflected aspects of the Yin. This is explained in the T’ai Chi T’u through the “lesser yin” and the “lesser yang”. These inner circles inside the greater yin and yang represent how each “opposing” force also contains within itself its opposite. This “seed” can also be related to genetics, as the genetic traits of the Yin races are dominant, with dominance being a Yang trait, and vice versa.

The meetings and intermingling between the Yin and Yang races mirrors the interaction between the male and female polarities: At times it was a beautiful dance with the mutual sharing of knowledge and trading of goods that allowed for the growth and development of people. However, at other times it produced conflict and a violent clash of misunderstanding, ending in wars, genocides and other atrocities. Unfortunately it is this latter experience that we are given to dwell upon.


Humanity is the product of the Divine Marriage of Heaven and Earth. Even materialist science has correlated this, noting that we humans contain elements from the stars within our DNA. Through this marriage of the elements of Heaven and Earth, some of us got more from “Dad’s side”, i.e. Heaven, and some of us got more from “Mom’s side”, i.e. Earth. This does not make anyone “superior” to anyone else, it just means we have different strengths and play different roles in the spiritual evolution of Earth and man. Again, “As above, so below…”

This creates a far more profound understanding of race than either looking at in terms of an imaginary construct that is only due to society and melatonin, or the social Darwinian and materialist point of view of eugenics.


Italian philosopher and mystic, Julius Evola explained:

“In the mystery of our blood, in the depth… of our being, resides the ineffaceable heredity of our primordial times. This is not heredity of brutality of bestial and savage instincts gone astray, as argued by psychoanalysis, and which, as one may logically conclude, derive from ‘evolutionism’ or Darwinism. This heredity of origins, this heredity which comes from the deepest depth of times is the heredity of the light.”

What I am conveying here is that race has MEANING; it isn’t happenstance. There is a reason you are born into the family you are born into, and there is a reason you are born into the race you are born into- race being an extension of family, of kin, of blood- both in a physical and a non-physical sense. Evola explains how there is purpose to this:

“Thus, (racial awareness) invigorates and renders tangible the concept of tradition; it makes the individual get used to observing in our ancestors not just a series of the more or less illustrious “dead,” but rather the expression of something still alive in ourselves and to which we are tied in our interior. We are the carriers of a heritage that has been transmitted to us and that we need to transmit – and in this spirit it is something going beyond time, something indicating, what we called elsewhere, ‘the eternal race.’”

I feel that it is necessary that we take in the fullness of this incarnation in order to make the most of it. Knowing and understanding folk and tribe and race gives us keys to unlock our full potential, reaching for the Heavens, while remaining rooted to the Earth. Rituals and spiritual traditions of our ancestors can provide the key to finding an organic spiritual path that best fosters our spiritual growth. And while we understand that at our core, that we are ultimately beyond race and creed, these things were given to us as unique expressions of the One manifesting into the many as a means of understanding our unique task or “destiny” here on Earth.

That being said, it is important that we maintain the ability to look at these things with both an open heart and a clear mind, and not allow the waters of consciousness to become muddied with social and political ideals like “political correctness” and “multiculturalism” that are indeed nothing more than social constructs.

I realize that this perspective breaks from the dogma of racial “sameness” that many have grown to tenuously believe. I realize that this may make people feel uncomfortable. To that I am going to quote Jose Vargas, the director/producer of MTV’s “White People”: “Good, let’s all get all uncomfortable together.”

Namaste and God Bless.




“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government…”
– Thomas Jefferson- The Declaration of Independence

Mainstream pop-culture in present-day America tends to denounce anyone who refers to the above quote in any other context than in a history class, as anything from “crazy right-winger” or “teabagger”, to “extremist” and “terrorist”. We see it over and over again depicted in television and movies- the crazy right -wing extremist with their conspiracy theories about government tyranny being a domestic terrorist (and a racist because they’re usually white men), with a stockpile of guns and ammo, living in an underground bunker.


A recent CNN article responding to last month’s “Summit on Countering Violent Extremism” stated the following:

“They’re carrying out sporadic terror attacks on police, have threatened attacks on government buildings and reject government authority… A new intelligence assessment, circulated by the Department of Homeland Security this month and reviewed by CNN, focuses on the domestic terror threat from right-wing sovereign citizen extremists and comes as the Obama administration holds a White House conference to focus efforts to fight violent extremism”

The article went on to say:

“Some federal and local law enforcement groups view the domestic terror threat from sovereign citizen groups as equal to — and in some cases greater than — the threat from foreign Islamic terror groups, such as ISIS, that garner more public attention… The Homeland Security report, produced in coordination with the FBI, counts 24 violent sovereign citizen-related attacks across the U.S. since 2010… The government says these are extremists who believe that they can ignore laws and that their individual rights are under attack in routine daily instances such as a traffic stop or being required to obey a court order.”


We are essentially led to believe that people who are label themselves as “sovereign citizens” or have any number of “qualifiers” to be labelled as such, (‘preppers’, anti-government, pro-constitution, etc.) are dangerous and want to go on shooting sprees and ultimately overthrow the government. We have profiles of these classes of people given to local law enforcement by Homeland Security and the FBI (see the MIAC Report).

miac-strategic-report <Missouri Information Analysis Center report on Militia Movement

However it should be noted that the FBI has a well-documented tendency to provocateur and enable terrorist activity that it then “thwarts” (sort of like fire departments starting fires that they then put out in order to maintain funding). Furthermore, I challenge folks to look into these 24 cases cited (which is a very small number in statistical terms) for themselves and see what they find.


This ramped-up fear of right-wing “extremism” brings back memories of the Oklahoma City Bombing. It should be noted that the FBI has been involved in a case surrounding the 1995 bombing and the family of a eyewitness to the events leading up to the bombing, Kenneth Michael Trentadue, who was later found hanging in his cell after being picked up on unrelated charges shortly thereafter. Local Fox 13 out of Utah reported last year:

“Jesse Trentadue said John Matthews, whom he claimed worked as an undercover government operative in the militia movement in the 1990s, had been contacted by an FBI agent and told ‘it would be best if he didn’t show up to testify.’… Trentadue told FOX 13 that Matthews had known convicted bomber Timothy McVeigh and worked for the government in an operation targeting the patriot militia movement known as ‘PATCON.’… ‘He was part of an operation the FBI ran for a decade during the ’90s where they would infiltrate, and it’s questionable whether they incited the right wing,’ he told FOX 13… To bolster his case, Trentadue introduced into evidence an FBI lead sheet that had been heavily redacted. It claims that the ATF and FBI had ‘prior knowledge of the bomb’ and the agencies had attempted to set up a ‘sting operation and did not take the bomb threat seriously.’”


Again, the FBI and other federal agencies have been caught enabling and creating terror attacks many, many times. However this has not stopped the narrative of the dangerous “lone” right-wing extremist from being parroted in the media repeatedly. One may even recall that before the suspects of the 2013 Boston Bombings were chosen, the immediate response all over the media by the “reporters” and pundits was that it was an act of right-wing domestic terrorism. You might recall that some aspects of that “label” were still pinned to the Tsarnaev brothers after the fact (ie. 9-11 “truth-er”, Alex Jones follower, etc.).

So who are these “extremists” really? Who are these people we are being taught to fear? More often than not these are veterans and rural folk and people who want to be self-sufficient, self-reliant, and want to be left alone- especially when it comes to government. Many of these folks don’t believe in the legality of the income tax (and there is MUCH historical and legal evidence to back that claim up) or the national security state. These are people who want to “throw off the chains” of what they see as an increasingly intrusive and oppressive government.


These folks can tend to be “separatists” or even “secessionists” when it comes to government. They want to, as Jefferson stated “throw off” government and live life and raise their families according to their own terms, morals and values. These folks will often tend to migrate toward rural areas and try and live “off the grid”. My question is that if these are people whose every action seems to be geared towards being self-reliant with a strong desire to simply be left alone, then why are they deemed as being so dangerous to society?

Obviously the first thing pointed at by the media and pop-culture is the fact that these “extremists” believe in the right to “keep and bear arms”- and not just in a hunting sense. It is hard to ignore the “echo chamber” created in the media regarding owning firearms for the defense of oneself, one’s family and one’s community as an overtly negative thing that inevitably leads to the deaths of innocent schoolchildren and police officers.


This reminds me of a recent anecdote a friend of mine told me about when he and another co-worker of his were discussing strange inconsistencies regarding 9-11. At one point, another co-worker of theirs overheard them and vehemently chastised them for being “conspiracy theorists” who would potentially go and “shoot up a school”. This is the sort of fear-based mindset being disseminated to the public regarding anyone who questions the government.

All that aside, I have there to be a less-overt characteristic of this “sovereign citizen equals domestic terrorist” narrative; and this involves the difference between what it means to “throw off” government versus what it means to “overthrow” government- something that many, including myself until recently, never thought any distinction between the two terms.

To “throw off” is essentially the severance of ties or the ending of a relationship. Think of throwing off the covers in the morning. The blankets are still intact (hopefully) and no damage has come to them, they just aren’t on you anymore. To “throw off” a government means you separate from that governing body and establish a different form of “governance” elsewhere. It is a separation- like separating from a spouse- “you do your thing and I’ll do mine”. The act of throwing off or separating is in and of itself a nonviolent act. Violence typically only happens when the party being separated from attempts to “hold on” to the relationship and maintain it through use of violent force, coercion, extortion, manipulation and/or other methods of control.

“Overthrow” on the other hand, is inherently forceful and more often than not, violent. Overthrow inevitably involves one individual or group imposing their will upon another. It is about physically forcing someone to abdicate or cease what they were doing so you can do it “your way”, which is the “better way”. Overthrow is a battle of egos. When a government is overthrown, it involves a forceful takeover or “coup” through the use of violent force, coercion, extortion, manipulation and/or other methods of imposing the will.

Historically speaking, the American Revolution was a “throwing off”, as the colonists did not seek to go to London and overthrow the British government. They simply wished to separate and live independently. Conversely, the French Revolution was an “overthrow”, as the palace was stormed, the monarchy and government officials (an everyone with any sort of remote connection to them) was executed, with the “overthrowers” setting up shop in their place and paving way for a dictatorship.


The vast majority of revolutions are “overthrow” revolutions. It should also be noted that the VAST majority of those revolutions created a more oppressive government than the one they got rid of. The Bolshevik Revolution that established the Soviet Union in Russia and surrounding territories in 1917, and the vast amount of suffering and death it caused is one of the best examples of this principle.

We are led to believe that these “sovereign citizens” are domestic terrorists who want to overthrow the government, when in truth they simply want to throw off the government and be left alone. The word “sovereign” means “self-rule”- this is the ideology of the sovereign citizen- one of self-determination, self-sufficiency and self-rule. This ideology is exactly why they are so dangerous to government. The government is well armed doesn’t actually fear attack, but it does fear the removal of the resources it gets from its compliant citizens.

Government cannot exist without a population to rule over and accept its ruling status. If it does not have this basic source of food, it withers and dies. And yes, while government is made up of “individuals”, individuals fall victim to a sort of gang or mob mentality when involved in any sort of large institutional body, which is compartmentalized and maintained by a top-down authority structure.  This loss of individuality and the desire to please authority creates a sort of “hive mind” that turns the institution into a sort of machine; the larger the government or institution or corporation, etc., the greater this phenomenon.

I would also add, the larger the government, the more resources it needs to sustain itself. These resources are typically taken from its “citizens” in the form of taxation, property, labor, etc.


The sovereign is dangerous because his/her IDEA is dangerous to the life of the state, because if people were to separate themselves from the Federal and State government system, “ending their relationship” to it, then the way of life for the politicians, bureaucrats, and the corporate interests that use the system to enrich themselves would be over. This is why Homeland Security has been stating these sovereign citizen groups as more of a threat than Al-Qaeda. If people were to realize that they are capable of surviving and thriving without the authority of a governing class and the “safety” and “infrastructure” it claims to provide, then government as we know it would be without a job.

We are taught to equate government with society and civilization. We are even taught in western society that “we are the government”, but when was the last time we were in a cabinet session or involved in creating legislation or setting foreign or even domestic policy? Having us vote every few years is akin to letting your two-year-old bang his toy hammer on the piece of wood you’re using to build his new bedroom. However, many are coming to realize that our government doesn’t serve the interests of the people at large. It serves the interests of the moneyed class. Statism (a belief system in which the state should have substantial centralized control over social and economic affairs, and trump the rights/needs of the individual) is tied to mercantilism. Author Richard Hoskins stated the following:

“The Merchant must establish a King to protect him and promote his interests.”

We may see monarchy as a thing of the past, but so-called “democratic” governments still operate under the same basic principles as the old feudal systems of serfdom. The state has the “right” to tax and micromanage your life because you live on ITS land (outright property ownership practically non-existent with property taxation); just as a king or a noble had the “right” to tax and micromanage the lives of the serfs who lived on their land. And the king and nobility, while “land rich”, were forever in debt to the merchant and banking class who financed their endeavors- the more things change…

However, history is like a mosaic and most folks are looking at it up close. This may be part of the reason why we still believe we need government like mom, or dad, or even God. We are taught that the world could not exist in any sort of livable manner without it. And many of us BELIEVE this in some manner. We are taught that those who don’t contribute to and comply with government and its wishes aren’t “pulling their weight in society” and are anti-civilization and dangerous. The truth is, if everyone stopped paying their income taxes tomorrow, the sky would not fall and human civilization would go on.


We are taught that those who go against the wishes of government want to destroy our way of life. We are taught to believe we NEED government. Why do you think such a spectacle is made every time a “government shutdown” looms? It is to further cement into the consciousness that government is the sustainer of human civilization and order. The truth is, we don’t need government to survive. Our ancient ancestors did not; the lone settlers who established homesteads in the old west did not, and neither do we. We have just become comfortable and accustomed to abdicating our power to others.

This is why WE fear people who would “overthrow the government”. We believe we need it to keep us safe and maintain order, as we have forgotten how to do these things ourselves. We have become detached from who we are to the point where we have forgotten our roots as beings from the Mother Earth who have within ourselves her infinite wisdom, least of which is how to survive and protect ourselves and our families.

We should look at how we are persecuting and fear-mongering around these sovereign citizens and how it has become socially acceptable to do so with historical perspective. We look at them as dangerous outsiders, lashing out at them for the way they see and live life and labelling them as “enemies of the state” due to their desire for separateness and their unwillingness to support the government and mainstream commercial pop-culture. Because of their affiliation we view them as those that would subvert and destroy our way of life. Of course there are going to be unbalanced and violent people in any strata of society and any socio-political movement, but to single out and label whole group of people as dangerous based on their ideology and how they want to live their life and because of the actions of a small number of individuals (many of whom had links to government infiltration groups) is wrong. This is why many Jews and Communists and other political “undesirables” were rounded up and put in forced labor camps in Nazi Germany. This is the EXACT same ideology and justification. We are told to be tolerant of everyone, EXCEPT these people.


Government is not morality and it is not community, even though it seems to masquerade as such. While we see a constant megaphoning of “doing our part” when it comes to complying with government, we see and hear very little when it comes to promoting individual communities looking out for their own local interests and associating freely. We don’t need government to build community nor do we need it to tell us what is right and what is wrong. These things are “written on our hearts”. Human beings need to be allowed to learn and grow and build relationships in a natural, organic way, rather than constricted and molded to meet the needs and desires of the governing class and the merchant and banking oligarchs that feed of the power of the government and the livelihood of the people.

Belief in external authority and helpless dependence upon external entities like government and its ideology of collectivism runs counter to the inherent individuality and self-determination of the true spiritual seeker. The true spiritual seeker seeks mastery over him or herself and recognizes this self-mastery or self-rule, aka. sovereignty cannot be achieved through threats, manipulation, or force from any external entity or from themselves. We cannot overthrow our lesser nature and character defects and we certainly can’t have someone else do it for us. We cannot use force to get the ego out of its seat of power and control. We need separate ourselves from our counter-productive “thinkings and doings” that keep us in a state of internal division and chaos. We “throw off” these things and surrender to a new way of doing and being.

Screenshot 2014-10-20 at 11.28.39 PM

As Jesus said in the Gospel of Thomas, “..when you make the inner like the outer and the outer like the inner… then will you enter the Kingdom of Heaven.”

This can be looked at as uniting this inner sovereignty of BEING with the outer sovereignty of DOING. And while we realize and readily accept that we may have responsibility and ties to those we have chosen to bring into our lives, we recognize and maintain this as all done by our own free will, and we refuse to accept imposition by an external “authority” that demands and involuntary and compulsory relationship we did not ask for, as if it is our “birth right”.

Our birth right is the willful and voluntary discovery of and building our relationship with the Divine Light within that is our connection to the universe and the limitless potential that comes with it. The realization of this limitless potential, completely unbound from the restraints of our would-be rulers or “archons” (both internally and externally), is FAR more dangerous to the state and the established “order” than owning a gun or not paying taxes. They just don’t believe we can ever do it, but I do. I KNOW we can.


“Let our Mind, Heart and Will be Unified in the Light of Christ and Moved to Action by the Holy Spirit.”


Many across the nation have been in a state of protest over the past few months regarding the case of Mike Brown and Darren Wilson. This state was intensified after the grand jury finding of Darren Wilson not needing to be indicted last week. I have been watching this whole drama being played out and it has caused a bit of a stir in me. The public and media reactions, the finger pointing, the race-baiting, the police state shows of force, the shameless attempt to use this incident as opportunity for political grandstanding and power-grabbing: This is a sad case of a nation trapped in base consciousness.

Ferguson riots continue in between police and protesters in Missouri **USA ONLY**

Here, in the case of Mike Brown and Darren Wilson, we have no heroes and no villains; no saints and no martyrs; we just have two men. Both men are victims of their own separate forms of cultural conditioning, beliefs and ideologies. These two men came into conflict for a brief moment due to the clashing of their ideologies and the roles they had CHOSEN to play in life; due to the clashing forms of conditioning they had ACCEPTED for themselves. Be it consciously, subconsciously, or both, they chose and accepted their “identity”. As a result of this clash of roles and identities, one man’s life has been lost. The other man’s life was destroyed, having been crucified and deemed a monster through the court of media and public opinion.


Unfortunately, this has become yet another event that has been used to promote further racial division in this country. One politician in a media interview went so far as to repeatedly say, “This is our RACE WAR”. This sort is the sort of “rallying cry” that can put lives in danger needlessly and create unnecessary strife and division. After the death of Trayvon Martin there was a major escalation of race based assaults and even murders of white Americans that were reported by local news affiliates, but went completely ignored by the mainstream media. This is not to downplay or ignore the plight of African-Americans in this country, but to show animosity against people of other races isn’t something that only white people can do, and that it isn’t right regardless of what color the person committing racist acts is.


Hate-CrimeOn the same hand, people do not need to be culturally forced into feeling guilt or shame because they happen to be of a certain race. These emotions do not cause healing, but rather just create more wounds.  Obsessing on concepts like “black struggle” or “white privilege” does nothing to empower or progress humanity in any way.  People do not need to be made even more aware of racial conflicts and divisions.  This is engrained into us from grade school on.  People need to learn how to rise above and beyond that level of division that exists within their own consciousness.  Mass Mind culture is doing its damnedest to prevent this from happening.

Racism has its roots in tribalism and the mistrust of marauding tribes. This fear and mistrust of the “other” is a very primitive thing and is hard-wired in the r-complex of the brain. This is not to say that we should be controlled by our primitive instincts, but rather we need to tame them and utilize them as Christ rode the unruly donkey.

As humans became more “civilized” tribalism gave rise to imperial culture with its complex/complicated structure and laws to keep that structure in place. It was during this transformation that tribal fear and mistrust was turned into racial or cultural superiority. The rulers of empire needed to impress upon their subjects the superiority of their culture and why they should be entitled to rule and regulate those outside their culture. This was based in the egos of the ruling class and spoon fed to the masses, so they would assist in the ruling class’ desire for more power, more control, and more satisfaction for their ego.  Racism and slavery has been an unfortunate cultural institution throughout history and among every race across the globe (no, not just white America).


It is true however that the world (or at least the VAST majority of those living in it) is not post-racial, although I feel that what that actually means has been a bit skewed. The great mystic, Rudolf Steiner saw the races as spiritual lineages.  The spiritual races should be honored and respected for their uniqueness just as individuals should be. There seems to be a certain spiritual birthing place or starting point that comes from one’s racial and/or tribal heritage. It is a powerful tool for people on the path towards spiritual attainment, where they will eventually shed ALL identity. I

myself have found immense help in utilizing my Celtic as well as Native American “roots”. Indeed, honoring the ancestral roots of this incarnation has guided me on my spiritual journey. To rob people who have not gotten to that point of utilizing their “spiritual ground” of which to start their spiritual journey because of a political ideology is misguided at best. Again, humanity as a whole is not at that point yet.

This is also not to say that we cannot or should not learn from the spiritual traditions of other races. This is where we can discover that the spiritual traditions across the world have a series of unifying themes that underlie all of them.  Each race is bringing something unique and special to the table in the “Great Work”.  Understanding and utilizing this knowledge is pivotal for spiritual evolution and getting to the point where we are truly “post-racial”.

But let us be clear in our understanding that the multiculturalism promoted in politics and media is actually geared toward creating a mono-culture. This monoculture has nothing to do with spiritual heritage and is all but devoid of any sort of spiritual component. The religion of monoculture is, at its core, subservience and worship of the state from whom all power is supposedly derived. But before we get to that point, the strivings of racial identity need to be fully exploited so that the resulting conflicts will create “winners” and “losers” resulting in the losers being absorbed into the mono-culture.  Much like racial gangs in a prison, the races are being divide along every line conceivable.  But this isn’t a future that needs to be.


In the 1950s there was an all-out witch hunt for communists in this country. Spearheaded by an ambitious Senator named Joseph McCarthy, numerous people were blacklisted and had their lives ruined because they had been accused of being a communist, and were prosecuted in the court of public opinion. These sorts of ‘witch hunts’ are repeatedly used by the ruling class to silence would-be dissenters. In today’s world, we live in the era of “political correctness”. Now people who speak out against the ruling class and their actions are often accused of being racist, anti-semitic, or even homophobic if some sort of vague accusation can be made. Again, people’s careers and lives are destroyed in this silencing culture of political correctness, where criticizing a black president makes one a racist.

Then there is also the label of “terrorist”, if the other ones aren’t enough. According to Department of Homeland Security documents, speeches and training exercises carried out by police and military personnel; returning veterans, gun owners, libertarians, homeschoolers, anti-war activists (pretty much anyone who does not tow the party line, so to speak); are considered potential terrorists. The violent, yet incredibly under-reported SWAT raids on homeschoolers (many of whom have been white) and others who choose alternatives to government-sanctioned ways of being paint the picture of a problem that goes beyond race. Ask pretty much ANYONE who is homeless if it necessarily matters what color they are when they get harassed, or beaten or worse.


There was actually a recent Washington University study, that used police offers in live scenarios, and they found that police are actually more hesitant to pull the trigger if the suspect is a minority as opposed to white.  But at the end of the day, the real problem here IS NOT race.  The race baiting going on in the media are diversion points.  Points of division are created and wounds are opened and re-opened in an attempt to divide the public against one another along the lines of race, gender, culture, class, social roles, etc. The strategy of “divide and conquer” has been used since Roman times. Essentially, it is the exploitation of differences among peoples to get them fighting amongst one another. This makes it easier for a united, dominator class to come in and run things, as well as posing as the ones who will bring “order”.

tumblr_mdcctdnB471r4fn52o1_500We must be wise to these divisive tactics at play in politics and the media and see these tactics for what they are. We are all brothers and sisters in humanity, regardless of skin color. We should honor and learn from one another in the absolute deepest sense. At the same time honor and celebrate our own spiritual heritage as well as our familial, tribal and racial lineage. This I feel, is a key component to truly figuring out our unique road map toward realization and fulfilling our purpose in this lifetime.