“The dark shall soon flee from the dells of the earth

So she a wonderful word to us speaks

The day shall again, new made rise from a rosy sky

Saint Lucy, Saint Lucy”

  • The Lucia Song: verse 3 (English Translation)





Something that has gained increasing traction in not only academia, but also in popular culture, is the idea that people of European descent, i.e. “White people”, have no “real” culture of their own.  This idea has largely come out of “Whiteness Studies”, which is an offshoot of Neo-Marxist Critical Theory and has entrenched itself into the worldview of an increasing number of people across the Western world.  If you ask any adherent to this philosophy what “White culture” is, they might respond with words like “patriarchy”, “capitalism”, “oppression”, “privilege”, “cultural appropriation”, “racism”, “exploitation”, etc.  They might even say that White people don’t really have a culture of their own outside of Big Macs and Hollywood movies.

There is perhaps no better, more consolidated example to support this view than the modern Christmas or “Holiday” Season.  Christmas and the Holiday Season, have become synonymous with capitalism, commercialism, consumerism, materialism, and of course, racism.  The myth of the fat old white man going around the world spreading “cheer” by distributing all the latest consumer products the “white” global consumerist market has to offer- this is what Christmas or “The Holidays” are all about in modern consumer society.

Plus, add to that the annual resurgence of all the various debates around whether we say “Merry Christmas” or “Happy Holidays” or what skin color Santa and Jesus should have.  One could even argue that the “origins” of Christmas, i.e. the Jesus Nativity story, is a sort of white cultural appropriation as it is a story involving Middle Eastern people in Middle Eastern lands, that is claimed by many white folk as their own.

In the following series, what I am going to lay out here is the case that what has become known as the oppressive “non-culture” of Whiteness, particularly as exemplified by the modern Holiday mythos, is in fact, something that was slowly imposed on “White people”, who in fact DO have a rich cultural tradition that still lives on DESPITE multiple attempts to twist, subvert and eradicate it over the centuries.  I also plan to show how this rich culture, which has been shared with the world in a variety of forms, is also personified by the stories and traditions surrounding what has become known as “Christmas”, and this culture lives on in us in a deep archetypal and spiritual way, and is available to us here and now.


I have written in the past about the Solar myth that forms the spiritual significance of this time of year and the deeper mysteries and parallels of Christianity and the earlier Proto-Indo-European religions.  However, what of the Santa myth that rivals Jesus in cultural significance during this time of year?  What of this seeming archetype of modern “White” patriarchal consumerist globalization?

When it comes to the origins of the figure known as “Santa Claus”, a lot of people immediately gravitate toward the story of St. Nicholas of Myra.  A somewhat legendary figure, St. Nicholas was reputed to have a “legendary habit” of secret gift-giving.  Nicholas was a said to be a Greek Christian in the Byzantine Empire and during lived in the 4th Century A.D.- three to four centuries before the Muslim conquest of the region.  However, some have argued that St. Nicholas was in fact born of wealthy ethnic Black Anatolian “Muurs.

But the origins of what became Santa Claus are in truth much older than that, and originated in a much colder place.  In many parts of pre-Christian Northern and Central Europe, the Winter Solstice was known as the time when Odin or Wotan- the white-bearded ruler of Asgard, led his hunting party across the sky.  Known as “The Wild Hunt”, Odin rode his eight-legged (eight reindeer) steed named Sleipnir, which would leap great distances across the heavens.  During this time, children would leave their boots by the chimney filled with carrots and hay to feed Sleipnir.  In return for their charity, “Odin” would leave the children gifts by their boots.

This night of Odin’s “Wild Hunt” has a counterpart in what is known as Lussinatta, or “The Lussi Night” in Sweden.  This is now celebrated as St. Lucy’s Day and occurs on the 13th of December every year.  However, before the Gregorian Calendar shift, it would have fallen on December 21st– the night of the Winter Solstice.  Some legends suggest that a supernatural female entity was said to ride through the air with her fearsome followers called “Lussiferda” and that it was particularly dangerous to be out on this night.  Misbehaved children had to take special care as Lussi could come down the chimney and take them away, and if certain tasks needed to prepare for Yule were not completed, Lussi would punish the household.

The contrast between Odin who left gifts and Lussi who brought punishment has echoes of the later pair of St. Nicholas/Santa Claus and the Krampus.  Interestingly, some scholars link Krampus, as a member of the fearsome entourage of the ancient Germanic goddess Frau Perchta, who some connect with the ancient Norse goddess, Freya– one of the primary Vanir or old nature gods who some say ruled before the Aesir.

The inclusion of both the fearsome and the festive shows a deep understanding of the dualism inherent in nature that these ancient European peoples possessed- especially during this most perilous time of year.  On the one hand, we have the often harsh and brutal forces of nature during the cold winter months.  And on the other, we have the festive joy that comes from the promise of the return of the Sun.

But if we go even deeper and look at etymology and linguistics, we add another layer of sophistication.  Swedish stems from the Indo-European family of languages, if we sound out the name of Lussi and in particular, her Lussiferda, the name “Lucifer” might perhaps come to mind.  Lucifer, of course, stems from “lux ferre”, which in another Indo-European language, and that is Latin, literally means “light bringing”.  We perhaps see that these ancient Northern Europeans were pointing at how it was the oft-times terrifying darkness that carried the Light that brought life to the world.  This is true not only within Nature, but within the trials and tribulations of our own lives and our own being- the night is darkest before the dawn.  It is the darkness that brings the Light.

We see this deep understanding mirrored in in the Scandinavian Festival of St. Lucy where traditionally a procession is led by a beautiful young lady adorned with a crown or wreath of candles upon her head (although now this is being changed to be morepolitically correct”), bringing the promise of life-giving Light into the darkest night.



The cold and brutal Northern European winter was a time that had the potential to bring starvation and death (and often did).  But with after the passing of the Solstice, the people knew that the days were slowly beginning to grow longer, and the life-giving Sun was growing stronger.

The Norse-Germanic festival of Yule was celebrated from right around the time of the Winter Solstice all the way through the second week in January.  This festival of feasting, drinking and sacrifice was a hallowed tradition among pre-Christian Northern European peoples to whom winter had a special significance that was not held among most others.  Yule was the tradition of a people who were close to the land and intimately tied into the cycles and processes of Nature.

The industrious elves/dwarves, the holly, the mistletoe, and the evergreens that have all become symbols of “Christmas” are all hallmarks of the culture and lore of Northern Europe.  The white of the pure, cleansing snow; the green of the evergreen tree- symbol of the magic of regenerative life; the red of the blood of the sacrifice and the folk; and the gold of the eternal undying Sun; these are the colors that are synonymous with “The Holidays” and they are inseparable from the unique folk consciousness and soul of the Northern European peoples.

These ancient “white” people were a very distinct culture with rich customs and traditions.  However, they would eventually find their culture usurped and altered at the point of a sword by invaders from the south and the east, as well as traitors within their own tribe.  Of course, what I am referring to is the spread of Christianity in Europe.


Christianity moved in slowly at first, with the rather tolerant Northern European pagans accepting and in some cases even adopting the worship of this new “god”, seeing similarities between their deities of similar attributes.  This was commonplace during the old phase of the Roman Empire, where Celtic gods and Roman gods were often mixed and matched.  However, Rome began to use its wealth and influence to spread its influence, bribing local rulers and nobility, who in turn would use their military resources to impose the new religion on their people as well as neighboring tribes.

Another reason this new empire was so successful was that it also became adept at using more subtle tactics, such as co-opting the patron deities of various European peoples and turning them into Christian “saints”.  These figures would be attributed to various good deeds or miracles that made them similar to the deity the church wished to replace.  They would then proclaim the pagan festivals and holy days that used to belong to the old deity as now being a celebration and veneration of that saint.  This is more than likely what happened with figures like Saint Nicholas and Saint Lucy in Northern Europe.

By the end of the 14th century, the entirety of Europe had been converted to Christianity, and even after the split between the Eastern and Western church in 1054 AD, Rome would still control Europe and its people from the British Isles, to Scandinavia, all the way into Hungary and parts of Romania.  Through the church, Rome controlled the people not only through political means, but through the indoctrination of the people into a dogmatic belief system, it by proxy controlled their minds.

The conflict of the incoming Semitic Saturnian religion with that of the Indo-European Solar religion, has in many respects seemed to create a sort of neurosis in the European collective consciousness.  This is could be in part because this was not really an organic spirituality of the people based on their unique relationship to Nature and Spirit, but rather something that was foisted upon them, largely against their will.  This could also be because the totality of what was happening and is continuing to happen with these archetypal forces has not been fully understood and integrated.



“And they clothed him with purple, and platted a crown of thorns, and put it on his head, and began to salute him, ‘Hail, King of the Jews.’… And when they crucified him, they parted his garments, casting lots upon them, what every man should take.  And it was the third hour, and they crucified him.  And the superscription of his accusation was written over, THE KING OF THE JEWS.”

 – Matthew 15:17-26


image courtesy of

One of the main plotlines in J.R.R. Tolkien’s epic “Lord of the Rings” series revolves around the character of Aragorn, the rightful heir to the throne of the human kingdom of Gondor and descendant of King Elendil who first destroyed the evil sorcerer, Sauron.  However, after vanquishing the dark lord, the king chose to keep the wizard’s Ring of Power rather than destroy it, which ultimately brought ruin and decay to himself and his kingdom.  Shamed by his family’s legacy, Aragorn changes his name to “Strider” and lives in a state of self-imposed exile until he is finally called to take action against the forces of Sauron and step back into his rightful place as king in order to reunite the fractioned kingdoms of men.  This is a call that Aragorn answers quite reluctantly at first.

Another more recent work of fiction that captured the imagination of readers and later moviegoers around the world through its focus on intrigue, secret societies and religious conspiracies was author Dan Brown’s “The DaVinci Code”, and the series of novels and films that followed.  A central theme in that story revolved around a well-kept secret that Jesus was in fact married to Mary Magdalene and that the two had children together.  It was this “bloodline” of Jesus that was the true “Holy Grail”, which had been covered up by the Vatican for centuries.

The word Grail linguistically stems from the Sangraal, or Sangreal.  It was divided into San Graal or San Greal, which essentially means a “holy vessel”, but if it the parting of the letters is switched and spelled Sang Raal or Sang Real we have “holy blood.”  In mystical and alchemical symbolism, the bowl or chalice is a feminine symbol, so in this context it could have correlated to a “womb”- in this case the womb of Mary Magdalene containing the “blood” or genetic lineage of Jesus.


The concept for the Jesus bloodline/Holy Grail story that appeared in Brown’s books first appeared in the French 19th-century socialist politician, Louis Martin’s 1886 book “Les Evangiles sans Dieu”, as well as several other books by several other authors in subsequent decades.  However, perhaps the most well-known of these was the work of nonfiction by authors Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln entitled “Holy Blood, Holy Grail”, which was published in 1996.  The essential concept, which was later delved into further more recently in Jeff Wilkerson’s “Sion’s Army: The Freemasons” is that Jesus was indeed a historical figure who was an exiled “priest-king”, descending from the ancient “Hebrew” patriarchs David and Abraham.

Now, I’m going to take some creative liberty and play off this basic plotline for a moment so as to provide context for a more in-depth exploration of the archetype of “the King” later on.  In the Old Testament we have the great patriarchal lineage that is stated to be from Noah, to Abraham, to David, to Solomon.  After that we saw a division among the Tribes of Israel and a collapse into decadence after their leaders and the people (repeatedly) broke their covenant with God.  This is what set the stage for the “Babylonian Captivity”.  Many scholars will agree that it was in Babylon that the Judaism that we know today was crafted, which is by and large a corruption of the original spiritual lineage.

This corruption grew as the Babylonian Empire eventually gave way to the Roman Empire.  Here we had the corrupt Pharisees and Sadducees, as well as the Jewish mercantile and political elitists working with the Roman Empire to maintain a sort of illegitimate power.  It is at this point we see the rise of the various ascetic and zealot movements that began to speak out against these corrupt classes of Jewish elitists (“The Synagogue of Satan”) who sought worldly power above God.  This is where the story of the man who would become known as “Jesus” is said to begin.

This time would have culminated approximately with the central point of the Kali Yuga (according to Sri Yukteswar’s interpretation).  This was the “Dark Age” where the forces of Satan/Saturn would have been felt at their strongest point.  It was a harsh and dangerous world back then.  Brutality was the order of the day and people suffered immensely.  This would have been the world Jesus was born into, perhaps at first, completely unaware of his lineage and ancestral connection to the ancient patriarchs.  But at some point he is made aware of this, which may have occurred in what are known as the “Lost Years”.  Perhaps this was the time when he might have rejected this and chose to live in a state of self-imposed exile similar to the character of Aragorn in “Lord of the Rings”.  Perhaps he too felt shame in the failure of his ancestors and what it brought upon the people.

But like Aragorn, Jesus eventually answered “the call” to fulfill the destiny of his lineage, and stood toe to toe with the seemingly overwhelming forces of darkness, culminating with his triumph over death.  Most are at least somewhat familiar with the rest of the story which culminated in the crucifixion at “the place of the skull” and the subsequent resurrection and the transmission of a spiritual “lineage” to a select group of disciples.  One of these disciples was Mary Magdalene.

In some of what have become known as the Gnostic Gospels, there is described a scenario where there appears to be an issue of jealousy amongst some of the Apostles, namely Peter, for Mary Magdalene’s “cozy” relationship with Jesus, with him kissing her on the lips and her sitting in his lap.  According to some scholars, there is record from the 1st century A.D. of a Yeshua ben Yoseph being married to a Mary of Bethany.  The Hebrew interpretation of Jesus’ name was Yeshua.  Some traditions maintain that Mary Magdalene was in fact a descendant of King Saul of the Tribe of Benjamin, who was later overthrown by David of the Tribe of Judah.  It is said that the marriage of the two would have been seen as reuniting the two remaining tribes, and the child produced would have been doubly seen as the rightful heirs to the throne.


photo courtesy of

The story continues that after the crucifixion, the authorities sought out the Apostles and persecuted, imprisoned, exiled and even executed those that did not escape.  It is said that Mary Magdalene indeed did escape this fate and made her way to Gaul (France) either pregnant with Jesus’ child or with baby in tow (and some legends say Jesus’ mummified body). There were early Church writers who stated that Mary Magdalene, Lazarus, Joseph of Arimathea, Phillip, and several others went by ship to Marseilles on the coast of France.  Legend states that Joseph went on to England, where he established a church at Glastonbury. Lazarus and Mary Magdalene, however, are supposed to have remained in Gaul.  Today in France, tourists can visit the purported remains of both Lazarus and Mary Magdalene.  It is in France where the “bloodline” supposedly took root.  We also have the mystical Grail Tradition of legend coming out of this part of Europe around this time, with legendary kings like King Arthur and the Fisher King being linked to both the legendary Holy Grail as well as the personage of Jesus.

As an aside, I’m sure some may or may not have noticed an odd correlation with the exile and impregnation with a royal child story that was initially ascribed to Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew in particular.  We also find the name “Mary” given to both the mother of Jesus and the alleged lover of Jesus.  Could this situation have been something that was flipped in order to protect or hide identities or obfuscate a truth?  While the identity or non-identity of a historical Jesus has been and continues to be hotly debated, I think it is worth considering the real possibility that the claims of some researchers that history before 1500 AD had been completely re-written by the Roman Vatican.  From the destruction of the Library at Alexandria, to the extermination of the Druids, to the persecution and execution of early Christians, to the destruction of the Mystery Schools, there appears to have been a real attempt by the Roman Empire in its many forms, as well as its allies, to hide and destroy certain forms of knowledge and perhaps re-write history itself.  With this potential scenario, we could postulate that Jesus may have indeed been a “real” person, but the truth of his identity and his story has been used and obfuscated for political reasons, with the inconvenient parts flushed down the “memory hole”.

In any case getting back to our story of the “Holy Grail” and Mary Magdalene’s journey, we will find that it is also in France where we see the rise of the Merovingian Dynasty who the fifth through the seventh centuries.  The Merovingians were referred to as “sorcerer kings” or “priest kings”, and were said to have the ability to heal by the laying of hands and supposedly had clairvoyant ability and other psychic capabilities.  They are recorded as all having a distinct birthmark- a red cross- either over their heart or between their shoulder blades, which was said to testify as to their having “divine blood”.  This idea of the semi-divine “priest king” is something that goes back to the Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt.  It is also interesting to note that the portraits of some of these Merovingian kings looks incredibly similar to the traditional western depiction of Jesus.


However, frequent wars on behalf of the Roman Vatican and the interests behind it, weakened the power of the Merovingians, while the lower aristocracy of dukes and counts began to take political power after being given concessions by the kings in return for their support.  This led to the corruption and fall of the Merovingian dynasty.  However it is said that a secret society of esoteric Judeo-Zionists originating out of Nazareth known as the Priory of Sion has played and continues to play a role in protecting and maintaining this royal bloodline and continues to seek avenues of power for it, although these avenues seem to have become increasingly corrupted.  Several researchers have concluded that this Priory of Sion played a role in the founding of the Knights Templar and later, the Freemasons, and are said to have played a hand in the American, French and Russian Revolutions.  This is another area of history that is debated, with contradictory evidence appearing on both sides, but I find the narrative intriguing nonetheless.

But as I stated earlier, the real theme I want to bring attention to and discuss moving forward here is this archetypal narrative of the “King lineage representing the highest, most noble and virtuous aspects of humanity; the capacity for a fall away from this state of spiritual virtue and the consequences of it; and the ability to return to this place of spiritual nobility by answering “The Call” of what Joseph Campbell would refer to as “The Hero’s Journey”.  These are all things I will be exploring in the second part of this article.

Namaste and God Bless.


“The desire to destroy Germany is not new. For over 300 years England and France have fought against Germany’s right to consolidate its states… Hate against Germany has been taught for centuries… We do not teach our people hate against the British or French. But in their countries they are relentless with their hate campaigns. One day these brain-washed people will become the new government and then Germany will not know what hit it. This is why I am building up a defense.”
– Adolph Hitler: speech at the Sportpalast Berlin on January, 30th 1940


The Germanic Folk Spirit has played a special role in the history of humanity.  For those not familiar, a “Folk Spirit” is a collective informing consciousness of a people created through genetics, metagenetics and the unique interaction between the Earth and the Heavenly Bodies in an area of prolonged generational habitation.  If one looks at history, one might see what was a sort of consciousness “counter-current”.  The philosophy of spirituality, science, and society coming out of Germany differed from that of the dominant “empire” at the time, be it Rome, London or Washington D.C.  In one way or another, the Germanic peoples and the Germanic Folk Spirit have competed with the sort of materialistic and monopolistic philosophies of the Roman Empire (The Caesars and the Vatican), the British Empire, and later the American Empire, as well as others who shared their philosophies and ideologies.

Since at least the Middle Ages (and undoubtedly before that), the land of the Rhine and Danube Rivers has produced some of the greatest artists, musicians, scientists, alchemists and mystics the world has ever seen.  It is this land that gave birth to Meister Eckhart, Christian Rosenkreutz, Paracelsus, Bohme, Luther, Goethe, Hegel, Nietzsche, Steiner, Beethoven, Mozart, Wagner, Schauberger, and many others.  Author Jonathan Black speaks of a certain spiritual impulse that rose out of the Germanic lands (Germany, Austria, Switzerland, as well as parts of Belgium and France):

As.. materialism.. took root and spread, the opposing impulse arose in Germany- an idealism alive to the varieties, the subtleties and the anomalies of the human experience.  The great tradition of idealism in German philosophy includes Johann Georg Hamann, known as ‘the Magus in the North’, Fichte, Schelling, and later Rudolf Steiner…”

During World War II, this beautiful German land was scorched, incinerating men, women, children, the elderly, as well as a host of animal and plant life.  The horrors enacted upon the German civilian population by the combination of the bombings and the pillage, rape and torture by the Red Army produced incredible trauma in the psyche of the German people.  The suffering would continue for those east of the “Iron Curtain” for decades after half of Europe was essentially given to the Soviets.

The common narrative around the beginning of World War II in Europe is that “Germany started it” to fulfill super villain, Adolf Hitler’s “mad dream” of world domination and an Aryan Empire.  It is taught that this was Hitler’s goal from the get go, and that he re-armed massively during the build up to the war in order to accomplish this vision.  However, this was not exactly the case.  Contrary to popular belief, Hitler did not assign priority to the manufacturing of military hardware prior to the outbreak of World War II, but rather focused on things like housing construction and improving conditions for the German working man and his family.  Likewise, international trade and economic restrictions imposed on Germany  after the NSDAP came to power made a massive arms build-up a little challenging.


When the war finally broke out, Hitler and the NSDAP used strategy, not sheer military might, to gain the upper-hand during the early part of the war. By and large, much of Hitler’s “advances” into countries like Austria, Czechoslovakia and Poland were in fact taking back territory that was held by Germany before the World War I and the implementation of the Treaty of Versailles. Many within were former German citizens who were welcoming reunification with Germany.  And while some may argue that Germany’s actions of moving into Poland and France was a “power grab” (and in some ways it was)again, these nations both held territory whose populations were ethnically German, and belonged to Germany prior to the Treaty of Versailles, and it was these regions that were occupied by Germany, while the areas that were not being “taken back”, remained under the governance of Poland and France.

As far as Poland, Germany technically only took back the pre-Treaty of Versailles German territory where ethnic Germans still lived, while leaving the rest of Poland to be run by the Polish government. Likewise, Germany had a “non-aggression” pact with Stalin, who also invaded Poland around the same time as Hitler while Britain turned a blind eye (Britain declared war on Germany for invading Poland). It was when Hitler found that Stalin had plans to launch a full on invasion of Europe that he launched the ill-fated preemptive strike on Communist Russia.


Hitler would see the encroachment of Communist uprisings across Europe coupled with the advancement of Stalin’s forces as reason for Germany to step up as a defender of Europe and leader in a sort of united Pan-Europeanism. Of course, the German occupation of European nations would have been done first and foremost to protect Germany from the Soviets, many of the “Nazi sympathizers” within the leadership of nations like Finland, Hungary and France, shared the NSDAP concern of advancing Communist power and willingly allied with Germany, seeing it as a strong leader in the fight against Communism. Of course at the end of the day, motives and reactions to Germany’s exertion of influence varied across occupied Europe.


By the end of the war, it would be the Communist Red Army that was allowed to march into Germany, raping and pillaging everywhere they went. This was something that severely upset U.S. General Patton, who could have taken Berlin before the Red Army in a much more humane fashion, but was not allowed to by Allied Commanding General Eisenhower. After the war, Patton became increasingly outspoken of his criticism of the Communist Russians and the fact they had essentially been given half of Europe. Shortly after the war, Patton died in a hospital in Germany after a minor vehicle accident. Many believe he was killed to silence him. In Patton’s diary, he recorded a correspondence between him and French General Alphonse Juin who told Patton:

It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that the English and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country – and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism.

German cities were absolutely leveled by the ferocious carpet bombing of the British and American forces. The supply rail lines were bombed out and the labor camps like Auschwitz that provided most of the raw supplies needed for the war effort were falling into chaos due to pandemic outbreaks of Typhus (which was spread by lice in particular) and the inability to get food and medical supplies. The German military was suffering massive casualties to the point where the NSDAP was recruiting youths and elderly men to fight to defend Germany from the advancing Communist hordes. In the end, though, NSDAP Germany would fall, and the Nuremberg “Show-Trials” would use torture and outlandish and unreliable “testimony” to make Germany an example to the world.


After the war, Europe was utterly devastated, and since then, no European nation has risen to the status that Germany did prior to the war. The creation of the E.U., which essentially signs on member nations to a shared debt (owned by Jewish-founded banking establishments like Goldman-Sachs) and rule by an unelected bureaucracy, ensures this. Likewise, the utter despair that dwelled behind the Communist “Iron Curtain” dwarfed anything that the Fascists or the NSDAP had created. This further served to weaken and demoralize Europe as did the U.S.-N.A.T.O. organized false flag terror campaigns created fear and instability in the heart of Europe for years after the war. Destabilization is a tried-and-true tactic of globalism to take out any potential resistance or competition.

While some may argue that Hitler was intentionally put into power by the actions of the banking establishment, the overwhelming historical evidence suggests that this can only be seen as true if it was done by proxy- which is that Hitler and the NSDAP were co-opted and infiltrated by agents working for the International Banking interests and somehow manipulated unwittingly into taking actions that would create conditions for another war. This would have been steered by those who wanted a Second World War to achieve what the First World War did not, i.e. a permanent global governing body (i.e. the United Nations) and the establishment of the State of Israel, among other things.

Likewise, there are those who sight Hitler’s relationship with Bernhard Stempfle, a Catholic Priest (critic of Jewish atheism and alleged Jesuit) who  helped Hitler write “Mein Kampf” as proof that Hitler was a Vatican agent or patsy.  It is believed by some that it was in fact Stempfle that wrote “Mein Kampf” and not Hitler, and that Hitler was used to further promote what were in fact Jesuit Vatican interests and agendas in Europe.  However, it is interesting to note that Stempfle was one of the NSDAP’s political enemies that were “eliminated” during the infamous “Night of the Long Knives

Hitler himself was a master politician, able to reach out to and convince wealthy industrialists and the common folk alike to work towards the common goal of a strong Germany and a strong German people. Does this mean he was a double agent of some kind? I don’t think so. If one reads his writings, I believe his love and sense of duty to Germany and the German people was very real, and held over from his days as a soldier. While you certainly can’t be a master politician without learning to compromise, and certainly the threat of annihilation by the Allies made for some difficult sacrifices, but I don’t think he ever willingly or intentionally “sold out” the German people.


Others argue that there is evidence of Hitler being drugged before his alleged suicide attempt, and then taken to Argentina by his secretary, Martin Bormann during the Nazi “exodus” at the end of the war. Some researchers have suggested that he was an agent of some kind, put in place to stir up the environment for another world war, and then allowed to escape to safety after his “mission” was completed. In either case, the evidence seems to be either lack of evidence or quotes from the Soviets stating that Hitler escaped, or that a cover-up ensued to ensure the world he was dead for P.R. purposes. However, other researchers dispute this and state that while there was most certainly a large emigration of Nazi officers and funds from Germany to South America after the war, Hitler was not among those that made the trek.

Researcher Dr. Joseph Farrell suggests that Hitler and the NSDAP managed to escape to South America and else where with secret technology they had developed to create a form of colony separate from the Anglo-American-Zionist establishment. Farrell argues that a “Nazi International” organization exists as a sort of self-interested bulwark against the Anglo-American-Zionist establishment. He also provides a great deal of evidence of “Ether” technology based on the science of men like Viktor Schauberger and Nikola Tesla, as well as the Vedas, being developed. Things like the “Nazi Bell” and various forms of “flying discs” were said to have been developed by the S.S.’s secret science program. It was this technology that was reportedly confiscated (at least some of it) by General Patten at the end of the war. Dr. Farrell concludes that the Reich’s development possession of this sort of technology was the “secret” reason for the war, and that most of the post-war U.F.O. sightings were the result of this technology being used by both the Anglo-Americans and the remnants of the NSDAP.


Indeed, German science was cutting edge at that time (television existed in Germany a good decade before it did in the U.S.), and it appears that “rocket science” was just scratching the surface of it. This is of course why German scientists were brought to the U.S. during “Operation Paperclip” after the war. This has been used as “proof” of a ‘Nazi conspiracy” to infiltrate the U.S., but again, this is more “cartoon history”. The rest of the story is that these scientists had three options: work for the U.S., work for the Soviets, or die. Given the reputation of the Soviets, it’s no small wonder so many German scientists came here, but it does not make it an infiltration, if anything, these men were co-opted and used by more powerful interests than their own, who had a different agenda than the Reich.

I am not a worshipper of Adolf Hitler or National Socialism. I don’t worship politicians and political parties, regardless of how intriguing some of their ideas and rhetoric may be. I do not agree with Statism and many of the tactics used by the National Socialists. I am vehemently opposed to totalitarianism and police state tactics. I am opposed to locking up political dissidents in internment camps. Likewise, I find it appalling to incarcerate innocent men, women and children who have not committed a crime because they are seen as potential enemy combatants by the government. However we should remember that this was done in the United States as well with people of Japanese as well as German ethnicity. Likewise the “dehumanization of the enemy” type of propaganda that was created in Germany targeting public perception of Jews and Communists, was also mirrored in the U.S. and other Allied nations towards the “Axis of Evil”.


I am of course, opposed to any sort of medical testing done through deception, manipulation or coercion (although the majority of the stories around Dr. Mengele and company are either seriously embellished or completely fabricated). Again though, this is something that the U.S. government has been guilty of on numerous occasions throughout the last 70 years. Neither am I a fan of things like coerced sterilization, race mixing laws or many of the other components associated with state-sponsored Eugenics that was a part of NSDAP Germany such as the Nuremberg race mixing laws (supported by the Zionists and not fully supported by Hitler). But again, we would do well to have appropriate historical context and know that these ideas and practices originated in the Anglo-American world, not Nazi Germany.

It is worth noting that the racial supremacy ideas that have long been associated with Nazi Germany are caricatured and often understood by the general public through the rhetoric of modern day Neo-Nazi Skinhead groups (many of whom have been federally infiltrated and are headed by federal operatives, i.e. Hal Turner).  As evidenced from later speeches, dialogues and writings Adolf Hitler’s notions of “racial purity” changed from his ideas he wrote about in “Mein Kampf” 20 years earlier. By the time of the war and the “Holocaust”, he saw the German people as a mixed people rather than of “pure stock”.  In fact, the evidence of Hitler’s “racism” can be seen in the words of African-American Olympian, Jesse Owens:

When I passed the Chancellor, he arose, waved his hand at me, and I waved back. I think the writers showed bad taste in criticizing the man of the hour (Hitler) in Germany… Hitler didn’t snub me -it was FDR who snubbed me. The president didn’t even send me a telegram.

Hitler saw the idea of a common Germanic “folk culture” to be the uniting factor. It was this folk culture that he used to unite and invigorate a demoralized the German people across a very entrenched class system. A united and culturally reinvigorated German people and the possibility of the same thing happening in Europe as a whole was a dangerous thing for the powers of Globalism and the Judeo-Zionist and Anglo-American combines behind it- the very reason why modern European Nationalist movements like Golden Dawn are so heavily demonized in the media.

It is this “Folk Culture” and its use of ancient Indo-European symbols like Runes and the Swastika that lie much at the heart of claims that the Nazi’s put some kind of spell on the people of Germany. The Swastika is an ancient Sun symbol and can be found all over the world. Sadly, it is now seen in the west as THE symbol of evil. It could be argued that the demonization of our sacred symbols of empowerment is an end unto itself, but that is a discussion for another time.dd89b46d1c83ad3d5be961c94e351e6a

A major component around the sort of evil “mystique” that has been given to Hitler and the NSDAP has been the rumored use of “occult” magick to cast a literal spell on the German people. Much of this centers around rumors and tales around the members of the S.S. and the symbol of the Swastika. This occult element has been employed to a great deal in Hollywood with films like “Indiana Jones” and “Hellboy”, and makes up a substantial part of certain alternative and conspiracy literature. The fact of the matter is that there was an interest in the occult and mysticism throughout the western world during the first part of the 20th century among intellectual circles.  Germany was no exception with mystic and occult orders and societies like the Rosicrucians, the Thule Society, the Vril Society, and Anthroposophy.

Rather than being “evil” or “good”, these “Occult” symbols are a tool, and are used by governments, corporations, and religions all over the world.  Austrian mystic (and no friend to the NSDAP) Rudolph Steiner was pointing this out when he said:

Be certain that these people who are now bringing this sign to Central Europe- they know exactly what they are doing.  This sign works.”

Looking at the complete turnaround from demoralized decay, to unified strength, this talisman certainly did “work”.  The myths and legends behind them have been used to motivate and inspire tribes of humanity for millennia. Just because the NSDAP understood the power of certain symbols on the German Folk Consciousness, does not automatically imply that they were employing them for sinister or strictly self-serving ends. In fact, it could be argued that what they were really doing was trying to awaken the archetypal folk soul of the people, as opposed to put them into some sort of trance.


This demonization of the Swastika, Folkish Nationalism, and other philosophies and ideologies of Nazi Germany is part of the programming we have been subject to that teaches us to think: “If Hitler/the Nazis did something then that something is automatically bad because Hitler/the Nazis are bad so likewise everything they do or believe is going to be bad.” This is line of logic is a textbook “logical fallacy”. The fact of the matter is that the German were empowered under the NSDAP in a way they have not been since. The uniting of a people under common values and a unique shared identity is a dangerous thing for those who wish to eradicate the concepts of sovereignty and self-determination in favor of a world where corporations literally own people and nations.

Hitler’s idea of a greater “Folk” culture for Europeans through shared heritage and symbolism, and his view of Germany as needing to take a leadership role in promoting this “Pan-Europeanism” (similar to Japan’s Pan-Asianism), has been twisted into a story of Hitler wanting to “conquer the world” and that if the Allies didn’t win, we’d all be speaking German. Hitler and Pan-Europeanism with its emphasis on folkish nationalism was seen as a way of beating back the sort of cultural oblivion that Marxism openly sought. It is a similar sort of “cultural oblivion” that people all over the world are facing as Globalism seeks create one Hollywood/Madison Avenue “monoculture” ruled by big banks, big corporations and the idea that “we are all the same” like cogs in a machine.


Indeed World War II can be summed up as “Globalism vs. Nationalism”. On one side you had proponents of a global “mono-culture” implemented through a synthesis of socialism/communism for the masses and exploitative crony capitalism for those on top. On the other side you had an alliance of nations who wanted to preserve their national sovereignty, self-determination and ethnic uniqueness, allied for that common cause. Globalism won. The world we live in today- and the agencies and institutions that control it (UN, CIA, IMF, etc.) are the direct result of that “victory”. It is basic criminal psychology to project one’s immoral or amoral behavior onto another. It wasn’t Hitler that wanted to “take over the world”- it was the men who said he did… and they pretty much did. While the time since World War II has been called “The Long Peace” (as large nations have only fought wars by proxy with one another since, i.e. Vietnam) it can be argued that slavery could be likened to peace when no one is fighting back.

When the various claims surrounding National Socialism and pre-World War II Germany are looked at in a different lens, we see a much different picture than what is presented to us in western film and television. We see actions with somewhat understandable motives and realistic situations, as opposed to the popular taglines of “racist insanity” on the part of Hitler and the Nazis, and a sort of “mass-hypnosis” being used on the German people. People were terrified of Communism and the cultural oblivion it promised in favor of “equality”, and the nightmare scenarios been seen in places like the Ukraine with the Holodomor. A “strongman” type arose to push back, and yeah, grab a little power for himself and the NSDAP leadership along the way.


And once the “death camp” narrative is understood to be fraudulent (see Thought Crimes: Questioning Zionism, Communism, the Holocaust, and the Founding of Israel), the bottom falls out of this story of “Nazi Evil”, giving us a much more grounded version of reality.  This version actually puts Hitler’s Germany and World War II itself in its proper context. Again, I am not looking to deify Hitler and the NSDAP; I am looking to relegate their role to its proper place in historical reality, as opposed to the Dr. Doom meets Jack the Ripper comic book super villain role they have been assigned to play. When the childish “comic book” stories are thrown out and events are put into proper context, the world we live in now, the one that was shaped by that war, makes A LOT more sense.

The belief system constructed around Hitler and the “Nazis” is a testament to the seemingly monolithic power of Hollywood, the global media, and western academia to manufacture and sustain belief systems in the modern world through illusion, “smoke-and-mirrors”, and political correctness. Of course, no one has been more devastated by this belief system than the German people themselves, who have been racked by a collective guilt, demoralization and self-hatred that is leading to the outright destruction of them as a nation and as a people at this very moment.

Unlike the philosophy of the NSDAP, many modern day German leaders don’t even pretend to be concerned with the well-being of the German nation or the ethnically German families who have called that land home for milennia.  People like  Joschka Fischer, ex Foreign Minister and Vice Chancellor of Germany agree with the strategy of keeping Germany on a short rope:

“Germany is to be contained from outside and heterogenized from the inside by influx, ‘diluted’ so to speak.”

Others like Attorney Gregor Gysi, the Jewish-German head of The Left party in Germany. Gysi, praise the inevitable destruction of the indigenous Germanic population.  Gysi and others within German leadership state that the German people were morally obligated to their doors to unlimited “refugees” from North Africa and the Middle East because of the actions of the Nazi Party. Gysi actually refers to Germans who protest the massive migration influx as “Nazis” and praises the German population crisis:

Every year more native Germans die than there are born. That is very fortunate. It’s because the Nazis are not very good at having offspring.


The Holocaust story and the other “evils” of the Nazi regime would be used to force financial reparations from the German taxpayer, as well as be used to indoctrinate schoolchildren through trauma.  The Holocaust narrative has caused generations of Germans not even alive for the war to hold onto a sense of guilt and self-loathing for themselves and their ancestors.  This guilt-based indoctrination has caused such a neurosis in the German collective consciousness that they dare not speak ill of anyone who is Jewish as described by the “Jewish Daily Forward” article entitled “German Left Haunted by the Holocaust- Split over Israel”:

“Growing up in reunified Germany, Eva Meyer remembers being overwhelmed by the Holocaust studies that were part of each school year. Meyer and her classmates were assigned to read books about the Holocaust. They heard personal stories from Holocaust survivors. They had to write essays about the Holocaust, too.

Learning so intensively about the horrors committed by Germans left her feeling shame and guilt, Meyer said. But that same education communicated something else:

‘There is Israel, and that’s the solution,’ Meyer said, describing the role that was assigned to the Jewish state in her education. ‘That’s the salvation. It makes you feel better. All the shame and guilt is not that bad, because there is Israel and everything is fine now. And whatever Israel wants — give it to them. And whatever a Jewish person wants — don’t ask, just give it. That’s what I learned about it.’”

In his article for the London Guardian entitled, “The Loneliness of Being German“, German-Irish novelist Hugo Hamilton states how “The emotional attachment to home, to the land, to the place in which you are born, is something hereditary that lies deep in the human psyche…” and how “In the process of exorcising the Nazi crimes, generations of Germans also denied their own heritage and severed an emotional link with their own people…”

Hamilton explains how Germans “In effect, they became a homeless people, and still are. The physical destruction of German cities, the occupation by foreign armies, was overcome by adapting and rebuilding. But the intellectual homelessness was more profound, and included a ruthless defection from anything that had a spiritual link with the German soul. There is an unacknowledged loneliness in being German… They have been to hell and back with guilt, and their overriding sense of duty towards their victims is unheard of in any other society.”

Many, both Jews and Gentiles believe that the people of Germany “got what’s coming to them” and that the results of WWII was “karma”.  But what do we say when we know how many of these “crimes” are a complete fabrication?  If this karma or is it a group of well-meaning, good-hearted, but unfortunately naive people being mentally, psychically and spiritually crippled and enslaved, while getting financially fleeced in the process.  Now with the “Refugee” Crisis, Germans are forced to move out of their homes and apologize for being racist after being sexually assaulted  in places like Cologne, while the German government cracks down on anything deemed as “anti-migrant hate speech

I believe that deep down, there sincere desire among many who sing the praises of German “extinction” to see this spiritual impulse that rose from the Germanic Folk, and the industriousness and creativity that comes from it, exterminated from the Earth.  As a man of Anglo-Saxon lineage, the German people are my people. The German people are also the family of my fiancée, who still has family living in Germany today. These Germans are the family and kin of my future children, and I will not stand silent as this manufactured, one-sided guilt is used to cripple and crush the spirit of my  Germanic folk, ultimately pushing them towards oblivion.

However, as bleak as things may seem, I don’t think Theodore Kaufman’s vision in “Germany Must Perish!” will come to pass. The mystic Folk Spirit of the Germanic People, as well as the European Peoples as a whole, is not something that can be snuffed from the face of the Earth, as it is at its core the extension of something immortal.





“I emphasized that the defeat of Germany and Japan and their elimination from world trade would give Britain a tremendous opportunity to swell her foreign commerce in both volume and profit.”

– Jewish Wall Street mogul Bernard M. Baruch: Presidential Advisor during World War I & II and associate of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill


The Treaty of Versailles and its intentional economic ruin of Germany is what laid the foundation for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (National Socialist German Worker’s Party) or NSDAP.  They would later be dubbed “Nazis” by the British and American press.  The crippling economic sanctions coupled with the runaway inflation of the German currency during the post-war Weimer Republic led to the absolute economic ruin of Germany. This runaway inflation was caused by reckless financial speculation by the primarily Jewish banking establishment in Germany and Europe, who were tied to the Banking Investment Houses in London and New York that triggered the Great Depression. As a disenfranchised, but decorated war veteran, Hitler saw German families starving, pushing around wheel barrows of useless currency while these Jewish banking and merchant elites lived quite well in Germany and neighboring Austria, where Hitler spent much time in his younger years. During a 1940 speech in the Sportpalast Berlin, he would reflect on this time:

Who can even recall the reality of the situation of those years: the despondency of the collapse of 1918; the tragedy of the year 1919; and then all those years of economic decay domestically; the continuation of the enslavement; the poverty of our Folk; and, above all, the utter hopelessness of those years! Even today the memory of these years profoundly shakes us when a great nation slowly lost not only its belief in itself, but all hope for earthly justice in this world. During this entire period, this “democratic” Germany hoped in vain, pleaded in vain, and protested in vain. International finance remained brutal and squeezed our Folk ruthlessly to the utmost. The statesmen of the Allied Nations were hard hearted. In cold blood, they declared that we were twenty million Germans too many.”


In the case of the Jews, Hitler (and many others in Europe as well as America) saw them as having been destructive to the German nation and its people since Germany was the first to ‘emancipate’ them- that meant they had the same rights as the citizen of that nation. Historically certain “rights” and privileges only applied to the hereditary people of the tribe or kingdom. Those “outside” or rather those not under the jurisdiction of the tribe or kingdom would have not had the protection of the tribe or kingdom. Our idea of civic nationalism or “citizenship” like what was developed in the “democratized world” is pretty new. After being emancipated, the Jews developed the reputation of using the privileges of newly awarded government protections and privileges to operate in a subversive and self-serving manner at the expense of the native ethnic population.

Jews hadn’t been citizens before, as they were seen as and behaved as outsiders- keeping socially exclusive to themselves, except during business operations, however, much of this separation between the Jews and the Europeans was self-imposed. The Jews saw themselves as needing to stay socially separated from the gentiles or “goyim” they did business with. It was taught in the Talmud that Jews had a different set of guidelines in dealings with those outside the Jewish community (that is not to say that historically most peoples have tended to treat those outside the tribe different).

Jews, like Gypsies, were traveling merchants, and would go from city to city setting up shops and banks, and were typically involved in many different forms of trade (including the Slave Trade). It is in banking and lending where the Jews were able to attain the most power and influence. It is in their business practices where they developed a less than stellar reputation among the Europeans who had a different set of ethics for dealings amongst themselves than for dealings with those “outside the tribe”, than did the Jews. It was a reputation for fraud and political subversion (like assisting the Islamic conquest of Spain) that was the major reason the Jews were expelled 110 times from 90 different nations and kingdoms over a millennia. Much of the frenzy around Jews in Christian ideology and “Blood Libels” was (at least in part) propaganda put out by the church or the nobility to get the public support for Jewish expulsion due to disputes over debts and interest on said debts and struggles over political power and influence.


Hitler viewed the practices and policies of Jewish businessman and politicians to be self-serving to their own desires, which in turn was detrimental to the German people as a whole, causing them suffering and hardship. Hitler believed that it was a lack of connection to the German people that allowed these Jewish bankers and politicians to behave in such a manner. He saw the Jewish social exclusiveness as indicative to the notion that they were an “alien” and ultimately “parasitic” race of con-men and hustlers, who live off the labor and livelihood of their “host” societies.


Hitler and the NSDAP also saw cohorts in this “conspiracy” being Freemasons, who often held political office and worked with these International Bankers, advancing their agenda through legislation. Likewise, Freemasons were also later persecuted and imprisoned. Hitler saw the corruption in modern politics as a whole as being enabled by the democratic governments set up by statesmen who were members of Freemasonic lodges. It was this collaboration that Hitler saw as the internal “sickness” that allowed Germany to have the crippling Versailles sanctions. Hitler saw these men as selling out the best interests of their fellow Germans and destroying the pride of Germany:

To strengthen his political position he [the Jew] tries to tear down the racial and civil barriers which for a time continue to restrain him at every step. To this end he fights with all the tenacity innate in him for religious tolerance—and in Freemasonry, which has succumbed to him completely, he has an excellent instrument with which to fight for his aims and put them across. The governing circles and the higher strata of the political and economic bourgeoisie are brought into his nets by the strings of Freemasonry, and never need to suspect what is happening.


Hitler understood the Weimar media establishment as being subversive to German nationalism, and the interests of the German people as a whole. Like in America, the media establishment was predominantly Jewish. Hitler would restrict Jewish ownership of radio and newspapers, and use political power to promote what he saw as a healthy and uplifting folkish patriotism to emotionally rejuvenate a destitute and demoralized people. Hitler did similar “housecleaning” in academia, politics and the arts, which he saw as having similar issues of promoting the sort of morally ambiguity and selfish individualism that Hitler saw as the “root cause” of Germany’s external social and economic woes.

Hitler saw that German cities like Berlin become places where families were no longer safe, teeming with prostitution, pornography, pedophilia and sex trafficking. Hitler saw the fact that the theater owners and the “smut-peddlers” were predominantly Jewish in ethnicity (many of whom would go to America to found the American Porn Industry) as yet another justification for the economic and social persecution he would later impose. He also saw a deeper issue with a predominant influence of Jewish politicians, academic leaders, and media moguls in Germany. He saw their actions as selfish and subversive to the general welfare of the German people. While some may see this as creating a sort of “morality police”, those German families who saw their quality of life (and the safety of their children) improve were often thankful.


Most importantly of all, Hitler (as well as other European Nationalists) saw the very real threat of Communism and Bolshevism in Europe, and the absolute horror it had caused in Russia. Hitler saw the very real fact that Jews were in positions of leadership throughout the Communist Party in all its forms as reason number one for their forced expulsion and later internment in prison labor camps. He saw the pincer attack of Capitalism driven by greedy Jewish financiers and Communism driven by disgruntled Jewish revolutionaries, and the destruction it had caused, to be ample enough proof that this needed to happen. While we may find it somewhat black and white to say that forced internment of civilians without trial is wrong, we still inevitably make those judgments from a position of historical “privilege” and lack the context of living in Germany at that time.

When Hitler and the NSDAP got into power and began to severely restrict and limit Jewish avenues to wealth and power in Germany, it drew the ire of the extremely cohesive and resourceful international Jewish community, which organized an international boycott of German industry and goods in March of 1933, shortly after the election of Adolf Hitler. There was even a rally of 40,000 that assembled in Madison Square Garden. Due to the large influence of the international Jewish community in the western media, this boycott spread to the gentile community as well. As a result the NSDAP government in turn, encouraged Germans to boycott Jewish shops and services, although with far less impact than that of the Jewish-organized international boycott.


Once again, the government and media propaganda machine that was active during World War I began to demonize Germany and beat the drums of war. However this time the rhetoric became even more incendiary and antagonistic. A good example of this was a book written by Jewish American author Theodore N. Kaufman entitled “Germany Must Perish!” Published in 1941 (just before Germany declared war on the U.S.) and acclaimed by the New York Times, Kaufmann’s book infuriated NSDAP Germany by making incendiary comments that Hitler and the NSDAP used as proof of the dangerous and subversive nature of “International Jewry”, and their hatred of the German people in particular. One such statement was:

This time Germany has forced a total war upon the world. As a result, she must be prepared to pay a total penalty. And there is one, and only one, such Total Penalty: Germany must perish forever! In fact—not in fancy!… the only way to accomplish that is to remove the German from the world. . . . There remains then but one mode of ridding the world forever of Germanism— and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind.”


Another book with a similar message was “A Program for the Jews and an Answer to all Anti-Semites; A Program for Humanity” published in 1939 by Marxist Jewish Author Harry Waton. In the book, Waton stated that “Jews are far more numerous and infinitely more powerful than the fascists are. Not that the Jews fear the fascists or have reasons to fear them, but the fascists fear the Jews, and have good reason to fear them.”

Like “Germany Must Perish!”, this book provoked the concerns and fears of NSDAP Germany with statements like: “Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth . . . The Jews will become the masters over the whole earth and they will subordinate to themselves all nations.

This sort of propaganda added fuel to the fire in the need for what became termed “The Final Solution”, which was not an expensive and resource-wasting gassing/extermination program, but rather was the plan for yet expulsion of the Jews (and any other Communists)- this time from all of Europe completely. This was Hitler and the NSDAP’s intent until the Allied carpet bombing and Soviet advances stalled his attempts to transport the Jews into mid-Eurasia. Hitler wanted to expel the Jews to the neither-reaches of Russia (arguably part of the reasoning behind Operation Barbarossa), and then secure Europe in a manner that kept them from returning.

Meanwhile, propaganda was also released by anti-German elements of the gentile Anglo-American establishment like the book “Conversations with Hitler”. The only record of Hitler stating he wanted to “take over the world”, “Conversations with Hitler”, printed as “The Voice of Destruction” in the U.S. in 1940, was later presented as evidence at Nuremberg. However, Swiss historian Wolfgang Haenel spent five years diligently investigating the memoir before announcing his findings in 1983. Haenel was able to conclusively establish that the author’s claim to have met with Hitler “more than a hundred times” is a lie. The words attributed to Hitler, he showed, were simply invented or lifted from many different sources. Haenel also found evidence that a prominent British journalist named Henry Wickham-Steele, who was known to be a right-hand man of Sir Robert Vansittart, perhaps the most vehemently anti-German figure in Britain, helped to produce the memoir. In addition, one of Germany’s most influential periodicals, “Der Spiegel” concluded in an article published in 1985 that Rauschning’s Conversations with Hitler “are a falsification, an historical distortion from the first to the last page


A careful study of the lead up to World War II and the rhetoric exchanged on all sides will show that the most vehement antagonism was directed towards Germany and was coming out of the Allied camp, specifically from Britain and the international Jewish leadership. Interestingly, many in the U.S., including many industrialists backed NSDAP Germany, and actually shared Germany’s concern over Jewish power in both Capitalism and Communism. Many spoke out against Communist International and their openly stated goal of a world Communist empire.

There was in fact a coup planned by elements within the American industrialist and business class to overthrow F.D.R. due to concerns of Communist and Zionist infiltration within the government. While the plot was foiled, the concerns of these business leaders were later confirmed in the book “My Exploited Father-In-Law”, by Roosevelt’s son-in-law, Col. Curtis B. Dall, which detailed the activities of Jewish influentials like the Warburg banking family and Secretary of the Treasury for the Roosevelt Administration and accused Communist, Henry Morgenthau. Morgenthau was the author of the infamous “Morgenthau Plan” for postwar Germany, calling for Germany to be partitioned into separate independent states, stripped of all heavy industry and forced to return to a pre-Industrial Revolution agrarian economy. Morgenthau was also a part of the Bretton Woods Conference at the end of World War II, which established globalist entities like the IMF and the World Bank.

Despite international demonization, Hitler was extremely popular in Germany and admired all over the world and was even Time Magazine’sMan of the Year”. Hitler was elected by German people through a popular election, to the position of German chancellor. Of course it can be argued that the events of and around the Reichstag Fire that allowed Hitler and the NSDAP declare a State of Emergency, which allowed them to set up a form of martial law, were somewhat questionable and possibly orchestrated through false-flag tactics.


This State of Emergency and martial law (which was actually enabled by the Weimar Republic Constitution established pre-NSDAP power) declared by Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP after the Reichstag Fire in 1933 was done (according to NSDAP leadership) to secure Germany from the wave of Jewish Communist terror attacks and assassinations that were running rampant throughout Germany as well of the rest of Europe at the time. At that time, this was seen by many as reasonable and justifiable given what had been occurring. But it was somewhat of a totalitarian society nonetheless, and there were certain guidelines for conduct and speech and the like that some did not care for. It was clear that those living in German society were to put Folk and the National Identity above their own individualistic desires. Hard-line individualists were certainly not a fan of Hitler’s German Police State, but the NSDAP saw self-interested individualism as antithetical to the wellbeing of a nation:

This state came into being, and all states come into being, through overcoming interests of pure personal will and individual selfishness. Democracy steers recklessly toward placing the individual in the center of everything. In the long run it is impossible to escape the crisis such a conflict will produce.”

While demonization of the NSDAP began as soon as they came to power, the fact remains that the actions of the National Socialist government enabled a social and economic “180” that astonished the world. Someone during that time may tell you how Hitler and the NSDAP turned Germany into and economic powerhouse in three-year’s time, while the rest of the world was still deep into an economic depression. Upon taking power in 1933, Hitler and the NSDAP implemented radical sweeping changes including pulling Germany out of the League of Nations; banning the Communist Party in Germany and arresting its leaders; replacing the national Marxist Trade Unions with smaller company unions; establishing the NSDAP as Germany’s only political party; refusing to make any more reparations payments on the Versailles Treaty; taking control of Germany’s Reichsbank and issuing debt-free currency; restricting Jewish ownership of radio and newspapers; cutting taxes and providing tax incentives for mothers to stay home and raise their children; rebuilding infrastructure and initiation of projects like the Autobahn Highway system.

Hitler’s state-sponsored social and development programs, backed by a German currency based off the production of the German people rocketed Germany to an unfathomable economic recovery and boom. Even the regularly praised “New Deal” of President Roosevelt was rife with corruption and financial boondoggling, and had nowhere near the efficiency and overall success rate of the German work programs. It was World War II and the U.S. dollar reserve currency status that came out of Bretton Woods that rebuilt the U.S. economy and turned the U.S. into a “superpower”, not FDR’s “New Deal”.

The philosophy of meritocracy was heavily promoted in National Socialist Germany, meaning that the individual was praised and promoted within the various avenues of society based on his merit and work, rather than any pre-determined class or social status. This philosophy eventually drew the resentment of the German Aristocracy; many of whom held had positions of high rank within the German military. They saw the rise to power of a man from an upper-middle-class family, as being antithetical to what Germany should be. It was these men who sought assassinate Hitler and gave information and military secrets to the Allies that ultimately led to German defeat in World War II.


It can be argued that it was National Socialism, with its emphasis on meritocracy, family and promoting vacations to the countryside and cruises, while maintaining good wages and working conditions, was the real “worker’s paradise” as opposed to the oppressive Communism, which essentially promoted the opposite of those things. Hitler understood that it was the uniting of the German people under folkish nationalism and a sense of the needs of the community trumping the desires of the individual:

We have overcome our internal division! Destructive forces took a grip on Germany. But constructive National Socialism has overcome this force. It has refused to allow the existing state of affairs and undertaken its modification. It changed the method of eradicating the state of affairs by saying: ‘We want to change this state of affairs by gradually permitting the non-possessing classes to partake in the national wealth and by educating them in how to partake in it.‘”

Hitler with animals

Much of the NSDAP leadership were also classical environmentalists and believed in animal rights. Vivisection (animal testing) was banned under the NSDAP government. Having the goal of building in harmony with their environment, the NSDAP pioneered “sustainable development” long before anyone knew what it was. The designs for NSDAP roadway and infrastructure projects were ecologically sound as well as aesthetically pleasing, as aesthetics and “classical” beauty in art and sculpture was highly prized by the NSDAP, who sought to produce a sort of “New Renaissance” and do away with what they saw as subversive and ugly modern art and architecture.


Of course, the Anglo-American and Judeo-Zionist powers that wished to establish the system of Globalism that we live under today understood that in order for this system to come to full fruition, Nationalism, especially the “Volkisch” Nationalism that was gaining strength and momentum in Europe, would need to be crushed.  Likewise, any and all “sympathizers” to this ideology in Britain and the U.S., needed to be marginalized and silence.  With the inevitable declaration of war by the Anglo-American establishment, any supporters of Hitler or National Socialist ideology, were now marginalized and seen as enemy sympathizers.  This included both British Royalty and wealthy American Industrialists.

In the third and final installment of this series, I will talk about the factors that surrounded the outbreak of the war and the results that linger still today.  I will also get into some of the “conspiracy theories” around Hitler and the NSDAP as well as the spiritual/occult side to all of this.



“(We are fighting) to defeat the most dangerous conspiracy ever plotted against the liberty of nations, carefully, skillfully, insidiously, clandestinely planned in every detail with ruthless, cynical determination.”
– British Prime Minister Lloyd George: speaking about Germany during World War I


If you go up to anyone on the street and ask the question, “Who was the most evil man that ever lived?” the vast majority will undoubtedly say one name: HITLER. No one person throughout the entirety of history has been more demonized and vilified than Adolf Hitler, and no entity more so than the National Socialist German Worker’s Party (NSGWP or NSDAP in German); aka. “The NAZIS”. To this day, to call someone a “Nazi” is to liken them to an ultra-racist, aggressively oppressive, freedom-hating, genocidal maniac. But the question is, how much of our perception around Hitler and the “Nazis” is rooted in actual fact and how much of it is rooted in propaganda? Also, what was their actual motivation for doing what they actually did?

To get a clear picture of what brought Hitler and the NSDAP to power, we need to have a firm rooting in historical context. To many, the rise of Hitler has been seen as a phenomenon that cannot be explained outside of some form of “mass hypnosis”.  Much of this is cartoonish, one-dimensional thinking, that lacks context and historical perspective. When we objectively look at history in totality, with a solid understanding of basic human psychology, things make a lot more sense. Sadly, even many with “spiritual sight” get sucked into the  emotional propaganda and the concrete belief system built around this period. So let’s look at why decent German people would have popularly elected a “madman”. In order to do that, we need to look at the history surrounding Germany and Europe before, during and after World War I, so we can provide context for the NSDAP’s rise to power.

For Germany, this really begins with the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71. After thwarting Napoleon III’s (nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte) advances, Prussia and a confederation of smaller German states unify under Kaiser Wilhelm I and Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck. With the defeat of France, this newly unified Germany was now the economic powerhouse of Europe with one of the most powerful professional armies in the world The Prussians were renowned for their military prowess, and in fact, their model for training their soldiers was used to model the American education system. Imperial Germany also began to acquire a small number of colonies to extract resources. This created a bit of uneasiness and contempt in the seat of global economic power that resided within the British Empire at the time.

The British Empire and more importantly the corporate and financial interests that controlled it through the City of London (a sovereign state within a state like the Vatican or D.C. except instead of churches or statehouses it’s banks) had a near-complete monopoly of economic power and control of resources at this point in history- something that continues to this day. In a recent article for the London Guardian, journalist George Monbiot describes how the City of London Corporation “has exploited this remarkable position to establish itself as a kind of offshore state, a secrecy jurisdiction which controls the network of tax havens housed in the UK’s crown dependencies and overseas territories. This autonomous state within our borders is in a position to launder the ill-gotten cash of oligarchs, kleptocrats, gangsters and drug barons… It deprives the United Kingdom and other nations of their rightful tax receipts.”

Monbiot goes on to say that the sovereign, unaccountable City of London Corporation “has also made the effective regulation of global finance almost impossible… the absence of proper regulation in London allowed American banks to evade the rules set by their own government. AIG’s wild trading might have taken place in the US, but the unit responsible was regulated in the City. Lehman Brothers couldn’t get legal approval for its off-balance sheet transactions in Wall Street, so it used a London law firm instead.

This economic empire operated in the same manner a century and a half ago. This empire wished to maintain this power, and did not like the competition that arose out of middle Europe. Throughout the latter part of the nineteenth century, it was the slight-of-hand “diplomacy” of British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli during the Congress of Berlin after the Russo-Turkish War, that created seeds of contentment and mistrust among Germany and her allies in continental Europe; specifically Czarist Russia- Great Britain’s other economic competitor. This fostered the environment that would isolate the economic competition and lead to World War I; this strategy was a tried and true tactic of the British Empire- the strategy of divide and conquer. Disraeli was Britain’s first Jewish-born Prime Minister, “who was always true to his race and proud of his origin.

It was Disraeli who once stated,The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.

It was also during this time that the Communist movement of Europe began to gather real momentum. Founded by Jewish-German philosopher, Karl Marx, Communism called for a “dictatorship of the proletariat” (the working class) and an overthrow of the “bourgeois” (the moneyed industrialist class). Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” outlines the road to a “utopian society” in three phases. The first phase is a revolution that overthrows the oppressive bourgeois, setting up a dictatorship dedicated to “the common good” (as opposed to rights of the individual).

This begins the second phase where once the dictatorship is established; the government takes centralized control of all aspects of society- property, transportation, education, industrial production, agriculture, regional planning, communications, and labor. Simultaneously, a Central Bank (i.e. the Federal Reserve) is established which proceeds to lay a heavy progressive income tax on the population.

This then takes us to phase three, where in theory, the centralization of power will create a society where the dictatorship of a few select is eventually no longer required. The dictatorship will then be relinquished in favor of a popular democracy of sorts, where ALL the proletariat (men and women) has a say in the workings of government and society. I say “in theory” for phase three because that last phase has NEVER happened in ANY Communist government in history.

The rise of the Communist movement would bring mainland Europe to the brink of chaos, with continued rioting and repeated assassination attempts on European leaders. Communists attempted to assassinate German leader Kaiser Wilhelm I twice in less than a month’s time! There was a concerted movement here to bring down the old monarchies and nobilities of Europe (interestingly, this never really caught on in Great Britain, although there was definitely abuse of the “proletariat” happening there as well).

After the death of Kaiser Wilhelm I, his 29-year-old son, Wilhelm II took the throne. The younger Wilhelm was a bit more pragmatic towards the communist movement and did not want to “crush the Reds” like his father did. He believed that if Germany became more “democratic” it would pacify them. This would prove to be a false assumption. Wilhelm II also turns his back on then-ally Russia in an attempt to get better relations with Great Britain, as his grandmother was on the throne there anyhow. Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck had crafted this alliance with Czarist Russia, but the young Kaiser severed this by refusing to re-sign the Reinsurance Treaty and dismissed Bismarck shortly thereafter. However, by that time the monarchy in Britain had become more of a “face” of power. The real power lied in the financial interests that were at that time largely represented by the Rothschild family of international financiers.

Poster - House of Rothschild, The_04

To quote Lawrence Joffe in his “Complete Illustrated History of the Jewish People”:

In the 19th century the Rothschild name exemplified wealth and success, and so it remains today. Their story is only one chapter in the story of Jewish financial prowess.

The Rothschilds “arguably founded the first transnational corporation” (Joffe) with banking branches in Frankfurt, Vienna, London, Naples and Paris. Again, according to Joffe’s “History of the Jewish People”, in the U.K., Nathan Mayer Rothschildfounded the brokering house N.M. Rothschild. The Rothschild family was soon handling most English financial dealings with the Continent. Nathan’s branch funded the British war effort against Napoleon… Between 1818 and 1835 Nathan Mayer issued 26 British and foreign government loans. In 1824 he floated the Alliance Assurance Company and the following year he helped the Bank of England avoid a liquidity crisis.

Usury is the lending of money at and exorbitant rate of interest. It needs to be understood that this is what international financiers like the Rothschilds did then, and this is what international financial institutions continue to do now. If there was one good thing the Catholic Church ever did it was the outlawing of usury, but by this time the Church did not wield that kind of political power. Through usury, the financial institution gets the one taking the loan locked into debt they cannot pay back due to ridiculously compounding interest. This causes the lender to assert the right to take property, resources, etc. as modes of payment. This is how international finance capital works.

Joffe also states that Rothschild was “famously discreet, and used similarly cautious agents to courier funds… Above all he understood the value of accurate and speedy information. His private intelligence service learned the outcome of the Battle of Waterloo a day before the British Government.

However, what is not stated in this book about the intelligence surrounding the Battle of Waterloo was that Rothschild used this information to start a rumor in the financial circles that Britain had lost that battle, causing investors to panic and sell off stocks, which Rothschild interests bought for pennies on the dollar. An interesting modern-day correlation is the recent revelation that NSA Data had been used by select corporations to get an edge on market competitors- the more things change…

After the passing of N.M. Rothschild, his eldest son Lionel succeeded him as head of the London branch that was based within the City of London. Under Lionel the bank financed the British government’s purchase of the Suez Canal in 1875 as well as Cecil Rhode’s colonial exploits into Africa. Lionel’s son, Alfred de Rothschild, became a director of the Bank of England in 1869, a post he held for 20 years. Alfred was one of representatives of the British Government at the 1892 International Monetary Conference in Brussels. According to Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett, Lionel also had an alleged affair with and sired several children to Queen Victoria of England.

The Rothschild Dynasty was the latest and greatest of the elite Jewish banking oligarchs that made inroads into British aristocratic society by acquiring their properties and titles, and thus mixing themselves with the aristocracy, and by the nature of the British representative system, they came closer and closer to the government. This was enabled after Oliver Cromwell and Charles I readmitted Jews into England in the mid-1600s as they had been expelled back in 1290 by Edward I for practicing usury. The Rothschilds followed the example of Jewish banking oligarchs like Sampson Gideon, and used this favorable climate to seize the reigns of the British military and naval machine in order to seize control of riches and resources across the globe. It was British Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli; Rothschild “front man”, and the man who bestowed upon Queen Victoria the title of “Empress of India” who stated:

The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.

The British and French branches of the Rothschild bank also financed and became the largest shareholders of the DeBeers diamond mines in South Africa in 1905. An interesting saga came out of this at the end of the World War I when Jewish-German diamond magnate Ernest Oppenheimer took advantage of German investor panic at the end of the war and was able to seize the German diamond assets that had initially broken the monopoly the British had on diamonds. Oppenheimer would go on to head up DeBeers and be knighted in England.

In 1904, the Entente Cordiale was signed between Britain and France. This series of agreements put an end to centuries-old conflict between the two nations, along with the Triple Entente between Britain, France, and ally-of-convenience Russia, effectively isolated Germany and her ally, Austria-Hungary. Former German Chancellor Otto Von Bismarck saw the storm coming and on his deathbed in 1897 stated that One day, the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans.”

Due to border rearrangement spearheaded by British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli at the Congress of Berlin, many ethnic Serbs found themselves under the rule of Austria-Hungary, who were ethnically and culturally very different from the Slavic Serbs. This caused a culture clash that spearheaded with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary by a group of Serbian Nationalists. Kaiser Wilhelm II attempted to convince Austria-Hungary to engage in talks with Serbia, but it was of little avail, as Austria-Hungary soon declared war on Serbia anyhow.

This started a chain reaction, bringing ethnically Slavic Russia in the war to defend its ally Serbia, which brought Germany into the war to defend Austria-Hungary, which brought France and the UK into the war on the side of Russia, which brings Russia’s rival the Ottoman Turks in on the side of Austria-Hungary and Germany. This began a bloody conflict, which brought death and destruction on a scale that had never been seen before. I’m not going to get into a blow-by-blow analysis on the various battles and tactical maneuvers of this war. What I am focusing on here is Germany’s role and how this was portrayed to the rest of the world.

In the press, Germans were demonized and dehumanized, often portrayed as barbaric monsters that raped women, cut off the hands of children, and impaling babies on bayonets and nailing them to doors. Other stories included that of German soldiers using the bodies of their own fallen soldiers to manufacture soap. This particular narrative would be recycled and repackaged for the Second World War as one of the more fantastical elements of the Holocaust story.

Images and stories depicting the supposed atrocities of German soldiers circulated around Britain and France, but lacked any sort of evidence to back up these allegations. Officially sanctioned by the British establishment, the publication of the infamous Report of the Committee on Alleged German Outrages, better known as “The Bryce Report”, was translated into 30 different languages in 1915, and although nearly every story produced within was eventually discredited, the damage had already been done as these false atrocity stories to rile up British and French youths to go to war with the evil “Hun”.


Despite the “Special Relationship” with Britain that was being promoted by the political establishment in the United States at the turn of the 20th century, the American public typically saw themselves as separate and removed from Great Britain and her affairs. In fact, the voices of impartiality during the war tended to come from American journalists. Roger Lewis of the Associated Press wrote:

To let the truth be known, we unanimously declare the stories of German cruelties, from what we have been able to observe, were untrue. After having been with the German army for two weeks, and having accompanied the troops for over one hundred miles, we are not able to report one single case of undeserved punishment or measure of retribution.”

Irwin Cobb of the Saturday Evening Post also correlated the apparent falsification of German Barbarity:

We found numerous rumours after investigation to be without foundation. German soldiers paid everywhere for what they bought, and respected private property and civil rights. We found Belgian women and children after the battle of Buissière to feel absolutely safe. A citizen was shot in Merbes-le-Chateau, but nobody could prove his innocence.

John T. McCutcheon of the Chicago Tribune confirmed:

Refugees, who told about cruelties and brutalities, could bring absolutely no proof. The discipline of the German soldiers is excellent; no drunkenness. The Burgomaster of Sorle-sur-Sambre voluntarily disclaimed all rumours of cruelties in that district. For the truth of the above we pledge our word of honor as journalists.

However, this voice of reason out of the American press would eventually turn into hysterical war drums. On May 7th, 1915, the British luxury liner, the RMS Lusitania, left New York for Britain with 1959 passengers and, unbeknownst to the passengers, some 600 tons of explosives, 6 million rounds of ammunition, and 1,200 cases of shrapnel shells. The German Embassy however, was aware of this and attempted to warn those planning to travel aboard of the danger they would be in, by attempting to place ads in major U.S. newspapers, but were in most cases, denied. The ship set sail and was deliberately maneuvered into dangerous waters by Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill, who then relieved the ship’s military escort. It was at that point German U-Boats fired upon and sank the liner, killing nearly 1200 passengers aboard, including 128 Americans. However, America was a different nation then, and it would take a bit more than a ship sunk in a war zone to get a nation “wary of foreign entanglements” to jump into what was still seen as “Europe’s war”.


By the end of 1916, the German–led Central Powers had the decisive advantage. France had suffered terrible casualties, the British forces were neutralized by a German U-Boat blockade, and Russia was becoming embroiled in what would become an incredibly bloody civil war. No German lands were occupied whatsoever. It was at that point, the Kaiser made a peace offering on behalf of the Central Powers with no strings attached. However, the British Empire and those who were in control of it had another trick up their sleeve.

The Balfour Declaration was a letter from British Foreign Secretary Arthur J. Balfour to Baron Walter Rothschild, banker, politician, and leader of the British Jewish community. The letter essentially sealed the deal in which the British government agreed to create a Jewish homeland in British-occupied Palestine in return for Rothschild utilizing his connections to mobilize the power and influence of Jewish community in the United States with the goal of getting the U.S. to enter the war on the side of Britain and her allies.

British Prime Minister David Lloyd George later stated to the Palestine Royal Commission in 1937:

In this critical situation it was believed that Jewish sympathy or the reverse would make a substantial difference one way or the other to the Allied cause. In particular Jewish sympathy would confirm the support of American Jewry, and would make it more difficult for Germany to reduce her military commitments and improve her economic position on the eastern front… The Zionist leaders gave us a definite promise that, if the Allies committed themselves to giving facilities for the establishment of a national home for the Jews in Palestine, they would do their best to rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the Allied cause. They kept their word.”

It was at this point the propaganda machine was turned on full force towards the American public. Jewish-American-owned media outlets like Reuters and the New York Times resurrected the Lusitania and hyped the supposed Zimmerman Note; which was an allegedly intercepted telegraph from Germany to Mexico asking for alliance if the U.S. entered the war; as an intention of Germany to war with the United States. The manufactured horror stories of German barbarism were mass-marketed for American consumption by the “father of public relationsEdward Bernays, nephew of the famed Jewish-Swiss psychoanalyst, Sigmund Freud.

Two of American President Woodrow Wilson’s closest advisers, Felix Frankfurter and Louis Brandeis were avid “Zionists” and influential in convincing the President to act in favor of Britain and the Allies. In April of 1917, Wilson convinced Congress to issue a declaration of war, and two months later, he instituted a very unpopular military draft, attempting to rally young men to the cause of “freedom” by using Bernays’ slogan: “Making the world safe for democracy.”

In 1918, after a successful spring offensive, labor strikes organized by trade unions within Germany halted the supply of much-needed munitions to the front. This event would come to be known as The Stab-in-the-Back, by Adolf Hitler, a veteran of the war. By this time, much of Organized Labor within Europe had been permeated by Marxist ideology of the “liberation of the proletariat” as well as the Labor Zionism of Jewish-French-German philosopher Moses Hess. The organizers of these strikes were young Jewish “revolutionaries” who saw what was going on in Russia and sought to use this as an opportunity to create a “worker’s paradise” in Germany. It has been extensively documented and proudly admitted that Jews were well represented in every revolutionary organization at the time and continue to be so today.


By 1918, Russia had fallen completely to the Bolshevik Revolution organized by Russian Vladmir Lenin (whose grandfather was Jewish) and Jewish-Russians Leib Bronstein, aka. Leon Trotsky and Julius Cedarbaum, aka. Julius Martov. Funded out of London and Germany by the Rothschild and Warburg banking conglomerates in partnership with the Jewish-American Schiff banking family out of Wall Street. This revolution completely destabilized Russia (a wary ally of and historical adversary to the British Empire), resulted in the brutal murders of Czar Nicholas II and his wife and children, and culminated in what was known as the “Red Terror”- a period marked by mass arrests in the middle of the night, executions, and brutally bizarre methods of torture. These atrocities were carried out by the Jewish-Russian-runCheka”, i.e., secret police and resulted in the murder of as many as 100,000 Russians. When U.S. Ambassador to Russia, David Francis, visited in January 1918, he noted:

The Bolshevik leaders here (Russia), most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide social revolution.”


The above statement illustrates what was one of the primary concerns/fears and motivating factors of Adolf Hitler in his dealings with Germany (and later Europe) and its Jews. This idea of the danger presented by the “International Jew” was also shared, oddly enough, by a man who would become one of Hitler’s primary nemesis- future British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. In his February 1920 article for the London Sunday Herald entitled “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”, Churchill spoke highly of Zionism and what he referred to as “National Jews”, who would say, “I am an Englishman practising the Jewish faith.

He saw the “National Jew” being contrasted by what he and many others referred to as “International Jews”:

The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt (founder of the nihilistic Bavarian Illuminati)  to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing… It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

Unfortunately, the subversive activities of these “International Jews” became so intensified in Germany and throughout Europe just prior to and during the Second World War that Hitler and the NSDAP (Nazis) saw no other choice then to lock up ALL Jews who had remained in Europe into prison labor camps, regardless of whether or not they were practicing subversive tactics or not. The prison labor camps and the whole “Holocaust” narrative is of course, a deep topic in and of itself, and something deserving of an entire article devoted specifically to it. Again, the point here is to really flesh out some understanding as to why Hitler and the NSDAP espoused to the philosophy adhered to and enacted the policies they did, beyond the simplistic “scapegoat” and “world-domination” memes we are given in most high school and even college-level history books.

By the fall of 1918, the war had essentially reached a stalemate, with neither Germany nor the Allies being able to achieve a decisive victory. However, the internal social and political establishment of Germany began to crumble. Jewish-German Communists Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht founded the “Spartacus League“, which later became the Communist Party of Germany. Aided by Jewish-Hungarian Bela Kun, the group attempted to take advantage of post-war chaos and stage a coup in Berlin. Fearing the same fate as the Czar, Kaiser Wilhelm fled to Holland. While a group of veterans known as the Freikorps reclaim control, the Communists continually attempt to seize power.

The Allied powers took advantage of the internal destabilization that was taking place in Germany and did not invite Germany to take part in the Paris Peace Conference, where a series of treaties were devised to reorganize Europe and establish the world governing body known as the League of Nations– the precursor to the United Nations- which had been a primary goal of the war from the outset (although it soon dissolved due to nations like the U.S. refusing to ratify the treaty). It was out of this that the Treaty of Versailles was established which included the following provisions:

1. Germany accepts 100% responsibility for the war

2. German armed forces restricted to 100,000 men

3. The industrial German Rhineland will be occupied by French troops for the next 15 years.

4. Kaiser Wilhelm should be tried for “offenses against international morality”

5. The German region of West Prussia is carved out and given to the new nation of Poland. (Millions of West Prussians are forcefully expelled from their homes, and East Prussia is left isolated from the rest of Germany)

6. The German Sudetenland region is put under the rule of the new nation of Czechoslovakia.

7. The new state of Austria is forbidden from uniting with their Germanic brothers in Germany.

8. Germany is stripped of her African colonies. Britain, France, & Belgium take them over.

9. The coal-rich Saar region of Germany is placed under League of Nations control for 15 years. During this time, its coal is to be shipped to France.

10. The Baltic Sea port city of Danzig is separated from Germany and declared a “free city.”

11. Germany is forced to pay massive war reparations in the form of money and natural resources. The crushing debt payments, equal to 1 Trillion dollars in modern currency, will devastate the German economy and soon cause a hyperinflationary monetary collapse.

There can be no mistaking that the objective here was to literally rob Germany blind while demoralizing and economically crippling the nation so that it could not pose a threat to the hegemony of the Anglo-Zionist Financial and Corporate Empire.  This war was not about “spreading democracy”, it was economic power and control. After the war was over, President Woodrow Wilson confirmed this point:

Is there any man or woman let me say, is there any child who does not know that the seed of war in the modern world is industrial and commercial rivalry? …This was an industrial and commercial war.

The methods of war have certainly changed greatly in the last 100 years since World War I (1914-1918), but the reasons have not. It’s funny how this is by and large a sort of “forgotten war” in the public eye (especially now that pretty much every veteran of WWI has passed). Many of us only know there was a World War I because Hollywood loves to make movies about World War II, and so we know there had to be a “one” before the “two”.  Now that we have set the stage, in part two, I will get into the rise of Hitler and the NSDAP, as well as some of the various narratives that surround this period of history that shaped the world as we know it today.




“The masses of people are carried along, obedient to environment; the wills and desires of others stronger than themselves; heredity; suggestion; and other outward causes moving them about like pawns on the Chessboard of Life. But the Masters, rising to the plane above, dominate their moods, characters, qualities, and powers, as well as the environment surrounding them, and become Movers instead of pawns. They help to PLAY THE GAME OF LIFE, instead of being played and moved about by other wills and environment. They USE the Principle (of Cause and Effect) instead of being its tools. The Masters obey the Causation of the higher planes, but they help to RULE on their own plane.”

– The Three Hermetic Initiates speaking in “The Kybalion”


Throughout human history, the knowledge of controlling one’s own perceptions was taught to students of spiritual knowledge by the mystics; however, let us recall the Principle of “as above so below; as within so without.” There was also the knowledge of how to control the perceptions of others through concentration and extending the mind outwards is a focused manner. Extending the mind can be done obviously through concentrated thought, but also in every other manner a human can express a thought; i.e. words, writing, symbols, art, song, dance, etc. Extending the influence of the mind into the world is the basis of prayer, magick, and sorcery in addition to being the way culture and the society that grows from it is formed. One of the most ancient ways ways of creating and preserving a culture is through the stories it tells.


All races and all cultures across the Earth have had their own folk stories, legends and myths, of course some are more localized and some are widely known by people across the world. One of these ethnic cultures whose “stories” are known throughout the world is the Jewish people. One of the most notable and qualities of the Jewish people has always been their talent for “storytelling”. From the tales of the Torah and the Talmud, to the Jewish folktales fables of Eastern Europe told by the “Wise Men of Chelm“, to the modern stage and cinema, the talents abilities of these “Wandering Storytellers” to spin a tale that draws the listener/viewer in emotionally through tapping into certain aspects of their psyche has been undeniable.


image courtesy of

Outcasts in part due to the cultural and social exclusiveness inherent in Judaism, Jews were excluded in certain aspects of Eastern European and Russian society due to their strong and insular group identity, as well as a somewhat negative reputation in business and finance practices towards non-Jews or “goyim” (cattle). This appears to be the reason many Eastern European Jews turned to Communism– a resentment for Eastern European society due to real, embellished and fabricated wrongs and an intense desire to see it transformed to their moral ideals.

This historical resentment has likely contributed to the reasons modern Judeo-Globalist elitists like George Soros use their money to promote and enable social chaos and destabilization programs in the Ukraine, which borders Russia. Because of these issues with Eastern European culture, which has historically been influenced by Russia due to the bond of Eastern Orthodox Christianity, many Jews in Eastern Europe choose chose to either become Communists or emigrate to America, which had been historically welcoming of Jews. Many of these Jews migrated to professions within cultural institutions like academia, literature, news media, music and theater.

At the turn of the 20th century, Jewish-American men like the Gershwin brothers thrived producing and composing on Broadway while others such as Paul Reuter and Adolph Ochs displayed a seemingly natural tendency towards media monopoly with their ownership of major news outlets like Reuter’s newswire and the New York Times. Moving into the newly developed motion picture industry seemed a natural progression for a people who seemed to thrive in the “culture business”.

The advent of the motion picture camera in the early part of the 20th century changed the world forever. From the outset, Jews were involved in both the production and promotion of the motion picture industry in both Europe and the United States. In his book, The Complete Illustrated History of the Jewish People, Jewish South African journalist Lawrence Joffe describes the movement of Jews into Hollywood:

At first promoters and producers, then directors, scriptwriters, actors and composers, by 1912 Jews had set up over a hundred production companies in California, and were pivotal to the creation of the eight super-firms…

Almost to a man… the Jewish movie moguls were born into poverty. Carl Laemmle, the 10th of 13 immigrant children, managed a clothes shop before running a string of nickelodeons and in 1912 founding Universal, the first big studio. Louis Mayer joined the junk trade at 8, owned a New York theatre-chain at 22 and produced the epic Birth of a Nation in 1915, aged 30. Adolph Zukor, who founded Paramount pictures in 1917, was born in Hungary, emigrated at 15 and peddled fur garments.

A similar rags-to-riches story applied to the Warner Brothers, sons of a Jewish cobbler from Poland. In 1927 they amazed the filmic world by harnessing new technology to produce the first ‘talkie’. Starring Al Jolson, ‘The Jazz Singer’ presented Jewish family dilemmas about tradition and assimilation to a mainstream audience.

Today, the longevity and dominance of film studios like Warner Brothers, Metro Goldwyn-Meyer, and NBC-Universal are a testament to the legacy of the Jewish pioneers of Hollywood and the film industry. In an op-ed article entitled Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon posted in the LA Times in December of 2008, renowned Jewish American journalist and author, Joel Stein talks about the entertainment industry’s “open secret”:

Jews totally run Hollywood.

How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah.

The person they were yelling at in that ad was SAG President Alan Rosenberg (take a guess). The scathing rebuttal to the ad was written by entertainment super-agent Ari Emanuel (Jew with Israeli parents) on the Huffington Post, which is owned by Arianna Huffington (not Jewish and has never worked in Hollywood.)

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between ‘The 700 Club’ and ‘Davey and Goliath’ on TV all day.

However, the “rags-to-riches” tale of Jewish dominance in the American film industry has somewhat of a dark side to it (as do most tales of dominance). In his review of Neal Gabler’s book, An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, writer Jack Wikoff describes what might be considered less than ethical business practices by these early film moguls in order to achieve a monopoly in the film industry:

These men acquired this control because of an excellent sense of what the public would buy, intense personal drive, group solidarity as Jews, a willingness for hard work-and — a lot of shady dealing. Gabler describes how Adolf Zukor and Carl Laemmle illegally used Edison cameras without paying the royalties and how Louis B. Mayer cheated the producers of Birth of a Nation by falsifying his bookkeeping, thereby making as much as $500,000 on the exhibition of that one film in 1915.

Of course, dirty dealings and questionable ethics in business are certainly not relegated to Jewish film moguls, although they certainly have developed a reputation as being particularly “slimy” over the years, with numerous testimonies and allegations of prostitution, sexual exploitation and abuse as well as pedophilia within the Hollywood community. However, the real thing that we need to consider for this conversation is what was being done with this new medium of film and what were the motivations behind doing it. Jewish-American actor, Ben Stein in an article for E! Online stated:

The ex-furriers who created Hollywood were Eastern European Jewish immigrants, and all of the great edifice of fantasy-making in Hollywood is their handiwork. Names like Zukor and Lasky and Goldwyn and Cohn are the foundation of mass culture in America and the world… There is a much quoted note that it took all these Eastern European Yiddish-speaking Jews to create the lasting, worldwide image of America and what America is–the mass culture mirror that America likes to hold up to its face.”

These Jewish film moguls created their vision of America and the ideal culture through the silver screen. While their brothers in Eastern Europe shaped the culture through politics, these men shaped it through storytelling. Little by little, bit by bit, the general became enamored by the “movies” and began to mimic and emulate the behaviors and ideals they saw on the movie screen. It became clear that Hollywood was not just “reflecting” certain cultural ideals and values in the American people, it was creating them.

In a speech during a Jewish American Heritage Month reception hosted by the Democratic National Committee back in 2013, Vice President and self-described “Zionist”, Joe Biden payed homage to the role of Jewish leaders in the culture industry for molding the American public’s perceptions:

What affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else?… It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace [gay marriage]. Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry.



As the ability of film to be used as a medium for spreading cultural ideas and behaviors became increasingly evident, large corporations began to partner with the film studios to market their products. It was on Madison Avenue in New York City that corporate advertising began, and still exists as a dominant force today. One of the pioneers of corporate advertising was Edward Bernays, the “Father of Public Relations” and nephew of famed Jewish psychotherapist, Sigmund Freud. Bernays pioneered Madison Avenue advertising and marketing campaigns for the tobacco industry among numerous other large businesses and corporate conglomerates.

One of the most famous publicity stunts Bernays orchestrated for the tobacco companies was when he had several famous actresses line up in the front of the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade and light up cigarettes, which until that time, had been seen as something “un-lady like”. The tobacco companies used the admiration that women had for these actresses, calling cigarettes Torches of Freedom, and associating them with the feminist movement. It worked quite well, creating the image of the sexy, independent, and fashionable smoking woman.

Noticing his knack for shaping public opinion, the U.S. Government recruited Bernays in its P.R. campaign to get a reluctant and isolationist American public behind the First World War. The U.S. Government itself, being pressured into joining the war effort by International Banking interests (primarily Judeo-Zionist) based out of Britain and Western Europe. It was Bernays who was charged with bombarding the American public with embellished and outright fabricated stories of “atrocities of the Hun”, which would be repeated in an even more effective and sophisticated manner during World War II. Bernays also came up with the slogan “Making the world safe for democracy”. In his 1928 book, Propaganda, Bernays referred to his experience working for the various “powers that be”:

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country… We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.

After the First World War, Hollywood and Madison Avenue continued to develop increasingly sophisticated methods of molding public desires and opinions, and during the Second World War, the propaganda machine was put into high gear, mobilizing the patriotism of the American public to fight a war in Europe that was not truly in their best interest. This propaganda marketing was so successful and so sophisticated; it continues to be effective to this day and is evidenced by the large volume of World War II and “Holocaust” movies produced by Hollywood as well as international (typically Jewish) filmmakers seemingly every year.

It was during and after World War II that the relationship/partnership between the U.S. Government, Hollywood, and Madison Avenue (and of course, International Finance) really became solidified. The post-war release of television brought the ability for this finely crafted visual “programming” of the population into individual households across America, and eventually the world. Television would become the ultimate way for those working in Hollywood, Madison Avenue, Washington D.C., and elsewhere, to extend their mental sphere to people all over the world. The mass media is a way to send all the aspects of the extension of an individual or a group mind, as well as that mind’s desires, to people all over the world.


Shortly after World War II, President Harry Truman signed the National Security Act, which created agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the National Security Agency (NSA). These were and still are essentially entities whose purpose for existence is to further the interests of what President Dwight D. Eisenhower referred to in his farewell address as the “Military Industrial Complex”. These entities whose public “mission” was foreign intelligence gathering so that another Pearl Harbor-type event did not happen again, were in fact created to ensure that the War never really ended. Military weapons manufacturers and defense contractors had gained an unprecedented amount of wealth, power and influence, and sought to hold onto that power at any cost. Truman himself stated that “I never would have agreed to the formulation of the Central Intelligence Agency back in forty-seven, if I had known it would become the American Gestapo.”

The Military Industrial Complex, with their front groups like the CIA, partnered with Global Mega Corporations and International Usury Finance, both of which had been empowered with the creation of organizations like the World Trade Organization and the International Monetary Fund directly after World War II. This combine of the old American (as well as Anglo) WASP establishment and the Judeo-Zionists in finance and media proceeded to organize the biggest mafia-style racketeering operation the world had ever seen. This sort of partnership between White European elitists and Jewish opportunists has been going on for centuries, growing in scope and complexity, suffering from time to time from factional in-fighting,

In the post-World War II Globalist system, International Usury Finance would take the lead, and offer loans to developing nations with interest attached that would be impossible to ever repay. It would then make part of the deal that select Global Mega Corporations would be allowed to come into the nation and essentially pillage resources and create a slave-wage labor force. The ultimate goal was the natural progression of the same goal that has existed in the minds of those who desire power throughout known history: consolidation of power and control of resources and populations.

In many cases, the job of the CIA (often working in tandem with other intelligence agencies like British MI6 and Israeli Mossad) would be to run psychological operations or “psy-ops” on the populations through various media and propaganda outlets to work on the consciousness of the populace so they were receptive to and cooperative with the overall agenda of the intelligence agencies and their corporate partners.

If a leader or a population were uncooperative, the Military Industrial Complex would often create and arm resistance movements and stage assassinations to install a government that would control the populace and enable the larger agenda, or they would simply send in the CIA Jackals to “take out” whoever was standing in the way. The CIA has been linked to numerous assassinations of world leaders since its inception. It is even well established thought that the CIA was involved in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy after he came to fully grasp their tactics and motives, and refused to comply.  Kennedy stated “I will splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.”

In the recently published book, “The CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film and Television”, author Tricia Jenkins outlines what many have known for years and what was until recently illegal under U.S. law, which was the direct use of the film industry as well as various television and news media outlets to conduct psychological conditioning (i.e. propaganda) operations on the American public via orders from the various Executive Branch “alphabet soup” agencies (CIA, NSA, DHS, CDC, FDA, etc.). Former CIA director William Colby stated, “The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media.”

The CIA specifically has conducted psy-ops through the use of media propaganda on foreign soil to manipulate populations in a manner that suited their aims for decades. However it came out in the 1975 Church Committee Hearings that the CIA used news media outlets to push propaganda and conducted illegal operations on U.S. soil, and it had done so since its inception. Talking about the CIA’s role in the media in a meeting with President Regan in 1981, former CIA director, William Casey stated “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.

The base of operations for one of these illegal psy-ops on U.S. soil took place at Laurel Canyon in southern California during the 1960s where the CIA and military intelligence got into the music business, and like film and television, Jews were (and still are) dominant as producers and record-label owners.

The music and lifestyles that was promoted by these various music and counter-culture celebrities that came out of Laurel Canyon, etc. were designed to discredit the anti-war movement among older and more conservative populations and repel those folks from taking part in it. They were also designed to create a generation of hedonistic, “burnt-out”, “peace-nicks”, that were so passive and detached from reality that they would no longer pose any sort of real threat to the establishment and their agenda.


During the 1960s and 1970s, the CIA conducted a large, multi-subject experiment and program of psychological manipulation and control known as “MK-Ultra”. One of the techniques used for mental manipulation of subjects was the use of LSD to create a schizophrenic state in the test subject. LSD is an extremely potent hallucinogen and (unlike meth) can only be manufactured in a relatively sophisticated lab setting by an experienced chemist. LSD slowly began to make its way into the streets of America, while “gurus” like Professor Timothy Leary were given television time to promote the drug to America’s youth.

From LSD in the 60s, to Cocaine in the 70s and 80s, to the recent Opium/Heroin epidemic, the CIA has a long history of pushing drugs onto the streets of America, using that money to further fund their operations. The intelligence agencies have historically taken part in drug smuggling (which was a specific tactic of the British Empire) and sex trafficking (slave trade) to not only further fund themselves and further demoralize and debase the population, causing destabilization.

It was during this time when the values presented to Americans via the television and film screen began to slowly degenerate and become increasingly violent, decadent, vapid, and hyper-sexualized. The prevalence and cultural acceptance of pornography (also pioneered and dominated by Jewish moguls) went hand-in-hand with the various “liberation” movements of the 60s and 70s, which were steered by Intelligence Agencies and promoted and inspired by various Jewish academics, psychologists, social activists and those working in the “culture industry” working in tandem with the various intelligence agencies.

A new culture was slowly being developed and promoted for America. It was done incrementally, over the course of a few generations, as it was understood that anything too far from the course would be rejected and rebelled against. In the course of 3-4 generations, we went from Beaver getting advice from his father to Miley Cyrus dressed as a doll and twerking on stage during prime time. The moral degradation of western culture with the progressive move into decadent materialism and Cultural Marxism didn’t “just happen”. At the end of the day, Joseph McCarthy was right.

So how does this sort of programming happen? The primary method of “attack” for weaponized media is to assault our definitions and perceptions of truth and reality. Once this becomes debased, the rest one can then be reprogrammed with a new reality. This is done in the sort of hard-core trauma-based mind control experiments done by Intelligence Agencies to create an individual that can be utilized as a dupe, patsy or even an assassin.  This is done by splintering an individual’s psyche through trauma. This is done in a more subtle way to the general public through television and the mass media.

Make no mistake, the terrorist attacks and mass shootings like 9-11 and Sandy Hook are a form of mass trauma-based programming that are partially or in some cases, completely staged productions for the media and public consumption in order to generate a sort of fear-based neurosis and obedience in the general public.


To quote former Jewish American Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, “It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true.”  To many, “truth” is nothing more than what allows them feel comfortable in their own skin; what they can “deal with”, and to many, that means believing what EVERYONE ELSE believes as truth- being safe in the majority.

Let’s recall Joe Biden’s earlier quote on Jewish leaders in the entertainment industry, and the implication that television and social media can be used to change the cultural values of a population. What this means is that the entertainment industry has the potential and the ability to shape what a society feels is right or wrong. This results in the ability of the media to shape what a society believes to be true or untrue, as most people nowadays use emotional reasoning, and will generally gravitate towards what they feel as “right” as being the ultimate truth.

So how is this done? The most effective propaganda is that which appeals directly to our emotions. If we look at the mind of a person, we can essentially break it down into three basic parts: conscious mind, subconscious mind, and unconscious mind. Our emotions and feelings tend to arise at the point where our conscious mind meets our subconscious mind. In our day-to-day life of work, family, and social lives, we are operating primarily in the realm of conscious mind as we conduct tasks, make decisions, and navigate reality.

However, when we sit down and “zone out” with out favorite television PROGRAM, we tend to stop performing all of those tasks of the conscious mind, which also serves as a sort of filter for information- a sort of “B.S. filter”. This is particularly true when we are watching something that is supposedly “pure entertainment” like a sitcom or a crime drama. We shut down our critical thinking centers and stop analyzing, just opening ourselves to the experience of being “entertained”. We let down our guard.

The unconscious mind responds to colors, symbols, archetypal imagery, and primal fears. Meanwhile the subconscious mind tends to respond to more complex emotional cues and triggers relating to personal experiences. Together they are the prime target of advertising and “behavior placement” in TV and films. It is the “guardian”, i.e. the conscious, critical-thinking mind being asleep, that allows the subconscious and the unconscious to be preyed upon. Archetypally this is akin to the man of the house being asleep while his wife and child are preyed upon, or the warriors of a tribe being put in a trance by a sorcerer while the women and children of the village are violated, abducted and murdered.

Those not familiar with the concept of behavior placement are more than likely familiar with product placement. This is where you will see, for example, the main character of your favorite TV show drinking a Coke, then see a commercial or two for Coke during that time slot as Coca-Cola is a sponsor of that program. The idea is that since you like and identify with your “TV friend” you will want to emulate them and drink Coke. Behavior placement works in a similar way, but in a slightly more complex fashion.

Again, we’ll use Joe Biden’s quote stating that programs like “Will and Grace” were what shaped the general public’s attitude about gay marriage as an example. This shaping of cultural perceptions is done through use of TV characters you grow to identify with and even “love”. You develop empathy for them and their situations. You think they’re “cool” and want to be like them in the same way a child adores and emulates puppets and cartoon characters.

It is through this empathy and identification with these characters that behavior placement happens. We form a make-believe friendship in our subconscious as we identify with the plights of the characters. We then may begin to take on the values and morals that they espouse to, just as we might tend to with any other real-life friend (that’s why mom didn’t want you hanging out with the “bad kids”).

We then may begin to identify with and even desire the world the program portrays as this simulated vicarious relationship develops. A well-known example of this is the “Hollywood Ending” that so many people want for every aspect of their lives. When watching a television program, you can rest assured that pretty much anything to do with politics, gender roles, and controversial social issues on a TV show would be considered behavior placement, as the “behavior” that the producers are wishing to place you into is the point-of-view and actions of the main characters or “heroes” (even though many modern TV “heroes” would not be considered so by traditional Western standards).

When I was doing door-to-door canvassing our primary goal was to appeal to the emotions of a prospective donor. In one particular organization I would come armed with a picture of our boss’ kid looking sickly juxtaposed next to a corporate CEO stating how much he made while children went unable to receive medical care. This simple imagery appealed to the emotional center of the person, and the objective was to bypass any sort of real sophisticated policy discussion about “who’s going to pay for this?” or “how is this going to be implemented?” which I’m sure many who financially supported “grassroots” efforts to get Obamacare may wish they had asked these sorts of questions.


This method of shaping cultural opinion through media is often used to create perceptions in the public mind that the media establishment wishes them to perceive as “facts” and true events, again through appealing to emotional reasoning and the imposition of a brand of “morality”. Recent examples of this can be seen through the generation of memes through the mainstream as well as through social media regarding the Middle East refugee crisis, specifically with the comparison of “refugees” to Jews fleeing the “Holocaust” in World War II. This “refugee/holocaust” narrative is something the establishment mouthpieces are using to guilt Americans into “getting with the program“.

Recent articles out of The Huffington Post, The Nation, Politico, and The Chicago Tribune among others, ALL follow this particular talking point. Talking points are typically generated from a centralized source such as a government or corporate agency or think-tank and disseminated to the various news outlets. In this case, it appears the source of this particular “talking point” is current CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, Jonathan Greenblatt. Greenblatt called upon the spirit of Nazi-Jewish Persecution and the “Holocaust” in an attempt to guilt and shame the American people in his op-ed for the ADL’s own website entitled “Closing the Borders to Refugees: Wrong in the 1930s, and Wrong Today”:

…in January 1939 another poll asked whether the U.S. government should permit ‘10,000 refugee children from Germany—most of them Jewish—to be taken care of in American homes.’ An astounding and shameful 61 percent said no.

In May of 1939 the St. Louis carrying 937 German refugees—mostly Jews fleeing the Third Reich—set sail for Cuba. Most had applied for U.S. visas. Turned away from Cuba, as the St. Louis sailed so close to Florida that the passengers could see the lights from Miami, they appealed to President Roosevelt to give them safe harbor. With public opinion opposed to lifting the stringent immigration quotas or to make an exception for the ship’s passengers, the St. Louis returned to Europe. Almost a quarter of the passengers perished in the Holocaust.

Today, the world faces the largest refugee crisis since World War II. Almost 60 million people around the world have been forcibly displaced from their homes. The war in Syria, fueled by the unparalleled brutality of ISIS, is largely responsible for the spike. And once more—shamefully—there is a push for the United States to turn a blind eye to the suffering of refugees and shut our doors to those in need.”

It should be noted that Jewish American author, Robert I. Friedman highlighted in his book “Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America” that the Anti-Defamation League pressured and eventually convinced the FBI to call of investigations of individuals with known affiliation to the Jewish-Russian Mafia who also sought “refugee status” back in the 1970s, stating that doing so would be “anti-Semitic”. This is the same Anti-Defamation League that has had ties to the Jewish Mafia since the days when infamous Jewish American mobster, “Bugsy” Siegel established Las Vegas (now dominated by Jewish American billionaire Sheldon Adelson).

In this article we have mentioned the “refugee poll” where Americans voice a politically incorrect opinion. This is a meme that has been popping up all over social media these days thanks to “AJ+”, i.e. Al Jazeera for millennials. Al Jazeera being the news media organization owned by the government of Qatar– one of the oil-rich Arab Gulf States that is refusing to take refugees, while being linked to the funding of Islamic terror groups. Now we will use this refugee poll as an example showing how a meme on social media can be used to shape public opinion.

As the refugee poll begins to be spread around on social media, often initiated by the organization or individuals that originated it, it can then be amplified though the echo chamber that social media creates, making a new “meme”. This effect causes this the core message carried by the meme to become amplified; where it can then be promoted as well as enforced through a sort of peer-pressure, that social media and any other modern social institution inevitably creates. The pushers of the meme will then often shout down those who would disagree with ad-homonym attacks where the dissenter is ostracized and attacked as a racist, a Nazi, an anti-Semite, etc., etc., causing critics to be silenced out of fear of social ostracizing and embarrassment.

As an aside, it is may be worth noting that much of social media openly partners with U.S. Intelligence agencies to collect data on the general public while tracking the trends in public opinion through complex algorithms.


It is ingrained into us to desire to “fit in”. This desire is so strong that many will change what they know to be right or wrong to simply “belong”. This starts at childhood with our family and is further refined through schooling and institutionalized peer-pressure. This is how the newly uploaded behavior/thought pattern, after being implanted into the subconscious of a large group of people takes root and becomes self-enforced as a sort of new cultural dogma or belief system. This is how human beings are trained what to think and feel.

We live in a bubble inside of a bubble. If the physical world is indeed holographic in nature, than the world the majority of us who live in modern culture experience life that is even more of an illusion. For multiple generations now, our beliefs, our culture, what we believe is and is not true about every aspect of the world has been defined to us by someone else who saw it in a movie somewhere. We have major news networks owned by major Hollywood movie studios (i.e. NBC-Universal). Does anyone see something wrong with this? Perhaps it is high time that we as a culture, as well as individuals, took a look at our ideas and our beliefs, while thinking of these words by psychotherapist and motivational speaker, Dr. Eldon Taylor:

We’ve come to a point in our lives where it’s fair to ask, ‘what was the last original thought (I) had?’ The way you walk, the way you talk, the vocabulary you use; all of these things are built into the expectation you have of yourself, based on the role you have chosen to play in the ‘theater’ of life, as it has been defined to you.


Years ago I had a brief debate with a friend who parroted a claim by his professor that art could only follow culture and not the other way around. I did not agree, although I did not have the understanding to articulate as I am here. Any serious study of the psychological effects of words, music, symbols, pictures, and movements on an individual or group would soon realize that was not the case. Visual arts, musical arts, and performing arts are all “art”, and all involve influencing the psyche of the viewer in some way to be effective. Anything that can reach into your psyche has the potential to influence it if allowed.

What is happening here is that another world is being created inside the one our physical bodies laugh, cry, work and love. An artificial bubble has been placed around us and is being continually upgraded. It is a media bubble that taps into, amplifies, steers and molds our fear and weakness. It gives us ideas and beliefs that we may not have otherwise held because we allowed ourselves to be weak and susceptible. It is a world of fear and illusion manifesting through our weakness.

Those who have the focus and concentration to project their mind in a unified manner with other “like minds” are building the world they perceive: a world that sees reality as a prison, rather than a classroom. People who live in this world don’t really want money, as many naively claim; they use money. But what they really want is pleasure and then power- that is the progression of greed and most people in modern society suffer from it. Power to rule the prison they perceive.

Recently I saw a discussion on whether there was a “conspiracy” of a few, or if it was the mental cluster known as “the mass mind” that was to blame for the hiding or “occulting” of certain knowledge or information. I will say that if we look at the “human as cell” model I presented earlier, it is both. If look at the example of a virus or other seemingly negative entity somehow coming into an existence in the BODY, we can see how this might be similar to the selfish and destructive individuals credited/blamed for the “disinformation program” accepted to the general public, and the desires and beliefs they adhere to.

There have ALWAYS been groups of individuals who kept certain knowledge from those not deemed ready to fully understand it.  That was a foundation for the ancient Mystery Schools and later Secret Societies like the Rosicrucians.  This hiding occulting of knowledge can be seen as good or bad depending on motivations.

Regardless, at the end of the day, it is the general public who is in a state where the virus; whatever you want to name it; can do its work and create a sort of viral cancer, causing the human “cells” to turn on each other and destroy themselves. But it is weakness and ill-health within the individual cells as well as their cell groups that allows the virus to take hold in the first place. The symptoms of an illness are simply the body trying to purge itself and bring itself back to balance. The same could be said of the suffering and “illness” in the individual as well as the collective humanity and all its components.

In the end, a society and its leaders will be reflections of one another, archetypally though it is the King who is ultimately responsible for living in accordance with the Law, so the people and the land don’t fall into ruin.  But the question becomes in this day and age; who is playing the role of the King?  Is it really those we have chosen, or allowed to lead us?

We are now at a point in history where any sort of natural aristocracy we had in the past has fallen into decay.  Perhaps it is now time for each of us to gather the strength to pick up the sword and scepter and become the King- the Sovereign who is master of himself and unchanged by external impulses and forces.

So next time you turn on the television, or go see a movie, or log on to social media, look at the various messages that are being pushed. Why might be a motive for pushing these messages? What might they be trying to say to you? What are they trying to get you to think or want or believe? Who would benefit from getting you to buy into or believe what is being presented?

Television and media in general is constantly advertising and “marketing”. If it is not actual products, its ideas and belief systems that others wish to impose upon us. So next time you watch your favorite TV shows or log onto social media, keep your critical thinking mind active and see what the program is trying to download into your consciousness. Or better yet, turn the TV off, log off Facebook and experience reality without having someone else define it for you.

Namaste and God Bless.


Ex·trem·ist (n):
Somebody who holds extreme or radical political or religious beliefs;
(adj): involving, typical of, or motivated by extreme opinions, especially in politics or religion.

Rad·i·cal (adj):
Favoring or making economic, political, or social changes of a sweeping or extreme nature.

Ter·ror·ist (n):
Somebody who uses violence or the threat of violence, especially bombing, kidnapping, and assassination, to intimidate, often for political purposes.

The above listed terms and their definitions are ones that we as Americans, as well as people in Western nations in general, have become all too familiar with. Here in the States, the “War on Terror” has officially gone on for over 14 years now, and shows no sign of stopping. As myself and many others have previously stated, it is not something that is ever meant to end, as it enriches the Military Industrial Complex both in military operations abroad, as well as domestic surveillance and the construction of a federalized police state at home.

At this point, I feel it would be laboriously repetitive for me to go further into how all that works at this point. What I want to look at here is the narrative being established and the deeper meaning behind it. A recent interview with sociopolitical and media narrative researcher and analyst, Jay Dyer presented a deeper perspective about the whole “radical extremism” narrative that is playing out on both sides of the media. This was something that I felt compelled to explore myself.

The whole world now is on red alert because of the actions of the “newest face” of Islamic extremism, ISIS. The Paris Attacks last month, and now the more recent San Bernardino mass shooting/terror attack have got the world gripped in a state of fear and panic. President Obama even gave a rare prime time speech to address the issue, which was obviously done to create hype around the incident. While tragic and definitely a bit “close to home” for me as I work with people with developmental disabilities, the narrative around the event is somewhat suspect. First we have a mass shooter drill happening to take place at the same time as the supposed event. Second, we have what was originally described as three assailants reported officially reduced to two (we saw a similar occurrence around the Colorado Theater Shooting narrative). Third, we have the police stepping aside and letting all who wish essentially ransack the suspects’ home on live television before even conducting an investigation of the crime scene, essentially destroying any ability to connect anyone else directly to the attacks.


However, what I find intriguing is the “battle” between the left and the right over who the “most dangerous” extremist group is. If you look at the Right Wing, NeoCon media (i.e. Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, etc.), they will hammer home the point that it is Islamic extremism that is the greatest threat to our safety and security, coupled with the migrant “surges” happening from the southern border. They will state that more needs to be done abroad to destroy ISIS and that their large fan base is so numerous that Islam itself is an existential threat to America. This was recently echoed by Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, who cited examples of Islamic communities celebrating the fall of the Twin Towers during 9/11 and the recent events of soccer matches, among the reasons why any and all Muslims need to be prevented from entering the U.S. until the nation can “figure out what the hell is going on”.

On the Left, we have the “Liberal” media (i.e. MSNBC and pretty much every other major news outlet) stating that while ISIS is bad, the “real threat” in America is not Radical Islam, but rather the “white male” mass shooters such as Dylann Storm Roof (I still have a hard time believing that one) and the recent shoot-up of a Colorado abortion clinic by the almost equally strange “Robert Dear”; as in “Robert, dear, can you take out the trash?” In either case, both these men were supposedly motivated by a sort of extreme “Right Wing” ideology, be it racism, or fundamentalist Christianity, it was vehemently opposed to the ultra-politically-correct ideals of the “Liberal” Left.

In either case, both support a sort of “lockdown” policy to “keep this from happening again”. The Right favors a closing of the border, militarism, and greater surveillance to prevent Islamic extremists and other undesirable “non-Americans” from being able to do us harm. The Left favors severe gun restrictions, “hate” speech restrictions for politically incorrect language and ideas, and greater surveillance to prevent dangerous White extremists and other “hate groups” from being able to do us harm. So what do both of these policies have in common? Obviously, both share the belief that it is centralized government power, rather than a self-reliant, self-sufficient and otherwise empowered citizenry, that is the key to “keeping us safe”. But there is something else going on here as well.

faces of terror

One thing that is happening across the board in the media that we should pay close attention to is the back and forth substitutions of the words “extremist“, “terrorist“, and “radical“.  This is done deliberately so that we equate anyone that have “extreme views” (i.e. views different from mainline establishment thought) with terrorists, regardless of whether or not these people are actually use aggressive violence towards others.  This is the current that underlies the whole “terrorism” narrative on both the Right and the Left side of the Power Structure.  In truth, this isn’t a war on “terrorism” at all.

What do Religious fundamentalists (Islamic, Christian, etc.), White Nationalists (or Black Nationalists, or Hispanic Nationalists, etc.), Sovereign Citizens, Anarchists, Libertarians, Constitutionalists, and “Conspiracy Theorists” all have in common? They all have strong ideologies or opinions that in some form or fashion create competition and opposition to the dominant power structure and the elite that control it. These are ideologies that supersede the allegiance to the State in the minds and hearts of those individuals who subscribe to them. These are ideologies that if left alone, threaten the power monopoly of the State, which is why the State will either seek to infiltrate and “co-opt” them, so as to use them for its own purposes, or it will seek to destroy them.

Let’s briefly take a look at each of these different ideologies that cause the State so much concern:

Religious fundamentalism or “extremism” is what is on is on everybody’s tongue right now. Religious fundamentalism is typically the strict adherence to a particular religion and its doctrine. Fundamentalists tend to hold to a literal or “exoteric” interpretation of their religion, and tend to be “traditionalists”- meaning they believe in traditional families and cultural moral values.  While most religious fundamentalists are not violent, the belief in any sort of “Higher Power” that supersedes the State is going to be targeted and demonized.  Likewise so will any ideologies around moral virtue or traditionalism that are not “State-endorsed“.  At the same time the State will drum up fear of these ideologies in the public mind to enhance its own power and control. While particular fundamentalist ideologies like violent Islamic extremism (which is typically government enabled and funded), are used to de-stabilize various regions resistant to Globalism, the goal is ultimately for these ideologies to be absorbed into a Corporate Global Monoculture based in consumerism and debt slavery.

Nationalism, while not as much of a focal point in the States, is really gaining steam in Europe. Nationalism is the belief that the state, acting as an extension of a particular culture, tribe, folk, or race needs to remain sovereign and maintain the ability for self-determination, free of influence or pressure from outside nations or groups. The various Nationalist movements are demonized heavily in the media there, as well as here to a lesser degree. Factions of the Power Elite have used Nationalism to their advantage in the past, but as the power structure moved full swing into a Trans-National Globalist system with the conclusion of World War II, any form of Nationalism is now seen as an enemy of “progress”. We would do well to understand that the one of the primary purposes of World War II was to crush folkish Nationalism and usher in a “cosmopolitan” Globalist system.


Sovereign Citizens or “Freeman” essentially reject the notion that the State has any legitimate authority over their lives. They understand the “LEGAL NAME” as it appears in all CAPS on your birth certificate, driver’s license, and any court documents to be different than the actual flesh and blood human person. The LEGAL NAME is a corporate entity, and one’s consent to it essentially makes one property of the State and the power structure behind it. Sovereign Citizens and Freeman use this legal understanding to separate themselves from the State, most notably from paying taxes, particularly income taxes (which are unconstitutionally levied by a private bank). The State cannot exist without funding from private citizens, so naturally, anyone with this sort of ideology and understanding is seen as a threat. Far from violent, Sovereign Citizens typically just want to be left alone.  You can read for yourself: Global SOv Handbook_0

Anarchists have a similar ideology to Sovereign Citizens, as they do not believe in the legitimacy of the State or government at all whatsoever. Anarchists do not believe that any group or individual has the right do declare itself as an authority over another. Anarchists believe that any imposition upon an individual’s free will (including taxation and imprisonment) that isn’t self-defense is immoral and illegitimate. Anarchists have been given a bad rap due to the use of violence in protest settings which have mainly been perpetrated by agent provocateurs rather than actual anarchists; particularly in recent decades. The public has been conditioned to fear the word “anarchy” and link it to chaos. Anarchy in fact does not mean “without rules”, it means “without rulers”. This makes those who subscribe to it a natural enemy of the State.


Libertarianism could be considered as “Anarchy Lite”. Libertarians share many of the same beliefs as Anarchists, but believe in some form of severely limited representative government. As the State seeks to continuously expand itself, Libertarianism is seen as an enemy, although their ideology of unrestricted markets can tend to play into the hands of Corporate Globalism. Libertarians also tend to be anti-imperialism, which puts them at odds with the Military Industrial Complex that steers much of U.S. foreign policy. Libertarians often identify as “fiscally conservative” but “socially liberal”.

Constitutionalists are similar to Libertarians in ideology, but specifically hold allegiance to the Bill of Rights and the U.S. Constitution. However, many Constitutionalists also tend to be conservative Christian and “pro-life”, while Libertarians tend to lean towards “pro-choice”. Constitutionalists reject the idea that the Constitution is a “living document” open to free interpretation that changes with the times. This ideology is particularly troublesome to the U.S. Federal Government as it has increasingly sought to expand its power and influence both at home and abroad, far beyond the scope outlined in that document. If one looks at the definition of the word, it would in fact be the Federal Government that would be defined as “radical”.


Within the category of “Constitutionalists”, we have a large portion of active and retired U.S. Military Service members. These are men and women who swore an oath to the Constitution and it is no small wonder that returning veterans are at the top of Homeland Security’s “Terror Watch List” (here’s the pdf of the report: rightwing).  In fact, police chiefs have justified their Homeland Security funded military weapons and vehicles due to the “threat” of “Constitutionalists” and “veterans” who have “the ability and knowledge to build IEDs and to defeat law enforcement techniques”. Throughout history, it has been the military and their codes of honor that has proven to be the biggest thorn in the side of political despotism.

Lastly we have “Conspiracy Theorists”. This has been a blanket term used to apply to pretty much anyone that believes that governments lie or that small groups of people meet in secret and make plans. While these “Conspiracy Theorists” run the gamut as far as areas of focus, from false-flag terrorism to U.F.O. cover-ups, nearly all of them point to secrecy, deception and outright lawless actions being perpetrated by the State in the past or in the present. Naturally, the State does not care for this and seeks to marginalize anyone who points to any wrong doing on the part of the power structure.

Another thing that tends to link “Conspiracy Theorists” is a “belief in a New World Order conspiracy”. So what is the New World Order exactly? Aside from just being a concept mentioned in speeches by both former President George H. W. Bush and former President Bill Clinton, and far from some fantasy construct of a dystopian sci-fi novel, the “New World Order” is nothing more and nothing less than the logical end-result of Trans-National Corporate Globalism. It is a gigantic corporate merger- a consolidation of power and influence by select financial and corporate interests, their shareholders as well as the politicians and bureaucrats they have under their thumb. It is a group of cartels with who work together to enhance mutual interests and dominate world markets and resources.

corporate man

The stated goal is to create a “one world government” ruled by a sort of “neo-feudalistic serfdom”, with a form of Socialism/Communism for the masses, while the “feudal lords” sit in offshore tax havens and fortified compounds. For those familiar with the “company towns” of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, it could be likened to that on a global scale. In fact, the nature of sovereignty erasing trade deals like the Trans-Pacific Partnership is evidence of this.

The subject as to who these “feudal lords” that sit atop this “pyramid” has long been debated. Count Richard von Coudenhove–Kalergi, founder and President of the Pan-European Union, which was the predecessor of the E.U., was a big-time power player in the Globalist movement. The Count gave us a somewhat of a clue of who these “lords” might be with this statement from his 1925 book, “Praktischer Idealismus”:

From the European quantity people… two quality races rise up: blood aristocracy and Jewry… both believe in their higher mission, of their better blood… The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility.

It should be noted that the British-Dutch-German royal family are the prime shareholders of Dutch Royal Shell Oil Corporation and the largest land owners in the world. Meanwhile Jewish elite financial empires like N.M. Rothschild and Goldman-Sachs influence interest rates and hold sway over major global financial lenders like the IMF, the World Bank, and the Bank for International Settlements– the central bank of central banks like the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve. It was these financial interests as well as their counterparts on Wall Street that funded both the Zionist and Bolshevik movements of the early 20th century. Historically, the financial/merchant class has worked with aristocracy to enhance one another’s interests and power for centuries.

The late Carroll Quigley, former Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former President Bill Clinton wrote the encyclopedic-length work of dry non-fiction “Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time”, in which he detailed with optimistic enthusiasm the mechanisms of what he referred to as the “Anglo-American Establishment”. The Anglo-American Establishment describes the alliance between the British Empire and the elite financial and corporate interests that were behind it (i.e. Rothschild) and the emerging American Empire and its financial and industrial titans like J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie. The forming of the much-celebrated “Special Relationship” between the U.S. and Britain in the late 19th century was at its core founded on a belief in the need for Anglo-American hegemony across the globe. As the British Empire declined, the American Empire took its place.

After the Anglo-American Establishment emerged victorious in World War II, a new entity emerged, referred to by President Eisenhower as the “Military Industrial Complex”, which acted as the “bulldog” for the financial and corporate entities who sought to get nations into debt they could not pay back, so they could then pillage their resources. The Military Industrial Complex was there to make sure that happened. Controlled primarily by the American WASP elites with ties to Zionism, this combine of arms dealers and weapons manufacturers used the power and influence they had gained in the Second World War to make sure that the war never ended. The creation of entities like the CIA as well as other Military Industrial Complex entities and operations helped to ensure this through use of false-flag terror, psychological warfare, narcotics trafficking, sex trafficking, manufactured revolutions, assassinations and puppet dictators.

With the spread of Corporate Globalism, new players like China entered into the equation. While western interests had covertly financed the Communist Revolution of Mao Tse Tung for decades, Communist China remained an “enemy” in the eyes of the general public through the Vietnam War. However, in the mid- 1970s China was “opened” to western markets- a move led by then U.S. Envoy to China and later CIA Director, George H.W. Bush. This was the beginning of the new chapter of the strange love-hate relationship between China, their elites like the Li family, and the Anglo-American Establishment. The Corporate Globalists love China due to their unending supply of cheap labor and complete disregard for the environment and human rights. Meanwhile those who are on the military and finance side of things know that China is still out for China, and not really “in” with the Judeo-Anglo-American Establishment, which seeks to be the dominant force in the world as it has for the last nearly 200 years.

The New World Order is a comprehensive system of dominance in financial, corporate, and government spheres where the most ruthless rise to the top, while the rest of the world is kept in a compartmentalized state. It is a system tailor-made for psychopaths. While there is infighting and backstabbing, as there is “no honor among thieves”, there is cooperation in the manner of a group of cartels. Judeo-Zionist, Anglo-American, and European elites primarily drive it, however players like the Saudis and the Chinese have played an increasing role in the past few decades. It has been said that millionaires see the world as a “playground”, while billionaires see the world as a “proving ground”, and this is certainly the case here as this is no “millionaires club”. The primary ideology is that of “Social Darwinism” and the belief that the 0.0001% who are in this “club” have a duty to direct the course of human civilization and lead the masses of the human population down “the right path”, with or without their consent.

However, these are also people who deeply understand the Law of Karma, which is why they always say what they are going to do in white papers, dry academic works, etc. before they do it. Silence, apathy, ignorance and disbelief from the general public equates to consent, as the information and stated goals of these folks is readily available. Likewise, they use “grunts” like the police and the military to do their dirty work, thereby skirting the immediate repercussions of Karma. They understand human psychology to an incredibly sophisticated degree and are masters at playing groups off against one another in order to advance their goals and create “order out of chaos”.


This is the “New World Order” in a nutshell. It is the Global Corporate Mega-State. This is an entity that has been constructed in the darkness of secrecy away from the light of inquiry, but now has become more vocal and blatant with its actions, as its dominance has caused it to grow in chutzpah and arrogance. Needless to say, this system as a whole is not something that most people would consent to if they were fully aware of it, which is why anyone sounding the alarm about any aspect of this is going to be ridiculed, demonized, or worse by the establishment.

So let’s be clear: governments aren’t afraid of terrorism. Governments have used terrorism for quite some time to advance their own power. What governments are afraid of are ideologies that compete with their own. The State and the individuals behind it know their real power lies in their hold over the minds and hearts of their populace. If that is gone, it is only a matter of time before they are as well.

We should note that it is increasingly accurate to use an impersonal term like “the State” in reference to the U.S. Government as it no longer matters who “the face” is, since we have a dictatorship of Executive Branch bureaucracies and the corporate interests that control them. Policies shift focus and move faster, but never really “change”. This is a State that has not been “for the people” for a long, long time. Similar statements can be made of most governments that are in existence today.

So that leads us to the question of what exactly is the ideology of the State and the emerging Global Corporate Mega State that ultimately seeks to completely absorb it? First and foremost, the State seeks to establish itself as God (although it will never say that). The State wants you to look to it for life and sustenance. The State wants you to look to it and only it, for safety and security. The State wants women to see it as provider, children to see it as parent, and men to see it as master. The State wants to destroy human sexuality and even human imagination because of the power it has to create without the approval of the State. The State will tell you what is moral and virtuous. The State will take your ideas and your movements and make them work to advance its own goals. All things belong to the State.  The State will let you have whatever does not threaten its power.

The State wants the “poor and oppressed” to look to it for hope, opportunity, and charity which it will give in exchange for loyalty and the elimination of its enemies. The State must crush any and all competition. The State must silence any and all dissent or ridicule. The State will choose what words and language is appropriate. The State will decide what sort of science and technology you can and can’t have. The State wants you to consume more and more. The State wants you to be self-absorbed and apathetic. The State wants you to care about frivolous things and obsess over mindless entertainment. The State wants you to believe you can only be what it says you can be. The State wants you to believe everything its “experts” and media pundits tell you.  The State will write history.  The State will tell you what is true or false.The State must dictate your reality.

The State wants you to cheer it on, no matter what it does. The State demands tribute and it demands sacrifice. The State will tell you that it is virtuous and honorable to pay your tribute to the State. The State cannot survive without it. The State thinks there are too many people and that threatens its ability to maintain power and control. The true nature of the State is that of a parasitic entity. It may give a tiny little bit, but then it takes oh so much more. Like a cancer it grows and grows. The State wants you in its cage until you die broke and in debt. The State will say what is good is evil and what is evil is good. The antithesis of Light, Life and Love, the State as we know it is an archaic holdover from the Kali Yuga and represents darkness, death and fear. The State is a vampiric illusion that only exists because we have put our faith and energy into maintaining it.

This is the State as it has come to be. This is the Global Corporate Mega-State. It is “Left Wing” as well as a bit “Right Wing”. It is all about you having any sort of “freedom” that keeps you dumbed-down, distracted and self-absorbed. It wants to take all of your money as you slowly die from the diseases that it creates or allows to be created in a variety of ways. It tolerates homogeneous, watered-down religion, just as long as your actions in the world are passive and subordinate to the State, and your life remains primarily focused on tribute and support of the State. It wants you to serve it until you no longer serve a purpose. It wants you to believe you are weak, powerless, and ugly. But in truth, it knows how powerful you truly are and is scared to death of that.

At the end of the day, an “extremist” is anyone who does not agree with the legitimacy of the power monopoly of the State and its attempt to dictate reality. An “extremist” sees the State’s attempt to become God for what it is. An “extremist” isn’t a threat because he or she uses bombs, or guns, or other fear-based tactics. An “extremist” is a threat because he or she isn’t afraid to use words and ideas to create a different version of reality than the one the State approves of. The Word and the Imagination are humanity’s most powerful tools, which is why the State seeks to suppress and control them with such vigor.


So in closing, my question to you, dear reader, is this: where do you stand? Do you stand with the State? Or do you follow a “Higher Power”? Will you be an “extremist”? Or will you be absorbed into the Global Corporate Mega-State?

Humanity is at a fork in the road, and the time is coming where we will all have to make the “hard choice”.  Honest, sincere, conscious action will be required of us.  What manner of action will depend on one’s own strengths and abilities, but in any case, it will require honest action and it will take every ounce of heart and courage we have.

There is a rough road ahead indeed, and the temptation will be there to just put our head in the ground and “go along to get along” and hope we go unnoticed.  But we may be wise to remember the words of Tuskegee Airman and Air Force Lt. Col. Hiram Mann:

“No man survives when freedom fails, the best men rot in filthy jails, and those who cry ‘appease, appease’, will be hanged by those they tried to please.”

Namaste and God Bless.

THOUGHT CRIMES: Questioning Zionism, Communism, the Holocaust and the Founding of Israel


“Growing up in reunified Germany, Eva Meyer remembers being overwhelmed by the Holocaust studies that were part of each school year. Meyer and her classmates were assigned to read books about the Holocaust. They heard personal stories from Holocaust survivors. They had to write essays about the Holocaust, too.

Learning so intensively about the horrors committed by Germans left her feeling shame and guilt, Meyer said. But that same education communicated something else:

‘There is Israel, and that’s the solution,’ Meyer said, describing the role that was assigned to the Jewish state in her education. ‘That’s the salvation. It makes you feel better. All the shame and guilt is not that bad, because there is Israel and everything is fine now. And whatever Israel wants — give it to them. And whatever a Jewish person wants — don’t ask, just give it. That’s what I learned about it.’”

– From the May 10th 2015 article, “German Left Haunted by the Holocaust- Split over Israel” written by Yermi Brenner and published in the “Jewish Daily Forward”

One of the primary motivations I had for starting this blog was the idea that personal alchemy and spiritual transformation went hand-in-hand with the quest for truth and the de-construction of illusions and belief systems. This premise has led me to delve into some topics and ask some questions that may have made some folks uncomfortable and maybe even a little angry. This will undoubtedly be the case with the topic I am going to delve into today. What I am presenting here is the culmination of a year and a half of deep research.  For months I have debated as to the most appropriate way for me to address this issue. I suppose I could have just left it alone, but my own personal journey led me to it and if nothing else, this blog is about my own perspectives on the reality matrix we experience, my quest to understand and make sense of it, and my burning desire to deconstruct it to its bare bones.

When I was in fifth grade I was introduced to the “Holocaust”. We watched films like “The Dairy of Anne Frank” as well as various documentaries. We learned that the Nazis were the most evil mass-murderers of all time, using gas chambers as well as other horrific means of torture and mutilation to maim and kill. We looked at books that showed pictures of emaciated concentration camp victims and described horrible stories of family members being killed in front of one another. This sort of trauma-based “education” continued at various points throughout my schooling where books like Eli Weisel’s “Night” were required reading. The conclusion I reached was that Nazis were megalomaniacal mass-murderers who sought to take over the world and create a “master race” of blonde-haired, blue-eyed “supermen”, while they exterminated six million Jews due to irrational racist hatred.


This programming I received pretty much ran as normal up until about a year and a half ago. As the “external” version of my search for the truth about history and our reality (which compliments my internal spiritual search) led me to information that I had never come across before. I was not searching for this information, but rather it sort of “found me”. Sure, I’d heard of people who supposedly didn’t believe the Holocaust happened, and were labeled “Holocaust Deniers”, like the former president of Iran, but I never really looked into what might make them believe that. I pretty much bought the line that it was simply due to blind, irrational hatred and “anti-Semitism” and took that as a subliminal cue not to investigate the matter further. I mean nobody wants to be labeled “Nazi” or a hateful “anti-Semite”, right? But the presentation of what was for me completely new historical evidence laid out in a very scholarly, rational way sparked my curiosity.

Before this time, any and all “evidence”- testimonies and the like, that I had seen or heard or read about the Holocaust were very “emotionally driven”; as in it was very obviously looking to trigger an emotional reaction rather than encourage intellectual inquiry. So I researched scholarly works done by numerous historical “revisionists”- people who conduct deep research into historical events and find evidence that things might have happened differently than the standard, textbook account of things. Revisionists will often find historical evidence of various inconsistencies that conflict with and contradict the mainstream narrative of an event.  The conclusions I reached have been often reluctant ones that I came to over a lengthy period of inquiry.  I didn’t really WANT to believe this, but in the face of the evidence, I felt I had no choice if I was going to hold fast to the quest for Truth.

So all that being said, I figured the best way to tackle this topic is simply to present a list of 100 interesting and puzzling points and questions that came up for me when I did my own research into the narrative of the Holocaust, as well Zionism, Communism and the founding of Israel. I just ask that you do your best to put aside any emotions around the subject and look at these points objectively. More importantly, I challenge you to research any or all of these points and questions for yourselves:

1. The May 1897 edition of “The Open Court” religious magazine speaks of the revolts in Roman occupied Judea in led by Bar Cocheba “in which nearly six million Jews lost their lives”.

2. What is the significance of the “Ye shall return minus 6 million” prophecy laid out by Jewish-American Rabbi Benjamin Blech in his book “The Secrets of Hebrew Words”?

3. Why were there NUMEROUS (approx. 271) newspaper articles and various other publications that stated that “six million Jews” were in peril and/or being killed in Europe from 1900 to 1945?


4. The political movement known as Zionism was founded in Europe in the 1800s to establish a homeland for the Jews living in Europe. While various nations were offered, including territory in East Africa by the British Empire, the leaders of the movement insisted on Palestine, which at the time was occupied by the Ottoman Empire.

5. This movement included Lord Rothschild of the U.K., who was a member of the wealthiest and most influential banking family the world has ever seen. Today, the Rothschild family continues to hold trillions of dollars in assets including Rothschild Investment Trust (now RIT Capital), which as of 2008 reported $3.4 billion in assets.

6. In the late 19th century in Britain several Anglicanized Sephardi and Western Ashkenazi families, dubbed ‘the Cousinhood’dominated Anglo-Jewish society. This old elite put up stiff resistance to the mass flux of eastern European Jews that were moving en masse to Britain. Could this have provided a motivation for the elite British arm of the Zionist movement to seek to put these “lesser Jews” somewhere else?

7. What happened to the people of rich medieval kingdom of Khazaria on the Black Sea who mass-converted to Judaism and what is the factual basis of the “Times of Israel” and “Haaretz” and others stating that the majority of Ashkenazi Jews (which make up the majority of Jews) are actually a mix of Eastern European and Central Asiatic tribes? Would this therefore mean that the notion of Palestine being ancestral lands and a “birthright” are somewhat of a falsehood?

8. At the time of the establishment of Zionism, the British Empire was at the height of its power. At the political helm was master politician, Jewish Anglo Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli. The largest financial power within the British Empire and arguably the world was the Jewish Rothschild banking dynasty, who also had operations in mainland Europe in France and Germany. Meanwhile in the United States, Jewish American financiers like Schiff and Warburg were powerhouses on Wall Street and Jewish Americans like Paul Reuter and Adolph Olcs ran Reuters and the New York Times- two of the most influential media outlets in the world to this day.

9. What were the circumstances around the debt that the Ottoman Empire supposedly owed the Rothschild banking interests and how did Palestine end up being territory of the British Empire?

10. According to the American Jewish Committee, there were approximately 15,688, 259 Jews in the world in 1939.  After World War II, the New York Times cited there being approximately 18,700, 000.  How would there have been such a population spike if  a mass-genocide of 6 million Jews had indeed taken place?

11. In 1917, during the height of World War I, a letter was sent from Britain’s Foreign Secretary Arthur James Balfour to Baron Walter Rothschild. Known as “The Balfour Declaration” it publicly stated full support by the British Government for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Why would the most powerful Empire in the world and a notorious exploiter of peoples across the globe be so willing to accommodate a “disenfranchised minority”?

12. In 1937, former British Prime Minister David Lloyd George addressed the Palestine Royal Commission in regards to the Balfour Agreement: “In this critical situation it was believed that Jewish sympathy or the reverse would make a substantial difference one way or the other to the Allied cause. In particular Jewish sympathy would confirm the support of American Jewry, and would make it more difficult for Germany to reduce her military commitments and improve her economic position on the eastern front… The Zionist leaders gave us a definite promise that, if the Allies committed themselves to giving facilities for the establishment of a national home for the Jews in Palestine, they would do their best to rally Jewish sentiment and support throughout the world to the Allied cause. They kept their word.”

13. If Jews throughout the world were truly a voiceless and persecuted minority, why was the most powerful Empire in the world courting their influence to help them win a war against their most powerful economic competition in Germany?

14. In America, the man in charge of wartime propaganda was Jewish American Edward Bernays.  Known as the “Father of Propaganda”, Bernays created PR and marketing as we know it, and worked for some of the biggest industries around to market their products.

15. In February of 1920, future British Prime Minister Winston Churchill wrote an article for the London Sunday Herald entitled “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People”. I highly suggest folks read this if they are not already familiar with it.

16. The Communist Bolshevik Revolution that brutally overtook Russia were led my and Jewish-Russians Leib Bronstein, aka. Leon Trotsky and Julius Cedarbaum, aka. Julius Martov. Vladimir Lenin was also a quarter Jewish. The intellectual founder of Communism, Karl Marx, was a Jewish German. To this day, many people revere these men as heroes. Financial interests out of London and New York reportedly provided funding for these men and their revolution.

17. After the brutal murders of Czar Nicholas II and his wife and children, the Bolsheviks carried out what was known as the “Red Terror”- a period marked by mass arrests in the middle of the night, executions, and brutally bizarre methods of torture. These atrocities were carried out by the Jewish Russian-run “Cheka”, i.e., secret police and resulted in the murder of as many as 100,000 Russians.

18. Jewish South African Lawrence Joffe notes in “Complete Illustrated History of the Jewish People”: “Jews were enthusiastic unionists in the early 20th century… A large number were anarchists or Communists…

19. When U.S. Ambassador to Russia, David Francis, visited in January 1918, he noted: “The Bolshevik leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide social revolution.

20. In 1918 Jewish-German Communists Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht founded the “Spartacus League”, which later became the Communist Party of Germany. Aided by Jewish-Hungarian leader Bela Kun, the group attempted to take advantage of post-war chaos and stage a coup in Berlin. Fearing the same fate as the Czar, Kaiser Wilhelm fled to Holland. While a group of WWI veterans known as the Freikorps reclaim control, the Communists continually attempted to seize power.

21. The primary force that decorated WWI veteran Adolf Hitler feared as a threat to Germany and Europe as a whole was Communism. The major leaders of the movement throughout Europe were Jewish.  Likewise, this very real fear of Communism was the driving force behind the various “anti-Semitic” Nationalist movements that swept across Europe prior to World War II.

22. The death toll under Communist regimes in the 20th century was 94 million people. This is a good 14-15 times the amount of deaths attributed to National Socialist Germany by mainline historians. So why is it is trendy and fashionable to wear and display Communist symbols and propaganda, use Communist slogans and why is it acceptable to openly identify as Communist, when even displaying the Swastika, an ancient Indo-European spiritual symbol is seen as evil and to even agree with any of the tenets or philosophies of National Socialism is seen as unforgivably monstrous?

23. The only record of Hitler stating he wanted to “take over the world” is taken from a book entitled , “Conversations with Hitler”, printed as “The Voice of Destruction” in the U.S. in 1940, was later presented as evidence at Nuremberg. However, Swiss historian Wolfgang Haenel spent five years diligently investigating the memoir before announcing his findings in 1983. Haenel was able to conclusively establish that the author’s claim to have met with Hitler “more than a hundred times” is a lie.  The words attributed to Hitler, he showed, were simply invented or lifted from many different sources. Haenel also found evidence that a prominent British journalist named Henry Wickham-Steele, who was known to be a right-hand man of Sir Robert Vansittart, perhaps the most vehemently anti-German figure in Britain, helped to produce the memoir.  In addition, one of Germany’s most influential periodicals, “Der Speigel” concluded in an article published in 1985 that Rauschning’s Conversations with Hitler “are a falsification, an historical distortion from the first to the last page ”  Meanwhile, Communist International or “Comintern” that was run out of Russia during that time openly stated they wanted to establish a worldwide Communist regime in numerous documents and no one knows about it.

24. If the Nazis were a brutal racist regime, why were there volunteers from Africa, the Middle East and India fighting on behalf of the Germans against the Communists and the British Empire?

25. Who has heard about the Anti-Comintern Pact between Japan and Germany? Who is aware that interests within the United States funded Mao and the Communist takeover of China and Southeast Asia?

26. Joseph Stalin, or “Uncle Joe” as FDR referred to him, was one of the most brutal dictators of the 20th century, yet he was an ally of the United States. Why did this change after the war and what if any role did the purge of the likes of Trotsky and other Jewish revolutionaries from power during the war years and taking a more nationalistic stance play in the relationship turning sour?

27. In March of 1933, shortly after the election of Adolf Hitler, there was a call by the international Jewish community to organize a worldwide boycott on German goods. There was even a rally of 40,000 that assembled in Madison Square Garden.

28. In the 1939 book “A Program for the Jews and an Answer to all Anti-Semites; A Program for Humanity” Marxist Jewish Author Harry Waton stated that “Jews are far more numerous and infinitely more powerful than the fascists are. Not that the Jews fear the fascists or have reasons to fear them, but the fascists fear the Jews, and have good reason to fear them.” In the book he also stated “Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have a right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters over the whole earth . . . The Jews will become the masters over the whole earth and they will subordinate to themselves all nations.

29. In 1941, Jewish American author Theodore Kaufman wrote a book that was praised in the New York Times entitled “Germany Must Perish!” which essentially called for genocide of the German people. This was a good 3 years before there was public knowledge of any “Holocaust”.

30. If Hitler and the Nazis wanted to “kill all the Jews” why was their documented policy always emigration? First with the “Transfer Agreement” to Palestine, where German Jews were set up with financial transfers and land to immigrate to Palestine, then afterwards with the plan in which the German government pleaded with the international community to allow a Jewish colony under strict supervision in Madagascar, and then finally the plan to evacuate Jews out of Europe into the Ural Mountains in Russia as was found when the British broke the German “Enigma” code.

31. Why did the British put a stop to Jews immigrating to Palestine from Germany and turn them back at gunpoint?

32. Why did a German Foreign Office circular bulletin of June 22, 1937 state that: “In view of the anti-German agitation of international Jewry, Germany cannot agree that the formation of a Palestine Jewish state would help the peaceful development of the nations of the world“? Given the issues with Israel and its neighbors since its founding, could this be considered an accurate assessment?  Why was Germany not the only nation that thought letting Palestine be an independent Jewish-controlled state as opposed to being under the auspices of the British, etc. was a bad idea for peace in the region and the world?

33. Forensic science shows that bodies that have been killed by poison gas turn a bright reddish color, however no photos of supposed victims of Nazi gas chambers displays this feature. Why in the over 1,000 autopsies performed on camp prisoners was there no evidence of death by poison gas found?

34. Why did the Jewish Zionists approve of the Nuremberg anti-race mixing laws?

35. The NSDAP (Nazi) government is renowned for being notoriously meticulous with paperwork and documenting EVERYTHING. So why is there no documented order from Hitler or any sort of central command to exterminate Jews via gas chambers? Why is all “proof” of such a thing taken from secondary sources?

36. Why is the only “documented evidence” of the gas extermination story that can be found from the war years in the form of propaganda leaflets dropped from the air by the Allies?

37. Official records from the time show that there were 4.5 million Jews in Nazi-controlled territory. Since the war, 4.3 million Jews have lodged claims for compensation as “Holocaust victims”. If 6 million Jews supposedly were killed, something doesn’t add up here.

38. Official German documentation actually reveals a total of 201,812 deaths in the camps- to me that sounds like a more realistic statistic than “6 million”.

39. Why did the placard outside Auschwitz “mourn 4 million murdered” in 1948, only to drop to 1 million decades later?

40. “The Diary of Anne Frank” is arguably the most famous “Holocaust” story out there. However, few realize that Anne Frank did not die in “the gas chamber”, she died of Typhus.

41. Why did Anne Frank’s father admit to transcribing parts of the diary?

42. Why does virtually no one know of or discuss the epidemic of Typhus that ran rampant throughout the camps during the last months of the war- the same time when the supposed “Final Solution” was implemented?  Likewise, why is no one told that the primary cause of this as well as the starvation was the Allied bombing of supply lines going to the camps?

43. Why did General Patton cite how 800 prisoners at Buchenwald were inoculated with a typhus vaccine (which didn’t work)?  Why would you vaccinate people you are planning on killing in a gas chamber?

44. One of the major sources for imagery of the piles of emaciated bodies was Bergen-Belsen camp- which was one of the camps that was hit hardest by the Typhus epidemic.

45. Typhus is a disease that causes massive dehydration and diarrhea, and turns the victim into an emaciated skeleton. This disease is typically carried by lice, and a pesticide called Zyklon B was used to de-louse clothing to prevent spread in the camps. Zyklon B was later claimed to have been used to “gas Jews”.

46. Lizzie Van Zyl was a victim of typhus and died in the British concentration camps that were set up during the South African Boer War. Folks might recognize her (I know I did) as her image has been used in numerous history books and “documentaries” about the WWII Holocaust, claiming she was a victim of Nazi concentration camps.

47. Why do the original German architect plans of Auschwitz show no gas chambers?

48. Why did forensic chemical examination of Auschwitz disprove use of Zyklon B in “ruined gas chambers”?

49. Why did the Auschwitz Camp Museum admit that the “gas chamber” it shows to millions of tourists every year is a fake?

50. Why did Israeli and Polish university archaeological digs at the Belzec and Sobibor camps fail to find any evidence of “gas chambers”?

51. Why are the “carbon monoxide” gas bottles on display at Majdanek camp labelled as carbon dioxide?

52. Why do the “gas chambers” at Majdanek have glass windows, baths and real working showers?

53. Why are none of the “gas chambers” hermetically sealed in a manner that would actually keep gas from escaping and killing the people who stood outside?

54. Why has the story surrounding the method of “gassing” changed multiple times?

55. Why did the Smithsonian say a terra-cotta tile imprinted with the logo of Polish terra-cotta manufacturer Dziewulski i Lange was a “Star of David” and state it was evidence of the existence of a Jewish gas chamber at the televised Treblinka archaeological dig in 2013?

56. Why would a German government who needed to use prison labor to support the war effort, was suffering immense casualties and going broke fighting a war on either side of them go through the cost and expense of setting up such an elaborate operation to exterminate Jews when it would have been infinitely easier and far more cost effective to just shoot them?

57. Why did U.S. General Patton state after the war that the U.S. had “fought on the wrong side”? Why was he killed shortly thereafter?

58. Why did French anti-Nazi resistance fighter Paul Rassinier, who was imprisoned at Buchenwald “death camp” from 1943 to 1945 state that the main atrocities that occurred at the camp were perpetrated by Communist prisoners rather than the S.S. Officers? Why did he state that the gas chambers were “vague rumors”? And why are his accounts not widely published like other, more sensational tales?

59. Camp directives required that the SS keep a “safe distance” between themselves and the inmates, for security and health reasons. The actual day-to-day administration of the camps was left to the tender mercies of the so-called “Kapos,” who were charged by the SS with keeping “order” among the inmates.

60. Why was the reputation of Nazi soldiers among civilians far better than those of the Allied forces?

61. Among the accusations projected towards the Nazis was intentionally starving prisoners to death in the camps. However, it was the Allied forces that carpet-bombed German cities and the railways that took food and provisions to the camps, causing the epidemic levels of disease and starvation that took place in the camps at the end of the war.

62. Why did Heinrich Himmler, chief commandant of all detention facilities, issued an order stating “The death rate in the camps must be reduced at all costs” on December 8th, 1942?  Why are there multiple documented letters and telegraphs from concentration camp heads begging for medical supplies and provisions for inmates to the point of getting aid from the Red Cross if the goal was to exterminate them? Meanwhile no such aid was permitted for the millions who died in the Soviet Gulags, and the Red Cross was not allowed in.

63. Why did the Red Cross state on pages 73 and 74 in Vol. 111 of its report on the camps that “Civilians deported (to the camps) on administrative grounds, who were arrested for political or racial motives because their presence was considered a danger to the State or the occupation forces were placed on the same footing as persons arrested or imprisoned under common law for security reasons.“?

red cross auschwitz
64. If the statements from the Red Cross are true, why do the official record of the Nuremberg Trials state that the camps had such things going on as Jews being fed to eagles and bears in cages, Jews being made into sausages, pedal-driven brain-bashing machines, Jews being made into lampshades, mass-electrocution extermination rooms, people being dumped into burning pits, and other wild tales of cartoonish violence (which later made their way into best-selling “historical” novels) that seem like something from an episode of “Itchy and Scratchy”? Should we believe that the International Red Cross collaborated with the Nazis to cover up the grisly murder of Jews?

65. The first reports of the Holocaust came from newspapers out of the Soviet Union. Anyone familiar with the Soviet regime knows that their “journalism” was little more than government propaganda and contained little by way of objective facts.

66. The stories of “Angel of Death” Dr. Mengele and his murderous medical experiments relied primarily on the testimony of one man, Miklos Nyiszli. There was actual no documentation that Dr. Mengele or anyone in his charge murdered anyone.

67. Miklos Nyiszli also originated the notion that 3 bodies could be fully cremated to ash in 20 minutes in one muffle of a cremation oven. Any mortician who has cremated a body will tell you that it takes more than 20 minutes for the water to fully evaporate from a full grown human body. The real capacity of such installations, as declared by Topf engineer Kurt Prüfer, who designed the furnaces, and Karl Schultze, who designed the blowers, was one single body per muffle per hour.

68. Why is it still taken as fact among many that the Nazis “made soap out of Jews” when even the Israel Holocaust Museum says it’s a myth?

69. Why has the story of the Holocaust repeatedly failed to stand up to forensic testing of the various concentration camp sites?

70. All German men of fighting age were fighting the war, so the manufacturing for the war effort was coming primarily from the camps. Why would the Nazis want to exterminate their labor force?

71. Why has the number of German concentration camps reported to be “death camps” shrank in number multiple times since the end of the war and why were the camps labelled as “death camps” primarily relegated to the ones that existed behind the “Iron Curtain” beyond the scope western investigation in the postwar years until the early 1990s?  Doesn’t basic criminology attest to a lie or a cover-up when a story continuously changes?

72. Why do the post-war memoirs of Dwight Eisenhower, Winston Churchill, and Charles DeGaulle mention nothing of a systematic genocide of Jews?

73. Why were German P.OW.s admittedly forced to alter a shower room at Sachenhausen camp to make it look like a gas chamber and why was this same construct demolished by the Soviets in 1952?

74. Why were the majority of Jews who did get imprisoned in the concentration camps from families and sects who opposed Zionism?

75. Why was Judge Wilhelm Staeglich forced to resign from his job, stripped of his doctoral degree, and have his book banned in 1973 after publishing testimony of his experience of the camps?

76. Why is it a crime punishable by fines and/or imprisonment in many European countries (particularly those around Germany that would potentially understand German) to speak out against or even question any aspect the official narrative of the Holocaust?  Why was German citizen Ernst Zundel extradited from Canada and imprisoned in Germany on a 12-year sentence for writing and speaking on the Holocaust?  Why is there no other historical period or event that is subject to these kinds of laws?  Why would truth need to be protected in such a manner?

77. Who is aware that the infamous pile of dead bodies at Bergen-Belsen was actually made by Allied soldiers to dispose of them?  In fact, The infamous video of piles of dead bodies being bulldozed into a mass grave was taken by Allied cameraman, and the driver of the bulldozer was in fact a British soldier.

78. Why was the lawyer of a Holocaust revisionist sent to prison for “defending her client too vigorously”?

79. Is it not interesting that it was the Holocaust story that finally garnered the appropriate sentiments from the international community for the U.N. to approve a sovereign Jewish state in Israel, which a decade earlier had been vehemently opposed?

80. Why does Israel continue to collect what now has accumulated to hundreds of billions of dollars in “reparations” from the German government via the taxpayer, most of whom are now too young to have had anything to do with the Nazi regime?

81. Why didn’t the U.S. go to war with Israel when Israeli Air Force jet fighter aircraft and Israeli Navy motor torpedo boats attacked the Navy technical research ship, the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967?

82. Why is there so much hysteria around Iran having nuclear capability when it was only recently de-classified that Israel itself had nukes that it obtained through illegal backroom deals with elements in the U.S. government? Has Israel not shown itself to be a hostile nation in its own right?

83. Why does the United States, via the taxpayers, continue to give aid and weapons to Israel, and why do politicians in D.C. continue to drum on this notion of a “special relationship” and the idea that “Israel’s welfare is our welfare”?

84. Is there a factual basis for “The Zionist Plan for Greater Israel” and if so, what role does that potentially play in U.S. foreign policy?

85. Why does Israel have its own lobbying group (AIPAC) in D.C.? Why is AIPAC one of the most powerful lobbying groups in the country?

86. Why are the conditions Israel has imposed on Palestine and the aggressions taken toward the Palestinians not considered genocidal?  Why isn’t the charge of anti-Semitism used when describing Israel’s actions towards Palestinians, who are also Semitic peoples?

87. Why are calls to “Boycott and Sanction” Israel referred to by the mainstream media as “anti-Semitic”?

88. Why are Israeli children indoctrinated with the idea that any day there will be another “Holocaust”?

89. Why did the President of the World Jewish Congress state that every single European country, along with the United States, were complicit in the alleged Holocaust?

90. Why did the World Jewish Congress accumulate roughly $7 billion in Holocaust Compensation money? Isn’t that supposed to go to actual Holocaust victims?

91. Why would Israeli diplomat Adi Farjon say Israel had no interest in full normalization of relations with Germany and that maintaining German guilt about the Holocaust helps Israel?


92. Why was Israeli jazz-musician Gilad Atzmon banned from Israel for publicly questioning the Holocaust and criticizing “Jewish power”?

93. The Nuremberg Trials presented testimony from German P.O.W.s that were extracted under “interrogation”, which were used as evidence of the Holocaust and other “war crimes”. However Judge Edward L. Van Roden was part of a commission by the U.S. Army to investigate misconduct and later wrote in his book, “American Atrocities in Germany” that out of 139 cases of treatment of alleged German “war criminals” who were investigated by the commission—and who were subsequently put on trial by the American Military Tribunal in Dachau after World War II—“137 of these Germans were tortured by having their testicles crushed.”

94. Other interrogation methods included brutal beatings, placing a hood over prisoners and punching them in the face with brass knuckles, breaking their jaws, knocking out their teeth, putting them on starvation rations, and subjecting them to solitary confinement. The prisoners were then presented with prepared statements to sign. Isn’t the reason why torture is not considered a truly effective interrogation method due to the fact that it will compel the person being tortured to confess to whatever the torturer wants them to- even if it’s not true?

95. The vast majority of the “evidence” presented to confirm the “reality” of the crimes of the Holocaust has been from eyewitness testimony. Anyone with any background in criminal justice will tell you that eyewitness testimony is the least reliable form of evidence, and any serious charges relying solely on eyewitness testimony rarely stick.

01 Jan 1946, Nuremberg, Germany --- The defendants at the Nuremberg Nazi trials. Pictured in the front row are: Hermann Goering, Rudolf Hess, Joachim Von Ribbentrop, Wilhelm Keitel and Ernst Kaltenbrunner. In the back row are: Karl Doenitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, and Fritz Sauckel. --- Image by © Bettmann/CORBIS

96. Why did the Jewish American Anti-Defamation League pressure and eventually persuade the FBI to call off investigations of “Soviet refugees” with ties to the Russian-Jewish mafia, stating that doing so would “foster anti-Semitism”(as highlighted in the book “Red Mafiya: How the Russian Mob Has Invaded America” by Jewish American author, Robert I. Friedman)?

97. The majority of German officers claimed no knowledge of the camps at the Nuremberg Trials with the exception of Rudolf Höss, the former Commandant of Auschwitz, who signed a document stating that he had overseen the slaughter of two and a half million Jews. Höss remarked, “Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could just as well have said it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not.” Decades later, an account was published of how Höss had been tortured for three days and nights without sleep by a British army team in order to extract that statement. In a letter to his wife, Höss apologized for his ‘confessions’ and explains that they had been extracted from him under torture

98. On Sept. 25, 1945, Thomas Dodd, who was the second in command on the American prosecution team at Nuremberg, stated “You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge, you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish.” How could any sort of fair and impartial verdict be reached here?

99. One of the major points used for propagating the idea that Nazis were evil is the notion that they believed they were a sort of “Master Race” who saw Jews and anyone who was “not pure Aryan” as lesser. Is it not interesting that esteemed Jewish Community leaders like Rabbi Mendel Schneerson have stated “The body of a Jewish person, is of a totally different quality from the body of members of all other nations of the world. Bodies of the Gentiles are in vain. An even greater difference is in regard to the soul…A non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness.” Likewise, Jewish activist and “Holocaust survivor” Eli Wiesel stated, “Everything about us is different; Jews are ontologically exceptional.” Wouldn’t these be considered statements of racial supremacy as well?

100. During World War II, Jewish American Hollywood film directors like Frank Capra worked for the U.S. government and were integral in shaping public perception of the war, including what was seen of the concentration camps. Now the Holocaust “brand” in film and books is a multi-billion dollar industry. A film about the Holocaust is a shoe-in for an Oscar. No other historical period or event gets this sort of PR.


There are many, many more points and questions that can be and have been posed surrounding this whole situation, but I’m hoping that if folks have made it this far they will take away this one point if nothing else- the case is FAR from being closed when it comes to the events surrounding this period in history. There have been volumes written on the subject of Holocaust as well as World War II revisionism. The meticulous work of people like Dr. Nick Koellerstrom, Jurgen Graf, Eric Hunt, Peter Winter and many others paint quite a different picture of what happened at the camps. Meanwhile the work of authors like Richard Tedor and Veronica Clark provide a different perspective of what was going on in NSDAP Germany as a whole.

While the details and events of NSDAP Germany as it relates to its role in World War II is a deep topic that is beyond the scope of this article, the actual root of the conflict can be summed up as “Globalism vs. Nationalism”. On one side you had proponents of a global monoculture implemented through a synthesis of socialism/communism for the masses and exploitive crony capitalism for those on top. On the other side you had an alliance of nations who wanted to preserve their national sovereignty, self-determination and ethnic uniqueness. Globalism won. The world we live in today- and the agencies and institutions that control it (UN, CIA, IMF, etc.) are the direct result of that “victory”. It is basic criminal psychology to project one’s immoral or amoral behavior onto another. It wasn’t Hitler that wanted to “take over the world”; it was the men who said he did.  Adolf Hitler gave the proverbial finger to the International Banking Cartel by removing Germany’s currency from the International debt-based system.  Unfortunately it was the German people paid the price.

Adolf Hitler addressing Nazi rally

I am not a worshipper of Adolf Hitler or National Socialism. I don’t worship politicians, regardless of how intriguing some of their ideas and rhetoric may be. I do not agree with statism and many of the tactics used by the National Socialists. I am vehemently opposed to totalitarianism and police state tactics. I am opposed to locking up political dissidents in internment camps. Likewise, I find it appalling to incarcerate innocent men, women and children who have not committed a crime because they are seen as potential enemy combatants by the government. However we should remember that this was done in the United States as well. I am of course, opposed to any sort of medical testing done through deception, manipulation or coercion. Again though, this is something that the U.S. government has been guilty of on numerous occasions throughout the last 70 years. Neither am I a fan of things like coerced sterilization, race mixing laws or many of the other components associated with state-sponsored Eugenics that was a part of NSDAP Germany. But again, we would do well to have appropriate historical context and know that these ideas and practices originated in the Anglo-American world, not Nazi Germany.

It is also worth noting that the racial supremacy ideas that have long been associated with Nazi Germany are caricaturized and often understood by the general public through the rhetoric of modern day Neo-Nazi Skinhead groups (many of whom have been federally infiltrated and are headed by federal operatives, i.e. Hal Turner). It should be noted that as evidenced from later speeches, dialogues and writings Adolf Hitler’s notions of “racial purity” changed from his ideas he wrote about in “Mein Kampf” 20 years earlier. By the time of the war and the “Holocaust”, he saw the German people as a mixed people rather than of “pure stock”. He saw the idea of a common Germanic “folk culture” to be the uniting factor. It was this folk culture that he used to unite and invigorate a demoralized the German people across a very entrenched class system (Hitler was a very skilled and pragmatic politician). Hitler, the NSDAP and many other European leaders, as well as many within the Jewish community, saw Jews as distinct and separate from this European folk culture, which had its roots in ancient Indo-European (a.k.a. Aryan) traditions, customs and symbolism.

06-Postcard-2013-erntedanke-01I realize that much of the evidence I have presented here starkly contradicts what is now seen as “common knowledge”. Let’s be honest though, the vast majority of the “knowledge” most have around this subject came from a film or a television screen. As I have gone into detail in past articles, the presentations on the screen are generally designed to first and foremost appeal to emotions and subconscious desires, bypassing the logical centers of the brain. When we watch a film like “Schindler’s List” or listen to the “testimonies” of Holocaust survivors from Hollywood documentaries, logic, intellect and rationality are completely neutralized by the strong emotional response elicited. This is the desired result, and if our desire is having an informed society, this method of “being informed” is EXTREMELY dangerous and leaves people open to manipulation. Hollywood should NOT be teaching us about history. A look at some of the  archived footage of some of Spielberg’s Shoah Foundation survivor interviews may show why.


It should also be clear to anyone remotely familiar with the history of Hollywood and the long-standing relationship between the U.S. Federal Intelligence and Hollywood dating back to before World War II that a movie disputing the narrative of murderous genocidal Nazis and the Holocaust will NEVER be made. One should also note that it was Jewish immigrants that founded the major Hollywood film studios in the early part of the 20th century. This isn’t “anti-Semitism”; this is historical fact, as is the fact that the eight major Hollywood studios are run by Jewish execs today. However, agencies like the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center state that making such observations is “dangerous”. But that still didn’t stop Jewish American author and journalist Joel Stein from stating the following in his 2008 article in the L.A. Times entitled, Who Runs Hollywood? C’mon:

The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews… As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between ‘The 700 Club’ and ‘Davey and Goliath’ on TV all day.

I think the word we’re looking for here is “chutzpah”. Stein closed out the article in similar fashion, which is worth repeating just because:

“I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”

Do with that last quote what you will, but the point is here that the narrative presented out of Hollywood is going to be one-sided. There is also the matter that the Holocaust has become a “new religion” among an increasingly secularized international Jewish community. A Pew Research Center poll found that a whopping 73% of Jews polled (a solid majority) believed that “Remembering the Holocaust” was what was “Essential to Being Jewish”- not observing Jewish law, not being part of a Jewish community, not leading an ethical/moral life, not even caring about Israel.  The Holocaust has been used to unite Jews of varying levels of faith (or lack thereof) across the world. Various Rabbis and other Jewish leaders have voiced criticism and concern over this, as well as the Holocaust being used to “evoke fear and paranoia” as was the concern of Jewish American actress, Natalie Portman.  Sadly, the Jewish community the world over is indoctrinated in the fear that another Holocaust WILL happen if they let their guard down.

I think it is unfortunate that there is such a wall around this subject and that the list I just compiled will probably get me labelled a “white supremacist anti-Semite who wants to kill Jews” among some people. If I were in Germany, I would get fined or imprisoned for doing this. I don’t hate Jews. I have friends that are Jewish if not religiously, ethnically and they are wonderful, warm and loving people. I have dated and loved two Jewish women in my life.   However, I feel that seventy years is long enough. We have witch hunts taking place to imprison the elderly like 94-year-old former SS accountant Oskar Groening for accessory to what is now 300,000 “murders” (a significant drop from 1.5 million) at Auschwitz. This case has been praised for being the first case of “someone not physically involved in murder to be convicted.” Does anyone else see something wrong with this? Where were the convictions for the Atomic Bomb or the innumerable atrocities that were perpetrated by the Red Army?

Defendant Oskar Groening arrives for his trial in Luneburg April 21, 2015. A 93-year-old former bookkeeper at Auschwitz goes on trial in Germany on Tuesday, accused by prosecutors of being an accessory in the murder of 300,000 people, even though he was not involved in any actual killing at the notorious Nazi death camp. The trial of Groening, who was 21 and by his own admission an enthusiastic Nazi when he was sent to Auschwitz in 1942, may turn out to be one of the last big Holocaust trials because so few Nazis suspected of committing crimes during World War Two are still alive. REUTERS/Fabian Bimmer

As evidenced by the quote from the beginning of the article, the German people have been completely demoralized and straddled with an inhuman amount of guilt, while they are literally extorted for cash. This cash is then pocketed by large organizations and a nation that commits genocidal acts on its neighbors while screaming persecution when they fight back. Meanwhile the Israeli population is brainwashed into believing they are the perpetual victims and the world is out to get them. This is insanity. This is a just cause for moral outrage. But to speak out against this is to be an “anti-Semite” and in the world of political correctness that is as bad, if not worse than being labelled a “racist”.

Cognitive dissonance is a condition that occurs when a person is presented with information that directly contradicts what they believe to be true. There are typically one of two things that can occur from this scenario: Either the person uses logic and reason and does research into the evidence presented, making an informed decision from that. Or the person has an emotional response and lashes out in some way against the information and the person presenting it. I am sure there are people reading this who are experiencing this, and that’s okay. The ego is a strong force in the human psyche, and pride is one of its primary attributes. Nobody WANTS to admit they’ve been fooled. It’s embarrassing- especially when we’re certain we’re right about something. It is even more difficult when there are emotions attached to this belief.

Feelings of anger will inevitably arise, the question is, how do we direct it? Do we “shoot the messenger”? Attacking someone’s character doesn’t actually disprove what they said. Or do we transform anger into motivation and drive to find out what the truth actually is for ourselves? I don’t want anyone to just believe what I say, any more than I would want them to believe Hollywood, the government, or anyone else who would have a vested interest in creating and maintaining this or any other narrative.

DenialWhen one questions the Holocaust narrative, they are called “deniers”, which is a modern-day facsimile of a “heretic”. These deniers are attacked on a personal level, and their very moral character is called into question. They are often called “heartless”, and other like terms. To those who may respond in such a manner I say this: There is a time to lead with your heart and there is a time to lead with your head. While empathy and compassion and letting our heart guide us is good for a lot of things, analyzing and discerning the nature of historical events is NOT one of them. I am not saying we should not feel emotion or empathy for the suffering that took place, but I am saying that we would do well to keep our emotions on a leash if we want to see things clearly.

At the end of the day, why would we want to hold onto a belief in such a horrific story if it there were so much factual evidence disputing it? Why are Holocaust movies and books so popular? Is it really about “honoring the dead”, or is it something closer related to the cultural fascination with serial killers and horror/torture movies? And if so, what does it say about our collective psyche when our strongest attachments are around death and suffering?

One question I would implore anyone to ask when looking into the Holocaust is “who has the most to gain and who has the most to lose?” What does a man like Dr. Nick Koellerstrom have to gain from publishing a book that cost him his tenure? What does anyone who speaks out against this narrative have to gain? Ridicule, ostracization, fines, imprisonment? Meanwhile, what do they have to lose? Everything in some cases. Conversely, what do the various governments and international power players involved in maintaining this narrative have to gain by perpetuating it? The world as we know it and the structures that have control over it are the result of the victory of Globalism and its proponents during World War II.   The narrative around the demonization of Hitler and “the Good War” is what was used to convince the public to go along with everything that was set up as a result. Likewise, the Holocaust is the cornerstone of the foundation of the Zionist State of Israel- and the power that the leaders of that nation and their associates hold. If the Holocaust narrative falls, theoretically the whole thing falls apart. It also means that Iran was right– and we definitely can’t have that.

The justification for the “speech laws” around the Holocaust in Europe is that stating these kinds of things will incite violence against Jews. However, this has already been happening to the point where the Israeli government is calling for the Jews of Europe to exodus to Israel. The violence against Jews of less than “elite” class and status has been blamed on rhetoric from groups like the Golden Dawn in Greece who blame Jewish bankers from banking institutions with Jewish names like “Goldman-Sachs” for their role in tanking Greece’s economy and selling off their natural resources for pennies-on-the-dollar.

However, the sad truth is that vast majority of the Western European population where these attacks have been so domesticated and broken by the culture of political correctness that has a stranglehold on Europe that they are just not a threat to the Jews or anyone else. This is a people who are singing songs while they allow themselves to be kicked out of their homes to make way for anyone who claims to be a Syrian refugee, even if they’re obviously from Africa.

Europe antisemitism

No, native Europeans are not presenting a physical threat to the Jewish population. In fact a study put out by the Institute for the Study of Global Anti-Semitism and Policy shows that the actual physical violence perpetrated on European Jews in the last 15 years is being committed by Muslims living in Europe to a “disproportionate” extent. However, much like the gang rapes of Swedish women, the media WILL NOT report that as this is seen as “racist”, and would prefer to demonize right-wing nationalist groups and people doing the “Quenelle”. However when you have high profile shootings at bat mitzvahs by men with names like Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein, you can’t help but pause for a moment. However, according to Israeli-American actress and the founder of the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, Barbara Lerner Specter, this “resurgence” of anti-Semitism is a side effect of Europe’s multicultural “transformation”:

“I think there’s a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multi-cultural and I think we’re going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which MUST take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic… societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the center of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multi-cultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.”

Now we have a surge of young, fighting-age men flooding into Europe, while Europe’s Jews are being told throughout the media that Europe is no longer safe for them and they need to come to Israel. But I thought Netanyahu built a wall said they couldn’t take refugees because Israel was “too small” of a country?  But then again, I also heard some land might be opening up in neighboring Syria…

Meanwhile, anti-Globalist Nationalists like Vladimir Putin are demonized and likened to Adolf Hitler, while intelligence agencies and men like Jewish Hungarian billionaire George Soros admittedly fund a destabilizing civil war on the doorstep of Russia. I’m not “lionizing” Putin, as he has instilled incredibly draconian anti-Holocaust denial laws to cover Russia’s ass for their crimes in World War II as well, however, he is still promoting national sovereignty and calling out the Anglo-American power structure. Likewise, BRICS (the coalition of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) openly challenges the financial hegemony of the IMF and World Bank. Indeed, while the names may have been changed, and the methods may have evolved, the game is still the same. It is no secret that history does indeed repeat itself- especially when the masses are ignorant about what happened the first time around.

Namaste and God Bless.





Over the past 15 years or so, I have gone through radical shifts in my political ideology.  From being a counter-culture rebel for rebellion’s sake- believing in the right to smoke weed freely and completely cynical towards government and politics; to what could best be described as a conflicted “progressive-libertarian”- who was anti-war, anti-corporatocracy, believed in “good government” and promoted civil liberties; to what would be described by many as an “anarchist”- from the Greek an-archon, which means “without rulers” not “without rules”(contrary to popular belief).  The major constant behind all of these ideological shifts has been a continually evolving understanding of what I would best describe as the Divine Principle of Free Will, as well as a dash of natural contempt for authority and authoritarianism.

anarchyThis understanding of free will and a slowly matured understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of government led me to the following conundrum: If every human being is at his or her core a divine being that is endowed with the Divine Light of the Creator of All Things, then how does any other human being have a right to claim themselves as an “authority” over another and impose their will in anything other than a completely open and voluntary manner?  Obviously a primary response might be, “well, sometimes people violate the free will of others and need to be punished for their violations so hopefully they don’t do it again”.

Okay, even if we are to take that a violation of the free will of another somehow obligates the violator to surrender their own free will, still the question remains, who is given that right, that power to enforce some sort of over-arching authority or “law”?  Better yet, why are a select few people awarded that power and authority that the rest of us are told we do not have?  What makes them qualified to wield that sort of power?  These are questions many don’t bother asking, preferring to accept things as “just the way it is”.

Others may say this is part of what is known as the “social contract” in which peoples within a society “willingly” give up a certain amount of freedom in exchange for order and protection.  This is of course, order and protection maintained by a third party, i.e. government (via the police, Homeland Security, the military, etc.).  If individuals, families and communities were actually charged with defending themselves, there would be no need for anyone to give up any liberty.  This can also be said for things that involve taxes and taxation.  There leads us to the question as to whether you could honestly say people “willingly agree”  to comply with these social contracts, when many feel they have no real choice unless they ultimately want to face the barrel of a government enforcer’s gun.

My questions regarding whether there can be or ever was any such thing as a truly legitimate government or authority led me to look into the governing systems of my ancestral folk- the ancient Celtic and Germanic tribal peoples of Europe.  In the book entitled “The High Kings: Arthur’s Celtic Ancestors”, author Joy Chant describes how “tribal interdependence made for a society wherein each individual had value, where for example women were equal to men, and children had legal rights rather than being at the disposal of their parents.  Rulers were usually elected from among an eligible group rather than succeeding by right, and their authority was far from absolute; a King was subject to law, and his people could pass judgment on him.”

MI+Celtic+high+kingIn Celtic society, the king or queen was chosen from the warrior or “protector” class of those who had proven themselves especially skilled in battle.  His primary duty was the protection of the tribe or clan.  The closely related Teutonic or Germanic peoples of Europe had a similar role for their king or chief.  Often times, a king would only be chosen to lead during a time of war.  There was a naturally wariness of despotism among Northern European peoples.  In pre-Christian Germanic society there were three basic tiers: the king, the nobility, and the freemen (men and women who are not slaves or serfs).  The Roman general, Tacitus described how tribal matters were settled:

“About minor matters the chiefs deliberate, about the more important the whole tribe.  Yet even when the final decision rests with the people, the affair is always thoroughly discussed by the chiefs. [… At the assembly, w]hen the multitude think proper, they sit down armed.  Silence is proclaimed by the priests, who have on these occasions the right of keeping order.  Then the king or the chief, according to age, birth, distinction in war, or eloquence, is heard, more because he has influence to persuade than because he has power to command.  If his sentiments displease them, they reject them with murmurs; if they are satisfied, they brandish their spears.”


We see in both the Celtic and Germanic tribal structures, there was a general sense of what would be considered an equal say to a large extent.  This was not uniform, across all tribes and nations, but definitely appears to be a dominant trend in Northern European tribal structure.  It is this vein of consciousness that brought forth documents like the Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights along with the “democratic republics” that are seen as the hallmark of freedom.  The tribal egalitarianism of the Celto-Germanic peoples differed greatly from the more overtly patriarchal and at times greatly oppressive empires of the ancient Mediterranean and Near East.  It was this latter form of ruling consciousness that was eventually implanted into the rest of Europe first through the old Roman Empire, then through its “rebirth” as the Roman Catholic Church.


In Celtic societies it was the “learned class” of bards, druids and ovates, rather than the warrior class of kings and nobleman that were the true leaders of society.  Arising out of the Indo-Aryan Brahman class of Ancient India and out of the Pythagorean Mystery Schools of Europe, these were men (and women) that were keepers of the law and the sacred Word of the ancient oral traditions.  They were the healers, the teachers, the priests, the philosophers, the poets, the historians, the musicians, the architects, the astronomers and the keepers of time and the calendar.  These were men and women of legendary abilities and attainment who reportedly trained for upwards of 20 years to hold this important position.


However, unlike those Celts of the warrior nobility, the Roman Empire could not come to terms with or assimilate these dissident intellectuals and conducted a campaign to systematically eradicate the druids.  Sadly, most of their knowledge appears to have died with them.  Most of what we have left is the somewhat biased writings of the Roman conquerors and the later writings of the Irish Catholic Monks.  It is this class of individuals that has truly captured my imagination and been the source of much contemplation as I attempt to understand the nature and role of human governance, what went wrong, and what if anything could possibly be done to move towards a form of right governance.

12380361The druids with their combination of cultural sophistication, deep philosophical and mystical understanding combined with their reverence for the natural world and understanding of its core workings is the archetype of the enlightened man.  Now is this to say that all druids were necessarily “enlightened” beings or that all druidic practices would be suitable for this or the coming Age?  No.  But this archetype of the man or woman that goes through intense and rigorous spiritual initiations to the point of real purification; this archetype of the “Renaissance Man” who is learned of the true arts and sciences and understands and knows how to utilize the Laws of Nature and Creation; this archetype of the enlightened man who is grounded in true morality- this is what we need to be demanding our leaders embody if they are to be worthy of holding any sort of position of power or authority over the rest of us; which means that the VAST MAJORITY of men and women that currently hold a position of power, have no business doing so.

Our leaders need to be living representations of incorruptibility, virtue, honor, wisdom, and understanding, representing the highest forms of human aspirations and potential, not the lowest.  Unfortunately, those who rise to the top of the political and corporate ladders are more often than not the very opposite of “moral” or “incorruptible”, and are often selected due to “fraternal” ties or showing that they will do “whatever it takes”.  Our leaders who we allow to become our rulers are by and large just as enamored with the trappings and vices of the material world as any one else walking the street.  In truth, many of the most powerful and influential leaders have far more skeletons in their closet than the average man or woman.  These men and women are the opposite of the spiritually attained druid or the noble warrior.


Our modern-day “leaders” are not required to undergo any training or testing to prove themselves honorable or ethical outside their ability to present an image to the public.  Politicians are often groomed (or blackmailed) by the powers-that-be and installed due to their ability and willingness to advance a socio-political and/or economic agenda.  When it comes to the general public, leaders are often chosen for little more than catchy slogans, good campaign rhetoric and ability for us to “identify” with them-to win the “popular vote”.

First, we are not actually electing leaders we are electing RULERS.  Leaders lead the people by example- by noble and honorable words and deeds.  Rulers give edicts and commands to the people that they are required to follow, even if the rulers themselves do not (how many times have you heard of government “officials” skirting or exempting themselves from the law somehow and getting away with it?).  Secondly, the general population consciously and/or unconsciously wants rulers that are in tune with the Mass Mind of the people- this is the collective lower mind that most of humanity resides in.  This is the mind that is drawn to vice, power, control, and greed.

business manager handshake isolated with hundred dollar money

When we select leaders or rulers who appeal to this mind, we will never really rise to anything other than what we have right now.  All the best legislation in the world- left, right or center- will NEVER be anything more than temporary Band-Aids.  We don’t need leaders and rulers who are like us, we need leaders who are better than us; and by better I mean if we’re going to have leaders or rulers, they need to be men and women of the utmost moral character who are among the highest examples of living human potentiality.  They should be representative of what we can be, not what we are.  We need men and women who can lead us out of the lower vibrations of the Mass Mind not cater to them, and the policies and ideologies promoted by both sides of the political spectrum do just that.

Some may feel I am being unfair towards those who are in positions of power.  Some may feel that my demands or expectations are unrealistic, and that the possibility of men and women of such attainment and virtue existing is just as unrealistic.  First, I should state right off the bat that I myself do not feel that I am anywhere near ready to take that sort of position either.  I still have a lot of learning and growing to do yet.  I am not through being educated or initiated to that point, and that is my point.  That being said, there are indeed men and women who DO fit these criteria, and I have met them.  Unfortunately, our current control-based system of government does not tend to attract these types.


What it ultimately boils down to is that our leaders and our society lack the sort of real education and initiations needed to turn out anything close to a qualified “statesmen” or government “authority”- be it a president or a cop.  This is why government as we know it doesn’t work and this is why government as we know it can’t work- EVER (at least not for those of us who are among the governed).  Monarchy, oligarchy, republic, democracy, socialism, communism, fascism- it doesn’t matter.  Yes that is a bold and definitive statement and I am 100% certain of this.

Many in the western world have been brought up with this notion that WE are the government.  To those that still believe this I ask when the last time was that you were consulted about fiscal or foreign policy?  Did you agree to the traffic laws and taxation systems that generate billions in government revenue each year?  And do we still honesty believe that our representatives truly “represent” our interests?  Why do we think these lawyers and corporate climbers are even capable of representing our interests?  Do we believe they will set selfish interests aside so as to be of service to the people?  Remember, they are public “officials” now, not public servants- that means something.

39347_10150240840085471_435917560470_13960066_993902_nDo we for some reason believe these “officials” to be incorruptible?  If so, why?  Have we not seen enough incidents of government corruption across the board to know that isn’t true?  What makes us think things will be different come next election?  A real look at campaign contributions as well as voting records and policies espoused by most government “officials” and agencies would probably show that our governments “officials” indeed do represent someone, but that someone isn’t “we the people”.  And it has been this way for a long, long time.

All that being said, in a way, we DID agree to all of this.  We agreed by saying nothing.  We agreed by “going along to get along”.  We agreed through compliance.  We agreed to allow ourselves, our family and our folk to be fleeced and relegated to debt slavery and taxation serfdom.  We agreed by choosing to remain in the dark and let “someone else” handle the big problems, which was the same trapping of the despotic governments of old.  The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.  We did not remain vigilant and our “Great American Experiment” has failed.  The majority of human consciousness wasn’t ready for the responsibility of true freedom yet.  We don’t need to get down on ourselves about it, I’d argue it was almost inevitable.  We certainly don’t need to waste time trying to “change the system”?  What we do need to do is learn from our mistakes and move on.


The current systems of governance across the globe are failing and rotting.  The great experiment of “liberal democracy” and representative government are in their death throws.  International Usury, Corporate Globalism, Medical Authoritarianism, the Military Industrial Complex, the war on “extremism”, forced multiculturalism, and the weird cult of political-correctness has successfully subverted and eroded the sovereignty, self-determination and liberty of the people that liberal democracy promised.  This is why we need to let go of our ingrained attachment to “reforming the system” and admit its failure.  At that point we can throw off (not overthrow) this system entirely and create something new for ourselves.

Namaste and God Bless.


“And he took the bread, and gave thanks, and brake it and gave unto them, saying, ‘This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.’ Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, ‘This cup IS the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.’”

The Gospel of Luke 22:19-20


In ancient times, the Celtic and Germanic peoples of Europe would celebrate Lammas, or “Loaf Mass” around August 1st.  This festival marked the height of summer and the time when the crops were ready for the first harvest, specifically the wheat harvest.  It was customary to bless a loaf of bread made from the wheat, and in Anglo-Saxon England, this bread may have then been employed in a magick ritual.  This ritual was later “Christianized”

This festival was known as “Lughnassadh” in even earlier times, named after the Celtic Sun god, Lugh.  In Ancient Ireland, races and games were held in his name and that of his mother, Tailtiu, which may have been funeral games in honor of Tailtiu who died of overwork clearing the plains of Ireland for agriculture. lughnasadh-deities

The primary myths surrounding this time have to do with sacrifice, either of the Goddess of the Land or the God of the Sun.  We see this in the myth of the Sacred King, who is understood to be an aspect of the Sun Deity.  This is an ancient legend wonderfully retold here by Lady Spring Wolf:

“In the green land of old, the men and women walked the fields in hunger. They would eat of those that walked in fur, fin and feather, and thanked them for their sacrifice.  But their gifts were not enough for the people to live.  They would eat of the wild fruits of the Earth, but that was not enough.  They would forage the wood and eat of the wild berries, mushrooms and gourds, but this was not enough.

As they looked for fruits and berries, as they hunted for fur, fin and feather, their homes could not be built.  The roofs leaked in rain, the rooms stood cold for lack of fire, the land could not be tilled.  For all of these gifts of food must be found, and hunted, and a home cannot be built on its own.

The Sacred King saw the men and women in their suffering.  He watched, waited, and thought upon it for a time, and his face grew grave and sad.  He spoke to the Lady, and said, ‘I must die.  The land will be fertile and the earth will bring forth a harvest and the people will live and grow.’

The Lady sobbed and fell on her knees.  She grieved for Her Lord and watched him leave for the fields beyond.  The Lord traveled to the center of the land and he fell upon his sword, and died.  The blood of his body flowed through the land and covered it in red.

The Great Mother buried the Sacred King in the Earth, returning him to her womb, and mourned his passing from the land of life.

Winter wrapped the world in ice and snow.  Covering the land with a gentile white blanket that hid the sleeping life beneath it’s frozen splendor.

The Great Mother covered the face of the sky with dark clouds, and her tears of rain poured from there in cascades and torrents.  The Tears of the Mother melted the snow and ice, and covered the ground in wetness.

Time passed and the Sun warmed the ground, and a green shoot appeared, poking its head out from the womb of the Mother.  The green shoot grew as the days grew, longer and taller, until the golden hair of the Sacred King once more waved proudly in the wind; until the Grain of the Fields stood, row upon row, as far as the eye could see; until the Bounty of the Mother, the Sacred King Himself, stood upon the world, ready to be harvested.

The great Mother looked out upon the green fields, and saw the wind caressing the face of the Sacred King.  ‘That was well done,’ she whispered upon the wind, ‘But it pains me to see you die once again.’

‘It is as it must be,’ He said, ‘And does it not show them that Death is an illusion.  It is just another change in a multiverse of change?’ he added.  ‘And through their harvest, they strive and survive.  They eat and grow.  Their houses are built, their fires burn and their bread bakes for the harvest. And all this is a good thing.’

‘You are right,’ She sighed with sadness, ‘But I just wish it could have been done in a kinder way.  The Lady still mourns your sacrifice and each year it will be so.  Her tears will fall and her heart will ache, for her love has left her side.’

‘Change is never easy, Great Mother.’  He spoke, lowly, ‘But it is as it is, nonetheless.  The fields are green, and the harvest is plentiful.  The people are well and the land will grow again’.

Thus it was, and so it is, and ever more shall be so!”


Here we have the “self-sacrifice” of the Sun, the “Sacred King” for the benefit of the people.  Remember that Christ Jesus is referred to as a “King”, as well as the “Son of Man”.  Jesus allowed himself to be sacrificed so that humanity might be “saved”, just as the Celto-Germanic Sun God of pre-Christian days did.  This is a recurring theme that is as old as humanity itself.  This sacrifice of the Sun that is alluded to in the myth extends to the wheat, barley and corn that is harvested from the Earth.

At the “Loaf Mass”, the people harvested the wheat for making the bread that would help them survive the colder months.  They recognized the “sacrifice” of the Sun, which was slowly beginning to wane and diminish in power.  The Sun gives of Himself so that we may live.  In the 1899 book, “Aryan Sun Myths: The Origin of Religions”, author Elizabeth E. Titcomb states that “All Indo-Germanic nations have worshiped crucified saviours and overwhelming proof was obtained that the sun-myths of the ancient Aryans (Indo-Europeans) were the origin of the religion in all of the countries which were peopled by the Aryans.”


In later centuries in England, there was born the legend of John Barleycorn- the God who sacrificed himself for the Goddess of the Land and for the harvest.  Below is an excerpt from “The Ballad of John Barleycorn”:

corn_king_by_charles_vess“There were three men come out of the west their fortunes for to try
And these three men made a solemn vow John Barleycorn should die.
They ploughed, they sowed, they harrowed him in, throw’d clods all on his head
And these three men made a solemn vow John Barleycorn was dead.
They let him lie for a very long time till the rain from heaven did fall
And little Sir John he throw’d up his head and he so amazed them all.”

Going back to the Sacred King story as retold by Lady Spring Wolf, we also see the story of a tribe of humans moving from a hunter-gatherer lifestyle to an agrarian lifestyle.  In Mesoamerica, we have the legend of Quetzalcoatl, the legendary “Sun King” of Mexico that brought the “light of knowledge”- specifically the knowledge of agriculture, to the people.

Picture2 QUETZALCOATL AAS THE MAIZE GODThe development of agriculture was imperative to the development of complex civilizations, simply due to the fact that it freed up time that would have been spent hunting and gathering.  We see this problem described in the story:

“As they looked for fruits and berries, as they hunted for fur, fin and feather, their homes could not be built.  The roofs leaked in rain, the rooms stood cold for lack of fire, the land could not be tilled.  For all of these gifts of food must be found, and hunted, and a home cannot be built on its own.”

With the coming of agricultural society, the relationship to Spirit also changed.  In hunter-gatherer societies, this relationship was primarily focused on manifesting a successful hunt.  This is illustrated (literally) in the cave paintings found in the caverns of France and Spain.  But when all time and energy was no longer going into searching for food, there was time for deeper inquiries into the nature of reality.  This allowed for man to “build” a spiritual “house” in a way that had not been possible in hunter-gatherer times.

However, the ancient Europeans knew of a deeper level of existence to the Sun that just what appears as a blazing disc in the sky.  They also knew of the Sun’s deeper relationship to mankind.  In his book, “Celtic Mysteries”, author John Sharkey talks about an interaction with the Sun God Lugh, and the warrior hero of the Ulster Myth Cycle, Cu Chulainn:

“In one episode, when the champion is badly wounded and needs a respite, the Sun God Lugh himself appears… ‘Who are you?’ Cu Chulainn asks the ghost warrior.  ‘Your father from the Outerworld am I… Lugh, son of Ethliu.  Sleep a while Cu Chulainn,’ says the radiant warrior, ‘and I will oppose all during that time.’…

In the Cu Chulainn story, the Sun God materializes to take over the functions of the warrior, who by dying for three days can remain mortal.  In this bardo state he can ascend the three mystical worlds of the Celtic afterlife: from earth-body to the physical spirit and finally into the radiant soul-light in which the Sun Himself is manifest.  When Cu Chulainn sleeps he becomes joined to his own embodied radiance, inhabiting all worlds at once…

This easy movement between the human warrior hero and his otherworldly archetype, the Sun God, is a common practice in every kind of Celtic Story.”

Lugh and Cu ChulainnIn my initiation into the Mysteries, I was taught how to see what is referred to as the “Self” in meditation.  The Self and the Soul that encapsulates it is physically located in the Solar Plexus (yes Solar as in “Sun”- there is no other meaning to the word).  Visually, it appears to me as a dark luminescence, like a black light, with a corona and a bright center that is still somewhat hard to look at directly for a lengthy period of time.  It feels like joy and laughter.  I am able to “see” it by closing my eyes and focusing my attention on that region of the body.

Father Paul Blighton referred to the Self as “a cell in the body of the Father… situated in man’s spiritual body basically, but it can be seen through the physical when the veil between the two worlds is removed, with the attainment of God-realization.”

Father Paul also stated that the “center of one’s Self is like the sun.  It is a reflection of the great Sun- the Christos… The Self is the sun of our body, of our universe.”


The Sun sacrifices itself so that we may have life in a physical sense AND in a spiritual or “metaphysical” sense.  The Self or “Inner Sun” sacrifices part of Its Divine Essence when it incarnates part of Itself into matter.  But this incarnation is what allows for a new type of spiritual growth and development to take place.

Like the suffering people in the story of the Sacred King, we too often find ourselves too distracted with “surviving” to tend to our own houses and when this happens, we do indeed suffer.  We suffer from the pains, depressions, and sicknesses that all have their prime root cause at the separation from our true nature- the nature of the Self.  But the sacrifice of Christ Jesus- the Sacred King of this Age- has helped bridge that gap of separation and opened up a direct link to Self and a possibility of spiritual growth and development that wasn’t there before.  We just have to make time for it and nurture and develop our relationship with it.

Developing a true relationship to Self- to the Divine within, inevitably takes sacrifice.  We need “to separate the wheat from the chaff” and let go of those ways of being that no longer serve us, giving ourselves in service to the Higher Impulses of Truth, Knowledge, Compassion, etc. This is our Bread of Life.


Namaste and God Bless.