“Exalted Frya.  When she had thus spoken the earth shook like WRALDA’S sea.  The ground of Flyland sank beneath her feet, the sky became black and green from tears, and when they looked for their mother she had already risen to her watch star; then at length thunder spoke from the clouds, and lightning wrote in the sky, ‘Watch!'”

– The Book of Adela’s Followers


The Oera Linda Book describes how the ancient Fryan civilization eventually decayed and disappeared due to external and internal factors; overrun by a combination of successive migrations and invasions of Asiatic peoples led by priest-kings from the Asiatic steppes and the Levant; and taken down internally by infighting and rebellion.

The desire of the later Fryans would be to forsake the institution of Folk Mothers and Matrons as guiding figures in favor of men who would be instituted as hereditary monarchs:

For a long time we have had no mother, but that comes from our being come of age.  At present it suits us best to have a king to win back our lands that we have lost through the imprudence of our mothers.”

These new kings swore to “protect” the people from the seemingly unending threat of invaders from the East as well as within Europe itself, while promising to win back lost lands and essentially make the Fryans “great again”- in exchange for absolute obedience of course…

Descendants of exiled Fryans came back into western Europe from the Punjab, the Aegean and the Middle East, brought with them corrupting “foreign morals and customs”.  The customs and values of the Fryans eventually deteriorated, as did the Fryan civilization.

The Fryans eventually gave in more and more to taking up the trade of piracy and began to take slaves, thus “The Viking Age” was born:

After that Askar (King Adel IV) had become so connected with the Jutlanders (Jutes) and the Denmarkers (Danes), they all went pirating together; but it produced no good to them.  They brought all sorts of foreign treasures home, and just for that reason the young men would learn no trades, nor work in the fields; so at last he was obliged to take slaves; but that was altogether contrary to WRALDA’S wish and to Frya’s counsel.”

The taking of slaves was absolutely forbidden by the old Fryan law given by Frya; the law that valued freedom as the greatest virtue of all.  According to the text, it was ultimately their partaking of “the peculiar institution” that led to the karmic and civilizational decline of the ancient western Europeans:

Frya has said we must not allow amongst us any but free people; but what have they done?  They imitated our enemies and instead of executing their prisoners or letting them go free, they have despised Frya’s advice and have made slaves of them.  Because they have done so, Frya could no longer protect them: they took freedom away from others and that is certainly why they lost theirs.

The Oera Linda Book ends with the defeat of the disgraced hereditary King Askar and the fall of Europe to Asiatic pagans:

While all this was going on, the Magyars went about audaciously over the lands of our neigbours. Near Egmuda, where formerly the burgh Forana had stood, they built a church larger and richer than that which Askar had built at Staveren. They said afterwards that Askar had lost a battle against the Gauls (Phoenician-led Fryan exiles), because the people did not believe that Wodin could help them, and therefore they would not pray to him. They went about stealing young children, whom they kept and brought up in the mysteries of their abominable doctrines.”


I believe that the processes of history, both “good” and “bad” are necessary for the evolution of the individual, the folk and humanity as a whole.  The Fryans needed to fall as an act of initiation.  And while there was much suffering and deracination as a result of this, we still have been able to keep our core virtues alive and in tact (even if somewhat dispersed)which means they can be recovered.

Despite being ancient “imports”, the tradition of Indo-European shamanism and the myths and legends of the Norse/Germanic/Slavic gods and heroes, as well as those of the Celts and the Greeks, are part of us.  They are part of our makeup and group identity regardless of how that initially came to be.

The same statement rings true for European Christianity in its various forms.  Without its ideological/philosophical groundings and cultural influence, the European peoples would not have come to be who and what they are- for better and for worse.

Both the Central Asiatic pagan traditions and the Semitic Christian traditions preserved and in the case of Christianity, reintroduced, certain elements of the European folk psyche, while attacking others.  They became carriers for is the Masculine and Feminine aspects of the collective European consciousness respectively.

Christianity emerged during the most brutal and harsh period of European pagan dominance- the time of the Roman Colosseum and the Druidic Wicker Man.  With Christianity, there was a re-injection of the virtues of compassion and charity that had been touted by the ancient Fryans- virtues that had largely been overcome by the relative harshness of the pagan warrior ethos.  This of course, was a reemergence of the Divine Feminine virtues of the European Folk Consciousness.

However, the fanaticism and other imbalances of Catholicism and later Protestantism, led to a large-scale degeneration of the true European Masculine and its warrior ethos.  Hence, it became things like the works of Homer and The Eddas that acted to preserve this element of the European Spirit that might have otherwise been completely castrated by Christianity.

But in their implementation and practice, both European paganism and European Christianity became tools of political and social control by priest classes and the rulers they influenced.  Both were ultimately imbalanced and inherently incomplete versions of the perennial European spiritual tradition of the Fryans.

The Fryan tradition was a potent and powerful synthesis of both Masculine and Feminine aspects of our folk consciousness.  These perennial virtues lie at the heart of who we are as a people, which is why they will always come out in some shape or form regardless of whatever system we adopt or have imposed upon us.  This is perhaps most powerfully and beautifully illustrated in the following passage from Frya’s Tex:

Should it happen they want advice or something else from you, you should help them.  If they come to rob you, though, then fall upon them like a raging fire.

This is who we are.

WRA-ALDA’S Blessings unto you and yours.



“Mountains, bow your heads; clouds and streams weep. Yes, Skenland blushes. Slave nations trample on your cloak. O, Frya!”



Norse/Germanic mythology was central to the NSDAP leadership in their effort to solidify a “folk culture” that the dejected and disjointed German people could unite around. One obvious example of this is the use of Runes and runic symbols throughout NSDAP German art and propaganda.

For those not familiar, the Runes were an ancient Germanic alphabet that were said to have magickal qualities and mystical origins. In Norse/Germanic myth, it was Odin/Wotan/Wodin that brought the Runes into the world (although not for the benefit of all, but rather for his own personal gain). In order to achieve this, Wotan pierced his side with a spear and hung himself from a tree (sound familiar?) for nine days and nine nights so that he might acquire the wisdom and magick of the Runes.

It is the virtue of being willing to sacrifice part of oneself to gain knowledge and wisdom, which is part of the essence of Wotan.

Wotan/Odin; god of wisdom, magick, poetry, war, and death, was a very important figure and archetype to many within the NSDAP. In his book, “The Myth of the Twentieth Century”, Alfred Rosenberg stated the following:

One form of Odin is dead, that is, the Odin who was the highest of the many gods who appeared as the embodiment of a generation still given up to natural symbolisms. But Odin as the eternal mirrored image of the primal spiritual powers of Nordic man lives today just as he did over 5,000 years ago.”

Renowned Swiss psychotherapist Carl Jung famously regarded NSDAP leader Adolf Hitler himself as a “personification” of the Wotan/Odin archetype, which in turn, was taken up by NSDAP Germany as a whole:

When, for instance, the belief in the God Wotan vanished and nobody thought of him anymore, the phenomenon originally called Wotan remained; nothing changed but its name, as National Socialism has demonstrated on a grand scale. A collective movement consists of millions of individuals, each of whom shows the symptoms of Wotanism and proves thereby that Wotan in reality never died, but has retained his original vitality and autonomy. Our consciousness only imagines that it has lost its Gods; in reality they are still there and it only needs a certain general condition in order to bring them back in full force.

Hitler was also a self-described “Wagnerian” and from the age of 12 became enthralled by the vision and philosophy that composer Richard Wagner produced in his operas (and writings) to such an extent that he would later state that “Whoever wants to understand National Socialist Germany must know Wagner.”

Image result for dwarves norse mythology

In Wagner’s four-part epic “The Ring of the Nibelung“, the composer re-imagined the Norse/Germanic mythos for a new era in what the composer called his “master artwork of the future”.  Based off the ancient Germanic Song of the Nibelungs“, the saga centers largely around the figure of Wotan, who finds himself tormented by his inability to undo the curse brought upon himself and the gods he has the duty to protect- a curse brought about by his own greed and desire for power.  This is a curse that ultimately destroys them.

Wotan/Wodin in traditional Germanic mythology was a god of poetry, battle, and the underworld who brought good fortune in battle, but is ultimately a “sinister” figure that condemns his followers to defeat and death and is accompanied by scavengers of the battlefield.  Before they were reinterpreted as Rubenesque maidens in armor in Wagnerian opera, Wotan’s Valkyries would have been much more akin to scavenging “vulture women” of the battlefield.

The characterization of Wodin as a figure that brings destruction to his people due to his own ego and folly may in fact, have its roots in historical events- events described in The Oera Linda Book.


One of the recurring themes in The Oera Linda Book was the tendency of less-advanced “slave peoples” to deify the Fryans- a practice known as “apotheosis”. In the text, the Fryans are depicted as an advanced civilization with Iron Age technology when the rest of the world is in the Bronze Age (and some peoples are even in the Stone Age), who upon coming into contact with and assisting other less-advanced peoples, are often deified (typically post-mortem) and become the gods and founders of that people’s civilization.

The Fryans were also depicted as being on average quite large in stature (there are both men and women described as being seven-feet tall!).  This stature would have caused them to be seen as giants, and may account for the legends of fair-skinned gods and giants told in ancient myths across the world.

One of these deified Fryans was a young warrior king (essentially an army general) named “Wodin”.

Wodin’s story begins with a group of people coming out of Asia into central and northern Europe. The Oera Linda Book refers to these as people from “Finda’s Race”. In the text, “Finda” is the name of the second daughter of WRA-ALDA who gave birth to the Asiatic races who seem to be particularly antagonistic towards the Fryans. The Oera Linda Book goes on to describe this particular group that came and settled into Finland and eastern Scandinavia (Skenland) a century after the sinking of Atland:

They were not wild people like many of Finda’s race; but they were like the Egiptalandar (Egyptians), they have priests like them and in their churches they also have statues.

The Priests are the only masters; they call themselves Magyarar, and their headman is known as Magi. He is high priest and king in one. The rest of the people are of no account, and under their rule. These people do not even have a name but we call them Finna because although their festivals are all melancholic and bloody, they are so formal that we are inferior to them in that respect. They are not to be envied though, because they are slaves to their priests, and much more to their creeds. They believe that evil spirits are everywhere and enter into people and animals, but of WRALDA’S Spirit they know nothing. They have stone weapons, the Magyar of copper….

When they were well settled, the Magyarar sought our friendship, they praised our language and customs, our cattle and iron weapons, which they wanted to barter for their gold and silver ornaments, and they always kept their people within their own boundaries, but that lulled our watchfulness.”

In mainline European history, it is taught that a tribe of peoples known as the “Magyar”, originated out of the Tarim Basin in northwest China, later settled in the Russian Ural Mountains and ultimately made their way into central Europe and became the primary ethnic stock of the Hungarian people. Their language and genetics were not Indo-European but of very different Finno-Urgic group. While it is typically the 9th century AD that is cited as the Magyars settling of Hungary, it is not hard to imagine that these nomadic people could have very well had contact with Europe long before.


We also see the historical Finns of Finland emerging from this same language group, as well as the Sami peoples of Scandinavia. The Sami in particular often tend to have Asiatic features and practice Shamanism, which was commonplace throughout northeastern Europe and throughout northern Asia. Shamanism becomes very important when looking at and understanding Wodin’s origins as a deity.

The Oera Linda Book goes on to describe the events that took place eighty years after the Magyarar/Finna settled into Scandanavia:

“… they unexpectedly overran our lands like snow driven by a storm wind. Those who could not flee were killed. Frya was called upon, but the Skenlandar (Fryans who lived in Scandanavia) had neglected her advice (they had allowed races of Finda’s people to live amongst them). Then all forces joined, and three hours from Godashisburch (possibly Gothenburg in Sweden) they were withstood, but war continued.

It is here that Wodin and his cousins Tunis and Inka (a sea king and a rear-admiral respectively), were placed in command of the Fryan forces and soundly defeated the invading forces:

Frya was their war-cry, and they drove back the Finns and Magyarar as if they were children.”

However, the Magy or Magi; the leader of the invading forces had another trick up his sleeve:

When the Magy heard how his men were all being slain, he sent a delegation with a truncheon (a scepter) and crown. They said to Wodin:

‘O greatest of kings, we are guilty, but all we have done was done from necessity. You think that we took on your brothers willingly, but we were driven out by our enemies, who are still at our heels…

You are the greatest military king on earth; your people are of iron. Become our king, and we shall willingly become your slaves. What glory it would be for you if you could drive back the savages! Our trumpets would resound with it, and our praises would precede you everywhere.’”

The crafty Magi appealed to the young warrior’s pride and ego, and proceeded to manipulate him accordingly. Wodin accepted the Magi’s coronation, making him a king twice over. However, the Asiatic invaders had the sort of absolute and hereditary succession form of kingship we are accustomed to, as opposed to the electoral model with strict limitations that was instituted by the Fryans.

Wodin soundly defeated the Magi’s enemies and was given the Magi’s daughter as a wife in return. The text describes how Wodin and his ego fully came under the thrall of the Magi only to eventually disappear from history:

When Wodin returned, the Magi gave him his daughter to wife. Thereupon he was smoked with herbs, but they were magic herbs because he gradually became so audacious that he disavowed and ridiculed the spirits of Frya and WRALDA whilst bending his free head before the false monstrous statues. His reign lasted seven years, and then he disappeared. The Magi said that he was taken up by their gods and that he reigned from there over them, but our people laughed at what they said.

When Wodin had been gone for some time, disputes arose.  We wished to choose another king, but the Magi would not allow it.  He claimed it was his right given him by his idols.  Over and above this dispute there was one between the Magyarar and Finna, who would honor neither Frya nor Wodin; but the Magi did just as he pleased, because his daughter had a son by Wodin, and he would have it that his son was of high descent.

While all were squabbling and arguing, he crowned the boy as king, and set himself as guardian and counselor.”

It is told in The Oera Linda Book that it was due to Wodin’s actions in particular, that caused the Asiatic invaders gained a strong presence and influence over the people and culture of northern Europe- particularly Scandanavia:

Through Wodin’s foolishness and irresponsibility, Magy had become master of Skenland’s eastern part.”

This would eventually lead to a reshaping of western European culture as it responded to and assimilated Asiatic shamanism and the people that brought it- much as it would with Christianity a few thousand years later:

The Finn women had children.  These grew up with our Fryan children. Sometimes they played and gambolled together in the fields, or else they were together by the hearth.  There they heard with delight the wicked tales of the Finns because they were bad and new.  So they became alienated despite the efforts of their parents…

The leading men and their sturdy sons crawled to the unchaste Finnish girls; and their own daughters, led astray by this vile example, allowed themselves to be charmed by the handsome Finnish lads to the ridicule of their degenerated parents.  When the Magi got sniff of this he took the most attractive of his Finns and Magyarar and promised them golden horns to let them be taken in (employed) by our people to spread his doctrines.  His people did even more.  Children disappeared, were taken away to Uppsala, and after they had been brought up in his filthy doctrines, were sent back.

When these pretended laborers had mastered our language, they got the dukes and the elite on board and convinced them that they should become subject to the Magi- then their sons would succeed them without having to be elected.”

What we see here is the beginning of what is typically described as “pre-Christian” Norse/Germanic culture with its hereditary royalty and stories of “bad spirits, witches, sorcerers, dwarfs, and elves, as if they descended from the Finns.

One rather puzzling component of the story of Wodin in The Oera Linda Book is Wodin’s “disappearance”.  In Snorri Sturluson’s “Ynglinga Saga“, Odin/Wodin becomes demoted from his post as “king of the gods” and becomes a wandering sorcerer.  This incarnation of Odin resembles the Finnish sorcerer and demigod, Väinämöinen.


Shamanic rites of ecstatic initiation would have been an established part of not only the Finna and Magyarar peoples (which may themselves have been “catch-all” terms used to describe multiple Eastern European/Asiatic tribes), but were also well known among the Thracian, Dacian, and Scythian peoples of the European northeastern “frontier” and the Eurasian Steppes.  These were the lands of the shaman priest kings and the birthplace of the Orphic Rites and other pagan (and according to the Fryans “monstrous”) Mystery Cults and Initiations of life, death, and rebirth.

One common theme of these priest-king initiations and the myths that surrounded them after they were dead and deified (which was customary among these peoples), was the king/savior god that was hung from a tree in a form of sacrifice.  Indeed, this tradition was a likely origin of both the story of Odin hanging himself from Yggdrasil to acquire the wisdom of the Runes, and the Crucifixion of Christ Jesus.

Being crowned king of these peoples, Wodin would have no doubt been initiated into these mysteries, and perhaps disappeared as a result of a personal spiritual exodus- or he consumed too much of whatever one of numerous hallucinogenic (and often potentially deadly) plant concoctions used for one of these rites to stimulate a sort of visionary or “near-death” experience.  In other words, he may have died, but not resurrected.

As an aside, and while this is quite speculative, perhaps the “Väinä” in Väinämöinen, which in Finnish means “stream pool”, could also be a reference to the characters “Vaina” or “Vanir” origins.


Norse myth is somewhat unique among mythological canons as it has two simultaneously ruling groups of deities:  The Aesir and the Vanir.  The Aesir gods were typically understood to be “martial” gods of war, conflict and heroic adventure. These are typically seen as the “more important” gods among the warlike vikings.  The gods within the Aesir ranks include Odin, Frigga, Thor, Heimdall, Tyr, and Baldur. These are the gods of the famed Asgard.

The Vanir gods on the other hand, are typically associated with nature and fertility and reside in the lesser-known realm of “Vanaheim”. Mainstream scholars tend to believe that these Vanir gods were in fact gods of an older time before they were supplanted by the Aesir. While most of these deities remain unnamed in the mythological records, two were very important and ultimately became “citizens” of Asgard. These would be the brother/sister Vanir gods, Freyr and Freya.

Norse myth describes how the Aesir and the Vanir coexisted and seemed to “share” power. But trouble began when the Aesir became fond of the goddess Freya and her magickal abilities, which she would use on the Aesir’s behalf. However, they used her magick to the point where it became a corrupting influence on them and caused them to become less honorable and virtuous among themselves. Naturally, they blamed this internal corrupting on Freya, kidnapping her and attempting to three times burn her alive (and three times she rose again from the ashes).

Image result for aesir vanir war

This started a great war between the Vanir and Aesir gods which lasted for quite some time, until eventually the two sides grew weary of fighting. As was traditional Norse/Germanic custom, two hostages were exchanged from each side as a form of truce. Hoenir and Mimir were taken by the Vanir, and Freya and her brother Freyr went to live amongst the Aesir.

However, like most myths, this story is rooted in historical persons and events.

In a lecture on Norse/Germanic myth and lore, renowned author, lecturer, and speaker Manly P. Hall stated the following:

The Nordic mythology probably originated in Asia, and was brought to the Scandinavian area by a Scythian prince called Sigge.  This migration which included a long trek across Europe, was accomplished sometime probably one to five centuries before the Christian era… dates are unobtainable.  After he had established himself at Uppsala, this Prince Sigge, formed a sacred college or school, and was eventually transformed by legend or lore to the figure of Odin.”

In searching various historical and genealogical records one might find record of a man known as Prince Sigge Odin Frithuwaldsson or Fridulfson.  Some records state this man was born in Aasgaard, Norway in the year 205 CE and died 45 years later in Uppsala, Sweden.  Meanwhile, other records show a “King Odin” of Scandinavia having lived a few centuries prior.  The following is an excerpt from an 1879 genealogy compiled by Albert Welles entitled “The Pedigree and History of the Washington Family“:

“Odin (first King of Scandinavia, 70 B.C.) came from Asaland or Asaheim, east of Tanais. He endeared himself to the Asiatic subjects, successful in every combat. Son of Fridulf, supreme ruler of the Scythians, in Asaland or Asaheim, Turkestand, between the Euxine and Caspian Seas in Asia He reigned at Asgard, whence he removed 70 B.C., and became the first king of Scandinavia. Died 50 B.C., and was succeeded by Sons who ruled in different parts of Scandinavia….”

The genealogies of Saxon kings were typically traced back to a man named “Woden”, much in a similar manner that Danish and Scandinavian kings traced their heritage back to “King Odin“.  The reality of this is disputed and confusing at best.  In The Oera Linda Book, we do find that the original King Wodin had a son, and thus “Wodin/Odin” may have been a name that was passed down to more than one ruler.  But there are certain characteristics, such as extreme prowess on the battlefield and a tendency to go on long journeys or “disappear”, that seem to be constants.

According to Snorri Sturluson in his translation of the Norse/Icelandic sagas, the Vanir and Aesir gods of myth were in fact based off historical groups of people. Sturluson at one point states that the Aesir were said to have originally come from a place called “Tyrkland” (Turkey; Aesir perhaps was a word for “Asian”), settled around the Black Sea and then migrated to/invaded northern and central Europe .

In “The Ynglinga Saga“, which was the story of the origins of the Swedish royal family, Sturluson describes the historical Aesir:

“The country east of the Tanaquisl in Asia was called Asaland, or Asaheim, and the chief city in that land was called Asgaard. In that city was a chief called Odin, and it was a great place for sacrifice. It was the custom there that twelve temple priests should both direct the sacrifices, and also judge the people. They were called Diar, or Drotner, and all the people served and obeyed them. Odin was a great and very far-travelled warrior, who conquered many kingdoms, and so successful was he that in every battle the victory was on his side. It was the belief of his people that victory belonged to him in every battle. It was his custom when he sent his men into battle, or on any expedition, that he first laid his hand upon their heads, and called down a blessing upon them; and then they believed their undertaking would be successful. His people also were accustomed, whenever they fell into danger by land or sea, to call upon his name; and they thought that always they got comfort and aid by it, for where he was they thought help was near.”

The Fryan Federation

Eventually the Aesir came into conflict with the Vanir people, described by Sturluson as living west of the River Don (see map>).

In The Oera Linda Book, we have Wodin/Odin as being a “Vanir” who became king of the “Aesir”, this is somewhat in contrast to the histories of Sturluson.  However, we would do well to understand the fairly dubious manner in which most of the history prior to the 1600s was written across Europe- by Vatican-commissioned monks or others associated with the Church.  And there is little doubt in my mind that there was a concerted effort by those who took control of Europe to erase the Fryan civilization from history- a concern expressed at the beginning of the text:

For the sake of our dear forefathers… never let the eye of a monk glance over these writings.  They speak sweet words but they secretly tamper with everything that relates to us Frisians.”

In his book “The Triumph of the Sea Gods: The War against the Goddess Hidden in Homer’s Tales”, author and researcher Steven Sora describes the events of Sturluson’s Aesir/Vanir war:

In general, the Vanir are decidedly the older goddess-worshiping peoples and the Aesir are the patriarchal invaders.

The Vanir were farmers and seafarers, made wealthy in trade. When a priestess of the Vanir was kidnapped and tortured by the Aesir, the two sides went to war. According to the lengthy epic poem, the status of just whose gods were most important was the true reason for battle. The Aesir, led by Odin, had a huge army but the Vanir were better prepared to resist invasion. The Aesir suffered the most defeats but both sides were exhausted by the vicious combat. A truce ended the war.”

The Oera Linda Book describes the ancient Fryans as farmers and seafarers who were an advanced and sophisticated society who possessed Iron Age technology in the Bronze Age. They could also be said to be “goddess worshipers”, who venerated the “Earth Mother” Frya, as well as “Irtha”- Mother Earth herself. However, officially, the Fryans only truly worshiped one deity- WRA-ALDA, the Divine One that created all things.

In The Oera Linda Book we also have an account of the Fryan Folk Mother (the chief high priestess) Frana being abducted by eastern Euro-Asiatic led by “the Magy”- a priest king from central Asia. The Magy has her abducted and taken aboard his ship where he proceeded to proclaim his intention of becoming “master of all the lands and people of Frya” and demanded that she proclaim this would indeed come to pass (Frana was a clairvoyant), or he would “let her suffer an agonizing death”. But Frana instead gave the following prophecy:

At the time Aldland sank, the first spoke of the Yule stood at the top. Then it went down, and our freedom with it. When two spokes, or two thousand years, shall have passed, the sons shall arise who have been bred of the fornication of the rulers and priests with the people, and shall witness against their fathers.

They shall all succumb to murder, but what they have proclaimed shall endure and become fruitful in the bosoms of bold men, like good seed which is laid in your lap. The spoke shall descend for a further thousand years, and sink deeper in darkness and in the blood shed over you by the wickedness of the rulers and priests. After that, the dawn shall begin to glow.

Seeing this, the false rulers and priests will all together strive and wrestle against freedom, but freedom, love and unity will take the people under their protection, and will rise with the Yule out of the vile pool. Justice, which at first only glimmered, shall then become a flame… All the disgraceful histories that were contrived in praise of the rulers and priests shall be offered to the flame. Thenceforth, your children shall live in peace.”

The Magy was upset by what he essentially saw as a non-answer and chastised the weakened Folk Mother. Frana then sat up and stared at him, stating, “Before seven days have passed your soul shall haunt the tombs with the night-birds ad your body shall lie at the bottom of the sea.

The Magy then had Frana thrown overboard to her presumed demise as The Oera Linda Book laments:

This was the end of the last of the Mothers. We shall never call for revenge. Time will provide that; nit a thousand times a thousand we will call with Frya, ‘Watch! Watch! Watch!’”


In the 1950s, Lithuanian-American archaeologist Marija Gimbutas put forth a theory known as the “Kurgan hypothesis“, which postulated that people of a “kurgan” (burial mound) culture from the Pontic-Caspian (highlighted on map below in pink) steppe were the originators of what became known as  Proto-Indo-European language.

Gimbutas believed that the expansions of the Kurgan culture were a series of military incursions where a new warrior culture imposed itself on the peaceful, matrilinear (hereditary through the female line), “matrifocal”, though egalitarian cultures of “Old Europe“, replacing it with a patriarchal warrior society, a process visible in the appearance of fortified settlements and hillforts and the graves of warrior-chieftains.  Gimbutas stated of this transformation:

“The process of Indo-Europeanization was a cultural, not a physical, transformation. It must be understood as a military victory in terms of successfully imposing a new administrative system, language, and religion upon the indigenous groups.

Later on, Gimbutas began to emphasize the authoritarian nature of this transition from the egalitarian process of the “nature/Mother Goddess to a patriarchal society and the worship of the patristic / father / sun / weather God (Zeus, Dyaus, Odin, Thor).

However, this current of thought was taken beyond an “agricultural vs. nomadic” society dialectic and used to fuel theories of feminist spirituality and feminist archaeology in the 1970s. These ultimately political movements tended to seek historical evidence of an egalitarian matriarchal society that had no hierarchy and was the embodiment of a feminist utopia.  However, Gimbutas’ opinion was that the matriarchal society would have functioned in a similar hierarchical manner as a patriarchal society, rather than the utopian vision of 2nd wave feminism, and received criticism from these movements as a result.

Gimbutas’ view of an “Old European matriarchy” was certainly closer to the reality presented in The Oera Linda Book, however it was a matriarchal society that primarily worshiped a Solar/Light deity typically referred to with masculine pronouns.  They essentially worshiped the Highest forces, which are rather non-dual, as opposed to the lower archetypes and forms that tend to come with a greater pre-packaged dualism.

The Oera Linda Book describes the ancient Fryans as farmers and seafarers who were an advanced and sophisticated society who possessed Iron Age technology in the Bronze Age. They could also be said to be “goddess worshipers”, who venerated the “Earth Mother” Frya, as well as “Irtha”- Mother Earth herself.  However, officially, the Fryans only truly worshiped one deity- WRA-ALDA, the Divine ONE through whom all things come into existence.


In both Wagner’s Ring Saga and the Eddas, Wotan/Wodin/Odin is depicted as being tormented by the fact that he knows his fate and the fate of those he is most connected to which he is powerless to stop.  And in the case of the Wagnerian mythos, it is Wodin who ultimately is the cause of this destruction.

The figure of Wodin is important in The Oera Linda Book as he represents the point where a people through their leaders, comes to a point where a fate-altering decision must be made- and the decision made brings about their decline.

It is difficult to say what, if any difference it would have made to the people of NSDAP Germany had The Oera Linda Book been accepted by the leadership, as the governing archetype had already been established- the archetype of Wotan; the archetype that brings a moment of glory before bringing about utter destruction.

In spite of the numerous, often rather comical attempts to psychoanalyze Adolf Hitler postmortem, no one can truly know what lied in the deepest recesses of his soul.  Jung claimed that he and NSDAP Germany had embodied  the archetype of Wotan- but what does that really mean?

On one level, Wodin/Odin/Wotan can be seen as a “proto-Faustian” archetype that embodies the European spirit.  Forever searching and striving; ever restless and hungry for something beyond material subsistance.  But the Faustian nature of European man is also very “Left-Hand” oriented and can have a somewhat sinister, egoic and potentially self-destructive element to it.

In his pamphlet “The Path of Wotan“, N.S. Kindred founder Jost Turner equates Wotan/Wodin/Odin with the Indo-Aryan god Shiva– lord of destruction and transformation.  Shiva is seen as a god of “creative destruction”; where things must be burned down to their base elements and then reconstituted.  This is a similar role given to Adolf Hitler in Savitri Devi’s “The Lightning and the Sun“.

For all intents and purposes, World War II was “Ragnarok” for Germany and the German people (and for much of Europe as a whole)- a Ragnarok from which it has yet to recover.  Perhaps, like Wotan, Hitler knew that this was going to happen; maybe even that it had to happen– and that he was powerless to stop it. 

But Ragnarok was also the crucible from which forged a new beginning for the world.  The world we see today may look like one of decline and decay.  Some may look upon the defeat of NSDAP Germany and the suppression of all “like ideas” as a tragic loss for the West and for the European folk.  But in the view of history, this is all just a blink of an eye.

The true “masters of the chessboard” are capable of seeing “the long game”.  They can see victory in defeat.  The European nationalist movements of the 1920s and 1930s were the first to really challenge the assumption that the absolute dominance of globalist modernity was an unquestionable moral good, and reassert the morality of folkish consciousness and the prosperity that it can bring.

The victory of these movements and ideas, was not one of the battlefield or even in the realm of socio-political life; but as seeds that needed to germinate in darkness, be given the proper nutrients, and then blossom at a later time, reaching towards the Sun; reaching towards WRA-ALDA.

That time is now.

WRA-ALDA’S Blessings unto you.


“SAVED FROM THE FLOOD” ~ Oera Linda studies

“TRACES OF OUR ANCESTORS” ~ a new English translation of the Oera Linda Book




“Hail to the Children of Frya!  In the end they shall see me again.  Though him only can I recognize as free who is neither a slave to another nor to his own passions.”

  • The Book of Adela’s Followers

(Editor’s note: The following is a repackaged revision of a previous article series):


One of the most legendary figures from what is referred to as “The Viking Age” is the “berserker”- the mad warrior who runs into battle wearing only animal skins, crying out a hideous yell as he slaughters all in his path, while seeming to be impervious to pain.

Famed Icelandic poet and historian, Snorri Sturluson wrote of these berserkers in the Ynglinga Saga:

“[Odin’s] men went without their mailcoats and were mad as hounds or wolves, bit their shields…they slew men, but neither fire nor iron had effect upon them. This is called ‘going berserk’.”

In Old Norse, “berserker” meant “bear shirts”. This indicated that these warriors went into battle wearing bear hides. However there were also úlfheðnar, which meant “wolf hides”; who were warriors who wore wolf skins into battle and went into a similar mad frenzy.

The practice of wearing totem animal skins and reaching a state of ecstatic frenzy during battle and/or ritual was and is a commonality among those who practice shamanism. Often referred to as “animism” or “nature worship”, shamanism is a common practice and worldview among indigenous peoples the world over, and many share similar practices and cosmologies across cultures and large geographic distance.

The common cosmology for the shaman typically consists of a World Tree or Pole that contains various realms, which the shaman can travel to and bring back wisdom and knowledge for the benefit of the tribe (or just himself). These realms are typically divided into an “upper”, “middle” and “lower” world; although they are often subdivided further depending on the culture.

The people of the greater Slavic lands into central Asia practiced shamanism for millennia before the coming of Christianity. The ancient Slavs had a cosmology consisting of an Earth that was an island floating in a great ocean, with a World Tree running through the middle of it, connecting it to various realms of existence from the heavenly realm of the god to the underworld land of the dead.

For those familiar with Norse-Germanic mythology, this is Yggdrasil, the World Tree. However, it is not only the cosmology of the Slavs that is similar to the Norse, but many of the pagan gods as well have a great deal of similarities to one another. One of primary explanations for this is that they were both part of a greater Proto-Indo European pagan tradition

This Indo-Aryan/European shamanic paganism and its offshoots are touted by many as the “primordial” religion of the Northern Europeans before Christianity took over.

But what if that isn’t true?

While most mainstream scholars and academics claim that shamanism and pagan “nature worship” are the oldest forms of spiritual practice and ritual, researchers into mystic and occult lore and traditions like Mark Booth found a different perspective in what has been referred to as “occult history”. In his book “The Secret History of the World”, Booth states the following in regards to shamanism:

“… the beings encountered by shamans seem to be from the lower levels, rather than the more elevated planetary gods with whom the initiate priests communed.

In the view of modern esoteric teachers, then, all shamanism, whether that of the old Hunnic or Mongol hordes… represent a degeneration of a once magnificent primordial vision…

In conventional history religion’s early stages were marked by animism and totemism. This developed into the complicated cosmologies of the great ancient civilizations. In the secret history humankind’s primordial vision was complicated, sophisticated and magnificent, and only later degenerated into animism, totemism and shamanism.”

Of course, if we are directing our spiritual attention straight to the Logos; the Most High Eternal Light of Creation; even the planetary gods could be understood as “lower beings”.

There has been a great revival and interest in the “old ways” of pagan European spirituality, particularly among the various European/White identitarian and nationalist movements. They argue that Christianity, which defined European and Western culture for the better part of a millennia, is a foreign religion that was imposed upon Europe and is ultimately antithetical to the true nature of the European stock of peoples.

Gravitating towards Asatru, Odinism and the veneration of the Norse/Germanic gods (as was the case with many within the old National Socialist leadership) these “neovölkisch” pagans have the expressed aim of reviving something more “authentic” to the European folk soul.

But again, what if it isn’t?

What if the spirituality of Norse/Germanic paganism is yet another, albeit older, Asiatic import that was brought into Europe? What if the pagan mythology and the shaman/warrior cultures associated with them represent a deviation from and a degeneration of an even older European perennial tradition?


In the spring of 1934, a group of NSDAP (“Nazi”) leaders and intellectuals were involved in a panel discussion that became a fierce debate at the University of Berlin. The center of the argument was an obscure Dutch-Frisian text known as “The Oera Linda Book”.

The Oera Linda Book first came to the public eye nearly 70 years earlier when a Dutchman by the name of Cornelius Over de Linden handed over the manuscript that had been passed down through his family for generations, to the provincial library of Friesland (a coastal province in the northwest Netherlands) for translation. While there were certainly scholars who claimed the work to be authentic, the bulk of mainstream academia by and large dismissed it (rather out of hand) as a forgery.

Image result for himmler oera linda

Several decades later, a Dutch völkisch philologist named Herman Wirth published a translation of The Oera Linda Book and dubbed it as the “Nordic Bible”. Wirth gave a copy of the book to his friend and associate, Heinrich Himmler, who soon became infatuated with the book to such an extent that it became known as “Himmler’s Bible”.

However, many leading figures within the NSDAP were not keen on the book, and essentially took the side of mainstream academia in declaring the text as inauthentic and a “hoax”. One of the main figures leading this charge was Alfred Rosenberg– author of the seminal work of NSDAP ideology, “The Myth of the Twentieth Century” and the man who introduced Adolf Hitler to the NSDAP.

The two opposing camps officially “squared off” during a panel discussion centered on The Oera Linda Book that took place on May 4th 1934 at the aforementioned University of Berlin. The discussion turned into a heated debate, but in the end, The Oera Linda Book was officially declared “a hoax” by the NSDAP, and “Himmler’s Bible” receded once again into obscurity.

A primary mythos utilized by the National Socialists that was promoted through art, literature and propaganda was that of an ancient Aryan pagan warrior society, taken largely from the Eddas as well as the Vedas, which are undeniably connected. The ideals and imagery associated with this somewhat romanticized history worked well with the rather patriarchal and authoritarian nature of the NSDAP regime.

However, The Oera Linda Book presented a rather different view of the ancient Aryans (or “Fryans” as they are referred to in the text), causing some researchers to postulate that the real reason for the rejection of the book by the NSDAP was largely political, rather than scholarly.


The Oera Linda Book speaks of an ancient civilization of farmers and sailors whose society once expanded across Europe into Russia and North Africa. Their homeland is a place called “Atland”, which can reasonably be correlated to “Atlantis”, and is presumed to lie beneath the waves of the northern Atlantic, save perhaps for a few remnants that survive as small islands.

Fryan society was a “theocracy” led by a “Folk Mother” and her “Matrons”– priestesses who were in charge of guiding the society and maintaining a sacred eternal fire (a predecessor of the Roman Vestal Virgins). These priestesses were in charge of maintaining the morals of the society so they could stay connected to “Frya”- the ancient semi-divine matriarch of the Fryan people (the “White” races), and was said to have given birth to her children without “aid of a man”, and ascended to her “Watch Star” before a major cataclysm reshaped the world.

The Fryan Federation

Frya was said to be the last and greatest of the three daughters of WRALDA or WR-ALDA (which would likely have been pronounced either RA-AL-DA or RA-EL-DA) – the overarching deity of the Fryans who was akin to the concept of the Greek “Logos”, the Hermetic “ALL”, “The Monad” of the Gnostics and even “The Tao” of Taoism.

WRALDA is the most ancient of ancients or the most ancient because he created all things.  WR-ALDA is all in all, for he is eternal and everlasting… All that we can see of him are the created beings who came through his life and go back again, because from WRALDA all things proceed and return to him.  From, WRALDA comes the beginning and the end.”

WRA-ELDA translated to “Ra the Elder“, and was understood to be the Prime Eternal Ordering Mind, Ground and/or Principle from which all things come; a sort of cosmic essence beyond anthropomorphism.  WRA-ALDA has correlations in both ancient Egypt and Phoenicia. “Ra” is of course the name of the primal ancient Egyptian “sun-god”, while “Al” or “El” was the name of the supreme “Most High” god of the Phoenicians– both of whom are known to have had “Aryan” influences.

Morality and virtue was of the utmost importance to the Fryans, and nothing was prized more than freedom:

Sensible Frya. The first she taught her children was self-control, the second was the love of virtue and when they were grown she taught them the value of liberty; for she said:

‘Without liberty all other virtues serve to make you slaves, your origins to eternal disgrace.’”

In the text, the Fryans refer to themselves as the “Free People”, with the name of Frya literally meaning “free”. Slavery and bondage was seen as morally abhorrent by the Fryans, who referred to their neighbors in Asia and Africa as “the slave peoples”; meaning they were enslaved and/or they enslaved others. The penalty for either of these things in Fryan society was of the highest magnitude:

Should any man rob another of his freedom, even his debtor, you must lead him away on a leash like a slave. I advise you, though, burn his body and that of his mother in an open place and bury their ashes fifty feet below ground, so that no grass shall grow on them because such grass would kill your cattle.”

A love of freedom was something that has often been linked to the Celts, but Irish historian and author Liam De Paor, questioned whether this distinctly “western” virtue was in fact Celtic in origin in the 1986 BBC documentary series “The Celts” :

There is something that gives a distinctive character to the western peoples, but I do wonder how much of it was necessarily ‘Celtic’… I think we are dealing.. with a heritage of people who were there before the Celts; of Atlantic ‘barbarians’.. whose heritage is.. along the western coast of Europe. One of the things that does seem to run into the continental Celts from this western area, mentioned by Caesar and other writers, is a passion for freedom; individual freedom and a freedom from a certain kind of order. A certain kind of order is rejected. It’s the kind of order the Romans imposed...”

Fryan society was also based on the “democratic” election of public officials. Even the kings were elected and had strict term limits:

Except for the king, all officials may be re-elected who conduct themselves correctly and in accordance to Frya’s directives… No king may remain king for longer than three years lest he becomes entrenched.”

The NSDAP government would have been quite wary of officially endorsing anything that detailed something akin to a “democracy” or spoke so much of “freedom”. The centralized authoritarianism of NSDAP was somewhat antithetical to these ideals, particularly in the forms that “freedom and democracy” had come to take in the 20th century.

Führers have no term limits.

Leaders within the German and European right as a whole saw democracy as a scourge on the world, and saw the freedom of America as something that was at this point bringing a culture of selfish materialism to the world.  But one also mustn’t forget that Germany had just come out of a type of social democratic republic with the failed Weimar Republic and saw the very real pitfalls of a “democratic experiment”- and the social and economic decay that had come with it.

However, the “social democracy” of the Fryans and the decaying democracy of the modern West were and are two very different animals, arising from two distinctly different cultural entities.

While perhaps having a root in a more virtuous and self-reliant founding cultural stock; the people of the modern west (led by America) generally want little to do with virtue or self-control, and only love their “freedom” because to them, it means they can pursue whatever selfish interest they want.

Fryans however, were raised to love virtue (i.e. the virtue of being a contributing member of a folkish society) and have self-control BEFORE the value of freedom was instilled.

The Fryans understood that with freedom comes great responsibility.

But, the freedom-loving Fryans were also “socialist” of “socially democratic” to a degree and believed in fair division of labor and resources and taking care of their own:

Four things are given for your enjoyment, namely air, water, land, and fire.  WRALDA, though, is the sole possessor of them.  Therefore I advise you, you should choose upright men who will fairly divide the labor and the fruits, so that no-one shall be exempt from work or from the duty of defense.

If a man has taken a wife, he must be given a house and yard.  If there is none, it must be built for him.

The Fryans were almost militant in their belief that they should look out for one another, as evidenced in Frya’s Tex (Laws):

You have seen how quickly I provide assistance.  Do the same for your neighbor.  Do not wait until someone begs you; the afflicted would curse you, my matrons would erase your name from the book, and I would have to denounce you as a stranger.”

However, their “socialism” was not the modern bureaucratic nightmare that promotes loafing about (Fryans exiled any able-bodied person who would not pull their own weight), but was more of along the lines of the sort of distributism that can be found particularly among the Amish and Mennonite communities. Indeed, these Dutch Christian peoples may be the closest one could get to understanding what the values of the ancient Fryans would have been.

The benefits of Fryan society were only extended to Fryans.  Non-Fryans and exiles were typically not permitted to stay within Burgh (city) limits.  If employed by Fryan merchant vessels, non-Fryans would have temporary living quarters outside of the city, although they would have been taken care of as guests.  They also would have had Fryan “missionaries” visit them and teach any who were receptive, the ideas of freedom that the Fryans valued, as the Fryans looked to “make friends everywhere“.

The “folkish socialism” of the Fryans would have been somewhat on par with NSDAP policy, as would have been their commitment to conservationism, the outlaw of usury, the requirement that boys be conscripted to some form of “national service” (either militarily or as a seamen for 3 years) and their anti-miscegenation laws.

The Fryans saw race mixing as something that would endanger the purity of their civilization, which they had just barely managed to preserve after the sinking of Atland and the corresponding catastrophes and raids from the East. This decree was encoded in their most sacred set of laws handed down from Frya herself:

“Should any of them (the people of Finda or Lyda [blacks]) desire one of your daughters as a wife, and she is willing, explain to her foolishness; but if she still wants to let her follow her suitor, let her go in peace.

If your son wishes for a daughter of theirs, you must do the same as with your daughter; but neither the one nor the other may ever return, for they would introduce foreign morals and customs, and if these were accepted by you, I could no longer watch over you.

But although there was a sense of cultural superiority among the Fryans, they were also very adament on maintaining good standing in the world at large as an example of high moral behavior and general kindness towards the other races.  However, they could also fierce and warrior-like as illustrated by the following passage:

Should it happen that they (the Races of Finda and Lyda) want advice or something else from you, you should help them.  If they come to rob you, though, then fall upon them like a raging fire.

The Fryans also believed in equality- something that is inherently “of the Left“, but their equality was not one of the universalist sense we think of when we hear the word today, but rather one for their own people within the constructs of their own laws, which they saw as divine in principle:

All Frya’s children are born equal.  Therefore they must have equal rights on land and else where, that is water, and in all that WRALDA has given.


Related image

Now to many, The Oera Linda Book itself will look like a less-than-credible source due to its confusing layout and seeming lack of supporting material. However, a great deal of work has been done by the late Afrikaner amateur archaeologist and historian, Alewyn J. Raubenheimer in his extensively-sourced book, “Chronicles from Pre-Celtic Europe: Survivors of the Great Tsunami”. In the book, Raubenheimer draws from both ancient historical texts, the most recent archaeological and geological discoveries, and DNA haplogroup mapping to show that the events described in The Oera Linda Book are indeed rooted in actual history.

One of the major historical themes in Raubenheimer’s book, as well as The Oera Linda Book is the ancient Asiatic migrations and invasions of Europe. Now, many are familiar with the invasions of the Huns, the Mongols and the Arab Turks into Europe during the Christian era. But far fewer know of any Asiatic invasions occurring around 2000 B.C., as the general mainstream history for northern and central Europe that far back tends to suggest that nothing much was going on at that time, and that everything of note was happening in the Middle East.

The Oera Linda Book explains a much more eventful situation:

How the Bad times came.

The whole summer the sun hid behind the clouds, as if it did not want to see the earth. The wind rested in its place causing smoke and mist to hang like sails above the houses and marshes. The air was dreary and dull, and in the hearts of people, there were neither joy nor happiness.

In the midst of this stillness, the earth began to tremble as if she was dying. The mountains split open to spew out fire and ash, others sank into her bowels, and where there were fields, mountains and waves went so high over mountain and dale that everything was submerged. Many people were buried in the earth and many who had escaped the fire perished in the water. Not only in Finda’s Land (Asia) did the mountains spew fire but also in Twiskland (Germany). Forests were burned one after the other, and when the wind fame there our land was covered with ash. Rivers changed their course, and at their mouths, new islands were formed of sand and floating animals.

Three years earth suffered, but when it improved, the forests could be seen. Many countries were submerged, others had risen out of the sea and in Twiskland half of the forests were destroyed. Bands of Finda’s people came and settled in the empty spaces. Our dispersed people were exterminated or became their slaves. Then watchfulness was doubly impressed upon us, and time taught us that unity is our best fortress.

Mountains, bow your heads; clouds and streams, weep. Yes. Skenland blush, Slave nations trample on your cloak. O, Frya!”

This is no doubt the same great cataclysm that is correlated in myths across the world as well, and is backed up by ancient historical records as well as the geological record. This event has been meticulously studied and documented by many researchers- both alternative and mainstream. This cataclysm brought about the destruction of old homelands and a “clash of civilizations” between European and Asiatic civilization that has been one of the primary recurring themes of recorded history.

Raubenheimer uses geological, archaeological and historical evidence to place this cataclysm and the earliest writings within The Oera Linda Book at nearly 3,000 years BC.

But it is not only the cataclysm itself that finds correlation among scholars, but the antediluvian “matriarchy” centered around a “goddess” can also be found. Reference to this can be found in the book “Mysteries of the Druids” written by British historian, explorer, and philosopher W. Winwood Reade in 1861:

There is, however, a tradition that at one period both in Gaul and Britain, the women were supreme, that they ruled the councils of state, that they led armies of war. That the Druids by degrees supplanted them, and obtained the power for themselves.”

This description correlates quite well with the history laid out in The Oera Linda Book, which speaks of “The Druids” as pagan priests from the Levant that partnered with the Phoenicians (who themselves were Fryan exiles that partnered with Semitic tribes) made rich off sex-trafficking and general mercantilism, and moved into France and the Fryan penal colony of Britain to lead a revolt against the Fryans. This concept of Semitic priest-kings exerting dominance in Britain has been extensively researched by folks like Michael Tsarion who in turn, references researchers like Ignatius Donnelly, Comyns Beaumont, Conor MacDari, Anna Wilkes, Ralph Ellis, and L.A.Waddell.

However, the “supremacy” of the Fryan priestesses known as Folk Mothers, Matrons and Maidens, was not totalitarian by any means, as the women headed the religious, ethical, educational, housing/welfare and horticultural aspects of the society, while men headed up the matters of defense, general governance, and mercantile activities with relative autonomy, although the Folk Mother did tend to have the final veto.

Fryan federation

This history of the primordial priestess and “Germanic Aryan Feminism” was attested to by the research and writings of Herman Wirth and was vehemently opposed by Alfred Rosenberg.  Rosenberg believed patriarchy to be an indigenous European institution.  This view of Rosenberg was also lauded by Julius Evola in his book “Revolt Against the Modern World“:

Rosenberg was also right to criticize Wirth’s association concerning the Northern-Atlantic cycle, of the solar cult with the cult of the Mother, which consistently presents cthonic (of or having to do with the underworld) and lunar, rather than solar characteristics.”

However, Evola’s examples of this “cult of the Mother” are all taken from the Semitic and Mediterranean world (Babylon, Egypt, and Greece), and would have therefore taken on a much different form than what was found in Northern Europe.  There also seems to be an ignorance that the true object of worship among these ancient “Germanic Aryans” was not the matrons or even Frya, but the SOLAR deity, Ra the Elder or WRALDA.

Russian political analyst, strategist and philosopher Alexander Dugin wrote of Wirth and this ancient Germanic religion in the foreword to “Signs of the Great North: The Hyperborean Theory”:

After all, paganism was a perversion of the ancient proto-monotheism which came along with patriarchal usurpation. The Aryan ancestors never recognized the existence of separate, individualized deities. They worshipped the One World imbued with the presence of the One God whose signs of manifestation changed, unfolding in time and space, but while remaining essentially the same, the Self. Paganism arose out of the crisis of the primordial Nordic matriarchy.

Perhaps one of the more troubling aspects for NSDAP leaders like Rosenberg, may have been the strong similarities between the “monotheism” of the Fryan “religion” and that of Judaeo-Christianity. The typical stance among thinkers like Rosenberg was that Christianity was ultimately the product of Judaism, and that as such, was completely alien to European man.

However, if The Oera Linda Book was taken as true, then a much more complicated history comes down in which it would appear that much of the core principles of Judaism and later Christianity- with it’s belief in one supreme deity; it’s disdain for idol worship, superstition and low magick (witchcraft/sorcery); and belief in a form of “humanitarianism” (and in the case of Judaism, strict ethno-separatism)- was in fact, the product of the White European folk, rather than something completely alien that was imposed upon it.

And although it is well-established that Christianity as an external religion was “assimilated” into European culture through its adoption of pagan sites, holy days, and even deities as saints; this does not explain why the very non-pagan values of Christianity were so readily adopted by the European peoples- unless they were already there in some form.

Indeed, if the history presented in The Oera Linda Book is true, then the religion of the seafaring Fryans made its way into the Middle East, where it was then amalgamated with the local Semitic cultural practices and deities, then repackaged and brought back into Europe in the following centuries.

Through the seafaring Fryans and their wanderings of trade and adventure, WRA-ELDA would have journeyed through Egypt and the Levant where his name shortened to Ra among the Egyptians and El among the Phoenicians (The Oera Linda Book specifically speaks of an exiled Fryan Sea King founding the city of Tyre and what became the renowned Pheonician maritime civilization). Some scholars and researchers suggest that it was the Phoenician El that was the god of Genesis, Enoch and the New Testament, but was replaced by the lower entity YHVH or Yahweh.  YHVH being a ruling archetype/archon of the forces of physical matter, while (WRA)EL(DA) represented the higher levels of spirit.

Similarly- and probably just as controversial for much of the NSDAP leadership- this history also suggests that the Nordic/Germanic paganism often touted as a “native” European spirituality, was not. But rather it too, was an Asiatic import that was brought into Europe and was made “European” through the adoption of it by the European folk who would have infused their own values, customs, and local legends into it- just as they would do Christianity.

However, if we look at the laws and values of Fryan society, of which I have provided only a small sample, we see a blend of both the masculine warrior ethos preserved in the European pagan and mythological traditions and the compassionate humanitarianism expressed in European Christianity.

In my view, this is THE perennial European spiritual philosophy as it embodies a marriage of the Feminine and Masculine polarities of the European folk psyche.  This later would become lopsided and unbalanced in various ways as foreign “re-packagings” were brought in, polluting the original purity of Frya’s spiritual transmission.

WRALDA’S Blessings unto you.







“The dark shall soon flee from the dells of the earth

So she a wonderful word to us speaks

The day shall again, new made rise from a rosy sky

Saint Lucy, Saint Lucy”

  • The Lucia Song: verse 3 (English Translation)





Something that has gained increasing traction in not only academia, but also in popular culture, is the idea that people of European descent, i.e. “White people”, have no “real” culture of their own.  This idea has largely come out of “Whiteness Studies”, which is an offshoot of Neo-Marxist Critical Theory and has entrenched itself into the worldview of an increasing number of people across the Western world.  If you ask any adherent to this philosophy what “White culture” is, they might respond with words like “patriarchy”, “capitalism”, “oppression”, “privilege”, “cultural appropriation”, “racism”, “exploitation”, etc.  They might even say that White people don’t really have a culture of their own outside of Big Macs and Hollywood movies.

There is perhaps no better, more consolidated example to support this view than the modern Christmas or “Holiday” Season.  Christmas and the Holiday Season, have become synonymous with capitalism, commercialism, consumerism, materialism, and of course, racism.  The myth of the fat old white man going around the world spreading “cheer” by distributing all the latest consumer products the “white” global consumerist market has to offer- this is what Christmas or “The Holidays” are all about in modern consumer society.

Plus, add to that the annual resurgence of all the various debates around whether we say “Merry Christmas” or “Happy Holidays” or what skin color Santa and Jesus should have.  One could even argue that the “origins” of Christmas, i.e. the Jesus Nativity story, is a sort of white cultural appropriation as it is a story involving Middle Eastern people in Middle Eastern lands, that is claimed by many white folk as their own.

In the following series, what I am going to lay out here is the case that what has become known as the oppressive “non-culture” of Whiteness, particularly as exemplified by the modern Holiday mythos, is in fact, something that was slowly imposed on “White people”, who in fact DO have a rich cultural tradition that still lives on DESPITE multiple attempts to twist, subvert and eradicate it over the centuries.  I also plan to show how this rich culture, which has been shared with the world in a variety of forms, is also personified by the stories and traditions surrounding what has become known as “Christmas”, and this culture lives on in us in a deep archetypal and spiritual way, and is available to us here and now.


I have written in the past about the Solar myth that forms the spiritual significance of this time of year and the deeper mysteries and parallels of Christianity and the earlier Proto-Indo-European religions.  However, what of the Santa myth that rivals Jesus in cultural significance during this time of year?  What of this seeming archetype of modern “White” patriarchal consumerist globalization?

When it comes to the origins of the figure known as “Santa Claus”, a lot of people immediately gravitate toward the story of St. Nicholas of Myra.  A somewhat legendary figure, St. Nicholas was reputed to have a “legendary habit” of secret gift-giving.  Nicholas was a said to be a Greek Christian in the Byzantine Empire and during lived in the 4th Century A.D.- three to four centuries before the Muslim conquest of the region.  However, some have argued that St. Nicholas was in fact born of wealthy ethnic Black Anatolian “Muurs.

But the origins of what became Santa Claus are in truth much older than that, and originated in a much colder place.  In many parts of pre-Christian Northern and Central Europe, the Winter Solstice was known as the time when Odin or Wotan- the white-bearded ruler of Asgard, led his hunting party across the sky.  Known as “The Wild Hunt”, Odin rode his eight-legged (eight reindeer) steed named Sleipnir, which would leap great distances across the heavens.  During this time, children would leave their boots by the chimney filled with carrots and hay to feed Sleipnir.  In return for their charity, “Odin” would leave the children gifts by their boots.

This night of Odin’s “Wild Hunt” has a counterpart in what is known as Lussinatta, or “The Lussi Night” in Sweden.  This is now celebrated as St. Lucy’s Day and occurs on the 13th of December every year.  However, before the Gregorian Calendar shift, it would have fallen on December 21st– the night of the Winter Solstice.  Some legends suggest that a supernatural female entity was said to ride through the air with her fearsome followers called “Lussiferda” and that it was particularly dangerous to be out on this night.  Misbehaved children had to take special care as Lussi could come down the chimney and take them away, and if certain tasks needed to prepare for Yule were not completed, Lussi would punish the household.

The contrast between Odin who left gifts and Lussi who brought punishment has echoes of the later pair of St. Nicholas/Santa Claus and the Krampus.  Interestingly, some scholars link Krampus, as a member of the fearsome entourage of the ancient Germanic goddess Frau Perchta, who some connect with the ancient Norse goddess, Freya– one of the primary Vanir or old nature gods who some say ruled before the Aesir.

The inclusion of both the fearsome and the festive shows a deep understanding of the dualism inherent in nature that these ancient European peoples possessed- especially during this most perilous time of year.  On the one hand, we have the often harsh and brutal forces of nature during the cold winter months.  And on the other, we have the festive joy that comes from the promise of the return of the Sun.

But if we go even deeper and look at etymology and linguistics, we add another layer of sophistication.  Swedish stems from the Indo-European family of languages, if we sound out the name of Lussi and in particular, her Lussiferda, the name “Lucifer” might perhaps come to mind.  Lucifer, of course, stems from “lux ferre”, which in another Indo-European language, and that is Latin, literally means “light bringing”.  We perhaps see that these ancient Northern Europeans were pointing at how it was the oft-times terrifying darkness that carried the Light that brought life to the world.  This is true not only within Nature, but within the trials and tribulations of our own lives and our own being- the night is darkest before the dawn.  It is the darkness that brings the Light.

We see this deep understanding mirrored in in the Scandinavian Festival of St. Lucy where traditionally a procession is led by a beautiful young lady adorned with a crown or wreath of candles upon her head (although now this is being changed to be morepolitically correct”), bringing the promise of life-giving Light into the darkest night.



The cold and brutal Northern European winter was a time that had the potential to bring starvation and death (and often did).  But with after the passing of the Solstice, the people knew that the days were slowly beginning to grow longer, and the life-giving Sun was growing stronger.

The Norse-Germanic festival of Yule was celebrated from right around the time of the Winter Solstice all the way through the second week in January.  This festival of feasting, drinking and sacrifice was a hallowed tradition among pre-Christian Northern European peoples to whom winter had a special significance that was not held among most others.  Yule was the tradition of a people who were close to the land and intimately tied into the cycles and processes of Nature.

The industrious elves/dwarves, the holly, the mistletoe, and the evergreens that have all become symbols of “Christmas” are all hallmarks of the culture and lore of Northern Europe.  The white of the pure, cleansing snow; the green of the evergreen tree- symbol of the magic of regenerative life; the red of the blood of the sacrifice and the folk; and the gold of the eternal undying Sun; these are the colors that are synonymous with “The Holidays” and they are inseparable from the unique folk consciousness and soul of the Northern European peoples.

These ancient “white” people were a very distinct culture with rich customs and traditions.  However, they would eventually find their culture usurped and altered at the point of a sword by invaders from the south and the east, as well as traitors within their own tribe.  Of course, what I am referring to is the spread of Christianity in Europe.


Christianity moved in slowly at first, with the rather tolerant Northern European pagans accepting and in some cases even adopting the worship of this new “god”, seeing similarities between their deities of similar attributes.  This was commonplace during the old phase of the Roman Empire, where Celtic gods and Roman gods were often mixed and matched.  However, Rome began to use its wealth and influence to spread its influence, bribing local rulers and nobility, who in turn would use their military resources to impose the new religion on their people as well as neighboring tribes.

Another reason this new empire was so successful was that it also became adept at using more subtle tactics, such as co-opting the patron deities of various European peoples and turning them into Christian “saints”.  These figures would be attributed to various good deeds or miracles that made them similar to the deity the church wished to replace.  They would then proclaim the pagan festivals and holy days that used to belong to the old deity as now being a celebration and veneration of that saint.  This is more than likely what happened with figures like Saint Nicholas and Saint Lucy in Northern Europe.

By the end of the 14th century, the entirety of Europe had been converted to Christianity, and even after the split between the Eastern and Western church in 1054 AD, Rome would still control Europe and its people from the British Isles, to Scandinavia, all the way into Hungary and parts of Romania.  Through the church, Rome controlled the people not only through political means, but through the indoctrination of the people into a dogmatic belief system, it by proxy controlled their minds.

The conflict of the incoming Semitic Saturnian religion with that of the Indo-European Solar religion, has in many respects seemed to create a sort of neurosis in the European collective consciousness.  This is could be in part because this was not really an organic spirituality of the people based on their unique relationship to Nature and Spirit, but rather something that was foisted upon them, largely against their will.  This could also be because the totality of what was happening and is continuing to happen with these archetypal forces has not been fully understood and integrated.



“And they clothed him with purple, and platted a crown of thorns, and put it on his head, and began to salute him, ‘Hail, King of the Jews.’… And when they crucified him, they parted his garments, casting lots upon them, what every man should take.  And it was the third hour, and they crucified him.  And the superscription of his accusation was written over, THE KING OF THE JEWS.”

 – Matthew 15:17-26


image courtesy of

One of the main plotlines in J.R.R. Tolkien’s epic “Lord of the Rings” series revolves around the character of Aragorn, the rightful heir to the throne of the human kingdom of Gondor and descendant of King Elendil who first destroyed the evil sorcerer, Sauron.  However, after vanquishing the dark lord, the king chose to keep the wizard’s Ring of Power rather than destroy it, which ultimately brought ruin and decay to himself and his kingdom.  Shamed by his family’s legacy, Aragorn changes his name to “Strider” and lives in a state of self-imposed exile until he is finally called to take action against the forces of Sauron and step back into his rightful place as king in order to reunite the fractioned kingdoms of men.  This is a call that Aragorn answers quite reluctantly at first.

Another more recent work of fiction that captured the imagination of readers and later moviegoers around the world through its focus on intrigue, secret societies and religious conspiracies was author Dan Brown’s “The DaVinci Code”, and the series of novels and films that followed.  A central theme in that story revolved around a well-kept secret that Jesus was in fact married to Mary Magdalene and that the two had children together.  It was this “bloodline” of Jesus that was the true “Holy Grail”, which had been covered up by the Vatican for centuries.

The word Grail linguistically stems from the Sangraal, or Sangreal.  It was divided into San Graal or San Greal, which essentially means a “holy vessel”, but if it the parting of the letters is switched and spelled Sang Raal or Sang Real we have “holy blood.”  In mystical and alchemical symbolism, the bowl or chalice is a feminine symbol, so in this context it could have correlated to a “womb”- in this case the womb of Mary Magdalene containing the “blood” or genetic lineage of Jesus.


The concept for the Jesus bloodline/Holy Grail story that appeared in Brown’s books first appeared in the French 19th-century socialist politician, Louis Martin’s 1886 book “Les Evangiles sans Dieu”, as well as several other books by several other authors in subsequent decades.  However, perhaps the most well-known of these was the work of nonfiction by authors Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln entitled “Holy Blood, Holy Grail”, which was published in 1996.  The essential concept, which was later delved into further more recently in Jeff Wilkerson’s “Sion’s Army: The Freemasons” is that Jesus was indeed a historical figure who was an exiled “priest-king”, descending from the ancient “Hebrew” patriarchs David and Abraham.

Now, I’m going to take some creative liberty and play off this basic plotline for a moment so as to provide context for a more in-depth exploration of the archetype of “the King” later on.  In the Old Testament we have the great patriarchal lineage that is stated to be from Noah, to Abraham, to David, to Solomon.  After that we saw a division among the Tribes of Israel and a collapse into decadence after their leaders and the people (repeatedly) broke their covenant with God.  This is what set the stage for the “Babylonian Captivity”.  Many scholars will agree that it was in Babylon that the Judaism that we know today was crafted, which is by and large a corruption of the original spiritual lineage.

This corruption grew as the Babylonian Empire eventually gave way to the Roman Empire.  Here we had the corrupt Pharisees and Sadducees, as well as the Jewish mercantile and political elitists working with the Roman Empire to maintain a sort of illegitimate power.  It is at this point we see the rise of the various ascetic and zealot movements that began to speak out against these corrupt classes of Jewish elitists (“The Synagogue of Satan”) who sought worldly power above God.  This is where the story of the man who would become known as “Jesus” is said to begin.

This time would have culminated approximately with the central point of the Kali Yuga (according to Sri Yukteswar’s interpretation).  This was the “Dark Age” where the forces of Satan/Saturn would have been felt at their strongest point.  It was a harsh and dangerous world back then.  Brutality was the order of the day and people suffered immensely.  This would have been the world Jesus was born into, perhaps at first, completely unaware of his lineage and ancestral connection to the ancient patriarchs.  But at some point he is made aware of this, which may have occurred in what are known as the “Lost Years”.  Perhaps this was the time when he might have rejected this and chose to live in a state of self-imposed exile similar to the character of Aragorn in “Lord of the Rings”.  Perhaps he too felt shame in the failure of his ancestors and what it brought upon the people.

But like Aragorn, Jesus eventually answered “the call” to fulfill the destiny of his lineage, and stood toe to toe with the seemingly overwhelming forces of darkness, culminating with his triumph over death.  Most are at least somewhat familiar with the rest of the story which culminated in the crucifixion at “the place of the skull” and the subsequent resurrection and the transmission of a spiritual “lineage” to a select group of disciples.  One of these disciples was Mary Magdalene.

In some of what have become known as the Gnostic Gospels, there is described a scenario where there appears to be an issue of jealousy amongst some of the Apostles, namely Peter, for Mary Magdalene’s “cozy” relationship with Jesus, with him kissing her on the lips and her sitting in his lap.  According to some scholars, there is record from the 1st century A.D. of a Yeshua ben Yoseph being married to a Mary of Bethany.  The Hebrew interpretation of Jesus’ name was Yeshua.  Some traditions maintain that Mary Magdalene was in fact a descendant of King Saul of the Tribe of Benjamin, who was later overthrown by David of the Tribe of Judah.  It is said that the marriage of the two would have been seen as reuniting the two remaining tribes, and the child produced would have been doubly seen as the rightful heirs to the throne.


photo courtesy of

The story continues that after the crucifixion, the authorities sought out the Apostles and persecuted, imprisoned, exiled and even executed those that did not escape.  It is said that Mary Magdalene indeed did escape this fate and made her way to Gaul (France) either pregnant with Jesus’ child or with baby in tow (and some legends say Jesus’ mummified body). There were early Church writers who stated that Mary Magdalene, Lazarus, Joseph of Arimathea, Phillip, and several others went by ship to Marseilles on the coast of France.  Legend states that Joseph went on to England, where he established a church at Glastonbury. Lazarus and Mary Magdalene, however, are supposed to have remained in Gaul.  Today in France, tourists can visit the purported remains of both Lazarus and Mary Magdalene.  It is in France where the “bloodline” supposedly took root.  We also have the mystical Grail Tradition of legend coming out of this part of Europe around this time, with legendary kings like King Arthur and the Fisher King being linked to both the legendary Holy Grail as well as the personage of Jesus.

As an aside, I’m sure some may or may not have noticed an odd correlation with the exile and impregnation with a royal child story that was initially ascribed to Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew in particular.  We also find the name “Mary” given to both the mother of Jesus and the alleged lover of Jesus.  Could this situation have been something that was flipped in order to protect or hide identities or obfuscate a truth?  While the identity or non-identity of a historical Jesus has been and continues to be hotly debated, I think it is worth considering the real possibility that the claims of some researchers that history before 1500 AD had been completely re-written by the Roman Vatican.  From the destruction of the Library at Alexandria, to the extermination of the Druids, to the persecution and execution of early Christians, to the destruction of the Mystery Schools, there appears to have been a real attempt by the Roman Empire in its many forms, as well as its allies, to hide and destroy certain forms of knowledge and perhaps re-write history itself.  With this potential scenario, we could postulate that Jesus may have indeed been a “real” person, but the truth of his identity and his story has been used and obfuscated for political reasons, with the inconvenient parts flushed down the “memory hole”.

In any case getting back to our story of the “Holy Grail” and Mary Magdalene’s journey, we will find that it is also in France where we see the rise of the Merovingian Dynasty who the fifth through the seventh centuries.  The Merovingians were referred to as “sorcerer kings” or “priest kings”, and were said to have the ability to heal by the laying of hands and supposedly had clairvoyant ability and other psychic capabilities.  They are recorded as all having a distinct birthmark- a red cross- either over their heart or between their shoulder blades, which was said to testify as to their having “divine blood”.  This idea of the semi-divine “priest king” is something that goes back to the Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt.  It is also interesting to note that the portraits of some of these Merovingian kings looks incredibly similar to the traditional western depiction of Jesus.


However, frequent wars on behalf of the Roman Vatican and the interests behind it, weakened the power of the Merovingians, while the lower aristocracy of dukes and counts began to take political power after being given concessions by the kings in return for their support.  This led to the corruption and fall of the Merovingian dynasty.  However it is said that a secret society of esoteric Judeo-Zionists originating out of Nazareth known as the Priory of Sion has played and continues to play a role in protecting and maintaining this royal bloodline and continues to seek avenues of power for it, although these avenues seem to have become increasingly corrupted.  Several researchers have concluded that this Priory of Sion played a role in the founding of the Knights Templar and later, the Freemasons, and are said to have played a hand in the American, French and Russian Revolutions.  This is another area of history that is debated, with contradictory evidence appearing on both sides, but I find the narrative intriguing nonetheless.

But as I stated earlier, the real theme I want to bring attention to and discuss moving forward here is this archetypal narrative of the “King lineage representing the highest, most noble and virtuous aspects of humanity; the capacity for a fall away from this state of spiritual virtue and the consequences of it; and the ability to return to this place of spiritual nobility by answering “The Call” of what Joseph Campbell would refer to as “The Hero’s Journey”.  These are all things I will be exploring in the second part of this article.

Namaste and God Bless.


“The desire to destroy Germany is not new. For over 300 years England and France have fought against Germany’s right to consolidate its states… Hate against Germany has been taught for centuries… We do not teach our people hate against the British or French. But in their countries they are relentless with their hate campaigns. One day these brain-washed people will become the new government and then Germany will not know what hit it. This is why I am building up a defense.”
– Adolph Hitler: speech at the Sportpalast Berlin on January, 30th 1940


The Germanic Folk Spirit has played a special role in the history of humanity.  For those not familiar, a “Folk Spirit” is a collective informing consciousness of a people created through genetics, metagenetics and the unique interaction between the Earth and the Heavenly Bodies in an area of prolonged generational habitation.  If one looks at history, one might see what was a sort of consciousness “counter-current”.  The philosophy of spirituality, science, and society coming out of Germany differed from that of the dominant “empire” at the time, be it Rome, London or Washington D.C.  In one way or another, the Germanic peoples and the Germanic Folk Spirit have competed with the sort of materialistic and monopolistic philosophies of the Roman Empire (The Caesars and the Vatican), the British Empire, and later the American Empire, as well as others who shared their philosophies and ideologies.

Since at least the Middle Ages (and undoubtedly before that), the land of the Rhine and Danube Rivers has produced some of the greatest artists, musicians, scientists, alchemists and mystics the world has ever seen.  It is this land that gave birth to Meister Eckhart, Christian Rosenkreutz, Paracelsus, Bohme, Luther, Goethe, Hegel, Nietzsche, Steiner, Beethoven, Mozart, Wagner, Schauberger, and many others.  Author Jonathan Black speaks of a certain spiritual impulse that rose out of the Germanic lands (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, as well as parts of Belgium and France):

As.. materialism.. took root and spread, the opposing impulse arose in Germany- an idealism alive to the varieties, the subtleties and the anomalies of the human experience.  The great tradition of idealism in German philosophy includes Johann Georg Hamann, known as ‘the Magus in the North’, Fichte, Schelling, and later Rudolf Steiner…”

During World War II, this beautiful German land was scorched, incinerating men, women, children, the elderly, as well as a host of animal and plant life.  The horrors enacted upon the German civilian population by the combination of the bombings and the pillage, rape and torture by the Red Army produced incredible trauma in the psyche of the German people.  The suffering would continue for those east of the “Iron Curtain” for decades after half of Europe was essentially given to the Soviets.

The common narrative around the beginning of World War II in Europe is that “Germany started it” to fulfill super villain, Adolf Hitler’s “mad dream” of world domination and an Aryan Empire.  It is taught that this was Hitler’s goal from the get go, and that he re-armed massively during the build up to the war in order to accomplish this vision.  However, this was not exactly the case.  Contrary to popular belief, Hitler did not assign priority to the manufacturing of military hardware prior to the outbreak of World War II, but rather focused on things like housing construction and improving conditions for the German working man and his family.  Likewise, international trade and economic restrictions imposed on Germany  after the NSDAP came to power made a massive arms build-up a little challenging.


When the war finally broke out, Hitler and the NSDAP used strategy, not sheer military might, to gain the upper-hand during the early part of the war. By and large, much of Hitler’s “advances” into countries like Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland were in fact taking back territory that was held by Germany before the World War I and the implementation of the Treaty of Versailles. Many within were former German citizens who were welcoming reunification with Germany.  And while some may argue that Germany’s actions of moving into Poland and France was a “power grab” (and in some ways it was)again, these nations both held territory whose populations were ethnically German, and belonged to Germany prior to the Treaty of Versailles, and it was these regions that were occupied by Germany, while the areas that were not being “taken back”, remained under the governance of Poland and France.

As far as Poland, Germany technically only took back the pre-Treaty of Versailles German territory where ethnic Germans still lived, while leaving the rest of Poland to be run by the Polish government. Likewise, Germany had a “non-aggression” pact with Stalin, who also invaded Poland around the same time as Hitler while Britain turned a blind eye (Britain declared war on Germany for invading Poland). It was when Hitler found that Stalin had plans to launch a full on invasion of Europe that he launched the ill-fated preemptive strike on Communist Russia.


Hitler would see the encroachment of Communist uprisings across Europe coupled with the advancement of Stalin’s forces as reason for Germany to step up as a defender of Europe and leader in a sort of united Pan-Europeanism. Of course, the German occupation of European nations would have been done first and foremost to protect Germany from the Soviets, many of the “Nazi sympathizers” within the leadership of nations like Finland, Hungary and France, shared the NSDAP concern of advancing Communist power and willingly allied with Germany, seeing it as a strong leader in the fight against Communism. Of course at the end of the day, motives and reactions to Germany’s exertion of influence varied across occupied Europe.


By the end of the war, it would be the Communist Red Army that was allowed to march into Germany, raping and pillaging everywhere they went. This was something that severely upset U.S. General Patton, who could have taken Berlin before the Red Army in a much more humane fashion, but was not allowed to by Allied Commanding General Eisenhower. After the war, Patton became increasingly outspoken of his criticism of the Communist Russians and the fact they had essentially been given half of Europe. Shortly after the war, Patton died in a hospital in Germany after a minor vehicle accident. Many believe he was killed to silence him. In Patton’s diary, he recorded a correspondence between him and French General Alphonse Juin who told Patton:

It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country – and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism.

German cities were absolutely leveled by the ferocious carpet bombing of the British and American forces. The supply rail lines were bombed out and the labor camps like Auschwitz that provided most of the raw supplies needed for the war effort were falling into chaos due to pandemic outbreaks of Typhus (which was spread by lice in particular) and the inability to get food and medical supplies. The German military was suffering massive casualties to the point where the NSDAP was recruiting youths and elderly men to fight to defend Germany from the advancing Communist hordes. In the end, though, NSDAP Germany would fall, and the Nuremberg “Show-Trials” would use torture and outlandish and unreliable “testimony” to make Germany an example to the world.


After the war, Europe was utterly devastated, and since then, no European nation has risen to the status that Germany did prior to the war. The creation of the E.U., which essentially signs on member nations to a shared debt (owned by Jewish-founded banking establishments like Goldman-Sachs) and rule by an unelected bureaucracy, ensures this. Likewise, the utter despair that dwelled behind the Communist “Iron Curtain” dwarfed anything that the Fascists or the NSDAP had created. This further served to weaken and demoralize Europe as did the U.S.-N.A.T.O. organized false flag terror campaigns created fear and instability in the heart of Europe for years after the war. Destabilization is a tried-and-true tactic of globalism to take out any potential resistance or competition.

While some may argue that Hitler was intentionally put into power by the actions of the banking establishment, the overwhelming historical evidence suggests that this can only be seen as true if it was done by proxy- which is that Hitler and the NSDAP were co-opted and infiltrated by agents working for the International Banking interests and somehow manipulated unwittingly into taking actions that would create conditions for another war. This would have been steered by those who wanted a Second World War to achieve what the First World War did not, i.e. a permanent global governing body (i.e. the United Nations) and the establishment of the State of Israel, among other things.

Likewise, there are those who sight Hitler’s relationship with Bernhard Stempfle, a Catholic Priest (critic of Jewish atheism and alleged Jesuit) who  helped Hitler write “Mein Kampf” as proof that Hitler was a Vatican agent or patsy.  It is believed by some that it was in fact Stempfle that wrote “Mein Kampf” and not Hitler, and that Hitler was used to further promote what were in fact Jesuit Vatican interests and agendas in Europe.  However, it is interesting to note that Stempfle was one of the NSDAP’s political enemies that were “eliminated” during the infamous “Night of the Long Knives

Hitler himself was a master politician, able to reach out to and convince wealthy industrialists and the common folk alike to work towards the common goal of a strong Germany and a strong German people. Does this mean he was a double agent of some kind? I don’t think so. If one reads his writings, I believe his love and sense of duty to Germany and the German people was very real, and held over from his days as a soldier. While you certainly can’t be a master politician without learning to compromise, and certainly the threat of annihilation by the Allies made for some difficult sacrifices, but I don’t think he ever willingly or intentionally “sold out” the German people.


Others argue that there is evidence of Hitler being drugged before his alleged suicide attempt, and then taken to Argentina by his secretary, Martin Bormann during the Nazi “exodus” at the end of the war. Some researchers have suggested that he was an agent of some kind, put in place to stir up the environment for another world war, and then allowed to escape to safety after his “mission” was completed. In either case, the evidence seems to be either lack of evidence or quotes from the Soviets stating that Hitler escaped, or that a cover-up ensued to ensure the world he was dead for P.R. purposes. However, other researchers dispute this and state that while there was most certainly a large emigration of Nazi officers and funds from Germany to South America after the war, Hitler was not among those that made the trek.

Researcher Dr. Joseph Farrell suggests that Hitler and the NSDAP managed to escape to South America and else where with secret technology they had developed to create a form of colony separate from the Anglo-American-Zionist establishment. Farrell argues that a “Nazi International” organization exists as a sort of self-interested bulwark against the Anglo-American-Zionist establishment. He also provides a great deal of evidence of “Ether” technology based on the science of men like Viktor Schauberger and Nikola Tesla, as well as the Vedas, being developed. Things like the “Nazi Bell” and various forms of “flying discs” were said to have been developed by the S.S.’s secret science program. It was this technology that was reportedly confiscated (at least some of it) by General Patten at the end of the war. Dr. Farrell concludes that the Reich’s development possession of this sort of technology was the “secret” reason for the war, and that most of the post-war U.F.O. sightings were the result of this technology being used by both the Anglo-Americans and the remnants of the NSDAP.


Indeed, German science was cutting edge at that time (television existed in Germany a good decade before it did in the U.S.), and it appears that “rocket science” was just scratching the surface of it. This is of course why German scientists were brought to the U.S. during “Operation Paperclip” after the war. This has been used as “proof” of a ‘Nazi conspiracy” to infiltrate the U.S., but again, this is more “cartoon history”. The rest of the story is that these scientists had three options: work for the U.S., work for the Soviets, or die. Given the reputation of the Soviets, it’s no small wonder so many German scientists came here, but it does not make it an infiltration, if anything, these men were co-opted and used by more powerful interests than their own, who had a different agenda than the Reich.

I am not a worshipper of Adolf Hitler or National Socialism. I don’t worship politicians and political parties, regardless of how intriguing some of their ideas and rhetoric may be. I do not agree with Statism and many of the tactics used by the National Socialists. I am vehemently opposed to totalitarianism and police state tactics. I am opposed to locking up political dissidents in internment camps. Likewise, I find it appalling to incarcerate innocent men, women and children who have not committed a crime because they are seen as potential enemy combatants by the government. However we should remember that this was done in the United States as well with people of Japanese as well as German ethnicity. Likewise the “dehumanization of the enemy” type of propaganda that was created in Germany targeting public perception of Jews and Communists, was also mirrored in the U.S. and other Allied nations towards the “Axis of Evil”.


I am of course, opposed to any sort of medical testing done through deception, manipulation or coercion (although the majority of the stories around Dr. Mengele and company are either seriously embellished or completely fabricated). Again though, this is something that the U.S. government has been guilty of on numerous occasions throughout the last 70 years. Neither am I a fan of things like coerced sterilization, race mixing laws or many of the other components associated with state-sponsored Eugenics that was a part of NSDAP Germany such as the Nuremberg race mixing laws (supported by the Zionists and not fully supported by Hitler). But again, we would do well to have appropriate historical context and know that these ideas and practices originated in the Anglo-American world, not Nazi Germany.

It is worth noting that the racial supremacy ideas that have long been associated with Nazi Germany are caricatured and often understood by the general public through the rhetoric of modern day Neo-Nazi Skinhead groups (many of whom have been federally infiltrated and are headed by federal operatives, i.e. Hal Turner).  As evidenced from later speeches, dialogues and writings Adolf Hitler’s notions of “racial purity” changed from his ideas he wrote about in “Mein Kampf” 20 years earlier. By the time of the war and the “Holocaust”, he saw the German people as a mixed people rather than of “pure stock”.  In fact, the evidence of Hitler’s “racism” can be seen in the words of African-American Olympian, Jesse Owens:

When I passed the Chancellor, he arose, waved his hand at me, and I waved back. I think the writers showed bad taste in criticizing the man of the hour (Hitler) in Germany… Hitler didn’t snub me -it was FDR who snubbed me. The president didn’t even send me a telegram.

Hitler saw the idea of a common Germanic “folk culture” to be the uniting factor. It was this folk culture that he used to unite and invigorate a demoralized the German people across a very entrenched class system. A united and culturally reinvigorated German people and the possibility of the same thing happening in Europe as a whole was a dangerous thing for the powers of Globalism and the Judeo-Zionist and Anglo-American combines behind it- the very reason why modern European Nationalist movements like Golden Dawn are so heavily demonized in the media.

It is this “Folk Culture” and its use of ancient Indo-European symbols like Runes and the Swastika that lie much at the heart of claims that the Nazi’s put some kind of spell on the people of Germany. The Swastika is an ancient Sun symbol and can be found all over the world. Sadly, it is now seen in the west as THE symbol of evil. It could be argued that the demonization of our sacred symbols of empowerment is an end unto itself, but that is a discussion for another time.dd89b46d1c83ad3d5be961c94e351e6a

A major component around the sort of evil “mystique” that has been given to Hitler and the NSDAP has been the rumored use of “occult” magick to cast a literal spell on the German people. Much of this centers around rumors and tales around the members of the S.S. and the symbol of the Swastika. This occult element has been employed to a great deal in Hollywood with films like “Indiana Jones” and “Hellboy”, and makes up a substantial part of certain alternative and conspiracy literature. The fact of the matter is that there was an interest in the occult and mysticism throughout the western world during the first part of the 20th century among intellectual circles.  Germany was no exception with mystic and occult orders and societies like the Rosicrucians, the Thule Society, the Vril Society, and Anthroposophy.

Rather than being “evil” or “good”, these “Occult” symbols are a tool, and are used by governments, corporations, and religions all over the world.  Austrian mystic (and no friend to the NSDAP) Rudolph Steiner was pointing this out when he said:

Be certain that these people who are now bringing this sign to Central Europe- they know exactly what they are doing.  This sign works.”

Looking at the complete turnaround from demoralized decay, to unified strength, this talisman certainly did “work”.  The myths and legends behind them have been used to motivate and inspire tribes of humanity for millennia. Just because the NSDAP understood the power of certain symbols on the German Folk Consciousness, does not automatically imply that they were employing them for sinister or strictly self-serving ends. In fact, it could be argued that what they were really doing was trying to awaken the archetypal folk soul of the people, as opposed to put them into some sort of trance.


This demonization of the Swastika, Folkish Nationalism, and other philosophies and ideologies of Nazi Germany is part of the programming we have been subject to that teaches us to think: “If Hitler/the Nazis did something then that something is automatically bad because Hitler/the Nazis are bad so likewise everything they do or believe is going to be bad.” This is line of logic is a textbook “logical fallacy”. The fact of the matter is that the German were empowered under the NSDAP in a way they have not been since. The uniting of a people under common values and a unique shared identity is a dangerous thing for those who wish to eradicate the concepts of sovereignty and self-determination in favor of a world where corporations literally own people and nations.

Hitler’s idea of a greater “Folk” culture for Europeans through shared heritage and symbolism, and his view of Germany as needing to take a leadership role in promoting this “Pan-Europeanism” (similar to Japan’s Pan-Asianism), has been twisted into a story of Hitler wanting to “conquer the world” and that if the Allies didn’t win, we’d all be speaking German. Hitler and Pan-Europeanism with its emphasis on folkish nationalism was seen as a way of beating back the sort of cultural oblivion that Marxism openly sought. It is a similar sort of “cultural oblivion” that people all over the world are facing as Globalism seeks create one Hollywood/Madison Avenue “monoculture” ruled by big banks, big corporations and the idea that “we are all the same” like cogs in a machine.


Indeed World War II can be summed up as “Globalism vs. Nationalism”. On one side you had proponents of a global “mono-culture” implemented through a synthesis of socialism/communism for the masses and exploitative crony capitalism for those on top. On the other side you had an alliance of nations who wanted to preserve their national sovereignty, self-determination and ethnic uniqueness, allied for that common cause. Globalism won. The world we live in today- and the agencies and institutions that control it (UN, CIA, IMF, etc.) are the direct result of that “victory”. It is basic criminal psychology to project one’s immoral or amoral behavior onto another. It wasn’t Hitler that wanted to “take over the world”- it was the men who said he did… and they pretty much did. While the time since World War II has been called “The Long Peace” (as large nations have only fought wars by proxy with one another since, i.e. Vietnam) it can be argued that slavery could be likened to peace when no one is fighting back.

When the various claims surrounding National Socialism and pre-World War II Germany are looked at in a different lens, we see a much different picture than what is presented to us in western film and television. We see actions with somewhat understandable motives and realistic situations, as opposed to the popular taglines of “racist insanity” on the part of Hitler and the Nazis, and a sort of “mass-hypnosis” being used on the German people. People were terrified of Communism and the cultural oblivion it promised in favor of “equality”, and the nightmare scenarios been seen in places like the Ukraine with the Holodomor. A “strongman” type arose to push back, and yeah, grab a little power for himself and the NSDAP leadership along the way.


And once the “death camp” narrative is understood to be fraudulent (see Thought Crimes: Questioning Zionism, Communism, the Holocaust, and the Founding of Israel), the bottom falls out of this story of “Nazi Evil”, giving us a much more grounded version of reality.  This version actually puts Hitler’s Germany and World War II itself in its proper context. Again, I am not looking to deify Hitler and the NSDAP; I am looking to relegate their role to its proper place in historical reality, as opposed to the Dr. Doom meets Jack the Ripper comic book super villain role they have been assigned to play. When the childish “comic book” stories are thrown out and events are put into proper context, the world we live in now, the one that was shaped by that war, makes A LOT more sense.

The belief system constructed around Hitler and the “Nazis” is a testament to the seemingly monolithic power of Hollywood, the global media, and western academia to manufacture and sustain belief systems in the modern world through illusion, “smoke-and-mirrors”, and political correctness. Of course, no one has been more devastated by this belief system than the German people themselves, who have been racked by a collective guilt, demoralization and self-hatred that is leading to the outright destruction of them as a nation and as a people at this very moment.

Unlike the philosophy of the NSDAP, many modern day German leaders don’t even pretend to be concerned with the well-being of the German nation or the ethnically German families who have called that land home for milennia.  People like  Joschka Fischer, ex Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor of Germany agree with the strategy of keeping Germany on a short rope:

“Germany is to be contained from outside and heterogenized from the inside by influx, ‘diluted’ so to speak.”

Others like Attorney Gregor Gysi, the Jewish-German head of The Left party in Germany. Gysi, praise the inevitable destruction of the indigenous Germanic population.  Gysi and others within German leadership state that the German people were morally obligated to their doors to unlimited “refugees” from North Africa and the Middle East because of the actions of the Nazi Party. Gysi actually refers to Germans who protest the massive migration influx as “Nazis” and praises the German population crisis:

Every year more native Germans die than there are born. That is very fortunate. It’s because the Nazis are not very good at having offspring.


The Holocaust story and the other “evils” of the Nazi regime would be used to force financial reparations from the German taxpayer, as well as be used to indoctrinate schoolchildren through trauma.  The Holocaust narrative has caused generations of Germans not even alive for the war to hold onto a sense of guilt and self-loathing for themselves and their ancestors.  This guilt-based indoctrination has caused such a neurosis in the German collective consciousness that they dare not speak ill of anyone who is Jewish as described by the “Jewish Daily Forward” article entitled “German Left Haunted by the Holocaust- Split over Israel”:

“Growing up in reunified Germany, Eva Meyer remembers being overwhelmed by the Holocaust studies that were part of each school year. Meyer and her classmates were assigned to read books about the Holocaust. They heard personal stories from Holocaust survivors. They had to write essays about the Holocaust, too.

Learning so intensively about the horrors committed by Germans left her feeling shame and guilt, Meyer said. But that same education communicated something else:

‘There is Israel, and that’s the solution,’ Meyer said, describing the role that was assigned to the Jewish state in her education. ‘That’s the salvation. It makes you feel better. All the shame and guilt is not that bad, because there is Israel and everything is fine now. And whatever Israel wants — give it to them. And whatever a Jewish person wants — don’t ask, just give it. That’s what I learned about it.’”

In his article for the London Guardian entitled, “The Loneliness of Being German“, German-Irish novelist Hugo Hamilton states how “The emotional attachment to home, to the land, to the place in which you are born, is something hereditary that lies deep in the human psyche…” and how “In the process of exorcising the Nazi crimes, generations of Germans also denied their own heritage and severed an emotional link with their own people…”

Hamilton explains how Germans “In effect, they became a homeless people, and still are. The physical destruction of German cities, the occupation by foreign armies, was overcome by adapting and rebuilding. But the intellectual homelessness was more profound, and included a ruthless defection from anything that had a spiritual link with the German soul. There is an unacknowledged loneliness in being German… They have been to hell and back with guilt, and their overriding sense of duty towards their victims is unheard of in any other society.”

Many, both Jews and Gentiles believe that the people of Germany “got what’s coming to them” and that the results of WWII was “karma”.  But what do we say when we know how many of these “crimes” are a complete fabrication?  If this karma or is it a group of well-meaning, good-hearted, but unfortunately naive people being mentally, psychically and spiritually crippled and enslaved, while getting financially fleeced in the process.  Now with the “Refugee” Crisis, Germans are forced to move out of their homes and apologize for being racist after being sexually assaulted  in places like Cologne, while the German government cracks down on anything deemed as “anti-migrant hate speech

I believe that deep down, there sincere desire among many who sing the praises of German “extinction” to see this spiritual impulse that rose from the Germanic Folk, and the industriousness and creativity that comes from it, exterminated from the Earth.  As a man of Anglo-Saxon lineage, the German people are my people. The German people are also the family of my fiancée, who still has family living in Germany today. These Germans are the family and kin of my future children, and I will not stand silent as this manufactured, one-sided guilt is used to cripple and crush the spirit of my  Germanic folk, ultimately pushing them towards oblivion.

However, as bleak as things may seem, I don’t think Theodore Kaufman’s vision in “Germany Must Perish!” will come to pass. The mystic Folk Spirit of the Germanic People, as well as the European Peoples as a whole, is not something that can be snuffed from the face of the Earth, as it is at its core the extension of something immortal.





“I emphasized that the defeat of Germany and Japan and their elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit.”

– Jewish Wall Street mogul Bernard M. Baruch: Presidential Advisor during World War I & II and associate of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill


The Treaty of Versailles and its intentional economic ruin of Germany is what laid the foundation for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Worker’s Party) or NSDAP.  They would later be dubbed “Nazis” by the British and American press.  The crippling economic sanctions coupled with the runaway inflation of the German currency during the post-war Weimer Republic led to the absolute economic ruin of Germany. This runaway inflation was caused by reckless financial speculation by the primarily Jewish banking establishment in Germany and Europe, who were tied to the Banking Investment Houses in London and New York that triggered the Great Depression. As a disenfranchised, but decorated war veteran, Hitler saw German families starving, pushing around wheel barrows of useless currency while these Jewish banking and merchant elites lived quite well in Germany and neighboring Austria, where Hitler spent much time in his younger years. During a 1940 speech in the Sportpalast Berlin, he would reflect on this time:

Who can even recall the reality of the situation of those years: the despondency of the collapse of 1918; the tragedy of the year 1919; and then all those years of economic decay domestically; the continuation of the enslavement; the poverty of our Folk; and, above all, the utter hopelessness of those years! Even today the memory of these years profoundly shakes us when a great nation slowly lost not only its belief in itself, but all hope for earthly justice in this world. During this entire period, this “democratic” Germany hoped in vain, pleaded in vain, and protested in vain. International finance remained brutal and squeezed our Folk ruthlessly to the utmost. The statesmen of the Allied Nations were hard hearted. In cold blood, they declared that we were twenty million Germans too many.”


In the case of the Jews, Hitler (and many others in Europe as well as America) saw them as having been destructive to the German nation and its people since Germany was the first to ‘emancipate’ them- that meant they had the same rights as the citizen of that nation. Historically certain “rights” and privileges only applied to the hereditary people of the tribe or kingdom. Those “outside” or rather those not under the jurisdiction of the tribe or kingdom would have not had the protection of the tribe or kingdom. Our idea of civic nationalism or “citizenship” like what was developed in the “democratized world” is pretty new. After being emancipated, the Jews developed the reputation of using the privileges of newly awarded government protections and privileges to operate in a subversive and self-serving manner at the expense of the native ethnic population.

Jews hadn’t been citizens before, as they were seen as and behaved as outsiders- keeping socially exclusive to themselves, except during business operations, however, much of this separation between the Jews and the Europeans was self-imposed. The Jews saw themselves as needing to stay socially separated from the gentiles or “goyim” they did business with. It was taught in the Talmud that Jews had a different set of guidelines in dealings with those outside the Jewish community (that is not to say that historically most peoples have tended to treat those outside the tribe different).

Jews, like Gypsies, were traveling merchants, and would go from city to city setting up shops and banks, and were typically involved in many different forms of trade (including the Slave Trade). It is in banking and lending where the Jews were able to attain the most power and influence. It is in their business practices where they developed a less than stellar reputation among the Europeans who had a different set of ethics for dealings amongst themselves than for dealings with those “outside the tribe”, than did the Jews. It was a reputation for fraud and political subversion (like assisting the Islamic conquest of Spain) that was the major reason the Jews were expelled 110 times from 90 different nations and kingdoms over a millennia. Much of the frenzy around Jews in Christian ideology and “Blood Libels” was (at least in part) propaganda put out by the church or the nobility to get the public support for Jewish expulsion due to disputes over debts and interest on said debts and struggles over political power and influence.


Hitler viewed the practices and policies of Jewish businessman and politicians to be self-serving to their own desires, which in turn was detrimental to the German people as a whole, causing them suffering and hardship. Hitler believed that it was a lack of connection to the German people that allowed these Jewish bankers and politicians to behave in such a manner. He saw the Jewish social exclusiveness as indicative to the notion that they were an “alien” and ultimately “parasitic” race of con-men and hustlers, who live off the labor and livelihood of their “host” societies.


Hitler and the NSDAP also saw cohorts in this “conspiracy” being Freemasons, who often held political office and worked with these International Bankers, advancing their agenda through legislation. Likewise, Freemasons were also later persecuted and imprisoned. Hitler saw the corruption in modern politics as a whole as being enabled by the democratic governments set up by statesmen who were members of Freemasonic lodges. It was this collaboration that Hitler saw as the internal “sickness” that allowed Germany to have the crippling Versailles sanctions. Hitler saw these men as selling out the best interests of their fellow Germans and destroying the pride of Germany:

To strengthen his political position he [the Jew] tries to tear down the racial and civil barriers which for a time continue to restrain him at every step. To this end he fights with all the tenacity innate in him for religious tolerance—and in Freemasonry, which has succumbed to him completely, he has an excellent instrument with which to fight for his aims and put them across. The governing circles and the higher strata of the political and economic bourgeoisie are brought into his nets by the strings of Freemasonry, and never need to suspect what is happening.


Hitler understood the Weimar media establishment as being subversive to German nationalism, and the interests of the German people as a whole. Like in America, the media establishment was predominantly Jewish. Hitler would restrict Jewish ownership of radio and newspapers, and use political power to promote what he saw as a healthy and uplifting folkish patriotism to emotionally rejuvenate a destitute and demoralized people. Hitler did similar “housecleaning” in academia, politics and the arts, which he saw as having similar issues of promoting the sort of morally ambiguity and selfish individualism that Hitler saw as the “root cause” of Germany’s external social and economic woes.

Hitler saw that German cities like Berlin become places where families were no longer safe, teeming with prostitution, pornography, pedophilia and sex trafficking. Hitler saw the fact that the theater owners and the “smut-peddlers” were predominantly Jewish in ethnicity (many of whom would go to America to found the American Porn Industry) as yet another justification for the economic and social persecution he would later impose. He also saw a deeper issue with a predominant influence of Jewish politicians, academic leaders, and media moguls in Germany. He saw their actions as selfish and subversive to the general welfare of the German people. While some may see this as creating a sort of “morality police”, those German families who saw their quality of life (and the safety of their children) improve were often thankful.


Most importantly of all, Hitler (as well as other European Nationalists) saw the very real threat of Communism and Bolshevism in Europe, and the absolute horror it had caused in Russia. Hitler saw the very real fact that Jews were in positions of leadership throughout the Communist Party in all its forms as reason number one for their forced expulsion and later internment in prison labor camps. He saw the pincer attack of Capitalism driven by greedy Jewish financiers and Communism driven by disgruntled Jewish revolutionaries, and the destruction it had caused, to be ample enough proof that this needed to happen. While we may find it somewhat black and white to say that forced internment of civilians without trial is wrong, we still inevitably make those judgments from a position of historical “privilege” and lack the context of living in Germany at that time.

When Hitler and the NSDAP got into power and began to severely restrict and limit Jewish avenues to wealth and power in Germany, it drew the ire of the extremely cohesive and resourceful international Jewish community, which organized an international boycott of German industry and goods in March of 1933, shortly after the election of Adolf Hitler. There was even a rally of 40,000 that assembled in Madison Square Garden. Due to the large influence of the international Jewish community in the western media, this boycott spread to the gentile community as well. As a result the NSDAP government in turn, encouraged Germans to boycott Jewish shops and services, although with far less impact than that of the Jewish-organized international boycott.


Once again, the government and media propaganda machine that was active during World War I began to demonize Germany and beat the drums of war. However this time the rhetoric became even more incendiary and antagonistic. A good example of this was a book written by Jewish American author Theodore N. Kaufman entitled “Germany Must Perish!” Published in 1941 (just before Germany declared war on the U.S.) and acclaimed by the New York Times, Kaufmann’s book infuriated NSDAP Germany by making incendiary comments that Hitler and the NSDAP used as proof of the dangerous and subversive nature of “International Jewry”, and their hatred of the German people in particular. One such statement was:

This time Germany has forced a total war upon the world. As a result, she must be prepared to pay a total penalty. And there is one, and only one, such Total Penalty: Germany must perish forever! In fact—not in fancy!… the only way to accomplish that is to remove the German from the world. . . . There remains then but one mode of ridding the world forever of Germanism— and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind.”


Another book with a similar message was “A Program for the Jews and an Answer to all Anti-Semites; A Program for Humanity” published in 1939 by Marxist Jewish Author Harry Waton. In the book, Waton stated that “Jews are far more numerous and infinitely more powerful than the fascists are. Not that the Jews fear the fascists or have reasons to fear them, but the fascists fear the Jews, and have good reason to fear them.”

Like “Germany Must Perish!”, this book provoked the concerns and fears of NSDAP Germany with statements like: “Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth . . . The Jews will become the masters over the whole earth and they will subordinate to themselves all nations.

This sort of propaganda added fuel to the fire in the need for what became termed “The Final Solution”, which was not an expensive and resource-wasting gassing/extermination program, but rather was the plan for yet expulsion of the Jews (and any other Communists)- this time from all of Europe completely. This was Hitler and the NSDAP’s intent until the Allied carpet bombing and Soviet advances stalled his attempts to transport the Jews into mid-Eurasia. Hitler wanted to expel the Jews to the neither-reaches of Russia (arguably part of the reasoning behind Operation Barbarossa), and then secure Europe in a manner that kept them from returning.

Meanwhile, propaganda was also released by anti-German elements of the gentile Anglo-American establishment like the book “Conversations with Hitler”. The only record of Hitler stating he wanted to “take over the world”, “Conversations with Hitler”, printed as “The Voice of Destruction” in the U.S. in 1940, was later presented as evidence at Nuremberg. However, Swiss historian Wolfgang Haenel spent five years diligently investigating the memoir before announcing his findings in 1983. Haenel was able to conclusively establish that the author’s claim to have met with Hitler “more than a hundred times” is a lie. The words attributed to Hitler, he showed, were simply invented or lifted from many different sources. Haenel also found evidence that a prominent British journalist named Henry Wickham-Steele, who was known to be a right-hand man of Sir Robert Vansittart, perhaps the most vehemently anti-German figure in Britain, helped to produce the memoir. In addition, one of Germany’s most influential periodicals, “Der Spiegel” concluded in an article published in 1985 that Rauschning’s Conversations with Hitler “are a falsification, an historical distortion from the first to the last page


A careful study of the lead up to World War II and the rhetoric exchanged on all sides will show that the most vehement antagonism was directed towards Germany and was coming out of the Allied camp, specifically from Britain and the international Jewish leadership. Interestingly, many in the U.S., including many industrialists backed NSDAP Germany, and actually shared Germany’s concern over Jewish power in both Capitalism and Communism. Many spoke out against Communist International and their openly stated goal of a world Communist empire.

There was in fact a coup planned by elements within the American industrialist and business class to overthrow F.D.R. due to concerns of Communist and Zionist infiltration within the government. While the plot was foiled, the concerns of these business leaders were later confirmed in the book “My Exploited Father-In-Law”, by Roosevelt’s son-in-law, Col. Curtis B. Dall, which detailed the activities of Jewish influentials like the Warburg banking family and Secretary of the Treasury for the Roosevelt Administration and accused Communist, Henry Morgenthau. Morgenthau was the author of the infamous “Morgenthau Plan” for postwar Germany, calling for Germany to be partitioned into separate independent states, stripped of all heavy industry and forced to return to a pre-Industrial Revolution agrarian economy. Morgenthau was also a part of the Bretton Woods Conference at the end of World War II, which established globalist entities like the IMF and the World Bank.

Despite international demonization, Hitler was extremely popular in Germany and admired all over the world and was even Time Magazine’sMan of the Year”. Hitler was elected by German people through a popular election, to the position of German chancellor. Of course it can be argued that the events of and around the Reichstag Fire that allowed Hitler and the NSDAP declare a State of Emergency, which allowed them to set up a form of martial law, were somewhat questionable and possibly orchestrated through false-flag tactics.


This State of Emergency and martial law (which was actually enabled by the Weimar Republic Constitution established pre-NSDAP power) declared by Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP after the Reichstag Fire in 1933 was done (according to NSDAP leadership) to secure Germany from the wave of Jewish Communist terror attacks and assassinations that were running rampant throughout Germany as well of the rest of Europe at the time. At that time, this was seen by many as reasonable and justifiable given what had been occurring. But it was somewhat of a totalitarian society nonetheless, and there were certain guidelines for conduct and speech and the like that some did not care for. It was clear that those living in German society were to put Folk and the National Identity above their own individualistic desires. Hard-line individualists were certainly not a fan of Hitler’s German Police State, but the NSDAP saw self-interested individualism as antithetical to the wellbeing of a nation:

This state came into being, and all states come into being, through overcoming interests of pure personal will and individual selfishness. Democracy steers recklessly toward placing the individual in the center of everything. In the long run it is impossible to escape the crisis such a conflict will produce.”

While demonization of the NSDAP began as soon as they came to power, the fact remains that the actions of the National Socialist government enabled a social and economic “180” that astonished the world. Someone during that time may tell you how Hitler and the NSDAP turned Germany into and economic powerhouse in three-year’s time, while the rest of the world was still deep into an economic depression. Upon taking power in 1933, Hitler and the NSDAP implemented radical sweeping changes including pulling Germany out of the League of Nations; banning the Communist Party in Germany and arresting its leaders; replacing the national Marxist Trade Unions with smaller company unions; establishing the NSDAP as Germany’s only political party; refusing to make any more reparations payments on the Versailles Treaty; taking control of Germany’s Reichsbank and issuing debt-free currency; restricting Jewish ownership of radio and newspapers; cutting taxes and providing tax incentives for mothers to stay home and raise their children; rebuilding infrastructure and initiation of projects like the Autobahn Highway system.

Hitler’s state-sponsored social and development programs, backed by a German currency based off the production of the German people rocketed Germany to an unfathomable economic recovery and boom. Even the regularly praised “New Deal” of President Roosevelt was rife with corruption and financial boondoggling, and had nowhere near the efficiency and overall success rate of the German work programs. It was World War II and the U.S. dollar reserve currency status that came out of Bretton Woods that rebuilt the U.S. economy and turned the U.S. into a “superpower”, not FDR’s “New Deal”.

The philosophy of meritocracy was heavily promoted in National Socialist Germany, meaning that the individual was praised and promoted within the various avenues of society based on his merit and work, rather than any pre-determined class or social status. This philosophy eventually drew the resentment of the German Aristocracy; many of whom held had positions of high rank within the German military. They saw the rise to power of a man from an upper-middle-class family, as being antithetical to what Germany should be. It was these men who sought assassinate Hitler and gave information and military secrets to the Allies that ultimately led to German defeat in World War II.


It can be argued that it was National Socialism, with its emphasis on meritocracy, family and promoting vacations to the countryside and cruises, while maintaining good wages and working conditions, was the real “worker’s paradise” as opposed to the oppressive Communism, which essentially promoted the opposite of those things. Hitler understood that it was the uniting of the German people under folkish nationalism and a sense of the needs of the community trumping the desires of the individual:

We have overcome our internal division! Destructive forces took a grip on Germany. But constructive National Socialism has overcome this force. It has refused to allow the existing state of affairs and undertaken its modification. It changed the method of eradicating the state of affairs by saying: ‘We want to change this state of affairs by gradually permitting the non-possessing classes to partake in the national wealth and by educating them in how to partake in it.‘”

Hitler with animals

Much of the NSDAP leadership were also classical environmentalists and believed in animal rights. Vivisection (animal testing) was banned under the NSDAP government. Having the goal of building in harmony with their environment, the NSDAP pioneered “sustainable development” long before anyone knew what it was. The designs for NSDAP roadway and infrastructure projects were ecologically sound as well as aesthetically pleasing, as aesthetics and “classical” beauty in art and sculpture was highly prized by the NSDAP, who sought to produce a sort of “New Renaissance” and do away with what they saw as subversive and ugly modern art and architecture.


Of course, the Anglo-American and Judeo-Zionist powers that wished to establish the system of Globalism that we live under today understood that in order for this system to come to full fruition, Nationalism, especially the “Volkisch” Nationalism that was gaining strength and momentum in Europe, would need to be crushed.  Likewise, any and all “sympathizers” to this ideology in Britain and the U.S., needed to be marginalized and silence.  With the inevitable declaration of war by the Anglo-American establishment, any supporters of Hitler or National Socialist ideology, were now marginalized and seen as enemy sympathizers.  This included both British Royalty and wealthy American Industrialists.

In the third and final installment of this series, I will talk about the factors that surrounded the outbreak of the war and the results that linger still today.  I will also get into some of the “conspiracy theories” around Hitler and the NSDAP as well as the spiritual/occult side to all of this.



“(We are fighting) to defeat the most dangerous conspiracy ever plotted against the liberty of nations, carefully, skillfully, insidiously, clandestinely planned in every detail with ruthless, cynical determination.”
– British Prime Minister Lloyd George: speaking about Germany during World War I


If you go up to anyone on the street and ask the question, “Who was the most evil man that ever lived?” the vast majority will undoubtedly say one name: HITLER. No one person throughout the entirety of history has been more demonized and vilified than Adolf Hitler, and no entity more so than the National Socialist German Worker’s Party (NSGWP or NSDAP in German); aka. “The NAZIS”. To this day, to call someone a “Nazi” is to liken them to an ultra-racist, aggressively oppressive, freedom-hating, genocidal maniac. But the question is, how much of our perception around Hitler and the “Nazis” is rooted in actual fact and how much of it is rooted in propaganda? Also, what was their actual motivation for doing what they actually did?

To get a clear picture of what brought Hitler and the NSDAP to power, we need to have a firm rooting in historical context. To many, the rise of Hitler has been seen as a phenomenon that cannot be explained outside of some form of “mass hypnosis”.  Much of this is cartoonish, one-dimensional thinking, that lacks context and historical perspective. When we objectively look at history in totality, with a solid understanding of basic human psychology, things make a lot more sense. Sadly, even many with “spiritual sight” get sucked into the  emotional propaganda and the concrete belief system built around this period. So let’s look at why decent German people would have popularly elected a “madman”. In order to do that, we need to look at the history surrounding Germany and Europe before, during and after World War I, so we can provide context for the NSDAP’s rise to power.

For Germany, this really begins with the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71. After thwarting Napoleon III’s (nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte) advances, Prussia and a confederation of smaller German states unify under Kaiser Wilhelm I and Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck. With the defeat of France, this newly unified Germany was now the economic powerhouse of Europe with one of the most powerful professional armies in the world The Prussians were renowned for their military prowess, and in fact, their model for training their soldiers was used to model the American education system. Imperial Germany also began to acquire a small number of colonies to extract resources. This created a bit of uneasiness and contempt in the seat of global economic power that resided within the British Empire at the time.

The British Empire and more importantly the corporate and financial interests that controlled it through the City of London (a sovereign state within a state like the Vatican or D.C. except instead of churches or statehouses it’s banks) had a near-complete monopoly of economic power and control of resources at this point in history- something that continues to this day. In a recent article for the London Guardian, journalist George Monbiot describes how the City of London Corporation “has exploited this remarkable position to establish itself as a kind of offshore state, a secrecy jurisdiction which controls the network of tax havens housed in the UK’s crown dependencies and overseas territories. This autonomous state within our borders is in a position to launder the ill-gotten cash of oligarchs, kleptocrats, gangsters and drug barons… It deprives the United Kingdom and other nations of their rightful tax receipts.”

Monbiot goes on to say that the sovereign, unaccountable City of London Corporation “has also made the effective regulation of global finance almost impossible… the absence of proper regulation in London allowed American banks to evade the rules set by their own government. AIG’s wild trading might have taken place in the US, but the unit responsible was regulated in the City. Lehman Brothers couldn’t get legal approval for its off-balance sheet transactions in Wall Street, so it used a London law firm instead.

This economic empire operated in the same manner a century and a half ago. This empire wished to maintain this power, and did not like the competition that arose out of middle Europe. Throughout the latter part of the nineteenth century, it was the slight-of-hand “diplomacy” of British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli during the Congress of Berlin after the Russo-Turkish War, that created seeds of contentment and mistrust among Germany and her allies in continental Europe; specifically Czarist Russia- Great Britain’s other economic competitor. This fostered the environment that would isolate the economic competition and lead to World War I; this strategy was a tried and true tactic of the British Empire- the strategy of divide and conquer. Disraeli was Britain’s first Jewish-born Prime Minister, “who was always true to his race and proud of his origin.

It was Disraeli who once stated,The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.

It was also during this time that the Communist movement of Europe began to gather real momentum. Founded by Jewish-German philosopher, Karl Marx, Communism called for a “dictatorship of the proletariat” (the working class) and an overthrow of the “bourgeois” (the moneyed industrialist class). Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” outlines the road to a “utopian society” in three phases. The first phase is a revolution that overthrows the oppressive bourgeois, setting up a dictatorship dedicated to “the common good” (as opposed to rights of the individual).

This begins the second phase where once the dictatorship is established; the government takes centralized control of all aspects of society- property, transportation, education, industrial production, agriculture, regional planning, communications, and labor. Simultaneously, a Central Bank (i.e. the Federal Reserve) is established which proceeds to lay a heavy progressive income tax on the population.

This then takes us to phase three, where in theory, the centralization of power will create a society where the dictatorship of a few select is eventually no longer required. The dictatorship will then be relinquished in favor of a popular democracy of sorts, where ALL the proletariat (men and women) has a say in the workings of government and society. I say “in theory” for phase three because that last phase has NEVER happened in ANY Communist government in history.

The rise of the Communist movement would bring mainland Europe to the brink of chaos, with continued rioting and repeated assassination attempts on European leaders. Communists attempted to assassinate German leader Kaiser Wilhelm I twice in less than a month’s time! There was a concerted movement here to bring down the old monarchies and nobilities of Europe (interestingly, this never really caught on in Great Britain, although there was definitely abuse of the “proletariat” happening there as well).

After the death of Kaiser Wilhelm I, his 29-year-old son, Wilhelm II took the throne. The younger Wilhelm was a bit more pragmatic towards the communist movement and did not want to “crush the Reds” like his father did. He believed that if Germany became more “democratic” it would pacify them. This would prove to be a false assumption. Wilhelm II also turns his back on then-ally Russia in an attempt to get better relations with Great Britain, as his grandmother was on the throne there anyhow. Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck had crafted this alliance with Czarist Russia, but the young Kaiser severed this by refusing to re-sign the Reinsurance Treaty and dismissed Bismarck shortly thereafter. However, by that time the monarchy in Britain had become more of a “face” of power. The real power lied in the financial interests that were at that time largely represented by the Rothschild family of international financiers.

Poster - House of Rothschild, The_04

To quote Lawrence Joffe in his “Complete Illustrated History of the Jewish People”:

In the 19th century the Rothschild name exemplified wealth and success, and so it remains today. Their story is only one chapter in the story of Jewish financial prowess.

The Rothschilds “arguably founded the first transnational corporation” (Joffe) with banking branches in Frankfurt, Vienna, London, Naples and Paris. Again, according to Joffe’s “History of the Jewish People”, in the U.K., Nathan Mayer Rothschildfounded the brokering house N.M. Rothschild. The Rothschild family was soon handling most English financial dealings with the Continent. Nathan’s branch funded the British war effort against Napoleon… Between 1818 and 1835 Nathan Mayer issued 26 British and foreign government loans. In 1824 he floated the Alliance Assurance Company and the following year he helped the Bank of England avoid a liquidity crisis.

Usury is the lending of money at and exorbitant rate of interest. It needs to be understood that this is what international financiers like the Rothschilds did then, and this is what international financial institutions continue to do now. If there was one good thing the Catholic Church ever did it was the outlawing of usury, but by this time the Church did not wield that kind of political power. Through usury, the financial institution gets the one taking the loan locked into debt they cannot pay back due to ridiculously compounding interest. This causes the lender to assert the right to take property, resources, etc. as modes of payment. This is how international finance capital works.

Joffe also states that Rothschild was “famously discreet, and used similarly cautious agents to courier funds… Above all he understood the value of accurate and speedy information. His private intelligence service learned the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo a day before the British Government.

However, what is not stated in this book about the intelligence surrounding the Battle of Waterloo was that Rothschild used this information to start a rumor in the financial circles that Britain had lost that battle, causing investors to panic and sell off stocks, which Rothschild interests bought for pennies on the dollar. An interesting modern-day correlation is the recent revelation that NSA Data had been used by select corporations to get an edge on market competitors- the more things change…

After the passing of N.M. Rothschild, his eldest son Lionel succeeded him as head of the London branch that was based within the City of London. Under Lionel the bank financed the British government’s purchase of the Suez Canal in 1875 as well as Cecil Rhode’s colonial exploits into Africa. Lionel’s son, Alfred de Rothschild, became a director of the Bank of England in 1869, a post he held for 20 years. Alfred was one of representatives of the British Government at the 1892 International Monetary Conference in Brussels. According to Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett, Lionel also had an alleged affair with and sired several children to Queen Victoria of England.

The Rothschild Dynasty was the latest and greatest of the elite Jewish banking oligarchs that made inroads into British aristocratic society by acquiring their properties and titles, and thus mixing themselves with the aristocracy, and by the nature of the British representative system, they came closer and closer to the government. This was enabled after Oliver Cromwell and Charles I readmitted Jews into England in the mid-1600s as they had been expelled back in 1290 by Edward I for practicing usury. The Rothschilds followed the example of Jewish banking oligarchs like Sampson Gideon, and used this favorable climate to seize the reigns of the British military and naval machine in order to seize control of riches and resources across the globe. It was British Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli; Rothschild “front man”, and the man who bestowed upon Queen Victoria the title of “Empress of India” who stated:

The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.

The British and French branches of the Rothschild bank also financed and became the largest shareholders of the DeBeers diamond mines in South Africa in 1905. An interesting saga came out of this at the end of the World War I when Jewish-German diamond magnate Ernest Oppenheimer took advantage of German investor panic at the end of the war and was able to seize the German diamond assets that had initially broken the monopoly the British had on diamonds. Oppenheimer would go on to head up DeBeers and be knighted in England.

In 1904, the Entente Cordiale was signed between Britain and France. This series of agreements put an end to centuries-old conflict between the two nations, along with the Triple Entente between Britain, France, and ally-of-convenience Russia, effectively isolated Germany and her ally, Austria-Hungary. Former German Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck saw the storm coming and on his deathbed in 1897 stated that One day, the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans.”

Due to border rearrangement spearheaded by British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli at the Congress of Berlin, many ethnic Serbs found themselves under the rule of Austria-Hungary, who were ethnically and culturally very different from the Slavic Serbs. This caused a culture clash that spearheaded with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary by a group of Serbian Nationalists. Kaiser Wilhelm II attempted to convince Austria-Hungary to engage in talks with Serbia, but it was of little avail, as Austria-Hungary soon declared war on Serbia anyhow.

This started a chain reaction, bringing ethnically Slavic Russia in the war to defend its ally Serbia, which brought Germany into the war to defend Austria-Hungary, which brought France and the UK into the war on the side of Russia, which brings Russia’s rival the Ottoman Turks in on the side of Austria-Hungary and Germany. This began a bloody conflict, which brought death and destruction on a scale that had never been seen before. I’m not going to get into a blow-by-blow analysis on the various battles and tactical maneuvers of this war. What I am focusing on here is Germany’s role and how this was portrayed to the rest of the world.

In the press, Germans were demonized and dehumanized, often portrayed as barbaric monsters that raped women, cut off the hands of children, and impaling babies on bayonets and nailing them to doors. Other stories included that of German soldiers using the bodies of their own fallen soldiers to manufacture soap. This particular narrative would be recycled and repackaged for the Second World War as one of the more fantastical elements of the Holocaust story.

Images and stories depicting the supposed atrocities of German soldiers circulated around Britain and France, but lacked any sort of evidence to back up these allegations. Officially sanctioned by the British establishment, the publication of the infamous Report of the Committee on Alleged German Outrages, better known as “The Bryce Report”, was translated into 30 different languages in 1915, and although nearly every story produced within was eventually discredited, the damage had already been done as these false atrocity stories to rile up British and French youths to go to war with the evil “Hun”.


Despite the “Special Relationship” with Britain that was being promoted by the political establishment in the United States at the turn of the 20th century, the American public typically saw themselves as separate and removed from Great Britain and her affairs. In fact, the voices of impartiality during the war tended to come from American journalists. Roger Lewis of the Associated Press wrote:

To let the truth be known, we unanimously declare the stories of German cruelties, from what we have been able to observe, were untrue. After having been with the German army for two weeks, and having accompanied the troops for over one hundred miles, we are not able to report one single case of undeserved punishment or measure of retribution.”

Irwin Cobb of the Saturday Evening Post also correlated the apparent falsification of German Barbarity:

We found numerous rumours after investigation to be without foundation. German soldiers paid everywhere for what they bought, and respected private property and civil rights. We found Belgian women and children after the battle of Buissière to feel absolutely safe. A citizen was shot in Merbes-le-Chateau, but nobody could prove his innocence.

John T. McCutcheon of the Chicago Tribune confirmed:

Refugees, who told about cruelties and brutalities, could bring absolutely no proof. The discipline of the German soldiers is excellent; no drunkenness. The Burgomaster of Sorle-sur-Sambre voluntarily disclaimed all rumours of cruelties in that district. For the truth of the above we pledge our word of honor as journalists.

However, this voice of reason out of the American press would eventually turn into hysterical war drums. On May 7th, 1915, the British luxury liner, the RMS Lusitania, left New York for Britain with 1959 passengers and, unbeknownst to the passengers, some 600 tons of explosives, 6 million rounds of ammunition, and 1,200 cases of shrapnel shells. The German Embassy however, was aware of this and attempted to warn those planning to travel aboard of the danger they would be in, by attempting to place ads in major U.S. newspapers, but were in most cases, denied. The ship set sail and was deliberately maneuvered into dangerous waters by Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill, who then relieved the ship’s military escort. It was at that point German U-Boats fired upon and sank the liner, killing nearly 1200 passengers aboard, including 128 Americans. However, America was a different nation then, and it would take a bit more than a ship sunk in a war zone to get a nation “wary of foreign entanglements” to jump into what was still seen as “Europe’s war”.


By the end of 1916, the German–led Central Powers had the decisive advantage. France had suffered terrible casualties, the British forces were neutralized by a German U-Boat blockade, and Russia was becoming embroiled in what would become an incredibly bloody civil war. No German lands were occupied whatsoever. It was at that point, the Kaiser made a peace offering on behalf of the Central Powers with no strings attached. However, the British Empire and those who were in control of it had another trick up their sleeve.

The Balfour Declaration was a letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur J. Balfour to Baron Walter Rothschild, banker, politician, and leader of the British Jewish community. The letter essentially sealed the deal in which the British government agreed to create a Jewish homeland in British-occupied Palestine in return for Rothschild utilizing his connections to mobilize the power and influence of Jewish community in the United States with the goal of getting the U.S. to enter the war on the side of Britain and her allies.

British Prime Minister David Lloyd George later stated to the Palestine Royal Commission in 1937:

In this critical situation it was believed that Jewish sympathy or the reverse would make a substantial difference one way or the other to the Allied cause. In particular Jewish sympathy would confirm the support of American Jewry, and would make it more difficult for Germany to reduce her military commitments and improve her economic position on the eastern front… The Zionist leaders gave us a definite promise that, if the Allies committed themselves to giving facilities for the establishment of a national home for the Jews in Palestine, they would do their best to rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the Allied cause. They kept their word.”

It was at this point the propaganda machine was turned on full force towards the American public. Jewish-American-owned media outlets like Reuters and the New York Times resurrected the Lusitania and hyped the supposed Zimmerman Note; which was an allegedly intercepted telegraph from Germany to Mexico asking for alliance if the U.S. entered the war; as an intention of Germany to war with the United States. The manufactured horror stories of German barbarism were mass-marketed for American consumption by the “father of public relationsEdward Bernays, nephew of the famed Jewish-Swiss psychoanalyst, Sigmund Freud.

Two of American President Woodrow Wilson’s closest advisers, Felix Frankfurter and Louis Brandeis were avid “Zionists” and influential in convincing the President to act in favor of Britain and the Allies. In April of 1917, Wilson convinced Congress to issue a declaration of war, and two months later, he instituted a very unpopular military draft, attempting to rally young men to the cause of “freedom” by using Bernays’ slogan: “Making the world safe for democracy.”

In 1918, after a successful spring offensive, labor strikes organized by trade unions within Germany halted the supply of much-needed munitions to the front. This event would come to be known as The Stab-in-the-Back, by Adolf Hitler, a veteran of the war. By this time, much of Organized Labor within Europe had been permeated by Marxist ideology of the “liberation of the proletariat” as well as the Labor Zionism of Jewish-French-German philosopher Moses Hess. The organizers of these strikes were young Jewish “revolutionaries” who saw what was going on in Russia and sought to use this as an opportunity to create a “worker’s paradise” in Germany. It has been extensively documented and proudly admitted that Jews were well represented in every revolutionary organization at the time and continue to be so today.


By 1918, Russia had fallen completely to the Bolshevik Revolution organized by Russian Vladmir Lenin (whose grandfather was Jewish) and Jewish-Russians Leib Bronstein, aka. Leon Trotsky and Julius Cedarbaum, aka. Julius Martov. Funded out of London and Germany by the Rothschild and Warburg banking conglomerates in partnership with the Jewish-American Schiff banking family out of Wall Street. This revolution completely destabilized Russia (a wary ally of and historical adversary to the British Empire), resulted in the brutal murders of Czar Nicholas II and his wife and children, and culminated in what was known as the “Red Terror”- a period marked by mass arrests in the middle of the night, executions, and brutally bizarre methods of torture. These atrocities were carried out by the Jewish-Russian-runCheka”, i.e., secret police and resulted in the murder of as many as 100,000 Russians. When U.S. Ambassador to Russia, David Francis, visited in January 1918, he noted:

The Bolshevik leaders here (Russia), most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide social revolution.”


The above statement illustrates what was one of the primary concerns/fears and motivating factors of Adolf Hitler in his dealings with Germany (and later Europe) and its Jews. This idea of the danger presented by the “International Jew” was also shared, oddly enough, by a man who would become one of Hitler’s primary nemesis- future British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. In his February 1920 article for the London Sunday Herald entitled “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”, Churchill spoke highly of Zionism and what he referred to as “National Jews”, who would say, “I am an Englishman practising the Jewish faith.

He saw the “National Jew” being contrasted by what he and many others referred to as “International Jews”:

The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt (founder of the nihilistic Bavarian Illuminati)  to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing… It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

Unfortunately, the subversive activities of these “International Jews” became so intensified in Germany and throughout Europe just prior to and during the Second World War that Hitler and the NSDAP (Nazis) saw no other choice then to lock up ALL Jews who had remained in Europe into prison labor camps, regardless of whether or not they were practicing subversive tactics or not. The prison labor camps and the whole “Holocaust” narrative is of course, a deep topic in and of itself, and something deserving of an entire article devoted specifically to it. Again, the point here is to really flesh out some understanding as to why Hitler and the NSDAP espoused to the philosophy adhered to and enacted the policies they did, beyond the simplistic “scapegoat” and “world-domination” memes we are given in most high school and even college-level history books.

By the fall of 1918, the war had essentially reached a stalemate, with neither Germany nor the Allies being able to achieve a decisive victory. However, the internal social and political establishment of Germany began to crumble. Jewish-German Communists Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht founded the “Spartacus League“, which later became the Communist Party of Germany. Aided by Jewish-Hungarian Bela Kun, the group attempted to take advantage of post-war chaos and stage a coup in Berlin. Fearing the same fate as the Czar, Kaiser Wilhelm fled to Holland. While a group of veterans known as the Freikorps reclaim control, the Communists continually attempt to seize power.

The Allied powers took advantage of the internal destabilization that was taking place in Germany and did not invite Germany to take part in the Paris Peace Conference, where a series of treaties were devised to reorganize Europe and establish the world governing body known as the League of Nations– the precursor to the United Nations- which had been a primary goal of the war from the outset (although it soon dissolved due to nations like the U.S. refusing to ratify the treaty). It was out of this that the Treaty of Versailles was established which included the following provisions:

1. Germany accepts 100% responsibility for the war

2. German armed forces restricted to 100,000 men

3. The industrial German Rhineland will be occupied by French troops for the next 15 years.

4. Kaiser Wilhelm should be tried for “offenses against international morality”

5. The German region of West Prussia is carved out and given to the new nation of Poland. (Millions of West Prussians are forcefully expelled from their homes, and East Prussia is left isolated from the rest of Germany)

6. The German Sudetenland region is put under the rule of the new nation of Czechoslovakia.

7. The new state of Austria is forbidden from uniting with their Germanic brothers in Germany.

8. Germany is stripped of her African colonies. Britain, France, & Belgium take them over.

9. The coal-rich Saar region of Germany is placed under League of Nations control for 15 years. During this time, its coal is to be shipped to France.

10. The Baltic Sea port city of Danzig is separated from Germany and declared a “free city.”

11. Germany is forced to pay massive war reparations in the form of money and natural resources. The crushing debt payments, equal to 1 Trillion dollars in modern currency, will devastate the German economy and soon cause a hyperinflationary monetary collapse.

There can be no mistaking that the objective here was to literally rob Germany blind while demoralizing and economically crippling the nation so that it could not pose a threat to the hegemony of the Anglo-Zionist Financial and Corporate Empire.  This war was not about “spreading democracy”, it was economic power and control. After the war was over, President Woodrow Wilson confirmed this point:

Is there any man or woman let me say, is there any child who does not know that the seed of war in the modern world is industrial and commercial rivalry? …This was an industrial and commercial war.

The methods of war have certainly changed greatly in the last 100 years since World War I (1914-1918), but the reasons have not. It’s funny how this is by and large a sort of “forgotten war” in the public eye (especially now that pretty much every veteran of WWI has passed). Many of us only know there was a World War I because Hollywood loves to make movies about World War II, and so we know there had to be a “one” before the “two”.  Now that we have set the stage, in part two, I will get into the rise of Hitler and the NSDAP, as well as some of the various narratives that surround this period of history that shaped the world as we know it today.




“The masses of people are carried along, obedient to environment; the wills and desires of others stronger than themselves; heredity; suggestion; and other outward causes moving them about like pawns on the Chessboard of Life. But the Masters, rising to the plane above, dominate their moods, characters, qualities, and powers, as well as the environment surrounding them, and become Movers instead of pawns. They help to PLAY THE GAME OF LIFE, instead of being played and moved about by other wills and environment. They USE the Principle (of Cause and Effect) instead of being its tools. The Masters obey the Causation of the higher planes, but they help to RULE on their own plane.”

– The Three Hermetic Initiates speaking in “The Kybalion”


Throughout human history, the knowledge of controlling one’s own perceptions was taught to students of spiritual knowledge by the mystics; however, let us recall the Principle of “as above so below; as within so without.” There was also the knowledge of how to control the perceptions of others through concentration and extending the mind outwards is a focused manner. Extending the mind can be done obviously through concentrated thought, but also in every other manner a human can express a thought; i.e. words, writing, symbols, art, song, dance, etc. Extending the influence of the mind into the world is the basis of prayer, magick, and sorcery in addition to being the way culture and the society that grows from it is formed. One of the most ancient ways ways of creating and preserving a culture is through the stories it tells.


All races and all cultures across the Earth have had their own folk stories, legends and myths, of course some are more localized and some are widely known by people across the world. One of these ethnic cultures whose “stories” are known throughout the world is the Jewish people. One of the most notable and qualities of the Jewish people has always been their talent for “storytelling”. From the tales of the Torah and the Talmud, to the Jewish folktales fables of Eastern Europe told by the “Wise Men of Chelm“, to the modern stage and cinema, the talents abilities of these “Wandering Storytellers” to spin a tale that draws the listener/viewer in emotionally through tapping into certain aspects of their psyche has been undeniable.


image courtesy of

Outcasts in part due to the cultural and social exclusiveness inherent in Judaism, Jews were excluded in certain aspects of Eastern European and Russian society due to their strong and insular group identity, as well as a somewhat negative reputation in business and finance practices towards non-Jews or “goyim” (cattle). This appears to be the reason many Eastern European Jews turned to Communism– a resentment for Eastern European society due to real, embellished and fabricated wrongs and an intense desire to see it transformed to their moral ideals.

This historical resentment has likely contributed to the reasons modern Judeo-Globalist elitists like George Soros use their money to promote and enable social chaos and destabilization programs in the Ukraine, which borders Russia. Because of these issues with Eastern European culture, which has historically been influenced by Russia due to the bond of Eastern Orthodox Christianity, many Jews in Eastern Europe choose chose to either become Communists or emigrate to America, which had been historically welcoming of Jews. Many of these Jews migrated to professions within cultural institutions like academia, literature, news media, music and theater.

At the turn of the 20th century, Jewish-American men like the Gershwin brothers thrived producing and composing on Broadway while others such as Paul Reuter and Adolph Ochs displayed a seemingly natural tendency towards media monopoly with their ownership of major news outlets like Reuter’s newswire and the New York Times. Moving into the newly developed motion picture industry seemed a natural progression for a people who seemed to thrive in the “culture business”.

The advent of the motion picture camera in the early part of the 20th century changed the world forever. From the outset, Jews were involved in both the production and promotion of the motion picture industry in both Europe and the United States. In his book, The Complete Illustrated History of the Jewish People, Jewish South African journalist Lawrence Joffe describes the movement of Jews into Hollywood:

At first promoters and producers, then directors, scriptwriters, actors and composers, by 1912 Jews had set up over a hundred production companies in California, and were pivotal to the creation of the eight super-firms…

Almost to a man… the Jewish movie moguls were born into poverty. Carl Laemmle, the 10th of 13 immigrant children, managed a clothes shop before running a string of nickelodeons and in 1912 founding Universal, the first big studio. Louis Mayer joined the junk trade at 8, owned a New York theatre-chain at 22 and produced the epic Birth of a Nation in 1915, aged 30. Adolph Zukor, who founded Paramount pictures in 1917, was born in Hungary, emigrated at 15 and peddled fur garments.

A similar rags-to-riches story applied to the Warner Brothers, sons of a Jewish cobbler from Poland. In 1927 they amazed the filmic world by harnessing new technology to produce the first ‘talkie’. Starring Al Jolson, ‘The Jazz Singer’ presented Jewish family dilemmas about tradition and assimilation to a mainstream audience.

Today, the longevity and dominance of film studios like Warner Brothers, Metro Goldwyn-Meyer, and NBC-Universal are a testament to the legacy of the Jewish pioneers of Hollywood and the film industry. In an op-ed article entitled Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon posted in the LA Times in December of 2008, renowned Jewish American journalist and author, Joel Stein talks about the entertainment industry’s “open secret”:

Jews totally run Hollywood.

How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between ‘The 700 Club’ and ‘Davey and Goliath’ on TV all day.

However, the “rags-to-riches” tale of Jewish dominance in the American film industry has somewhat of a dark side to it (as do most tales of dominance). In his review of Neal Gabler’s book, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, writer Jack Wikoff describes what might be considered less than ethical business practices by these early film moguls in order to achieve a monopoly in the film industry:

These men acquired this control because of an excellent sense of what the public would buy, intense personal drive, group solidarity as Jews, a willingness for hard work-and — a lot of shady dealing. Gabler describes how Adolf Zukor and Carl Laemmle illegally used Edison cameras without paying the royalties and how Louis B. Mayer cheated the producers of Birth of a Nation by falsifying his bookkeeping, thereby making as much as $500,000 on the exhibition of that one film in 1915.

Of course, dirty dealings and questionable ethics in business are certainly not relegated to Jewish film moguls, although they certainly have developed a reputation as being particularly “slimy” over the years, with numerous testimonies and allegations of prostitution, sexual exploitation and abuse as well as pedophilia within the Hollywood community. However, the real thing that we need to consider for this conversation is what was being done with this new medium of film and what were the motivations behind doing it. Jewish-American actor, Ben Stein in an article for E! Online stated:

The ex-furriers who created Hollywood were Eastern European Jewish immigrants, and all of the great edifice of fantasy-making in Hollywood is their handiwork. Names like Zukor and Lasky and Goldwyn and Cohn are the foundation of mass culture in America and the world… There is a much quoted note that it took all these Eastern European Yiddish-speaking Jews to create the lasting, worldwide image of America and what America is–the mass culture mirror that America likes to hold up to its face.”

These Jewish film moguls created their vision of America and the ideal culture through the silver screen. While their brothers in Eastern Europe shaped the culture through politics, these men shaped it through storytelling. Little by little, bit by bit, the general became enamored by the “movies” and began to mimic and emulate the behaviors and ideals they saw on the movie screen. It became clear that Hollywood was not just “reflecting” certain cultural ideals and values in the American people, it was creating them.

In a speech during a Jewish American Heritage Month reception hosted by the Democratic National Committee back in 2013, Vice President and self-described “Zionist”, Joe Biden payed homage to the role of Jewish leaders in the culture industry for molding the American public’s perceptions:

What affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else?… It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace [gay marriage]. Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.



As the ability of film to be used as a medium for spreading cultural ideas and behaviors became increasingly evident, large corporations began to partner with the film studios to market their products. It was on Madison Avenue in New York City that corporate advertising began, and still exists as a dominant force today. One of the pioneers of corporate advertising was Edward Bernays, the “Father of Public Relations” and nephew of famed Jewish psychotherapist, Sigmund Freud. Bernays pioneered Madison Avenue advertising and marketing campaigns for the tobacco industry among numerous other large businesses and corporate conglomerates.

One of the most famous publicity stunts Bernays orchestrated for the tobacco companies was when he had several famous actresses line up in the front of the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade and light up cigarettes, which until that time, had been seen as something “un-lady like”. The tobacco companies used the admiration that women had for these actresses, calling cigarettes Torches of Freedom, and associating them with the feminist movement. It worked quite well, creating the image of the sexy, independent, and fashionable smoking woman.

Noticing his knack for shaping public opinion, the U.S. Government recruited Bernays in its P.R. campaign to get a reluctant and isolationist American public behind the First World War. The U.S. Government itself, being pressured into joining the war effort by International Banking interests (primarily Judeo-Zionist) based out of Britain and Western Europe. It was Bernays who was charged with bombarding the American public with embellished and outright fabricated stories of “atrocities of the Hun”, which would be repeated in an even more effective and sophisticated manner during World War II. Bernays also came up with the slogan “Making the world safe for democracy”. In his 1928 book, Propaganda, Bernays referred to his experience working for the various “powers that be”:

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country… We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.

After the First World War, Hollywood and Madison Avenue continued to develop increasingly sophisticated methods of molding public desires and opinions, and during the Second World War, the propaganda machine was put into high gear, mobilizing the patriotism of the American public to fight a war in Europe that was not truly in their best interest. This propaganda marketing was so successful and so sophisticated; it continues to be effective to this day and is evidenced by the large volume of World War II and “Holocaust” movies produced by Hollywood as well as international (typically Jewish) filmmakers seemingly every year.

It was during and after World War II that the relationship/partnership between the U.S. Government, Hollywood, and Madison Avenue (and of course, International Finance) really became solidified. The post-war release of television brought the ability for this finely crafted visual “programming” of the population into individual households across America, and eventually the world. Television would become the ultimate way for those working in Hollywood, Madison Avenue, Washington D.C., and elsewhere, to extend their mental sphere to people all over the world. The mass media is a way to send all the aspects of the extension of an individual or a group mind, as well as that mind’s desires, to people all over the world.


Shortly after World War II, President Harry Truman signed the National Security Act, which created agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA). These were and still are essentially entities whose purpose for existence is to further the interests of what President Dwight D. Eisenhower referred to in his farewell address as the “Military Industrial Complex”. These entities whose public “mission” was foreign intelligence gathering so that another Pearl Harbor-type event did not happen again, were in fact created to ensure that the War never really ended. Military weapons manufacturers and defense contractors had gained an unprecedented amount of wealth, power and influence, and sought to hold onto that power at any cost. Truman himself stated that “I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in forty-seven, if I had known it would become the American Gestapo.”

The Military Industrial Complex, with their front groups like the CIA, partnered with Global Mega Corporations and International Usury Finance, both of which had been empowered with the creation of organizations like the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund directly after World War II. This combine of the old American (as well as Anglo) WASP establishment and the Judeo-Zionists in finance and media proceeded to organize the biggest mafia-style racketeering operation the world had ever seen. This sort of partnership between White European elitists and Jewish opportunists has been going on for centuries, growing in scope and complexity, suffering from time to time from factional in-fighting,

In the post-World War II Globalist system, International Usury Finance would take the lead, and offer loans to developing nations with interest attached that would be impossible to ever repay. It would then make part of the deal that select Global Mega Corporations would be allowed to come into the nation and essentially pillage resources and create a slave-wage labor force. The ultimate goal was the natural progression of the same goal that has existed in the minds of those who desire power throughout known history: consolidation of power and control of resources and populations.

In many cases, the job of the CIA (often working in tandem with other intelligence agencies like British MI6 and Israeli Mossad) would be to run psychological operations or “psy-ops” on the populations through various media and propaganda outlets to work on the consciousness of the populace so they were receptive to and cooperative with the overall agenda of the intelligence agencies and their corporate partners.

If a leader or a population were uncooperative, the Military Industrial Complex would often create and arm resistance movements and stage assassinations to install a government that would control the populace and enable the larger agenda, or they would simply send in the CIA Jackals to “take out” whoever was standing in the way. The CIA has been linked to numerous assassinations of world leaders since its inception. It is even well established thought that the CIA was involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy after he came to fully grasp their tactics and motives, and refused to comply.  Kennedy stated “I will splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.”

In the recently published book, “The CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film and Television”, author Tricia Jenkins outlines what many have known for years and what was until recently illegal under U.S. law, which was the direct use of the film industry as well as various television and news media outlets to conduct psychological conditioning (i.e. propaganda) operations on the American public via orders from the various Executive Branch “alphabet soup” agencies (CIA, NSA, DHS, CDC, FDA, etc.). Former CIA director William Colby stated, “The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media.”

The CIA specifically has conducted psy-ops through the use of media propaganda on foreign soil to manipulate populations in a manner that suited their aims for decades. However it came out in the 1975 Church Committee Hearings that the CIA used news media outlets to push propaganda and conducted illegal operations on U.S. soil, and it had done so since its inception. Talking about the CIA’s role in the media in a meeting with President Regan in 1981, former CIA director, William Casey stated “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.

The base of operations for one of these illegal psy-ops on U.S. soil took place at Laurel Canyon in southern California during the 1960s where the CIA and military intelligence got into the music business, and like film and television, Jews were (and still are) dominant as producers and record-label owners.

The music and lifestyles that was promoted by these various music and counter-culture celebrities that came out of Laurel Canyon, etc. were designed to discredit the anti-war movement among older and more conservative populations and repel those folks from taking part in it. They were also designed to create a generation of hedonistic, “burnt-out”, “peace-nicks”, that were so passive and detached from reality that they would no longer pose any sort of real threat to the establishment and their agenda.


During the 1960s and 1970s, the CIA conducted a large, multi-subject experiment and program of psychological manipulation and control known as “MK-Ultra”. One of the techniques used for mental manipulation of subjects was the use of LSD to create a schizophrenic state in the test subject. LSD is an extremely potent hallucinogen and (unlike meth) can only be manufactured in a relatively sophisticated lab setting by an experienced chemist. LSD slowly began to make its way into the streets of America, while “gurus” like Professor Timothy Leary were given television time to promote the drug to America’s youth.

From LSD in the 60s, to Cocaine in the 70s and 80s, to the recent Opium/Heroin epidemic, the CIA has a long history of pushing drugs onto the streets of America, using that money to further fund their operations. The intelligence agencies have historically taken part in drug smuggling (which was a specific tactic of the British Empire) and sex trafficking (slave trade) to not only further fund themselves and further demoralize and debase the population, causing destabilization.

It was during this time when the values presented to Americans via the television and film screen began to slowly degenerate and become increasingly violent, decadent, vapid, and hyper-sexualized. The prevalence and cultural acceptance of pornography (also pioneered and dominated by Jewish moguls) went hand-in-hand with the various “liberation” movements of the 60s and 70s, which were steered by Intelligence Agencies and promoted and inspired by various Jewish academics, psychologists, social activists and those working in the “culture industry” working in tandem with the various intelligence agencies.

A new culture was slowly being developed and promoted for America. It was done incrementally, over the course of a few generations, as it was understood that anything too far from the course would be rejected and rebelled against. In the course of 3-4 generations, we went from Beaver getting advice from his father to Miley Cyrus dressed as a doll and twerking on stage during prime time. The moral degradation of western culture with the progressive move into decadent materialism and Cultural Marxism didn’t “just happen”. At the end of the day, Joseph McCarthy was right.

So how does this sort of programming happen? The primary method of “attack” for weaponized media is to assault our definitions and perceptions of truth and reality. Once this becomes debased, the rest one can then be reprogrammed with a new reality. This is done in the sort of hard-core trauma-based mind control experiments done by Intelligence Agencies to create an individual that can be utilized as a dupe, patsy or even an assassin.  This is done by splintering an individual’s psyche through trauma. This is done in a more subtle way to the general public through television and the mass media.

Make no mistake, the terrorist attacks and mass shootings like 9-11 and Sandy Hook are a form of mass trauma-based programming that are partially or in some cases, completely staged productions for the media and public consumption in order to generate a sort of fear-based neurosis and obedience in the general public.


To quote former Jewish American Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, “It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true.”  To many, “truth” is nothing more than what allows them feel comfortable in their own skin; what they can “deal with”, and to many, that means believing what EVERYONE ELSE believes as truth- being safe in the majority.

Let’s recall Joe Biden’s earlier quote on Jewish leaders in the entertainment industry, and the implication that television and social media can be used to change the cultural values of a population. What this means is that the entertainment industry has the potential and the ability to shape what a society feels is right or wrong. This results in the ability of the media to shape what a society believes to be true or untrue, as most people nowadays use emotional reasoning, and will generally gravitate towards what they feel as “right” as being the ultimate truth.

So how is this done? The most effective propaganda is that which appeals directly to our emotions. If we look at the mind of a person, we can essentially break it down into three basic parts: conscious mind, subconscious mind, and unconscious mind. Our emotions and feelings tend to arise at the point where our conscious mind meets our subconscious mind. In our day-to-day life of work, family, and social lives, we are operating primarily in the realm of conscious mind as we conduct tasks, make decisions, and navigate reality.

However, when we sit down and “zone out” with out favorite television PROGRAM, we tend to stop performing all of those tasks of the conscious mind, which also serves as a sort of filter for information- a sort of “B.S. filter”. This is particularly true when we are watching something that is supposedly “pure entertainment” like a sitcom or a crime drama. We shut down our critical thinking centers and stop analyzing, just opening ourselves to the experience of being “entertained”. We let down our guard.

The unconscious mind responds to colors, symbols, archetypal imagery, and primal fears. Meanwhile the subconscious mind tends to respond to more complex emotional cues and triggers relating to personal experiences. Together they are the prime target of advertising and “behavior placement” in TV and films. It is the “guardian”, i.e. the conscious, critical-thinking mind being asleep, that allows the subconscious and the unconscious to be preyed upon. Archetypally this is akin to the man of the house being asleep while his wife and child are preyed upon, or the warriors of a tribe being put in a trance by a sorcerer while the women and children of the village are violated, abducted and murdered.

Those not familiar with the concept of behavior placement are more than likely familiar with product placement. This is where you will see, for example, the main character of your favorite TV show drinking a Coke, then see a commercial or two for Coke during that time slot as Coca-Cola is a sponsor of that program. The idea is that since you like and identify with your “TV friend” you will want to emulate them and drink Coke. Behavior placement works in a similar way, but in a slightly more complex fashion.

Again, we’ll use Joe Biden’s quote stating that programs like “Will and Grace” were what shaped the general public’s attitude about gay marriage as an example. This shaping of cultural perceptions is done through use of TV characters you grow to identify with and even “love”. You develop empathy for them and their situations. You think they’re “cool” and want to be like them in the same way a child adores and emulates puppets and cartoon characters.

It is through this empathy and identification with these characters that behavior placement happens. We form a make-believe friendship in our subconscious as we identify with the plights of the characters. We then may begin to take on the values and morals that they espouse to, just as we might tend to with any other real-life friend (that’s why mom didn’t want you hanging out with the “bad kids”).

We then may begin to identify with and even desire the world the program portrays as this simulated vicarious relationship develops. A well-known example of this is the “Hollywood Ending” that so many people want for every aspect of their lives. When watching a television program, you can rest assured that pretty much anything to do with politics, gender roles, and controversial social issues on a TV show would be considered behavior placement, as the “behavior” that the producers are wishing to place you into is the point-of-view and actions of the main characters or “heroes” (even though many modern TV “heroes” would not be considered so by traditional Western standards).

When I was doing door-to-door canvassing our primary goal was to appeal to the emotions of a prospective donor. In one particular organization I would come armed with a picture of our boss’ kid looking sickly juxtaposed next to a corporate CEO stating how much he made while children went unable to receive medical care. This simple imagery appealed to the emotional center of the person, and the objective was to bypass any sort of real sophisticated policy discussion about “who’s going to pay for this?” or “how is this going to be implemented?” which I’m sure many who financially supported “grassroots” efforts to get Obamacare may wish they had asked these sorts of questions.


This method of shaping cultural opinion through media is often used to create perceptions in the public mind that the media establishment wishes them to perceive as “facts” and true events, again through appealing to emotional reasoning and the imposition of a brand of “morality”. Recent examples of this can be seen through the generation of memes through the mainstream as well as through social media regarding the Middle East refugee crisis, specifically with the comparison of “refugees” to Jews fleeing the “Holocaust” in World War II. This “refugee/holocaust” narrative is something the establishment mouthpieces are using to guilt Americans into “getting with the program“.

Recent articles out of The Huffington Post, The Nation, Politico, and The Chicago Tribune among others, ALL follow this particular talking point. Talking points are typically generated from a centralized source such as a government or corporate agency or think-tank and disseminated to the various news outlets. In this case, it appears the source of this particular “talking point” is current CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, Jonathan Greenblatt. Greenblatt called upon the spirit of Nazi-Jewish Persecution and the “Holocaust” in an attempt to guilt and shame the American people in his op-ed for the ADL’s own website entitled “Closing the Borders to Refugees: Wrong in the 1930s, and Wrong Today”:

…in January 1939 another poll asked whether the U.S. government should permit ‘10,000 refugee children from Germany—most of them Jewish—to be taken care of in American homes.’ An astounding and shameful 61 percent said no.

In May of 1939 the St. Louis carrying 937 German refugees—mostly Jews fleeing the Third Reich—set sail for Cuba. Most had applied for U.S. visas. Turned away from Cuba, as the St. Louis sailed so close to Florida that the passengers could see the lights from Miami, they appealed to President Roosevelt to give them safe harbor. With public opinion opposed to lifting the stringent immigration quotas or to make an exception for the ship’s passengers, the St. Louis returned to Europe. Almost a quarter of the passengers perished in the Holocaust.

Today, the world faces the largest refugee crisis since World War II. Almost 60 million people around the world have been forcibly displaced from their homes. The war in Syria, fueled by the unparalleled brutality of ISIS, is largely responsible for the spike. And once more—shamefully—there is a push for the United States to turn a blind eye to the suffering of refugees and shut our doors to those in need.”

It should be noted that Jewish American author, Robert I. Friedman highlighted in his book “Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America” that the Anti-Defamation League pressured and eventually convinced the FBI to call of investigations of individuals with known affiliation to the Jewish-Russian Mafia who also sought “refugee status” back in the 1970s, stating that doing so would be “anti-Semitic”. This is the same Anti-Defamation League that has had ties to the Jewish Mafia since the days when infamous Jewish American mobster, “Bugsy” Siegel established Las Vegas (now dominated by Jewish American billionaire Sheldon Adelson).

In this article we have mentioned the “refugee poll” where Americans voice a politically incorrect opinion. This is a meme that has been popping up all over social media these days thanks to “AJ+”, i.e. Al Jazeera for millennials. Al Jazeera being the news media organization owned by the government of Qatar– one of the oil-rich Arab Gulf States that is refusing to take refugees, while being linked to the funding of Islamic terror groups. Now we will use this refugee poll as an example showing how a meme on social media can be used to shape public opinion.

As the refugee poll begins to be spread around on social media, often initiated by the organization or individuals that originated it, it can then be amplified though the echo chamber that social media creates, making a new “meme”. This effect causes this the core message carried by the meme to become amplified; where it can then be promoted as well as enforced through a sort of peer-pressure, that social media and any other modern social institution inevitably creates. The pushers of the meme will then often shout down those who would disagree with ad-homonym attacks where the dissenter is ostracized and attacked as a racist, a Nazi, an anti-Semite, etc., etc., causing critics to be silenced out of fear of social ostracizing and embarrassment.

As an aside, it is may be worth noting that much of social media openly partners with U.S. Intelligence agencies to collect data on the general public while tracking the trends in public opinion through complex algorithms.


It is ingrained into us to desire to “fit in”. This desire is so strong that many will change what they know to be right or wrong to simply “belong”. This starts at childhood with our family and is further refined through schooling and institutionalized peer-pressure. This is how the newly uploaded behavior/thought pattern, after being implanted into the subconscious of a large group of people takes root and becomes self-enforced as a sort of new cultural dogma or belief system. This is how human beings are trained what to think and feel.

We live in a bubble inside of a bubble. If the physical world is indeed holographic in nature, than the world the majority of us who live in modern culture experience life that is even more of an illusion. For multiple generations now, our beliefs, our culture, what we believe is and is not true about every aspect of the world has been defined to us by someone else who saw it in a movie somewhere. We have major news networks owned by major Hollywood movie studios (i.e. NBC-Universal). Does anyone see something wrong with this? Perhaps it is high time that we as a culture, as well as individuals, took a look at our ideas and our beliefs, while thinking of these words by psychotherapist and motivational speaker, Dr. Eldon Taylor:

We’ve come to a point in our lives where it’s fair to ask, ‘what was the last original thought (I) had?’ The way you walk, the way you talk, the vocabulary you use; all of these things are built into the expectation you have of yourself, based on the role you have chosen to play in the ‘theater’ of life, as it has been defined to you.


Years ago I had a brief debate with a friend who parroted a claim by his professor that art could only follow culture and not the other way around. I did not agree, although I did not have the understanding to articulate as I am here. Any serious study of the psychological effects of words, music, symbols, pictures, and movements on an individual or group would soon realize that was not the case. Visual arts, musical arts, and performing arts are all “art”, and all involve influencing the psyche of the viewer in some way to be effective. Anything that can reach into your psyche has the potential to influence it if allowed.

What is happening here is that another world is being created inside the one our physical bodies laugh, cry, work and love. An artificial bubble has been placed around us and is being continually upgraded. It is a media bubble that taps into, amplifies, steers and molds our fear and weakness. It gives us ideas and beliefs that we may not have otherwise held because we allowed ourselves to be weak and susceptible. It is a world of fear and illusion manifesting through our weakness.

Those who have the focus and concentration to project their mind in a unified manner with other “like minds” are building the world they perceive: a world that sees reality as a prison, rather than a classroom. People who live in this world don’t really want money, as many naively claim; they use money. But what they really want is pleasure and then power- that is the progression of greed and most people in modern society suffer from it. Power to rule the prison they perceive.

Recently I saw a discussion on whether there was a “conspiracy” of a few, or if it was the mental cluster known as “the mass mind” that was to blame for the hiding or “occulting” of certain knowledge or information. I will say that if we look at the “human as cell” model I presented earlier, it is both. If look at the example of a virus or other seemingly negative entity somehow coming into an existence in the BODY, we can see how this might be similar to the selfish and destructive individuals credited/blamed for the “disinformation program” accepted to the general public, and the desires and beliefs they adhere to.

There have ALWAYS been groups of individuals who kept certain knowledge from those not deemed ready to fully understand it.  That was a foundation for the ancient Mystery Schools and later Secret Societies like the Rosicrucians.  This hiding occulting of knowledge can be seen as good or bad depending on motivations.

Regardless, at the end of the day, it is the general public who is in a state where the virus; whatever you want to name it; can do its work and create a sort of viral cancer, causing the human “cells” to turn on each other and destroy themselves. But it is weakness and ill-health within the individual cells as well as their cell groups that allows the virus to take hold in the first place. The symptoms of an illness are simply the body trying to purge itself and bring itself back to balance. The same could be said of the suffering and “illness” in the individual as well as the collective humanity and all its components.

In the end, a society and its leaders will be reflections of one another, archetypally though it is the King who is ultimately responsible for living in accordance with the Law, so the people and the land don’t fall into ruin.  But the question becomes in this day and age; who is playing the role of the King?  Is it really those we have chosen, or allowed to lead us?

We are now at a point in history where any sort of natural aristocracy we had in the past has fallen into decay.  Perhaps it is now time for each of us to gather the strength to pick up the sword and scepter and become the King- the Sovereign who is master of himself and unchanged by external impulses and forces.

So next time you turn on the television, or go see a movie, or log on to social media, look at the various messages that are being pushed. Why might be a motive for pushing these messages? What might they be trying to say to you? What are they trying to get you to think or want or believe? Who would benefit from getting you to buy into or believe what is being presented?

Television and media in general is constantly advertising and “marketing”. If it is not actual products, its ideas and belief systems that others wish to impose upon us. So next time you watch your favorite TV shows or log onto social media, keep your critical thinking mind active and see what the program is trying to download into your consciousness. Or better yet, turn the TV off, log off Facebook and experience reality without having someone else define it for you.

Namaste and God Bless.


Ex·trem·ist (n):
Somebody who holds extreme or radical political or religious beliefs;
(adj): involving, typical of, or motivated by extreme opinions, especially in politics or religion.

Rad·i·cal (adj):
Favoring or making economic, political, or social changes of a sweeping or extreme nature.

Ter·ror·ist (n):
Somebody who uses violence or the threat of violence, especially bombing, kidnapping, and assassination, to intimidate, often for political purposes.

The above listed terms and their definitions are ones that we as Americans, as well as people in Western nations in general, have become all too familiar with. Here in the States, the “War on Terror” has officially gone on for over 14 years now, and shows no sign of stopping. As myself and many others have previously stated, it is not something that is ever meant to end, as it enriches the Military Industrial Complex both in military operations abroad, as well as domestic surveillance and the construction of a federalized police state at home.

At this point, I feel it would be laboriously repetitive for me to go further into how all that works at this point. What I want to look at here is the narrative being established and the deeper meaning behind it. A recent interview with sociopolitical and media narrative researcher and analyst, Jay Dyer presented a deeper perspective about the whole “radical extremism” narrative that is playing out on both sides of the media. This was something that I felt compelled to explore myself.

The whole world now is on red alert because of the actions of the “newest face” of Islamic extremism, ISIS. The Paris Attacks last month, and now the more recent San Bernardino mass shooting/terror attack have got the world gripped in a state of fear and panic. President Obama even gave a rare prime time speech to address the issue, which was obviously done to create hype around the incident. While tragic and definitely a bit “close to home” for me as I work with people with developmental disabilities, the narrative around the event is somewhat suspect. First we have a mass shooter drill happening to take place at the same time as the supposed event. Second, we have what was originally described as three assailants reported officially reduced to two (we saw a similar occurrence around the Colorado Theater Shooting narrative). Third, we have the police stepping aside and letting all who wish essentially ransack the suspects’ home on live television before even conducting an investigation of the crime scene, essentially destroying any ability to connect anyone else directly to the attacks.


However, what I find intriguing is the “battle” between the left and the right over who the “most dangerous” extremist group is. If you look at the Right Wing, NeoCon media (i.e. Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc.), they will hammer home the point that it is Islamic extremism that is the greatest threat to our safety and security, coupled with the migrant “surges” happening from the southern border. They will state that more needs to be done abroad to destroy ISIS and that their large fan base is so numerous that Islam itself is an existential threat to America. This was recently echoed by Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, who cited examples of Islamic communities celebrating the fall of the Twin Towers during 9/11 and the recent events of soccer matches, among the reasons why any and all Muslims need to be prevented from entering the U.S. until the nation can “figure out what the hell is going on”.

On the Left, we have the “Liberal” media (i.e. MSNBC and pretty much every other major news outlet) stating that while ISIS is bad, the “real threat” in America is not Radical Islam, but rather the “white male” mass shooters such as Dylann Storm Roof (I still have a hard time believing that one) and the recent shoot-up of a Colorado abortion clinic by the almost equally strange “Robert Dear”; as in “Robert, dear, can you take out the trash?” In either case, both these men were supposedly motivated by a sort of extreme “Right Wing” ideology, be it racism, or fundamentalist Christianity, it was vehemently opposed to the ultra-politically-correct ideals of the “Liberal” Left.

In either case, both support a sort of “lockdown” policy to “keep this from happening again”. The Right favors a closing of the border, militarism, and greater surveillance to prevent Islamic extremists and other undesirable “non-Americans” from being able to do us harm. The Left favors severe gun restrictions, “hate” speech restrictions for politically incorrect language and ideas, and greater surveillance to prevent dangerous White extremists and other “hate groups” from being able to do us harm. So what do both of these policies have in common? Obviously, both share the belief that it is centralized government power, rather than a self-reliant, self-sufficient and otherwise empowered citizenry, that is the key to “keeping us safe”. But there is something else going on here as well.

faces of terror

One thing that is happening across the board in the media that we should pay close attention to is the back and forth substitutions of the words “extremist“, “terrorist“, and “radical“.  This is done deliberately so that we equate anyone that have “extreme views” (i.e. views different from mainline establishment thought) with terrorists, regardless of whether or not these people are actually use aggressive violence towards others.  This is the current that underlies the whole “terrorism” narrative on both the Right and the Left side of the Power Structure.  In truth, this isn’t a war on “terrorism” at all.

What do Religious fundamentalists (Islamic, Christian, etc.), White Nationalists (or Black Nationalists, or Hispanic Nationalists, etc.), Sovereign Citizens, Anarchists, Libertarians, Constitutionalists, and “Conspiracy Theorists” all have in common? They all have strong ideologies or opinions that in some form or fashion create competition and opposition to the dominant power structure and the elite that control it. These are ideologies that supersede the allegiance to the State in the minds and hearts of those individuals who subscribe to them. These are ideologies that if left alone, threaten the power monopoly of the State, which is why the State will either seek to infiltrate and “co-opt” them, so as to use them for its own purposes, or it will seek to destroy them.

Let’s briefly take a look at each of these different ideologies that cause the State so much concern:

Religious fundamentalism or “extremism” is what is on is on everybody’s tongue right now. Religious fundamentalism is typically the strict adherence to a particular religion and its doctrine. Fundamentalists tend to hold to a literal or “exoteric” interpretation of their religion, and tend to be “traditionalists”- meaning they believe in traditional families and cultural moral values.  While most religious fundamentalists are not violent, the belief in any sort of “Higher Power” that supersedes the State is going to be targeted and demonized.  Likewise so will any ideologies around moral virtue or traditionalism that are not “State-endorsed“.  At the same time the State will drum up fear of these ideologies in the public mind to enhance its own power and control. While particular fundamentalist ideologies like violent Islamic extremism (which is typically government enabled and funded), are used to de-stabilize various regions resistant to Globalism, the goal is ultimately for these ideologies to be absorbed into a Corporate Global Monoculture based in consumerism and debt slavery.

Nationalism, while not as much of a focal point in the States, is really gaining steam in Europe. Nationalism is the belief that the state, acting as an extension of a particular culture, tribe, folk, or race needs to remain sovereign and maintain the ability for self-determination, free of influence or pressure from outside nations or groups. The various Nationalist movements are demonized heavily in the media there, as well as here to a lesser degree. Factions of the Power Elite have used Nationalism to their advantage in the past, but as the power structure moved full swing into a Trans-National Globalist system with the conclusion of World War II, any form of Nationalism is now seen as an enemy of “progress”. We would do well to understand that the one of the primary purposes of World War II was to crush folkish Nationalism and usher in a “cosmopolitan” Globalist system.


Sovereign Citizens or “Freeman” essentially reject the notion that the State has any legitimate authority over their lives. They understand the “LEGAL NAME” as it appears in all CAPS on your birth certificate, driver’s license, and any court documents to be different than the actual flesh and blood human person. The LEGAL NAME is a corporate entity, and one’s consent to it essentially makes one property of the State and the power structure behind it. Sovereign Citizens and Freeman use this legal understanding to separate themselves from the State, most notably from paying taxes, particularly income taxes (which are unconstitutionally levied by a private bank). The State cannot exist without funding from private citizens, so naturally, anyone with this sort of ideology and understanding is seen as a threat. Far from violent, Sovereign Citizens typically just want to be left alone.  You can read for yourself: Global SOv Handbook_0

Anarchists have a similar ideology to Sovereign Citizens, as they do not believe in the legitimacy of the State or government at all whatsoever. Anarchists do not believe that any group or individual has the right do declare itself as an authority over another. Anarchists believe that any imposition upon an individual’s free will (including taxation and imprisonment) that isn’t self-defense is immoral and illegitimate. Anarchists have been given a bad rap due to the use of violence in protest settings which have mainly been perpetrated by agent provocateurs rather than actual anarchists; particularly in recent decades. The public has been conditioned to fear the word “anarchy” and link it to chaos. Anarchy in fact does not mean “without rules”, it means “without rulers”. This makes those who subscribe to it a natural enemy of the State.


Libertarianism could be considered as “Anarchy Lite”. Libertarians share many of the same beliefs as Anarchists, but believe in some form of severely limited representative government. As the State seeks to continuously expand itself, Libertarianism is seen as an enemy, although their ideology of unrestricted markets can tend to play into the hands of Corporate Globalism. Libertarians also tend to be anti-imperialism, which puts them at odds with the Military Industrial Complex that steers much of U.S. foreign policy. Libertarians often identify as “fiscally conservative” but “socially liberal”.

Constitutionalists are similar to Libertarians in ideology, but specifically hold allegiance to the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution. However, many Constitutionalists also tend to be conservative Christian and “pro-life”, while Libertarians tend to lean towards “pro-choice”. Constitutionalists reject the idea that the Constitution is a “living document” open to free interpretation that changes with the times. This ideology is particularly troublesome to the U.S. Federal Government as it has increasingly sought to expand its power and influence both at home and abroad, far beyond the scope outlined in that document. If one looks at the definition of the word, it would in fact be the Federal Government that would be defined as “radical”.


Within the category of “Constitutionalists”, we have a large portion of active and retired U.S. Military Service members. These are men and women who swore an oath to the Constitution and it is no small wonder that returning veterans are at the top of Homeland Security’s “Terror Watch List” (here’s the pdf of the report: rightwing).  In fact, police chiefs have justified their Homeland Security funded military weapons and vehicles due to the “threat” of “Constitutionalists” and “veterans” who have “the ability and knowledge to build IEDs and to defeat law enforcement techniques”. Throughout history, it has been the military and their codes of honor that has proven to be the biggest thorn in the side of political despotism.

Lastly we have “Conspiracy Theorists”. This has been a blanket term used to apply to pretty much anyone that believes that governments lie or that small groups of people meet in secret and make plans. While these “Conspiracy Theorists” run the gamut as far as areas of focus, from false-flag terrorism to U.F.O. cover-ups, nearly all of them point to secrecy, deception and outright lawless actions being perpetrated by the State in the past or in the present. Naturally, the State does not care for this and seeks to marginalize anyone who points to any wrong doing on the part of the power structure.

Another thing that tends to link “Conspiracy Theorists” is a “belief in a New World Order conspiracy”. So what is the New World Order exactly? Aside from just being a concept mentioned in speeches by both former President George H. W. Bush and former President Bill Clinton, and far from some fantasy construct of a dystopian sci-fi novel, the “New World Order” is nothing more and nothing less than the logical end-result of Trans-National Corporate Globalism. It is a gigantic corporate merger- a consolidation of power and influence by select financial and corporate interests, their shareholders as well as the politicians and bureaucrats they have under their thumb. It is a group of cartels with who work together to enhance mutual interests and dominate world markets and resources.

corporate man

The stated goal is to create a “one world government” ruled by a sort of “neo-feudalistic serfdom”, with a form of Socialism/Communism for the masses, while the “feudal lords” sit in offshore tax havens and fortified compounds. For those familiar with the “company towns” of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it could be likened to that on a global scale. In fact, the nature of sovereignty erasing trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership is evidence of this.

The subject as to who these “feudal lords” that sit atop this “pyramid” has long been debated. Count Richard von Coudenhove–Kalergi, founder and President of the Pan-European Union, which was the predecessor of the E.U., was a big-time power player in the Globalist movement. The Count gave us a somewhat of a clue of who these “lords” might be with this statement from his 1925 book, “Praktischer Idealismus”:

From the European quantity people… two quality races rise up: blood aristocracy and Jewry… both believe in their higher mission, of their better blood… The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility.

It should be noted that the British-Dutch-German royal family are the prime shareholders of Dutch Royal Shell Oil Corporation and the largest land owners in the world. Meanwhile Jewish elite financial empires like N.M. Rothschild and Goldman-Sachs influence interest rates and hold sway over major global financial lenders like the IMF, the World Bank, and the Bank for International Settlements– the central bank of central banks like the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve. It was these financial interests as well as their counterparts on Wall Street that funded both the Zionist and Bolshevik movements of the early 20th century. Historically, the financial/merchant class has worked with aristocracy to enhance one another’s interests and power for centuries.

The late Carroll Quigley, former Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former President Bill Clinton wrote the encyclopedic-length work of dry non-fiction “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time”, in which he detailed with optimistic enthusiasm the mechanisms of what he referred to as the “Anglo-American Establishment”. The Anglo-American Establishment describes the alliance between the British Empire and the elite financial and corporate interests that were behind it (i.e. Rothschild) and the emerging American Empire and its financial and industrial titans like J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie. The forming of the much-celebrated “Special Relationship” between the U.S. and Britain in the late 19th century was at its core founded on a belief in the need for Anglo-American hegemony across the globe. As the British Empire declined, the American Empire took its place.

After the Anglo-American Establishment emerged victorious in World War II, a new entity emerged, referred to by President Eisenhower as the “Military Industrial Complex”, which acted as the “bulldog” for the financial and corporate entities who sought to get nations into debt they could not pay back, so they could then pillage their resources. The Military Industrial Complex was there to make sure that happened. Controlled primarily by the American WASP elites with ties to Zionism, this combine of arms dealers and weapons manufacturers used the power and influence they had gained in the Second World War to make sure that the war never ended. The creation of entities like the CIA as well as other Military Industrial Complex entities and operations helped to ensure this through use of false-flag terror, psychological warfare, narcotics trafficking, sex trafficking, manufactured revolutions, assassinations and puppet dictators.

With the spread of Corporate Globalism, new players like China entered into the equation. While western interests had covertly financed the Communist Revolution of Mao Tse Tung for decades, Communist China remained an “enemy” in the eyes of the general public through the Vietnam War. However, in the mid- 1970s China was “opened” to western markets- a move led by then U.S. Envoy to China and later CIA Director, George H.W. Bush. This was the beginning of the new chapter of the strange love-hate relationship between China, their elites like the Li family, and the Anglo-American Establishment. The Corporate Globalists love China due to their unending supply of cheap labor and complete disregard for the environment and human rights. Meanwhile those who are on the military and finance side of things know that China is still out for China, and not really “in” with the Judeo-Anglo-American Establishment, which seeks to be the dominant force in the world as it has for the last nearly 200 years.

The New World Order is a comprehensive system of dominance in financial, corporate, and government spheres where the most ruthless rise to the top, while the rest of the world is kept in a compartmentalized state. It is a system tailor-made for psychopaths. While there is infighting and backstabbing, as there is “no honor among thieves”, there is cooperation in the manner of a group of cartels. Judeo-Zionist, Anglo-American, and European elites primarily drive it, however players like the Saudis and the Chinese have played an increasing role in the past few decades. It has been said that millionaires see the world as a “playground”, while billionaires see the world as a “proving ground”, and this is certainly the case here as this is no “millionaires club”. The primary ideology is that of “Social Darwinism” and the belief that the 0.0001% who are in this “club” have a duty to direct the course of human civilization and lead the masses of the human population down “the right path”, with or without their consent.

However, these are also people who deeply understand the Law of Karma, which is why they always say what they are going to do in white papers, dry academic works, etc. before they do it. Silence, apathy, ignorance and disbelief from the general public equates to consent, as the information and stated goals of these folks is readily available. Likewise, they use “grunts” like the police and the military to do their dirty work, thereby skirting the immediate repercussions of Karma. They understand human psychology to an incredibly sophisticated degree and are masters at playing groups off against one another in order to advance their goals and create “order out of chaos”.


This is the “New World Order” in a nutshell. It is the Global Corporate Mega-State. This is an entity that has been constructed in the darkness of secrecy away from the light of inquiry, but now has become more vocal and blatant with its actions, as its dominance has caused it to grow in chutzpah and arrogance. Needless to say, this system as a whole is not something that most people would consent to if they were fully aware of it, which is why anyone sounding the alarm about any aspect of this is going to be ridiculed, demonized, or worse by the establishment.

So let’s be clear: governments aren’t afraid of terrorism. Governments have used terrorism for quite some time to advance their own power. What governments are afraid of are ideologies that compete with their own. The State and the individuals behind it know their real power lies in their hold over the minds and hearts of their populace. If that is gone, it is only a matter of time before they are as well.

We should note that it is increasingly accurate to use an impersonal term like “the State” in reference to the U.S. Government as it no longer matters who “the face” is, since we have a dictatorship of Executive Branch bureaucracies and the corporate interests that control them. Policies shift focus and move faster, but never really “change”. This is a State that has not been “for the people” for a long, long time. Similar statements can be made of most governments that are in existence today.

So that leads us to the question of what exactly is the ideology of the State and the emerging Global Corporate Mega State that ultimately seeks to completely absorb it? First and foremost, the State seeks to establish itself as God (although it will never say that). The State wants you to look to it for life and sustenance. The State wants you to look to it and only it, for safety and security. The State wants women to see it as provider, children to see it as parent, and men to see it as master. The State wants to destroy human sexuality and even human imagination because of the power it has to create without the approval of the State. The State will tell you what is moral and virtuous. The State will take your ideas and your movements and make them work to advance its own goals. All things belong to the State.  The State will let you have whatever does not threaten its power.

The State wants the “poor and oppressed” to look to it for hope, opportunity, and charity which it will give in exchange for loyalty and the elimination of its enemies. The State must crush any and all competition. The State must silence any and all dissent or ridicule. The State will choose what words and language is appropriate. The State will decide what sort of science and technology you can and can’t have. The State wants you to consume more and more. The State wants you to be self-absorbed and apathetic. The State wants you to care about frivolous things and obsess over mindless entertainment. The State wants you to believe you can only be what it says you can be. The State wants you to believe everything its “experts” and media pundits tell you.  The State will write history.  The State will tell you what is true or false.The State must dictate your reality.

The State wants you to cheer it on, no matter what it does. The State demands tribute and it demands sacrifice. The State will tell you that it is virtuous and honorable to pay your tribute to the State. The State cannot survive without it. The State thinks there are too many people and that threatens its ability to maintain power and control. The true nature of the State is that of a parasitic entity. It may give a tiny little bit, but then it takes oh so much more. Like a cancer it grows and grows. The State wants you in its cage until you die broke and in debt. The State will say what is good is evil and what is evil is good. The antithesis of Light, Life and Love, the State as we know it is an archaic holdover from the Kali Yuga and represents darkness, death and fear. The State is a vampiric illusion that only exists because we have put our faith and energy into maintaining it.

This is the State as it has come to be. This is the Global Corporate Mega-State. It is “Left Wing” as well as a bit “Right Wing”. It is all about you having any sort of “freedom” that keeps you dumbed-down, distracted and self-absorbed. It wants to take all of your money as you slowly die from the diseases that it creates or allows to be created in a variety of ways. It tolerates homogeneous, watered-down religion, just as long as your actions in the world are passive and subordinate to the State, and your life remains primarily focused on tribute and support of the State. It wants you to serve it until you no longer serve a purpose. It wants you to believe you are weak, powerless, and ugly. But in truth, it knows how powerful you truly are and is scared to death of that.

At the end of the day, an “extremist” is anyone who does not agree with the legitimacy of the power monopoly of the State and its attempt to dictate reality. An “extremist” sees the State’s attempt to become God for what it is. An “extremist” isn’t a threat because he or she uses bombs, or guns, or other fear-based tactics. An “extremist” is a threat because he or she isn’t afraid to use words and ideas to create a different version of reality than the one the State approves of. The Word and the Imagination are humanity’s most powerful tools, which is why the State seeks to suppress and control them with such vigor.


So in closing, my question to you, dear reader, is this: where do you stand? Do you stand with the State? Or do you follow a “Higher Power”? Will you be an “extremist”? Or will you be absorbed into the Global Corporate Mega-State?

Humanity is at a fork in the road, and the time is coming where we will all have to make the “hard choice”.  Honest, sincere, conscious action will be required of us.  What manner of action will depend on one’s own strengths and abilities, but in any case, it will require honest action and it will take every ounce of heart and courage we have.

There is a rough road ahead indeed, and the temptation will be there to just put our head in the ground and “go along to get along” and hope we go unnoticed.  But we may be wise to remember the words of Tuskegee Airman and Air Force Lt. Col. Hiram Mann:

“No man survives when freedom fails, the best men rot in filthy jails, and those who cry ‘appease, appease’, will be hanged by those they tried to please.”

Namaste and God Bless.